


Ask the community...
One thing nobody has mentioned yet - if you sell on Etsy, they actually handle collecting and remitting sales tax for you in most states now through their marketplace facilitator status. You still need to handle it yourself for some states, but it simplifies things a lot for beginners.
This is partially true but somewhat misleading. Etsy does collect and remit for marketplace facilitator states, but you still need to register for a sales tax permit in your home state and any states where you have physical nexus. And if you sell through your own website too, you're fully responsible for those sales.
Great question Omar! As someone who just went through this same confusion when starting my online business, I can share what I learned. You're absolutely right that it's overwhelming at first. The key thing to understand is that you have flexibility in HOW you handle sales tax, but you're still responsible for paying the correct amount to the government regardless of your method. I initially tried the absorption method (building tax into prices) because I was worried about cart abandonment too. But I quickly realized a few issues: 1) It gets really complicated when selling to multiple states with different tax rates, 2) Your profit margins take a hit, and 3) You need very detailed record-keeping to back out the tax amounts properly. I ended up switching to collecting tax at checkout after about 6 months. Yes, some customers might be put off by seeing the additional tax, but most people expect it and it's much cleaner from an accounting perspective. Plus, you're not essentially giving customers a discount equal to the tax amount. For nexus, you're probably safe starting with just your home state until you hit those economic thresholds (usually $100k+ in sales to a state). Focus on getting your home state registration sorted first - that's where most of your early sales will likely be anyway. The learning curve is steep but you'll figure it out! Consider starting simple with tax collection at checkout and expanding your knowledge as your business grows.
This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation starting my own online business and was leaning toward the absorption method too, but your point about profit margins is making me reconsider. When you switched to collecting tax at checkout, did you notice a significant drop in conversions or cart abandonment? That's my biggest fear right now - I feel like every extra dollar at checkout might scare away potential customers, especially for higher-priced items. Also, how difficult was it to transition your existing customers to the new pricing structure when you made the switch?
I just went through this exact situation with my disabled aunt last year. One thing that really helped was getting a clear breakdown of her disability benefits from Social Security - you can request a detailed statement that shows exactly what type of benefits she receives (SSDI vs SSI) and the monthly amounts. Since you mentioned she gets $1,550 monthly ($18,600 annually), if this is all SSDI, it would unfortunately exceed the $4,700 income limit for 2025. However, don't give up yet! There are still valuable tax benefits available: 1. You can likely file as Head of Household since you're providing more than half the cost of maintaining the home where your mother lives. This gives you a higher standard deduction and better tax brackets. 2. If she doesn't qualify as a dependent due to income, you might still get the $500 Credit for Other Dependents if she meets all other dependency tests. 3. Keep detailed records of all support you provide (housing, food, medical, utilities) - this documentation is crucial for both the support test and potential future audits. The key is to calculate your taxes both ways (single vs head of household, with and without credits) to see which scenario gives you the best outcome. Even without claiming her as a full dependent, you could still save significant money on your tax bill through the other available benefits.
This is really comprehensive advice, thank you! I'm curious about the Head of Household filing status - you mentioned I can file as HOH if I'm providing more than half the cost of maintaining the home where my mother lives. Since she lives with me in my apartment, would that still qualify? Or does she need to have her own separate residence for me to use this filing status? I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before I file.
Great question about Head of Household with a shared residence! Yes, you can absolutely file as Head of Household when your mother lives with you in the same home. The key requirement is that you pay more than half the cost of "keeping up" the household - which includes rent, utilities, groceries, repairs, and other household expenses. Since you mentioned you're covering "pretty much all our housing expenses (rent, utilities, groceries)," you're likely meeting this requirement easily. The IRS doesn't require your mother to have a separate residence - the "household" can be the same home you both live in. For Head of Household with a parent, you normally need to be able to claim them as a dependent, BUT there's an exception for the income test. So even if your mom's $18,600 in disability income disqualifies her as a dependent, you can still file HOH if she would otherwise qualify (which sounds like she would, since you provide her support and she's your mother). This filing status alone could save you several hundred dollars compared to filing Single, so definitely worth pursuing even if you can't claim her as a full dependent!
I work as a tax preparer and see this situation frequently. One additional consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is the timing of when you started providing support. Since your mom moved in with you 2 years ago, make sure you're only calculating support for the current tax year (2024). Also, disability benefits can sometimes include one-time adjustments or cost-of-living increases that might push someone just over the income threshold. If your mom's monthly amount varies, it's worth calculating her exact annual total rather than just multiplying $1,550 x 12. Another tip: if you're close to meeting the support test but not quite there, consider whether you're counting all eligible expenses. Things like medical insurance premiums you pay on her behalf, transportation costs for her medical appointments, and even reasonable estimates for the fair rental value of the room she occupies in your home all count toward support you provide. Finally, consider consulting with a tax professional for this first year to make sure you're maximizing all available benefits. The cost of a consultation could easily pay for itself through proper tax planning, especially with the Head of Household status potentially saving you hundreds of dollars.
Don't forget to also check if your state has its own health insurance marketplace! Some states have different rules and might be more flexible about retroactive adjustments than the federal marketplace. If you live in California, New York, Massachusetts, or several other states with their own exchanges, call your state marketplace directly rather than the federal one.
That's a good point! Washington state's marketplace helped me with a similar issue last year. They were able to adjust my 1095-A and send a corrected one that significantly reduced what I owed.
I'm sorry you're dealing with this stressful situation. Based on what you've described, unfortunately you'll likely need to repay most or all of the $3,899 in advance premium tax credits since your wife had affordable employer coverage available during that overlap period. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. **Gather all documentation** - Get your wife's pay stubs from Jan-July 2023 showing insurance deductions, both 1095 forms, and any correspondence from the marketplace. 2. **Contact the Marketplace directly** at 1-800-318-2596 to report the overlap situation. While they may not be able to retroactively cancel coverage, they need to know about the error and might provide guidance specific to your case. 3. **Calculate the exact repayment amount** using Form 8962. You'll need to determine if there were any months where you were actually eligible (like transition periods). 4. **Consider professional help** - A tax professional experienced with ACA issues might be able to identify any legitimate ways to reduce your repayment obligation. The silver lining is that this is a relatively common mistake, and the IRS has procedures for handling it. You won't face penalties beyond having to repay the credits you weren't eligible for. Make sure to file your taxes accurately with Form 8962 to avoid future complications. Going forward, always contact the marketplace immediately when you get employer insurance to avoid this situation happening again.
This is really comprehensive advice, thank you! I'm definitely going to start gathering all those documents you mentioned. One question though - when you say "transition periods" where we might have been eligible, what exactly does that mean? Also, do you have any recommendations for finding a tax professional who specifically deals with ACA issues? I'm worried about going to just any tax preparer who might not understand the complexities of this situation.
One thing nobody mentioned yet - if your coverage was through Medicaid or CHIP, some states don't send 1095-B forms automatically. You might need to specifically request one from your state Medicaid office. I learned this the hard way last year when I was waiting forever for a form that was never going to come unless I asked for it! Check your state's Medicaid website as some states now have portals where you can download the form yourself.
Good point! I had marketplace coverage (ACA plan) and they send a different form - the 1095-A. Those ARE required for filing if you got any premium tax credits. Don't confuse the different 1095 forms. The A version is necessary, but B and C versions aren't required for filing.
Just to add some clarity on the state penalty situation since there seems to be some confusion in the comments - while California does have a state individual mandate, the 2-month gap mentioned by the original poster would likely qualify for the "short gap exemption" as Katherine mentioned. However, it's worth noting that you need to actively claim this exemption on your California state return (Form 540) - it's not automatic. You'll need to check the appropriate box and keep documentation of your coverage dates in case of an audit. For anyone else reading this with similar situations, the key states with individual mandate penalties for 2024 are: - California (with short gap exemption for under 3 months) - Massachusetts - New Jersey - Rhode Island - Washington D.C. Each state has different exemption criteria, so definitely check your specific state's requirements. And yes, you can absolutely file your federal return without the 1095-B form - the IRS has all the information they need from your insurance company already.
This is really helpful information about the state exemptions! I'm actually dealing with a similar situation in New Jersey - had about a 6-week gap between jobs last year. Do you know if NJ has a similar short-gap exemption like California, or am I looking at a penalty for that coverage gap? I've been trying to find clear information about NJ's specific rules but their website is pretty confusing.
Danielle Campbell
Has anyone tried just establishing an "accountable plan" for the LLC? We did this with our engineering partnership and it helped with cashflow. Basically, we documented that certain retained earnings were being held in anticipation of specific business expenses for the following year. Then we reimbursed ourselves when we actually incurred those expenses personally. Our accountant said this doesn't eliminate SE tax on the original profits, but it creates a clean paper trail and business justification for why we're keeping funds in the company account.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
ā¢We did something similar but our CPA warned us that the IRS looks very closely at accountable plans in partnerships. The reimbursements have to be for legitimate business expenses that would be deductible if the partnership paid them directly. You can't just create a general fund for future expenses and call it an accountable plan.
0 coins
Aria Washington
One thing that might help with the cash flow issue is to make quarterly estimated tax payments throughout the year instead of waiting until tax time. Since you know you'll owe SE tax on your share of profits regardless of distributions, you can set aside money each quarter based on your projected earnings. For our consulting LLC, we calculate roughly 15.3% for SE tax plus our marginal income tax rate, then multiply that by our expected quarterly profits. We transfer that amount to a separate "tax savings" account each quarter. This way, when tax time comes around, we're not scrambling to find cash to pay taxes on money that's still sitting in the business account. Also worth noting - if you're consistently retaining earnings year over year, you might want to consider whether some of those retained funds could be reclassified as loans to the partners rather than undistributed profits. This gets complex and definitely needs professional guidance, but it's another structure some partnerships use to manage the cash flow vs. tax timing mismatch.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
ā¢This is really helpful advice about quarterly payments! As someone new to partnership taxation, I'm curious about the loan structure you mentioned at the end. How does that work exactly - can you have the LLC loan money to the partners instead of treating it as undistributed profits? It sounds like that could solve the cash flow problem, but I imagine there are strict rules about when that's legitimate versus just trying to avoid taxes. Do you know what kind of documentation the IRS would expect to see for that kind of arrangement?
0 coins