


Ask the community...
Has anyone dealt with reporting these adjustments on M-3? I'm trying to figure out how to properly reflect the timing differences since the income/loss adjustments relate to prior years but are being reported in the current year.
For Schedule M-3 reporting, you should include the Form 8978 adjustments on Part II, Line 25 "Other income (loss) items with differences." You'll need to attach a statement detailing that these are partnership audit adjustments from prior years.
Thanks for that clarification! That makes sense to report them on Line 25 with a disclosure. These forms are still relatively new so it's hard to find good examples.
This is a great discussion that covers most of the key issues with Form 8986/8978 reporting. One additional consideration I'd add is documentation - make sure you're keeping detailed records of how these adjustments flow through to future years. I recommend creating a separate workpaper that tracks the original K-1 amounts, the 8986 adjustments, and the net effect on your NOL carryforwards and partnership basis. This will be crucial for accuracy in future years, especially if you receive additional 8986 forms or if the client disposes of the partnership interest. Also, don't forget to update your permanent file with copies of all the 8986 forms and your Form 8978 calculations. These adjustments can have ripple effects for years to come, and you'll want clear documentation for future reference.
Excellent advice on the documentation! I'm new to handling these partnership audit adjustments and hadn't thought about the long-term tracking implications. Creating a separate workpaper sounds like a smart approach - especially since these forms are still relatively uncommon and the next person working on the file might not be familiar with how the adjustments were handled. Do you have any recommendations for how to structure that workpaper? Should it include reconciliations back to the original partnership returns, or focus more on the forward-looking impact on NOLs and basis calculations?
I've seen this exact scenario multiple times with the Emerald Card. What you're experiencing is likely H&R Block's staged refund release system - they'll sometimes send partial amounts while waiting for the full IRS deposit to clear their system. Since you mentioned your DDD is April 13th, I'd expect the remaining balance to hit your card by then. The $500 you received isn't necessarily connected to any offset or issue - it's more about H&R Block's internal processing. You can verify this by logging into your MyBlock account or calling their customer service line. They should be able to show you exactly what's pending and when to expect the rest. This is pretty normal behavior for the Emerald Card during tax season.
This is really helpful context! I've been seeing this more frequently this tax season with H&R Block customers. The staged release system makes sense from their perspective - they're essentially managing liquidity while ensuring customers get their money as quickly as possible. I'm curious though - when you say it's your "actual refund money" rather than an advance, does that mean H&R Block has already received the full amount from the IRS but is just releasing it in chunks? Or are they fronting their own money while waiting for the IRS transfer to complete?
I went through something similar with my Emerald Card last month! Got a $500 deposit out of nowhere, then the rest of my refund came about a week later. What helped me figure it out was checking the "Account Activity" section in the MyBlock app - it actually showed two separate entries: one labeled "Refund Advance" and another for "Federal Tax Refund" when the full amount came through. The advance didn't get deducted from my total refund either, which was confusing at first. Since you're expecting your deposit on April 13th, I'd bet the remaining balance will show up right on schedule. H&R Block's customer service told me this is pretty standard now - they're basically giving people a preview of their refund while the IRS processes everything. Definitely worth checking your app though, just to see if there's any breakdown of what's coming and when.
This is super reassuring to hear! I had no idea H&R Block was doing these "preview" payments now. Did your advance show up with any specific description in your transaction history, or was it just a generic deposit? I'm trying to figure out if I should be worried about anything or just wait it out until my DDD. Also, when you say the advance didn't get deducted from your total refund - does that mean you essentially got extra money, or did they adjust something else to account for it?
Great question about the tax implications! One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given is to make sure you understand how your S-Corp's accumulated adjustments account (AAA) and any accumulated earnings and profits (AE&P) from prior C-Corp years will be affected by the asset sale. When the S-Corp recognizes gain from the asset sale, it increases the AAA, which then flows through to you as shareholders. This can actually be beneficial because it increases your stock basis, which might help offset some of the tax impact when you eventually liquidate the S-Corp after the sale. Also, since you mentioned installment payments over 5 years, consider whether you want to make a Section 338(h)(10) election if the buyer is willing. This can sometimes provide better tax treatment by treating the transaction as an asset sale for tax purposes while still being a stock sale legally. It requires buyer cooperation but might be worth exploring with your team. The depreciation recapture timing that others mentioned is crucial - with installment sales from S-Corps, the recapture generally gets accelerated and recognized in year one even though the payments are spread out. This can create a significant tax burden upfront that you'll want to plan for.
This is really helpful information about the AAA and potential Section 338(h)(10) election! I hadn't considered how the accumulated adjustments account would be affected. Just to clarify - when you mention that the depreciation recapture gets "accelerated" in year one of an installment sale from an S-Corp, does that mean ALL of the recapture gets recognized immediately regardless of the payment schedule? That seems like it could create a massive tax hit in the first year if you have significant depreciated assets.
Yes, that's exactly right - under Section 453(i), depreciation recapture cannot be reported on the installment method. ALL depreciation recapture gets recognized as ordinary income in the year of sale, regardless of when you actually receive the payments. This is a huge trap that catches many people off guard. So if you have $200K in depreciation recapture on equipment/vehicles but only receive $50K in cash at closing with the rest in installment payments, you'll still owe taxes on the full $200K recapture in year one. Only the gain above the recapture amount gets the benefit of installment treatment. This is why it's critical to negotiate the asset allocation carefully with the buyer - you want to minimize the amount allocated to depreciable assets that will trigger recapture. Sometimes you can also structure the deal to accelerate some cash payments in year one to help cover the immediate tax liability from the recapture. @53e30ed04c48 made an excellent point about the AAA impact too - that increased basis can be really valuable for offsetting the tax hit, especially if you're planning to liquidate the S-Corp afterward.
This is such a complex situation and I really appreciate everyone sharing their experiences! I'm dealing with something similar where we're being pushed toward an asset sale structure after years of stock ownership in our S-Corp. One thing that's been keeping me up at night is the cash flow timing issue. Between the depreciation recapture hitting all at once in year one (as @eea5fcc4b6c2 and @f8384843a0d6 discussed) plus estimated tax payments, it feels like we could owe more in taxes than we actually receive in cash during the first year. Has anyone figured out creative ways to structure the initial cash payment to cover the immediate tax liability? Our buyer is pretty flexible on terms but obviously wants to minimize their upfront cash outlay. I'm wondering if there's a sweet spot where we get enough cash to handle the recapture taxes without scaring them off with a huge down payment requirement. Also, @53e30ed04c48 - your point about the Section 338(h)(10) election is intriguing. How difficult is it typically to get buyers to agree to this? Does it create any downside for them that would make it a hard sell?
@876094894ea6 You're absolutely right to be concerned about the cash flow timing - it's one of the biggest pitfalls in these deals. We faced the same issue and solved it by structuring what we called a "tax gross-up" payment in year one. Basically, we calculated the maximum possible tax liability from depreciation recapture and negotiated for the buyer to provide enough additional cash in the first payment to cover those taxes. The key is framing it to the buyer as a timing issue, not asking for more total consideration. You're not asking for more money overall - just front-loading enough cash to handle the immediate tax consequences of the structure THEY'RE requesting. Most reasonable buyers understand this, especially when you show them the math. For the Section 338(h)(10) election, it can actually benefit the buyer too since they get a stepped-up basis in the assets. The downside for them is usually just complexity and potentially some additional transaction costs. In our case, the buyer's tax advisor actually suggested it once they understood the benefits. Definitely worth having both sides' tax teams explore it early in the process.
Has anyone successfully e-filed an amended return? Last time I had to do this (back in 2020) I had to mail in a paper return and it took FOREVER to process.
Yes! I e-filed an amended return through TurboTax last year and it was processed in about 12 weeks. Way better than the 16+ months my paper amended return took during COVID. Most tax software supports e-filing 1040-X forms now.
I went through something very similar last year with a forgotten 1098 for my second mortgage. Like others mentioned, you definitely need to file an amended return - you can't claim 2023 interest on your 2024 return. One thing I learned is to double-check that all your HELOC interest is actually deductible. Since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the interest is only deductible if you used the funds to "buy, build, or substantially improve" your home. If any portion went to other expenses (like debt consolidation, investments, etc.), you can only deduct the proportional amount that went toward home improvements. The 1040-X isn't as scary as it seems - most tax software will walk you through it step by step. Just make sure you have good documentation of how the HELOC funds were used in case the IRS asks questions later. And yes, e-filing amended returns is now possible and much faster than mailing paper forms!
This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I found some missed deductions after filing. Quick question - when you say "good documentation," what exactly should I be keeping? I have the loan paperwork and receipts for the renovations, but is there anything else the IRS typically looks for to prove the HELOC funds went toward home improvements?
Ethan Taylor
Warning from personal experience: I tried deducting a design certificate program a few years back and got audited! The IRS determined my courses qualified me for a "new profession" even though I was already working in a related field. Ended up owing back taxes plus penalties. Make sure your courses are truly enhancing EXISTING skills, not qualifying you for something new. The distinction can be really subjective and depends on how you present it. Document everything!
0 coins
Yuki Ito
ā¢That's scary! What kind of documentation did they ask for during the audit? Did you have to show them course syllabi or something?
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
ā¢They requested course syllabi, transcripts, my business records showing what work I was doing before vs after the courses, and even asked for examples of my actual work. The IRS agent said the key issue was that my certificate program had "certification" in the title and prepared me for a specific new role title that I wasn't using before. Even though the skills were related, they viewed it as career advancement rather than skill maintenance. My advice: be very careful about how you describe the education on your return and keep detailed records showing you were already performing similar work before taking the courses. The burden of proof is on you to show it's maintaining existing skills, not developing new career paths.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
This is really helpful information, everyone! I'm in a similar situation as a marketing professional who recently took some advanced analytics courses. Based on what I'm reading here, it sounds like the key is proving these courses enhance existing skills rather than qualify you for something completely new. @Chloe Anderson - for your UI/UX courses, since you're already in graphic design and have started earning income using these enhanced skills, you seem to have a solid case. The fact that you're already generating $4,200 in freelance income using these new capabilities strengthens your position significantly. One thing I'd add - make sure you can clearly articulate how UI/UX design relates to your existing graphic design work. Maybe document some specific projects where you used both skill sets together? That connection will be important if you ever need to justify the deduction. Also keeping an eye on that "hobby loss rule" mentioned by @CosmicCruiser. Since you're already profitable in your first year with these skills, that's a great sign for the IRS that this is a legitimate business activity rather than a hobby.
0 coins
Felix Grigori
ā¢Great point about documenting the connection between graphic design and UI/UX! As someone new to this community, I'm finding this discussion really valuable. I'm actually a freelance photographer who's been considering taking some business courses to better manage my client relationships and pricing strategies. Based on what everyone's sharing here, it sounds like I should focus on courses that directly enhance my existing photography business skills rather than something that might be seen as preparing me for a completely different career path. The audit story from @Ethan Taylor is definitely making me want to be extra careful about how I approach this. One question - does anyone know if there s'a difference in how the IRS views online courses versus traditional classroom education when it comes to these deductions? I m'looking at some specialized photography business courses that are only offered online.
0 coins