IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Noah Lee

•

Just a heads up - don't forget that putting your brokerage account in an LLC means you'll need to get an EIN from the IRS, even though it's a disregarded entity for tax purposes. Your broker will require it. Also, for maximum asset protection, make sure you don't commingle personal and LLC funds. Have a separate bank account for the LLC and keep good records. The whole "corporate veil" protection can be pierced if you don't respect the separation between your personal finances and the LLC's.

0 coins

Does that mean you need to file a separate tax return for the LLC even though it's a pass-through entity? All this extra complexity makes me wonder if the asset protection is worth it for a regular investor.

0 coins

Amaya Watson

•

No, you don't need to file a separate tax return for a single-member LLC that's treated as a disregarded entity. The LLC itself doesn't file anything with the IRS - all the income and expenses flow through to your personal 1040 just as if you owned the investments directly. The EIN is just for identification purposes with banks and brokers. Think of it like a social security number for the LLC - you need it to open accounts, but it doesn't create any additional tax filing obligations. As for whether the complexity is worth it, that really depends on your risk tolerance and net worth. If you're worried about potential lawsuits or creditors, the LLC can provide valuable protection. But if you're just a regular investor without significant liability concerns, you might be better off with adequate insurance coverage instead.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of question I had when I was considering the same move! Based on my experience and research, I can confirm what others have said - your qualified dividends will absolutely maintain their preferential tax treatment even when held through a single-member LLC. The key thing to understand is that the IRS treats a SMLLC as completely transparent for tax purposes. It's like the LLC doesn't exist from a tax perspective - all the income, including qualified dividends, flows through to your personal return with the same character it would have if you owned the investments directly. One practical tip: when you do make the transfer, work with your broker to ensure it's done as a non-taxable transfer rather than a sale and repurchase. Most brokers can handle this as an "in-kind" transfer to avoid triggering any capital gains. Also, while the tax treatment stays the same, don't underestimate the administrative overhead. You'll need that EIN, separate bank account, and good record-keeping practices. But for $8,500 in annual dividends and the asset protection benefits you're seeking, it's probably worth the extra paperwork. Just make sure you have adequate liability insurance too - the LLC isn't a magic bullet for all risks!

0 coins

Thanks Connor, this is really helpful! Quick question about the "in-kind" transfer you mentioned - do all brokers automatically know how to handle this, or do I need to specifically request it? I'm worried about accidentally creating a taxable event when I transfer my positions to the LLC. Also, roughly how long did the whole process take you from forming the LLC to having everything transferred over?

0 coins

Something else to consider - if the stock price drops after your purchase and you sell at a loss, you might face the wash sale rule complications if you continue participating in the ESPP program. This has bitten me before when I sold some underwater ESPP shares but then acquired more through the next purchase period within 30 days.

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

That's an excellent point! I got caught in this exact situation last tax season. The way I understand it, if you sell ESPP shares at a loss and then acquire more shares through another ESPP purchase within 30 days before or after the sale, the loss gets disallowed under wash sale rules. The disallowed loss gets added to the cost basis of the newly acquired shares.

0 coins

Great point about the wash sale rule complications! This is something that caught me off guard when I first started with ESPPs. The automatic nature of ESPP purchases makes it really easy to accidentally trigger wash sale rules if you're trying to harvest losses from previous purchases. One strategy I've learned is to be very strategic about timing any ESPP share sales if you're planning to continue in the program. You either need to wait more than 30 days after selling before your next ESPP purchase, or suspend participation for a purchase period if you want to realize losses for tax purposes. The wash sale rule gets even more complex with ESPPs because you might have shares from multiple purchase dates with different cost bases. I keep a spreadsheet tracking all my ESPP purchases and any sales to avoid accidentally creating wash sale situations. It's tedious but has saved me from some nasty surprises at tax time. Also worth noting - if you have other employee stock options or restricted stock that vest around the same time, those can potentially trigger wash sale rules too if they're the same underlying stock.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful information about wash sale rules with ESPPs! I'm new to this whole situation and honestly hadn't even thought about the wash sale complications. Your spreadsheet idea sounds like a lifesaver - do you track anything specific beyond just purchase dates and cost bases? I'm particularly worried about accidentally triggering this since my company does quarterly purchases and I was thinking about selling some shares that are currently underwater. It sounds like I'd need to either skip the next purchase period or wait over 30 days after selling before the next automatic purchase kicks in. Is that right? Also, when you mention other employee stock options potentially triggering wash sales - does that include RSUs that vest automatically, or just options I actively exercise?

0 coins

Has anyone used cryptocurrency tax software to handle this kind of situation? I tried CoinTracker but it doesn't seem to have a way to properly categorize theft or hacks.

0 coins

I used Koinly for a similar situation. You can manually add a transaction and mark it as "lost" or "stolen" which helps with the reporting. You'll still need to double-check everything because the software isn't perfect with edge cases like theft.

0 coins

This is a complex situation, but you're on the right track thinking about it as a capital loss. Here's what I'd recommend based on similar cases I've seen: 1. Report the forced Dogecoin sale on Form 8949 with your $26,000 cost basis and $6,200 proceeds - this gives you a $19,800 capital loss. 2. For the Ethereum that was immediately stolen, you technically owned it briefly. I'd treat this as a purchase at $6,200 and then a disposal with $0 proceeds (theft), creating another $6,200 loss. 3. Document everything thoroughly - keep records of the hack, any exchange communications, police reports, and blockchain transaction IDs showing the unauthorized transfers. 4. Consider attaching a brief statement to your return explaining the circumstances. This shows good faith if the IRS ever questions the large loss. The total loss would be substantial, so make sure you understand the capital loss limitations ($3,000 per year against ordinary income, with the rest carrying forward). You might want to consult a tax professional who deals with crypto to review everything before filing. Also, definitely file that police report if you haven't already - it's important documentation for the theft claim.

0 coins

Renting apartment below fair market value - Is it considered a rental property for tax purposes?

So I've got this apartment outside the US that I rented to a friend for all of 2023 at below fair market value. When doing my taxes in TurboTax, I selected "Rental Properties and Royalties (Sch E)" option. During the interview process, TurboTax asked me two specific questions: 1. Days rented at a fair rental price 2. Personal use during the year Since I'm renting it below fair market value to my friend, I put "0" for both questions. TurboTax still continued with the interview, and I entered all my expenses, total rent collected, etc. This resulted in a significant loss on paper. From what I've been reading, if a property is rented below fair market value, it's actually considered a personal property, not a rental property for tax purposes. Is this true? If so, why did TurboTax still treat it as a rental property? I'm confused about this. After some research, I realized question #2 should have been 365 days, which would make it a personal property, not a rental. But I'm still unsure about the tax implications. My friend only pays the maintenance fees as rent - nothing directly to me. I would have paid these maintenance fees anyway even if the apartment was empty. Other expenses like property taxes and insurance actually result in an overall loss. I'm not worried about claiming the loss, but someone told me I need to report the maintenance fees as income without being able to deduct any expenses (even from that income). This contradicts what a TurboTax rep told me: "When you rent below fair market price, you would be considered to be renting 'not for profit.' If your expenses (mortgage interest plus property taxes) were more than the rent you received, you are not required to report the income." I'm taking the standard deduction if that matters. Thanks for any help!

StarSailor}

•

I'm confused about one thing - if the apartment is outside the US, don't you have to report it on FBAR and Form 8938 regardless of whether it's rental or personal? My accountant told me all foreign properties need to be disclosed even if they don't generate income.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Foreign property itself isn't reportable on FBAR or 8938 - those forms are for foreign financial accounts and assets. You'd only report the foreign bank account used to receive rental income or pay expenses. The property itself is reported on Schedule E if it's a rental or not at all if it's personal. The foreign rental income would be reported on your tax return regardless of whether it's held in a foreign account or not. But the FBAR/8938 reporting is about the accounts, not the property.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

That's actually a good point I hadn't considered. I do have a foreign bank account I use for collecting the maintenance fees and paying property expenses. I'll need to make sure I'm reporting that correctly. Thanks for bringing this up!

0 coins

This is a really complex situation that highlights how confusing tax software can be with edge cases. You're absolutely right that TurboTax should have caught this - when you entered "0" for both fair rental days and personal use days, that's mathematically impossible since the property exists somewhere for 365 days. Based on what others have explained here, it sounds like you need to go back and correct your filing. You should enter 365 days for personal use (since below-market rentals to friends/family are considered personal use), which would take you out of the Schedule E rental property track entirely. The good news is that if your maintenance fees are less than your property taxes, you likely don't need to report any income at all. But you should definitely get professional help or use one of the tools mentioned here to make sure you're handling the foreign aspects correctly - there are additional considerations for foreign properties that go beyond just the rental vs. personal determination. Don't feel bad about the confusion - this is one of those areas where the tax code is genuinely unclear and even tax professionals sometimes get it wrong!

0 coins

This is such a helpful summary of everything discussed here! I'm definitely going to need to amend my return. One question though - when I go back to correct this in TurboTax, should I completely start over with the rental property section, or is there a way to edit it to change from 0/0 days to 365 personal use days? I'm worried about messing up other parts of my return if I have to delete and restart that whole section. Also, does anyone know if there are penalties for having filed this incorrectly initially? I'm not trying to avoid taxes - I actually reported a loss that I apparently shouldn't have been able to claim anyway. Just want to make sure I handle the correction properly.

0 coins

Ezra Bates

•

I've been through this exact situation! Got a 971 code about 3 months ago and was absolutely terrified. Turned out the IRS just needed me to verify my address because I had moved during the tax year. The letter arrived in about 10 days and I was able to call the number provided and resolve it over the phone in less than 20 minutes. My refund was issued 2 weeks after that call. The 971 code really is just the IRS saying "we're sending you mail" - it doesn't indicate anything is wrong with your return necessarily. I know the waiting is brutal but try to stay positive! Most of these end up being simple fixes that don't significantly delay your refund.

0 coins

Ella Russell

•

This is so helpful to hear! I'm new to dealing with tax transcripts and seeing that 971 code really freaked me out. It's reassuring to know that address verification can be handled with just a phone call and resolved so quickly. I moved twice last year so that could definitely be what this is about. Thanks for sharing the timeline too - knowing it could be resolved in just a few weeks makes this feel way more manageable! šŸ™‚

0 coins

Hey Dylan! I totally understand the worry - seeing unfamiliar codes on your transcript can be really stressful, especially when you've been waiting months for your refund. The good news is that a 971 code is actually pretty routine! It just means the IRS is mailing you a notice, and like others have mentioned, it's often something simple like identity verification or confirming some information on your return. I went through something similar last year and the anticipation was honestly the worst part. My letter took about a week to arrive and it was just asking me to verify my identity online through ID.me - took maybe 10 minutes and my refund processed shortly after. Try not to stress too much while you wait for the mail! The fact that there's no amount listed with the code is actually normal and doesn't indicate a problem. Keep checking your mailbox over the next week or two and remember that most of these notices are just standard verification steps. You're definitely not alone in this - tons of people deal with 971 codes every tax season and it usually works out just fine! 😊

0 coins

Prev1...19111912191319141915...5644Next