IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Isaiah Cross

•

This is exactly the kind of situation that can cause a lot of stress, but you're handling it the right way! I've dealt with similar K-1 corrections before and can confirm what others have said - for SSN-only corrections, you typically don't need the full 1065X process. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned much: make sure to double-check ALL the other K-1s in your return while you're at it. I've found that when I make one data entry error like this, there's sometimes others lurking that I missed. Better to catch them all now rather than having to do multiple corrections later. Also, since you mentioned this is stressing you out - completely understandable! But this is actually one of the easier tax corrections to handle. The IRS deals with SSN corrections all the time, and as long as you're proactive about it (which you are), it should resolve smoothly. Your partner will appreciate you catching and fixing this quickly.

0 coins

Great point about checking all the other K-1s! I hadn't thought about that but you're absolutely right - if I made one data entry mistake, there could easily be others. I'll go through each partner's information carefully before submitting the correction. Thanks for the reassurance too. It's helpful to hear from someone who's been through this that it's not as complicated as it seems. I was imagining all sorts of penalties and complications, but it sounds like the IRS handles these SSN corrections pretty routinely. One quick question - when you say "double-check ALL the other K-1s," do you mean just the SSNs or should I be reviewing all the allocations and amounts too? I'm pretty confident about the numbers since I used our accounting software, but want to be thorough.

0 coins

I'd recommend checking both SSNs and at least doing a quick review of the key allocation amounts - especially the profit/loss percentages and any guaranteed payments. While your accounting software should have the calculations right, it's worth verifying that the percentages you entered match your partnership agreement. For SSNs, definitely double-check those against your partner records or W-9s. For amounts, focus on making sure the allocations add up to 100% across all partners and that any special allocations (like different percentages for ordinary income vs. capital gains) are correctly reflected. You don't need to recalculate every line item if you trust your software, but a quick sanity check on the major numbers can save you from discovering other issues later. The peace of mind is worth the extra 30 minutes of review time!

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

I went through this exact situation about 6 months ago with our LLC that's taxed as a partnership. You're absolutely right that you don't need to file a 1065X for just an SSN correction - that would be overkill for this type of error. Here's what worked perfectly for me: I created a new K-1 with the correct SSN, wrote "CORRECTED" in red ink at the top, and included a simple one-page letter explaining that only the SSN was incorrect and no dollar amounts were changed. I referenced our EIN and the tax year, then sent everything via certified mail to the same IRS processing center. The whole thing was resolved without any issues. My partner never heard anything from the IRS about it, and when I followed up a few months later, everything was properly updated in their system. One tip that really helped: I made sure to give my partner the corrected K-1 immediately so they could reference it if any questions came up on their personal return. Fortunately they hadn't filed yet, so it didn't complicate things on their end. Don't stress too much about this - it's really a straightforward correction and the IRS handles these SSN fixes all the time!

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same process! I'm glad to know it resolved smoothly for you. The tip about using red ink to mark "CORRECTED" is helpful - I hadn't thought about making it that visible. Quick question: when you followed up "a few months later" to check that everything was updated in their system, how did you actually verify that? Did you call the IRS directly or was there another way to confirm the correction was processed? I'd love to have that peace of mind knowing it's been properly handled on their end. Also, since your partner hadn't filed yet when you gave them the corrected K-1, did you have them sign anything acknowledging they received the correction? I'm wondering if I should document that my partner received the updated version, just in case there are questions later.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

I'm confused by FreeTaxUSA's handling of this. When I tried to create a superseding return, the software only gave me the amended return option. Does anyone know if FreeTaxUSA actually supports filing superseding returns properly? Or do I need to manually handle this somehow?

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

I used FreeTaxUSA last year for a similar situation. The software itself doesn't have a specific "superseding return" option. What I had to do was prepare a completely new return through FreeTaxUSA, print it out, manually check the "amended" box, and write "SUPERSEDING RETURN" at the top in big letters. Then I had to mail it in rather than e-file.

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Thanks for asking this question! I was in a similar boat last month and learned the hard way that there's a big difference. Just to add to what others have said - timing is really crucial here. Since you're still before April 15, you have the choice between superseding (complete replacement) or amending (correction to original). One thing I wish someone had told me: if your changes are significant (like major income additions or big deduction changes), superseding is usually the better route because it treats your situation as if you filed correctly the first time. But if it's just minor corrections, an amendment might be simpler. Also, keep in mind that if you go the superseding route, you'll need to paper file since most tax software doesn't handle the specific markings required for superseding returns. The IRS needs to see "SUPERSEDING RETURN" clearly marked at the top of a new 1040, not a 1040-X form. Have you determined what kind of changes you need to make? That might help decide which path is better for your situation.

0 coins

Javier Garcia

•

Has anyone tried the buy-borrow-die strategy? I've heard this is what billionaires actually do. You buy appreciating assets, borrow against them for living expenses (no tax), and when you die your heirs get the stepped-up basis (avoiding capital gains). Seems like it would work for dividend stocks too if you just reinvest all dividends and borrow for cash needs.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

I've implemented a modified version of this. The key is finding the right securities-based lending program. Interactive Brokers offers rates around 3.5% right now, and some private banks go even lower for 7-figure portfolios. Just be careful about margin calls if the market drops significantly.

0 coins

Another strategy worth mentioning is tax-loss harvesting paired with dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs). The ultra-wealthy systematically harvest losses throughout the year to offset dividend income, but they do it strategically. Here's what many people miss: you can sell losing positions to harvest the loss for tax purposes, then immediately reinvest the proceeds into a similar (but not identical) security to avoid wash sale rules. This creates tax deductions that directly offset your dividend income. For your $8k in dividends, if you can harvest $8k in losses, you've effectively made your dividend income tax-free for that year. The key is maintaining a diversified portfolio specifically for this purpose - holding similar stocks or ETFs that you can swap between. I also recommend looking into qualified small business stock (QSBS) if you're entrepreneurial. Dividends from qualifying small businesses can be completely tax-free up to certain limits. It requires more active involvement but can be incredibly tax-efficient for the right person. The real game-changer though is understanding that tax optimization is a year-round strategy, not something you think about in April. Start tracking your unrealized gains and losses monthly so you can make strategic moves throughout the year.

0 coins

This is really eye-opening! I never thought about tax-loss harvesting as a year-round strategy. Quick question though - when you mention swapping between similar securities to avoid wash sale rules, how similar can they be? Like could I sell a dividend-focused ETF and immediately buy a different dividend ETF, or does it need to be more different than that? I'm worried about accidentally triggering the wash sale rule and losing the tax benefit.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

I think everyone is overlooking something important - if your daughter is a dependent on your tax return, her standard deduction is much lower than the regular standard deduction. It's limited to either $1,250 or her earned income plus $400, whichever is greater (but not more than the regular standard deduction). So with $2,700 in earned income, her standard deduction would be $3,100 ($2,700 + $400), which means some of her capital gains might be taxable! Make sure FreeTaxUSA is calculating this correctly.

0 coins

Are you sure about that? I thought the dependent standard deduction only affects unearned income (like the capital gains), not earned income from jobs or self-employment. The earned income should still be fully covered by the standard deduction, right?

0 coins

You're absolutely right to be confused about FreeTaxUSA not recognizing the earned income! I went through this exact same issue with my nephew's landscaping income last year. The key is making sure you enter the dog sitting income in the right place. In FreeTaxUSA, you need to: 1. Go to Income → Business Income (Schedule C) 2. Enter "Pet Care Services" or similar as the business name 3. Report the $2,700 as gross receipts 4. Deduct any legitimate business expenses (supplies, mileage, etc.) Once you complete Schedule C, FreeTaxUSA will automatically calculate the self-employment tax AND recognize this as earned income for Roth IRA purposes. The software should then stop giving you errors about the Roth contribution. One thing to note - she'll owe about 15.3% self-employment tax on her net business income (around $413 if she has no deductible expenses), but this is separate from regular income tax. The good news is her total income is still under the standard deduction, so no regular income tax owed. The $1,422 in capital gains goes in the investment section and doesn't count toward Roth IRA eligibility, but it shouldn't push her into owing income tax either.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

This is super helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my son's tutoring income. Quick question - when you say "legitimate business expenses," how strict is the IRS about this for teenagers? Like, if my son bought a whiteboard specifically for tutoring sessions, that would count, but what about something like a portion of our home internet since he does some virtual tutoring? I want to make sure I'm not being too aggressive with deductions and accidentally triggering an audit.

0 coins

Has anyone actually successfully amended their return after paying the amount on a CP23? I'm in a similar situation but I already paid what they asked because I was scared of penalties, and now I'm trying to figure out how to get my money back by providing the missing documentation.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Yes! I paid first and then filed a 1040-X with the missing documentation. Got my refund about 4 months later. The key is to write "CP23 RESPONSE" in red at the top of your 1040-X and include a copy of the original notice. Make it super clear you're not making new changes but correcting an issue they identified.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! Also on a J-1 visa and just became a tax resident for 2024. The transition from nonresident to resident status creates so much confusion with the withholding forms. One thing I learned from my tax advisor is that you should definitely mention in your response letter that you're a tax resident filing Form 1040 even though you received a 1042-S. The IRS systems sometimes flag this as inconsistent, so explaining the visa status change and why the university issued the 1042-S (before they knew about your resident status) helps prevent further confusion. Also, if you have any documentation from your university showing when they became aware of your tax resident status, include that too. It helps explain the timeline and why the withholding was processed differently than your filing status. Good luck with your response! The stress is real but it sounds like you have a clear path forward.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm also dealing with the J-1 to resident transition confusion. Did your tax advisor give you any specific language to use when explaining the visa status change? I want to make sure I'm being clear about why I have a 1042-S but filed as a resident without making it sound like I made an error in my filing status determination. Also, what kind of documentation from the university would be most helpful? I have emails where I notified them about my status change, but I'm not sure if that's sufficient or if I need something more official.

0 coins

Prev1...18721873187418751876...5643Next