
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm in a really frustrating situation with my Employee Retention Credit checks from the government. I was supposed to receive several ERC payments for my small business, but they never showed up. I went through the whole process of filing Form 3911 to trace them, and finally got a response from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Here's where it gets crazy - they sent me a letter saying my checks were cashed, with copies attached. But these are NOT my checks! They have a completely different business name (not mine), different signature (not mine), but somehow the exact same dollar amounts as my expected ERC payments. I've been calling the IRS repeatedly, but they just say this isn't their problem and they can't help. I've tried calling the Bureau of the Fiscal Service literally dozens of times but no one ever answers. I've sent faxes and written letters to both agencies explaining the situation. I'm completely stuck in this bureaucratic nightmare. The IRS won't reissue my ERC checks because the Bureau says they were cashed, but they clearly weren't cashed by ME or my business! Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before? Any advice on how to get through to someone who can actually fix this mess?
I've been trying to figure this out but can't seem to find a straight answer online. My boyfriend and I aren't married, but he's the primary breadwinner in our household. He works full-time while I only made about $13,500 last year. We live together with my 6-year-old daughter (not his biological child), and he covers most of our expenses including rent, utilities, and food. I'll be filing my own tax return, but was wondering if he could claim my daughter as a dependent on his taxes since he provides more than half of her support? We both think it would make more sense tax-wise, but I'm not sure if that's allowed since we're not married and she's not his biological child. Thanks for any help you can provide!
Not sure if anyone already mentioned this but if your boyfriend claims your daughter, he might qualify for Head of Household filing status instead of Single which could save him a lot more on taxes. But he has to pay more than half the cost of keeping up the home (rent, utilities, food, etc) where both of you and daughter lived for more than half the year.
But doesn't head of household require you to be related to the dependent? I thought boyfriend/girlfriend can't claim HOH for their partner's kids?
You don't actually need to be related to the dependent to file as Head of Household. You just need to have a qualifying person living with you (like a dependent child), pay more than half the cost of keeping up the home, and be considered unmarried for tax purposes. As long as the boyfriend can legitimately claim the daughter as a dependent (meets all the IRS tests we've discussed), and he pays more than half of the household expenses, he can file as HOH. This is specifically addressed in IRS Publication 501. The key is that the dependent has to live with him, which seems to be the case here.
One thing nobody's mentioned - if your income is only $13,500, you might actually benefit MORE from claiming your daughter yourself because of the Earned Income Credit. Depending on your situation, this could potentially be worth more than your boyfriend's tax savings from the dependent deduction.
Thank you for bringing this up! I hadn't even thought about the Earned Income Credit. I'll definitely look into how much that could be worth for me at my income level before we decide who claims her. I really appreciate everyone's helpful advice here. It sounds like we have options and just need to figure out which approach saves us the most money overall. It's such a relief to know that him claiming her is even possible if that turns out to be the better choice.
Absolutely run the numbers both ways! With your $13,500 income and one child, the EITC could be around $3,600 for 2024. Plus you'd get the $2,000 Child Tax Credit. That's potentially $5,600 in credits versus whatever deduction your boyfriend would get (probably around $4,700 standard deduction plus $4,300 for the dependent). The key question is what tax bracket your boyfriend is in. If he's in the 22% bracket or higher, his tax savings from claiming her might exceed your potential EITC. But if he's in the 12% bracket, you claiming her with the EITC is probably the better move financially for your household overall.
I checked my transcript today and I see some codes I don't understand. When looking at my TRANSACTIONS section, I see the following: CODE | EXPLANATION OF TRANSACTION | CYCLE | DATE | AMOUNT 150 | Tax return filed | 20241805 | 05-20-2024 | $1,658.00 30221-457-03146-4 806 | W-2 or 1099 withholding | 04-15-2024 | -$7,037.00 570 | Additional account action pending | 05-20-2024 | $0.00 971 | Notice issued | 10-22-2024 | $0.00 This Product Contains Sensitive Taxpayer Data I understand code 150 shows my tax return was filed with cycle date 20241805 for May 20, 2024 with an amount of $1,658.00. There's also code 806 for my W-2 or 1099 withholding dated April 15, 2024 for -$7,037.00. But what's really making me nervous are these two codes that appeared at the bottom: a 570 code showing "Additional account action pending" dated 05-20-2024 for $0.00, and a 971 code saying "Notice issued" dated 10-22-2024 also for $0.00. My refund amount is supposed to be $7,037 (as shown in the 806 code line) and I'm getting really nervous seeing these codes pop up. I checked IRS2Go and accessed my transcript through sa.www4.irs.gov at 12:49, but I don't understand what these codes mean or why they're there. Can someone help me figure out what these 570 and 971 codes mean? Will I still get my full refund of $7,037.00? Is there something wrong with my return? The "Additional account action pending" and "Notice issued" codes are making me really anxious.
The 570 and 971 codes can definitely be nerve-wracking when you first see them! I had these exact same codes last year and went through the whole process. The 570 code means your refund is temporarily on hold while the IRS reviews something in your return - it's not necessarily bad news, just means they need to verify something before releasing your money. The 971 code with the October date means they issued (or will issue) a notice explaining what they need. Since it's dated 10-22-2024, you should be getting a letter soon if you haven't already. This could be anything from identity verification (very common) to them needing additional documentation about your income or deductions. Your refund calculation looks correct based on what you've shared - $7,037 in withholdings minus your tax liability should give you a substantial refund. The key is responding quickly to whatever letter they send you. In my case, it was just identity verification through their online portal, and once I completed that, my refund processed within about 6 weeks. Keep checking your transcript weekly for updates and watch your mail closely. Most people with 570/971 codes do get their refunds - it's just a matter of patience and responding promptly to their requests. You've got this!
@Ravi Gupta This is exactly what I needed to hear! I ve'been losing sleep over these codes since I saw them on my transcript. Your experience sounds almost identical to mine - the timing, the amounts, everything. Just to confirm, when you say identity verification through their online portal, was that the ID.me system or something else? I want to be prepared for whatever they might ask for when that letter arrives. Also, did your transcript show any updates or changes during those 6 weeks while you were waiting, or did it just suddenly update when the refund was approved? Thanks so much for taking the time to share your experience - it really helps to know others have gone through this successfully!
Hey, I just wanted to chime in since I literally went through this exact scenario about 6 months ago - same codes, similar amounts, and the same panic! The 570/971 combo is super common and usually resolves fine, though I know it doesn't feel that way when you're staring at your transcript. From your numbers, it looks like you should be getting a refund of $6,279 ($7,037 withholdings - $1,658 tax liability), not the full $7,037. The 570 code from May means they put a hold on processing your refund right away, and the 971 from October means they're sending you a notice explaining why. In my case, the letter took about 10 days to arrive after the 971 date, and it was requesting identity verification through their ID.me portal. Once I completed that (took maybe 15 minutes online), my transcript updated with a 571 code (reversal of the 570) within about 4 weeks, and I got my refund deposit 2 weeks after that. The waiting is definitely the hardest part, but try not to stress too much - the vast majority of these reviews resolve in the taxpayer's favor. Just keep checking your mail and respond immediately when that letter comes. You've got this! ๐ช
@Sean Murphy Thank you so much for sharing your timeline - this is incredibly helpful! I was wondering about the refund calculation too, so I m'glad you clarified that it should be $6,279 rather than the full $7,037. That makes sense when you break down the withholdings minus tax liability. Your 6-week total timeline from ID verification to refund deposit is actually not as bad as I was expecting based on some of the other stories I ve'heard. Did you notice any other code changes on your transcript during that 4-week period after completing the ID.me verification, or did it just suddenly flip to the 571 code all at once? I m'trying to understand what to watch for so I know things are moving in the right direction once I hopefully (get) my letter and can respond to it.
Hey everyone! I'm currently enrolled in a tax preparation class with Liberty Tax that meets twice a week in the evenings. The class is very hands-on with everything being done manually using Liberty's specific textbook. My instructor definitely knows her stuff, but seems a bit disorganized, and I'm finding it hard to connect with her teaching approach. I just received some info about H&R Block's tax prep course in my area (they're the only other option where I live). From what I can tell, their program is more digital/software-based and seems more aligned with what I'd actually be doing when working with clients. I've done some digging online and noticed that H&R Block tax preparers tend to earn about $2-3 more per hour than those at Liberty Tax. Would love to hear from people who have experience with either or both companies! What are the pros and cons of each? Any insights on training quality, work environment, advancement opportunities, etc.? Thanks in advance for any advice!
One thing to consider is the software each uses. I've worked with Drake (which Liberty often uses) and H&R Block's proprietary software. Block's system is more user-friendly but also more restrictive in some ways. Liberty offices can sometimes use different software depending on the franchise owner, which can be confusing if you transfer between locations.
As someone who's been preparing taxes for over 8 years, I'd strongly recommend going with H&R Block if you're serious about this as a career path. The software-based training will serve you much better in the real world. When I started at Liberty years ago, all that manual preparation felt thorough but was honestly pretty useless once I got on the job and had to use actual tax software with clients. H&R Block also has much better support during tax season. At Liberty, you're often on your own if you run into complex situations, but Block has experienced preparers and managers available to help walk you through tricky returns. One more thing - Block's brand recognition brings in more clients, which means more experience for you and potentially more hours/income. Liberty locations can really struggle to get foot traffic depending on the area. If advancement is important to you, Block is definitely the way to go. I've seen people go from seasonal preparer to year-round tax professional to office manager within a few years. That path is much less clear at Liberty. Good luck with whatever you choose!
I attended school full time last year and only worked part time. My boyfriend has been supporting me and my daughter financially all year - paying rent, bills, food etc. Would he be able to claim my daughter as a dependent on his taxes? She lived with us the entire year.
Another thing to consider - make sure you understand the difference between a "qualifying child" and "qualifying relative" for tax purposes. Since your daughter is 6 and lived with you both all year, she'd likely be considered a qualifying child if your boyfriend provided more than half her support. But as others mentioned, you as the biological parent have the first right to claim her. The Form 8332 is definitely the way to go if you want to release that claim. Also worth noting that whoever claims her can potentially get the Child Tax Credit too, which could be significant depending on income levels.
Ryder Ross
This is an incredibly frustrating situation that unfortunately affects more ERC recipients than most people realize. Based on your description, it sounds like there was likely a processing error where your EIN or business information got cross-referenced with another company's details in the Treasury payment system. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. File a complaint with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) at tigta.gov. They handle cases involving potential fraud or systemic errors in tax processing. Your situation - where checks with your payment amounts were cashed by a completely different business - suggests either a processing error or potential fraud that TIGTA needs to investigate. 2. Document everything meticulously. Create a timeline showing when you filed for ERC, when payments should have been issued, when you filed Form 3911, and when you received the Bureau's response. Include copies of all correspondence and the fraudulent checks they sent you. 3. Consider filing a police report for check fraud. Even though these are government checks, someone cashing checks that weren't meant for them could constitute fraud, and having a police report number can help when dealing with government agencies. 4. Contact your congressional representative's office. They have direct lines to both the IRS and Bureau of the Fiscal Service that can often resolve cases that get stuck in normal channels. Bring all your documentation and explain that you're caught between two agencies that won't take responsibility. Don't give up - this kind of error is resolvable, but it requires persistence and the right approach. The fact that the amounts match your expected ERC payments but the business details are completely wrong strongly suggests a systematic processing error rather than a simple mix-up.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
I'm dealing with a very similar situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! I wanted to add one more resource that worked for me after months of getting nowhere. I ended up filing a complaint through the Treasury's Financial Management Service (FMS) - now called the Bureau of the Fiscal Service - using their online complaint portal. What's different about this approach is that it goes directly to their Check Claims Division rather than through general customer service. The portal is at fiscal.treasury.gov and you can file under "Payment Inquiry" then select "Treasury Check Issues." The key is being very specific in your complaint description. I wrote something like: "ERC check traced as cashed but endorsement shows different business name and signature. Requesting investigation of check endorsement fraud and reissuance of proper payment." Within 2 weeks, I received a call from an actual Check Claims specialist (not just a general rep) who could see the full chain of what happened with my payment. They immediately recognized it as a known processing error and initiated a formal investigation. The specialist explained that when these errors happen, they need to verify that the business who cashed the checks wasn't legitimately entitled to them before issuing replacements. But once they confirmed the endorsement was completely wrong for my account, replacement checks were processed within 3 weeks. Sometimes going directly to the source - the actual department that processes these payments - can bypass all the finger-pointing between different agencies. Worth trying alongside the other excellent suggestions in this thread!
0 coins