


Ask the community...
Has anyone used a donor-advised fund to manage AMT exposure? I'm thinking about setting one up this year since my income is unusually high.
I've been using Fidelity's donor-advised fund for years specifically for AMT planning! You can contribute in high-income years (getting the full tax benefit) and then distribute to charities over time. Works great for appreciated stock donations too - you avoid the capital gains AND get the full deduction.
Great question! I went through this exact confusion last year when planning my charitable giving strategy. The key thing to remember is that charitable donations are one of the few deductions that work favorably under both regular tax and AMT systems. Here's what I learned from working with my tax advisor: **Cash donations**: Fully deductible under both systems (up to 60% of AGI). No AMT adjustment needed. **Appreciated securities**: You can deduct fair market value (up to 30% of AGI) and avoid capital gains tax. This is actually a sweet spot for AMT planning since you're getting double tax benefits. **Property donations**: Similar to securities, but watch out for special rules on certain property types. Make sure you get proper appraisals for items over $5,000. One strategy that helped me was "bunching" donations in high-income years when I was more likely to hit AMT. Since charitable deductions work the same under both systems, you can maximize their impact by concentrating them when your other itemized deductions are being limited by AMT. The confusion online probably comes from people mixing up charitable donations with other itemized deductions (like state taxes) that DO get added back for AMT. Charitable giving is actually one of your best tools for tax planning when facing AMT!
This is really helpful, thanks! Quick follow-up question - when you mention "bunching" donations in high-income years, how do you actually time this? Do you wait until you know you'll hit AMT for the year, or do you plan it out in advance based on projected income? I'm worried I might miscalculate and end up in a worse position than if I just spread donations evenly across years.
Has anyone looked into leasing equipment instead of buying as a strategy to deal with the bonus depreciation phase-out? We're considering this approach for our business since lease payments are fully deductible as business expenses. Seems like it might be simpler than navigating all these depreciation rules.
We switched to leasing for some of our equipment last year. The monthly payments are higher than financing a purchase, but being able to deduct 100% of the lease payment regardless of bonus depreciation changes made our tax planning much more predictable. Just make sure it's a true lease and not disguised financing - the IRS looks at the substance of the agreement.
I'm a small business owner dealing with similar concerns about the depreciation changes. One thing I learned from my tax advisor is that if you're considering major equipment purchases, pay attention to the "placed in service" date rather than just when you order or pay for equipment. For the bonus depreciation, what matters is when you actually start using the equipment in your business. So if you order something in 2024 but it doesn't get delivered and put into use until 2025, you'll only get the 40% bonus depreciation rate for 2025, not the 60% rate for 2024. This timing issue caught me off guard last year when some manufacturing equipment I ordered in late 2023 didn't arrive until early 2024. Fortunately it still qualified for decent bonus depreciation, but it's something to plan around as the percentages keep dropping each year.
That's such an important point about the "placed in service" date! I'm just getting started with my small consulting business and was planning to buy some office equipment and a company vehicle early next year. Should I be rushing to get everything ordered and delivered before December 31st to lock in the 2024 rates? Or would it make more sense to wait and rely on Section 179 since my equipment purchases will probably be under the limits anyway?
This is exactly what I went through a couple years ago! I remember panicking and calling HR thinking there was some massive payroll error. The HR rep was super patient and walked me through the Social Security wage base limit concept. What really helped me understand it was when she showed me how to calculate it backwards from my paycheck. If $638 was being withheld for Social Security at 6.2%, that means your gross pay per check is about $10,290 ($638 รท 0.062). If you're paid bi-weekly, that's roughly $267k annually, which definitely puts you well over the $167,700 threshold. One thing I wish I'd known earlier - this is actually a good time to review your overall tax situation. Since you're no longer paying Social Security tax for the rest of the year, you might want to consider increasing your federal income tax withholding slightly to avoid any surprises at tax time. Some people in our income bracket end up under-withheld without that Social Security contribution. Also, definitely enjoy that extra cash flow, but like others mentioned, maybe set aside some of it for when January hits and reality comes back! That first paycheck of the new year always stings a little.
This is really helpful advice about reviewing the overall tax situation! I hadn't thought about potentially being under-withheld without the Social Security tax. Do you have any rough guidelines for how much extra federal withholding might be needed? I'm trying to avoid that nasty surprise come April, but I also don't want to overwithhold and give the government an interest-free loan all year. Did you end up adjusting your W-4 when this happened to you, or did you handle it some other way? Also, totally agree about that first January paycheck being a shock! I'm definitely going to start setting money aside now so I'm prepared for the reality check.
Just wanted to add my experience for anyone else who might be confused about this! I hit the Social Security wage cap for the first time last year and had no idea what was happening when my withholding suddenly dropped. One thing that really helped me was understanding that this is actually a progressive system working as designed. The Social Security tax stops at $167,700 because benefits are also capped - you can't get unlimited Social Security benefits no matter how much you earn. Meanwhile, Medicare tax continues because everyone gets the same Medicare coverage regardless of income. A few practical tips from someone who's been through this: 1. Double-check your paystub's year-to-date Social Security wages - should show exactly $167,700 2. The remaining withholding is likely Medicare (1.45%) plus any state/local taxes 3. If you're married, remember this cap applies per person, not per household 4. Consider adjusting your tax withholding since you're losing that "forced savings" of SS tax 5. Set aside some of the extra cash for January when full withholding resumes It's actually kind of nice having higher take-home pay for the last few months of the year, but definitely plan ahead for when it resets!
Watch out for the timing of your backdoor Roth! I messed up last year by waiting too long between making the Traditional IRA contribution and doing the conversion. My $6,000 contribution grew to $6,120 in just a few weeks and that extra $120 was taxable income when I converted! It wasn't the end of the world, but it created some extra tax liability and made the TurboTax entry more complicated. Do the conversion ASAP after making the contribution.
This is good advice. I've done backdoor Roth conversions for several years now and I always make sure to do the conversion within 1-2 days of the contribution. Keeps things clean with minimal earnings to worry about.
Great question! As someone who's been doing backdoor Roth conversions for a few years, I can confirm you're on the right track. Since this is your first Traditional IRA and you're contributing $6,500 of after-tax money, your basis is indeed $6,500. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given - when TurboTax asks about your basis, it's essentially asking "how much after-tax money have you put into Traditional IRAs over the years?" Since you're starting fresh with $6,500, that's your answer. Also, make sure you complete the conversion quickly! I see you mentioned submitting the paperwork "later today" - that's perfect timing. The longer you wait, the more chance for earnings that would be taxable upon conversion. TurboTax will automatically generate Form 8606 for you, which tracks your nondeductible contributions. Keep a copy of this form - you'll need it for future years if you continue doing backdoor Roth conversions. The software handles most of the complexity, but double-check that it shows zero taxable income from the conversion (assuming you convert the full amount quickly with minimal earnings). You've got this! The first one is always the most nerve-wracking, but you're being thorough which is exactly the right approach.
Keisha Thompson
This thread has been an absolute game-changer for me as someone brand new to this community! I just filed my first complex tax return this year and was already starting to worry about potential verification issues. Reading through everyone's detailed experiences has been both educational and reassuring - it's clear that the ID.me confusion is a widespread problem that catches even experienced taxpayers off guard. What really helps is seeing the consistent pattern: people who went straight to the phone number on their verification letters got resolved in minutes, while those who got caught up in ID.me spent weeks going in circles. The airport security vs passport control analogy is perfect - they're both identity checks but serve completely different purposes in the process. I'm definitely bookmarking this entire discussion as my reference guide and will remember to completely skip ID.me if I ever receive a verification letter. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed, real-world experiences - this community is providing clearer guidance than the IRS website itself!
0 coins
LongPeri
โขThis entire thread has been incredibly enlightening as someone completely new to this community and tax complications! I can't believe how many people have shared nearly identical experiences with the ID.me confusion - it really shows this is a systematic issue with how the IRS presents information rather than individual mistakes. What's particularly helpful is seeing the clear pattern where people who called the verification number directly got resolved in under 20 minutes, while those stuck in the ID.me loop wasted weeks. I'm definitely saving this whole discussion and the airport security analogy really sealed it for me - two different identity checkpoints for two completely different purposes. It's honestly mind-blowing that a community forum is providing better guidance than the official government website, but I'm so grateful this resource exists for newcomers like us who might otherwise fall into the same trap!
0 coins
Nia Thompson
This thread is incredibly helpful for newcomers like me! I just joined this community because I'm dealing with my first complex tax situation and was terrified about potentially facing verification issues. Reading through everyone's experiences has been such a relief - it's clear that the ID.me confusion is almost like a universal experience that catches people off guard. The consistent pattern I'm seeing is that people who called the specific verification number on their letter got resolved in minutes, while those who got stuck trying to fix it through ID.me wasted weeks thinking they were on the right track. The airport security vs passport control analogy finally made it all click for me - they're checking identity but at completely different stages for different reasons. It's honestly frustrating that the IRS website doesn't make this distinction clearer, but I'm so grateful this community exists to fill in those gaps. Definitely saving this entire thread as my emergency reference guide in case I ever receive one of those verification letters!
0 coins