IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Melody Miles

•

Just to add a quick data point - we're a local bakery and donated desserts for a charity gala last year. Our CPA classified it under 170(e)(3) and we were able to deduct our cost plus half the difference between our cost and retail price (limited to twice our cost basis). Made a nice deduction! Just make sure you document EVERYTHING - we took photos, kept all correspondence, got a formal acknowledgment letter, etc.

0 coins

Did your company name appear in the event program or signage? Our restaurant is donating food for a similar event and I'm trying to figure out if that changes how we should classify the deduction.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

Yes, our bakery name was listed in the program as a "dessert sponsor" but our CPA said that didn't disqualify us from the 170(e)(3) treatment as long as the primary purpose was charitable and any recognition was incidental. The key test is whether you received substantial return benefits - just having your name mentioned usually doesn't rise to that level. However, if you're getting prominent logo placement, booth space, or other marketing benefits that have real commercial value, then part of it might need to be treated as a business expense under Section 162 instead. Document what recognition you're receiving so your tax preparer can make the right call!

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

Based on all the great advice here, I wanted to share what I ended up finding for anyone else dealing with this situation. The key code sections are: **IRC Section 170(e)(3)** - This is the enhanced deduction for food inventory donations that everyone mentioned. It allows businesses to deduct cost basis plus half the difference between cost and fair market value (capped at twice the cost basis) when donating food to qualifying organizations. **IRC Section 162** - Ordinary and necessary business expenses, which applies if you received substantial marketing benefits in return. The IRS also has specific guidance in **Publication 526** (Charitable Contributions) and **Regulation 1.170A-4A** that covers the documentation requirements for food donations. What really helped me was realizing that the classification depends on your primary intent and what you received in return. If it was purely charitable with minimal recognition, go with 170(e)(3). If you got significant marketing value, you might need to split it between charitable contribution and business expense. My boss was impressed when I presented both the code sections AND the documentation requirements. Thanks everyone for pointing me in the right direction - this community is amazing!

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This is such a helpful summary! As someone new to navigating business tax deductions, I really appreciate how you broke down the different scenarios and code sections. The distinction between charitable intent vs. marketing benefits seems like it could be a gray area - do you know if there are any specific thresholds or guidelines the IRS uses to determine when recognition becomes "substantial"? Also, did you end up getting the proper written acknowledgment from the charity that @417e3acad7e5 mentioned? I'm curious how that process went since I might be in a similar situation soon with our company's upcoming charity sponsorship.

0 coins

CyberSiren

•

I'm confused about the original post... are you talking about taxes for 2023 (filing now in 2024) or 2024 (filing in 2025)? If it's 2024 taxes, you don't need to worry yet since those aren't due until next year.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

Sorry for the confusion! I meant 2023 taxes that I'll be filing now in 2024. I just realized I wrote the wrong year in my post. So yeah, I'm trying to figure out if I should pay now in February or wait until April for the taxes due for 2023. Thanks for catching that!

0 coins

This is exactly why tax questions on Reddit get so confusing lol. People always mix up the tax year vs filing year. Pro tip: always specify "2023 taxes (filing in 2024)" to avoid this confusion!

0 coins

Based on your clarification that you're talking about 2023 taxes, yes - paying earlier will definitely save you money! The IRS charges interest that compounds daily from April 15th, 2024 until you pay in full, plus a 0.5% monthly penalty on unpaid amounts. For your $5,800 balance, paying now versus waiting until April 15th could save you roughly $50-75 in interest and penalties (depending on current IRS interest rates). It might not sound like a lot, but every dollar counts when you're already facing an unexpected tax bill. You can pay immediately through IRS Direct Pay without even filing your return first. Just make sure to note it's for your 2023 tax year when you make the payment. Then when you do file your return, the payment will already be credited to your account.

0 coins

Yara Khalil

•

This is really helpful math! I was wondering about the actual dollar impact. One thing I'm curious about though - you mentioned the 0.5% monthly penalty, but doesn't that only apply if you don't file your return by April 15th? I thought if you file on time but just can't pay the full amount, the penalty is different (or maybe lower)? Just want to make sure I understand the penalties correctly since I'm planning to file on time regardless.

0 coins

As someone completely new to estate planning and trust matters, this discussion has been absolutely invaluable. I had no idea how complex these QPRT situations could become or how many different factors need to be considered. What really stands out to me is how the "simple" solution of just transferring the property back to your father could actually create much bigger problems than maintaining the rental arrangement. The property appreciation since 2013 seems like it could be the deciding factor - if we're talking about a house that's doubled or tripled in value, the gift tax implications could be enormous. I'm also struck by how important the specific language in the original trust documents appears to be. Several people mentioned finding provisions they didn't know existed that changed their available options completely. It sounds like getting those documents reviewed by someone who specializes in QPRTs should definitely be your first step. The consensus seems clear that this isn't a situation where you can afford to make the wrong choice or delay indefinitely. Given your father's estate size and the upcoming changes to the estate tax exemption, the stakes are really high here. Thank you to everyone who's shared their expertise - as a newcomer, I've learned so much about how these complex estate planning vehicles actually work in practice versus theory. @Natasha Petrov, I really hope you'll update us on what you discover when you get that specialized advice!

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

@Jungleboo Soletrain, you've really captured the essence of what makes this situation so challenging! As another newcomer to estate planning, I'm fascinated by how what seems like a straightforward family decision ("dad wants his house back") actually involves so many layers of tax law, trust provisions, and potential consequences. The property appreciation angle that keeps coming up is particularly eye-opening. I never would have thought about how real estate gains since 2013 could turn a simple family transfer into a major gift tax event. It really drives home why getting that current appraisal is so critical before making any decisions. What I find most helpful about this whole thread is how it's shown that there are professionals who specialize specifically in these expired QPRT situations. Before reading this, I probably would have assumed any estate planning attorney could handle it, but it's clear this requires very specific expertise. The timing pressure aspect is also concerning - it sounds like the IRS doesn't like situations that just drift indefinitely without proper resolution, but rushing into the wrong solution could be even more expensive than the original problem. @Natasha Petrov, I'm really hoping you'll share what you learn from the specialist consultation. This has been such an educational discussion for those of us trying to understand these complex trust and tax issues!

0 coins

Amaya Watson

•

As someone completely new to estate planning, this entire discussion has been absolutely eye-opening! I had no idea that trusts like QPRTs could become so complicated when they expire. What strikes me most is how many people are emphasizing that the "obvious" solution of just giving the house back to your father could actually create much bigger tax problems than keeping the current arrangement. The property appreciation since 2013 seems to be a huge factor that could turn what feels like a simple family decision into a massive gift tax situation. I'm also really impressed by how many specific resources people have shared - from the ACTEC directory for finding specialized attorneys to the detailed questions you should ask when interviewing them. It's clear this requires someone with very specific experience in expired QPRTs, not just general estate planning knowledge. The timeline pressure seems concerning too - it sounds like the IRS doesn't like situations that drift without proper resolution, but making the wrong choice quickly could be even more expensive than the original problem. Thank you to everyone who's shared their expertise and experiences. This has been incredibly educational for someone trying to understand these complex trust and tax issues. @Natasha Petrov, I really hope you'll update us on what you discover when you get that specialist consultation and current property appraisal!

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

@Amaya Watson, you've really summarized this complex discussion perfectly! As someone also completely new to estate planning, I'm amazed by how what seemed like a straightforward family situation has so many potential legal and tax landmines. The property appreciation factor that keeps coming up is really striking - it never occurred to me that real estate gains over more than a decade could completely change the math on what seems like a simple family transfer. Getting that current appraisal really does seem like the crucial first step before any decisions can be made. What I find most valuable is how this thread has highlighted the importance of finding attorneys who specialize specifically in expired QPRTs rather than just general estate planning. The questions @Natasha Kuznetsova suggested for interviewing potential attorneys were particularly helpful - asking about their specific experience with post-term QPRT situations and IRS audits in this area. The consensus seems clear that this isn t'a situation where you can afford to guess or delay indefinitely, but rushing into the wrong solution could be catastrophically expensive. With the father s'estate size and the upcoming exemption changes, the stakes are really high. This has been such an educational discussion for newcomers like us trying to understand these complex trust and tax issues!

0 coins

Code 830 is definitely a good sign! It means your return has been processed and your refund has been approved. I got the same code about 3 weeks ago and was in panic mode not knowing what it meant. My refund finally hit my account yesterday via direct deposit! The timeline seems to vary but most people I've talked to get their money within 2-4 weeks after 830 appears. Since you filed in February you've definitely been through the ringer, but hang tight - you're in the home stretch now! šŸ™

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

Congrats on finally getting your refund! šŸŽ‰ That's such a relief after waiting so long. I'm a newcomer here but this whole thread has been super helpful - I just noticed code 830 on my transcript yesterday and was totally confused about what it meant. Seeing all these success stories gives me hope that I might actually see my money soon! Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences šŸ™

0 coins

Hazel Garcia

•

Hey everyone! New to this community but been lurking and reading all your posts about transcript codes. Just wanted to say this thread has been incredibly helpful - I've been stressing about my refund status for months and seeing all these explanations about code 830 finally gives me some peace of mind. Filed back in March and just got my 830 code yesterday, so sounds like I'm hopefully looking at a few more weeks of waiting. Thanks to everyone who's shared their timelines and experiences - it really helps us newcomers navigate this confusing process! šŸ™

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Has anyone tried using bonus depreciation instead of Section 179 to avoid this carryover headache? For 2023, bonus depreciation is 80% instead of 100%, but at least you don't have to deal with the business income limitation.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

Yes! I switched to using bonus depreciation for exactly this reason. With Section 179 I kept creating carryovers I couldn't use. With bonus depreciation, I can immediately deduct 80% of the cost and then depreciate the remaining 20% over the regular recovery period. Just remember that bonus depreciation phases down to 60% for 2024, 40% for 2025, and 20% for 2026 before disappearing completely in 2027 unless Congress extends it.

0 coins

I had this exact same frustration last year! The key insight that helped me was understanding that Form 4562 is designed to handle multiple scenarios, which makes it confusing for straightforward carryover situations. Here's what I learned: Your carryover from 2022 should go on Line 10, but the critical step many people miss is ensuring your business income limitation on Line 11 is calculated correctly. If your business income is too low to absorb both your current year Section 179 election AND your carryover, then yes, you'll create another carryover. However, there are a few strategies to consider: 1. As Freya mentioned, make sure you're including ALL business income when calculating the limitation 2. Consider splitting your current year purchases between Section 179 and bonus depreciation to optimize your deductions 3. If you know your business income will be higher next year, it might make sense to carry more forward The carryover isn't "lost" - it will continue indefinitely until you have sufficient business income to use it. With $48K in equipment, you definitely want to maximize this deduction when possible!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, Adrian! I'm new to dealing with Section 179 carryovers and had no idea about the strategy of splitting between Section 179 and bonus depreciation. That sounds like it could really help optimize the deductions. Quick question - when you say "splitting" the current year purchases, do you mean I can choose which specific pieces of equipment get Section 179 treatment versus bonus depreciation? Or is it more of an overall dollar amount decision? I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to be strategic about which assets get which treatment based on their depreciation schedules. Also, is there a good rule of thumb for deciding how much to carry forward versus trying to use immediately? My business income varies quite a bit year to year.

0 coins

Prev1...17621763176417651766...5643Next