


Ask the community...
Don't forget to check which payment processor you're using for your taxes! They each charge different rates: Pay1040.com - 1.87% fee (min $2.50) PayUSAtax.com - 1.96% fee (min $2.55) ACI Payments - 1.98% fee (min $2.50) Made the mistake of not checking last year and used the most expensive one. That 0.11% difference adds up on a big tax bill!
Great thread! I'm in a similar situation this year. One thing I'd add is to make sure you factor in the opportunity cost of tying up your credit limits when doing these large tax payments. I learned this the hard way last year when I put $25k on my Amex Gold and then couldn't use it for regular spending while waiting for the payment to process. Had to use my backup cards which didn't have any bonuses running. Also, for anyone considering the Chase cards mentioned here - be aware of Chase's 5/24 rule if you've opened a lot of cards recently. I got denied for the Sapphire Reserve because I had opened 6 cards in the past 24 months, even though my credit score was excellent. One more tip: if you're planning to do this again next year, consider setting calendar reminders to apply for new cards in January/February so you have them ready by April. The application-to-approval process can take weeks, especially for business cards.
This is such valuable advice! The credit limit issue is something I never would have thought about. I'm planning to put about $15k on a new card and you're right - that would basically max out most cards and leave me scrambling for everyday purchases. The 5/24 rule is also a great callout. I've been pretty aggressive with card applications over the past year so I should probably check where I stand before applying for any Chase products. Do you know if business cards from other issuers count toward the 5/24 limit, or is it just personal cards? And definitely setting those calendar reminders now! Nothing worse than realizing in March that you needed to apply months ago.
My sister is actually a CPA and I asked her about this. She said they have a standard practice of getting written permission from clients before filing extensions. She was pretty shocked your accountant did this without asking. One thing she mentioned - check if you signed any kind of engagement letter that might have given blanket authorization for extensions. Some accountants have this buried in their paperwork. If not, what he's doing is pretty unprofessional.
This is important! My accountant had this in the fine print of their engagement letter - that they "may file extensions as necessary" - which I never noticed until I had a similar issue. Worth checking your paperwork.
This is definitely not normal professional behavior. I've been doing my own taxes for years, but when I used an accountant, they always communicated major decisions like extensions beforehand. What really concerns me is that you've been owing significant amounts ($7,500 last year) and your accountant isn't helping you plan for this. A good tax professional should be proactive about estimated payments or adjusting withholdings to avoid these large year-end bills, especially when it's a recurring pattern. The communication issue is the biggest red flag though. Tax season is busy, but that doesn't excuse going radio silent or making unilateral decisions about your finances. You're paying for a service, and part of that service should be keeping you informed about what's happening with your return. I'd strongly recommend looking for a new accountant. When you interview potential replacements, ask specifically about their communication practices and how they handle extensions. A professional will have clear processes for both.
You're absolutely right about the proactive planning piece! That's what's been bothering me the most - we keep getting hit with these large bills year after year, and our accountant has never once suggested adjusting our withholdings or making quarterly payments. It feels like he's just reacting to problems instead of helping us avoid them in the first place. The communication thing is what really pushed me over the edge though. I shouldn't have to chase down my accountant to find out basic information about my own tax return. Thanks for confirming this isn't normal - it helps to know I'm not being unreasonable here.
Just a quick question - how different is the MICR number from your actual account number? Sometimes part of the MICR includes your account number, so there's a small chance it might work if your actual account number is contained within the MICR sequence.
This is actually an important point. The MICR line typically contains three parts: the routing number, account number, and check number, along with special symbols. If you only included the portion that has your account number (without the special symbols), it might still go through. It really depends on exactly what you entered.
That's a really good point! @NebulaNinja - you should double-check exactly what you entered. If you look at the bottom of one of your checks, the MICR line usually has your routing number first, then your account number, then the check number. They're separated by special symbols that look like this: ā ā ā If you accidentally copied the whole MICR line, your actual account number might be buried in there. Banks sometimes can still process deposits if the account number portion is readable, even with extra characters. It's worth checking your return to see exactly what numbers you put down - you might get lucky!
Don't beat yourself up too much about this - it's actually a pretty common mistake! I've seen several people in tax prep forums make similar errors with MICR numbers, routing numbers, and account numbers. The good news is that while it's frustrating, it's not going to cause any major problems beyond the delay. One thing to keep in mind is that when the IRS switches to sending a paper check, make sure your mailing address is current with them. If you've moved recently, you might want to file a Form 8822 (Change of Address) to ensure the check gets to you. The last thing you want is for the check to get lost in the mail on top of the direct deposit issue. Also, for future reference, most banks have their routing and account numbers clearly listed in online banking or on deposit slips, which tends to be more reliable than trying to read the MICR line. Live and learn!
Thanks for the reassurance! I actually did move about 6 months ago and completely forgot about updating my address with the IRS. I updated it with my bank and most other places, but totally spaced on the IRS. I'll definitely file that Form 8822 right away - the last thing I need is my refund check getting sent to my old apartment! Really appreciate everyone's advice here. It's frustrating to deal with my own mistake, but at least I know what to expect now and have some concrete steps to take. Going to check that MICR situation @Santiago mentioned too - maybe I'll get lucky and the account number portion will still work!
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if your sister didn't get an EIN (tax ID) for the trust, that's a bigger issue than the bank account. The trust is considered a separate taxpayer from both your sister and the original trustmakers (your parents). Without an EIN, how is she planning to file the trust tax return? And without a trust tax return, how will she generate legal K-1s? This might be why she's delayed getting you the K-1.
Not necessarily true. If it's a revocable living trust that became irrevocable upon death, it may have been using the SSN of the grantor while they were alive. After death, THEN they need to get an EIN. Many successor trustees don't realize this change is required.
@f014fc63b237 You're absolutely right about the EIN requirement after death. This is such a commonly missed step! The trust becomes a separate tax entity when the grantor dies, even if it was using their SSN before. @c0c1ffde3828 Harper, you should definitely ask your sister if she obtained an EIN for the trust after your mom passed. If she hasn't, she needs to apply for one using Form SS-4 before she can file the trust return or issue proper K-1s. This could explain the delay you're experiencing. The IRS is pretty strict about this - they won't accept a trust return filed under a deceased person's SSN. Without the proper EIN and trust return, any K-1s she gives you won't be legitimate for tax purposes.
I went through something very similar when my father passed and I was named successor trustee. The stress of not knowing if you're handling everything correctly is overwhelming, especially when you're already grieving. From my experience, your sister's approach creates unnecessary complications and potential liability issues. Even though it's not strictly illegal, mixing trust funds with personal accounts makes proper accounting much more difficult and could cause problems if the IRS ever audits the trust. Here's what I learned the hard way: Always get an EIN for the trust immediately after the grantor's death, open a separate trust checking account, and keep meticulous records of every transaction. When I sold my dad's house, I made sure the proceeds went directly into the trust account, then issued checks from that account to beneficiaries with clear documentation. The good news is that since you're the beneficiary, your main concern is getting that K-1 form so you can properly report your share on your personal return. The burden of proper trust administration falls on your sister as trustee. If she can't provide accurate documentation, that becomes her problem with the IRS, not yours. I'd strongly suggest having a gentle but firm conversation with your sister about getting professional help to clean this up properly. It's worth the cost to avoid potential headaches down the road.
@83f8e40db21f Thank you for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to hear from someone who went through a similar situation. The stress really is overwhelming when you're trying to do right by everyone while grieving. I think you're right about having that conversation with my sister. She's been defensive when I've brought up concerns, but maybe framing it as "let's get professional help to make sure we're protected" rather than "you did this wrong" might be more productive. One question - when you say the burden falls on the trustee if there are IRS issues, does that mean I'm completely in the clear as long as I report whatever she puts on my K-1? Or could I still face problems if her accounting was sloppy and the IRS questions the distributions later? I'm hoping to avoid any complications since this whole process has already been emotionally draining for our family.
Isabella Costa
Has anyone dealt with the GILTI tax in situations like this? If the Ghana LLC is treated as a foreign corporation rather than disregarded, wouldn't the US owner be subject to GILTI on earnings?
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
ā¢GILTI wouldn't apply if it's properly treated as a disregarded entity. GILTI only applies to foreign corporations, not DREs or FDEs. That's another reason why getting the classification right is so important!
0 coins
Jace Caspullo
This is a great discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a client who has a foreign LLC in Mexico. One thing I'd add is that even though the Ghana LLC will likely be treated as an FDE and flow through to Schedule C, don't forget about potential state tax implications. Some states have different rules for recognizing foreign entities, and you might need to file additional state forms or make state-level elections. Also, make sure to document your classification decision thoroughly in your workpapers. The IRS has been scrutinizing foreign entity classifications more closely lately, so having clear documentation of why you treated it as a disregarded entity (default classification, no Form 8832 election, single owner, etc.) will be crucial if you ever get questioned. Has anyone here dealt with retroactive compliance for missed Form 8858 filings? I'm wondering if the reasonable cause exception applies when the taxpayer wasn't aware of the filing requirement.
0 coins
Abby Marshall
ā¢Great point about state tax implications! I hadn't considered that angle. Regarding retroactive compliance for Form 8858, I've had some success with reasonable cause arguments when clients genuinely weren't aware of the requirement, especially for smaller foreign entities. The IRS seems more willing to consider reasonable cause if you can show the taxpayer properly reported the income on Schedule C but just missed the information return filing. Documentation is key - I always include a reasonable cause statement explaining that the taxpayer was unaware of Form 8858 requirements, had no intent to evade taxes, and properly reported all income. Having the income already on the returns definitely strengthens the case. The penalties for Form 8858 are substantial ($10,000 per form), so it's worth the effort to request abatement.
0 coins