IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

For golf influencers, I'd recommend establishing clear documentation standards from the start. Create a simple spreadsheet tracking each equipment purchase with columns for: purchase date, item description, cost, content where it was featured, and revenue attribution. The IRS looks favorably on taxpayers who can demonstrate a clear business purpose and profit motive. If your client is genuinely making income from this content and treating it as a business (not just a hobby), equipment purchases are much more defensible. One thing to watch out for: make sure they're not double-dipping by deducting equipment they later sell or give away. If they do equipment reviews and then sell the clubs, that sale price should be reported as income, and the original purchase becomes cost of goods sold rather than a business expense. Also consider depreciation for expensive items like club sets - depending on how long they plan to use them for content creation, it might be better to depreciate over several years rather than expense everything in year one.

0 coins

Sean Kelly

•

This is really comprehensive advice! The point about equipment sales is especially important - I've seen clients get tripped up on that. One question about the depreciation approach: for items that might only be used for a few videos before becoming obsolete (like when new club models come out), would it make more sense to expense immediately rather than depreciate? It seems like the useful business life for some golf equipment could be pretty short in the content creation world. Also, do you have any specific recommendations for revenue attribution? Some of my client's content generates income through multiple streams (ad revenue, sponsorships, affiliate links) and it can be tricky to tie specific equipment purchases to specific revenue amounts.

0 coins

Great question about depreciation vs. immediate expensing! For items with short useful lives in content creation, Section 179 or bonus depreciation might be your best bet - you can often expense the full amount in year one anyway. The key is documenting the business useful life expectation upfront. For revenue attribution, I'd suggest tracking at the content piece level rather than trying to tie individual equipment to specific dollars. Create a simple formula based on views/engagement for equipment-focused content vs. your client's average revenue per view. This gives you a reasonable basis for business use percentage without getting too granular. Also consider the "ordinary and necessary" test - if comparable golf influencers regularly purchase similar equipment for content, that strengthens the deduction argument regardless of the exact revenue attribution.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

One additional consideration I haven't seen mentioned yet - if your client does equipment reviews and receives free golf clubs/equipment from manufacturers for testing, they need to report the fair market value of those items as income. This actually strengthens the business expense argument for equipment they purchase themselves, since it demonstrates the review/testing activity is clearly income-generating. I'd also suggest having them maintain a content calendar that shows planned equipment purchases tied to upcoming video concepts. This proactive approach demonstrates business planning rather than just deducting personal golf expenses after the fact. For audit protection, consider having them sign a brief memo each time they purchase equipment outlining the intended business use. Something like "Purchased TaylorMade driver set for upcoming 'Best Drivers Under $500' video series, planned filming dates X-Y." Takes 30 seconds but creates contemporaneous documentation of business intent.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

This is excellent advice about the free equipment reporting - I hadn't thought about how that actually strengthens the case for purchased equipment deductions. The contemporaneous documentation idea is brilliant too. One quick follow-up question: when documenting business intent for equipment purchases, should clients also note if they plan to use items for personal recreation after the business use is complete? Or is it better to keep the documentation focused purely on the business purpose to avoid muddying the waters? Also, for the content calendar approach - do you recommend they update it retroactively if plans change, or just maintain it going forward and document any deviations separately?

0 coins

Sasha Ivanov

•

Has anyone here actually gotten audited specifically about S Corp health insurance treatment? I'm curious what the real-world risk is. I've been just paying health insurance personally and taking the self-employed health insurance deduction without running it through my S Corp payroll at all... which I'm now realizing might be incorrect after reading this thread.

0 coins

Liam Murphy

•

Yes, actually. My S Corp got audited in 2021, and health insurance handling was one of the specific issues they examined. The agent was particularly interested in whether we had properly included shareholder health premiums on W-2s and whether we had documentation for our health reimbursement plan. We had been doing it correctly (thankfully) but they indicated this is an area they look at closely because it's frequently done wrong. They specifically mentioned that taking the self-employed health insurance deduction without having the premiums flow through the S Corp and onto the W-2 is a red flag.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Thanks for sharing your audit experience - that's exactly the kind of real-world insight that's helpful! It sounds like the IRS is definitely paying attention to this area. For anyone in a similar situation to @Sasha Ivanov, you'll want to correct this for future years. The proper flow should be: S Corp pays or reimburses health insurance premiums → those amounts get added to your W-2 as wages (but not subject to FICA/FUTA) → you then take the self-employed health insurance deduction on your personal return. Just paying personally and taking the deduction skips the crucial W-2 reporting step that the IRS expects to see. It's one of those things that might fly under the radar for a while, but if you do get audited, it's an easy thing for them to catch since the deduction on your personal return won't match up with any corresponding W-2 wages. The good news is this is usually fixable by amending prior year returns if needed, though you'll want to consult with a tax professional about the best approach for your specific situation.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

This is really helpful clarification! I've been doing exactly what @Sasha Ivanov described - paying my health insurance personally and just taking the self-employed deduction. I had no idea about the W-2 reporting requirement for S Corp owners. Quick question: if I want to correct this going forward, do I need to amend my S Corp s'payroll for this year to add the health insurance amounts to my W-2? Or can I just start doing it correctly from next year? I m'worried about creating a mess with payroll adjustments mid-year, but I also don t'want to keep doing it wrong if the IRS is actively looking for this. Also, does this apply even if my S Corp never formally paid "the" premiums - like if I just want to reimburse myself for premiums I ve'already paid personally?

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

This is a complex situation that requires careful attention to both timing and documentation. Given that you operated for nearly 3 months before the LLC was legally formed, you'll definitely need to address the pre-formation period separately from your QSub election timing. For the Form 8869, March 25th (your LLC formation date) is indeed the earliest possible effective date you can request. Since the deadline for that would have been June 9th, you'll need to file for late election relief under Rev. Proc. 2013-30. The good news is that the IRS is generally reasonable about granting relief for first-time filers who can demonstrate reasonable cause. A few critical steps you should take: 1. Prepare a reasonable cause statement explaining why you missed the deadline - unfamiliarity with the requirement is typically acceptable 2. Mark your Form 8869 clearly with "FILED PURSUANT TO REV. PROC. 2013-30" 3. Create formal assignment documentation for those $15,000 in pre-formation transactions 4. Verify your LLC operating agreement doesn't create multiple membership classes (which would disqualify QSub status) The pre-formation activities will need to be properly transferred to the LLC through an assignment agreement, and you'll want to ensure proper basis tracking for when everything eventually consolidates at the S-Corp level. Consider having both your attorney and accountant review the documentation to avoid any issues down the road. Don't let the complexity discourage you - these situations are more common than you might think, and with proper documentation and filing, you should be able to get everything straightened out.

0 coins

This is really comprehensive advice! I'm curious about the assignment agreement you mentioned - should this be dated as of the LLC formation date (March 25th) or should it reflect when I'm actually creating the documentation now? Also, if I'm assigning contracts and customer relationships from that pre-formation period, do I need to notify those customers about the change in the contracting entity, or is the assignment documentation sufficient for tax purposes? I want to make sure I handle this correctly since some of those early transactions involved ongoing service agreements that are still active.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

The assignment agreement should be dated as of the LLC formation date (March 25th) to properly reflect when the transfer legally occurred, even though you're creating the documentation now. This backdating is appropriate because you're documenting a transfer that you intended to happen at formation. For ongoing service agreements, the assignment documentation is generally sufficient for tax purposes, but you should consider the legal implications. Many contracts have assignment clauses that require notice or consent from the other party. Even if not legally required, it's often good business practice to send a brief notice to customers explaining that the LLC has assumed the contract obligations. This helps avoid confusion and ensures customers know which entity to pay. You might want to include language in your assignment agreement stating something like "all rights and obligations under customer contracts are hereby assigned and assumed by the LLC effective as of the formation date." This creates a clear record for tax purposes while also establishing the LLC's legal standing to enforce those agreements going forward. Since these are active contracts, make sure your assignment documentation specifically identifies each significant agreement by customer name and service description. This level of detail will be helpful if the IRS has any questions about the business continuity between your personal activities and the LLC.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add a practical perspective from someone who went through a very similar situation last year. The advice about requesting late election relief is spot-on - don't try to work around it with a current effective date because that creates more complexity than it's worth. One thing I'd emphasize is to be very thorough with your documentation package when you submit Form 8869. Include copies of your LLC formation documents, your S-Corp documentation showing it owns 100% of the LLC, and a detailed timeline of events. The IRS processor reviewing your request will appreciate having everything in one place rather than having to ask for additional information. Also, when you're preparing that assignment agreement for the pre-formation activities, make sure it specifically addresses any equipment or assets you purchased during that January-March period. If you bought a computer, office supplies, or other business assets with personal funds during that time, those need to be properly transferred to the LLC with appropriate basis adjustments. The reasonable cause statement doesn't need to be elaborate - I used something simple like "Taxpayer was unaware of the QSub election filing requirement and deadline due to inexperience with entity taxation requirements" and it was accepted without issue. The key is being honest and straightforward rather than trying to craft some complex legal argument. Budget some time for this process - between preparing the documentation, getting everything reviewed, and potentially following up with the IRS, it took me about 2-3 months to get everything finalized. But it's definitely worth doing correctly rather than trying to shortcut it.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Just got my first paycheck last week and had the same panic seeing how much was taken out. Reading through this thread has been so reassuring - I thought I was the only one completely lost by all these deductions. Those abbreviations are absolutely terrible! Why can't they just say "Social Security" and "Medicare" instead of making us decode "OASDI/EE" and "MED/EE"? It's like they're trying to make it as confusing as possible. Based on everyone's advice here, I'm definitely going to check out that IRS withholding calculator this weekend. My federal withholding also seems way too high - I think I got scared during orientation and accidentally had them withhold extra money "just to be safe." Now I realize I'm basically giving the government a free loan when I could be using that money for rent, groceries, or actually starting to save! Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - it makes me feel so much better knowing that paycheck shock is totally normal and that there are actually tools to help us figure this stuff out. Why don't they teach any of this in school?!

0 coins

You're definitely not alone in feeling that paycheck shock! I remember staring at my first pay stub thinking there had to be some kind of error. It's honestly wild how they use these cryptic abbreviations that make everything seem so much more complicated than it needs to be. The IRS withholding calculator really is a game-changer - I wish someone had told me about it sooner! It sounds like a lot of us made the same mistake of being overly cautious with our W-4 forms and ended up having way too much withheld. At least now we know we can fix it and get that money back in our regular paychecks instead of waiting for a huge refund. You're so right about this stuff not being taught in school. We learn all kinds of theoretical things but somehow graduate without knowing how to understand our own paychecks or fill out basic tax forms. Thank goodness for threads like this where we can all figure it out together! Once you get your W-4 sorted out, you'll probably feel so much better about your take-home pay.

0 coins

I totally feel your pain! When I got my first real paycheck, I had the exact same reaction - I actually called my mom thinking there was some kind of mistake because nearly 30% was gone. Those abbreviations are seriously the worst - I spent like an hour googling "OASDI/EE" because I thought it was some weird company-specific deduction! Everyone's already given you amazing explanations about what those taxes actually are, but I wanted to add that your situation is super fixable. That $392 federal withholding on a $2300 gross definitely seems too high for someone at your income level. I made a similar mistake on my W-4 - I was so paranoid about owing money at tax time that I basically told them to withhold extra "just in case." The IRS withholding calculator that everyone keeps mentioning literally saved me about $200 per month once I figured out how to use it correctly. And don't worry about looking clueless when you talk to HR about updating your W-4 - they deal with this stuff constantly and are usually really helpful. The silver lining is that if you've been over-withholding, you'll get all that extra money back as a refund. But you're absolutely right to want to fix it so you can actually use that money for rent, groceries, and maybe even start building an emergency fund instead of giving the government a free loan!

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation this year - minimal income in Q1-Q3 and then a large retirement account rollover in Q4. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful, especially the clarification about Form 1040-ES vs Form 2210. One thing I'm still confused about though - when you have zero or minimal income in the early quarters, do you need to formally notify the IRS that you're not making payments for those quarters, or do you just... not pay anything? I keep worrying that not sending in any payment vouchers will somehow trigger a penalty, even though my calculations show I don't owe anything for those periods. Also, has anyone here dealt with the situation where your "lumpy" income pushes you into a higher tax bracket for the year, but only for that final quarter? I'm trying to figure out if the annualized method properly accounts for the progressive tax rates when most of your income hits in one quarter.

0 coins

You don't need to formally notify the IRS when you're not making payments for quarters where you owe nothing - you simply don't send anything in. The IRS doesn't expect payment vouchers when no payment is due based on your calculations. Regarding the progressive tax rates with lumpy income, the annualized method does handle this properly! It calculates your tax liability for each period based on your actual income timing, so if most of your income hits in Q4 and pushes you into higher brackets, the method accounts for that. The key is that it looks at your cumulative income through each quarter and applies the tax brackets accordingly, rather than assuming even distribution throughout the year. This is actually one of the main benefits of the annualized method - it prevents you from overpaying in early quarters when your income was low, and ensures you're paying the correct amount in the quarter when your income actually materialized. Your retirement rollover situation sounds very similar to the Roth conversion example from the original post.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar boat with uneven income this year. One additional consideration I wanted to mention for anyone dealing with retirement account conversions or rollovers - make sure you understand the timing rules for when the income is considered "received" for estimated tax purposes. For traditional IRA to Roth conversions, the taxable income is generally considered received on the date of the conversion, not when you originally contributed to the traditional IRA. This matters for the annualized method calculations because it determines which quarter the income gets allocated to. Also, if you're doing a series of smaller conversions throughout the year to manage your tax bracket (rather than one large conversion), you'll need to track each conversion date separately for your quarterly calculations. I learned this the hard way when I assumed I could just lump all my conversions into one quarter for simplicity. The documentation advice from Hugh Intensity is spot on too - keep records of every conversion date and amount. Your brokerage should provide statements showing the exact dates, but it's worth keeping your own spreadsheet as backup.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

This is such valuable information about conversion timing! I hadn't even thought about the "received" date being different from contribution dates. That actually explains some of the confusion I was having with my calculations. Your point about multiple smaller conversions is really important too. I was considering doing exactly that - spreading conversions across quarters to stay in lower brackets - but I hadn't realized each one would need to be tracked separately for the annualized method. That could actually make the calculations much more complex. Do you happen to know if there's a minimum conversion amount that makes sense from a paperwork/complexity standpoint? I was thinking about doing monthly small conversions, but if each one creates a separate tracking requirement, maybe quarterly larger conversions would be more manageable? Also, did your brokerage provide any guidance on optimal timing for tax purposes, or did you have to figure that out on your own?

0 coins

Prev1...166167168169170...5643Next