IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As someone who just went through a very similar situation, I can definitely relate to the initial panic! I had the exact same thing happen where my W2 showed a PEO (in my case, it was Trinet based in California) instead of my actual employer, even though I work remotely from Texas. What really helped me understand the situation was learning that PEOs are essentially co-employers for administrative purposes only. Your actual work location and state tax obligations don't change just because the PEO is in a different state. The key thing to focus on is boxes 15-17 on your W2 - as long as those show Indiana (which it sounds like they do based on your follow-up), you're only responsible for filing Indiana state taxes. I was worried about this for weeks until I finally filed my return with just Texas taxes despite the California PEO, and everything processed normally with no issues. The IRS and state tax agencies are very familiar with these PEO arrangements since they're becoming so common with remote work and smaller companies outsourcing HR functions. You should be completely fine filing only in Indiana as long as your state information in boxes 15-17 is correct!

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

Thanks for sharing your experience with Trinet! As someone who's completely new to dealing with PEOs, it's really comforting to hear from multiple people who've been through this exact situation. I was definitely in panic mode when I first saw Decision HR listed instead of my actual company name on the W2. Your explanation about PEOs being "co-employers for administrative purposes only" really helps clarify things. I keep going back to check boxes 15-17 on my W2 just to make sure I'm reading it correctly, but yes, Indiana is clearly listed there with the appropriate withholding amounts. It sounds like this is way more common than I initially thought, especially with remote work becoming so prevalent. I really appreciate everyone in this thread sharing their experiences - it's made me feel much more confident about just filing in Indiana and not worrying about Arizona at all!

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

I just want to echo what everyone else has said here - you're definitely not alone in this situation! As someone who works in payroll processing, I see PEO arrangements like this all the time, and they're becoming increasingly common especially for smaller companies and remote workers. The confusion is totally understandable when you first see an unfamiliar company name on your W2, but Decision HR is just handling the payroll and tax administration for your actual employer. Think of it like your employer hiring an accountant to do their books - the accountant handles the paperwork, but you still work for your original company. Since you've confirmed that Box 15 shows Indiana and Box 17 has your Indiana state withholding, you're all set to file only in Indiana. The fact that Decision HR is in Arizona is completely irrelevant to your tax obligations. I've processed thousands of these situations and have never seen anyone run into issues as long as the state information on the W2 is correct. Don't stress about it - just file your Indiana state return as you normally would. The IRS processes these PEO situations routinely and there's nothing unusual or problematic about your situation!

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Thank you so much for this professional perspective! As someone completely new to this situation, it's incredibly reassuring to hear from someone who actually works in payroll processing and sees these PEO arrangements regularly. Your analogy about the accountant handling the books really helps me understand the relationship - Decision HR is just the "accountant" handling payroll administration while I still actually work for my Indiana company. That makes so much sense now! I really appreciate you taking the time to explain this and confirm that there's nothing unusual about my situation. After reading everyone's experiences here, I feel much more confident about just filing my Indiana return normally. It's amazing how something that seemed so complicated and scary at first is actually pretty routine. Thanks again for the peace of mind!

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

This is a great question that many married couples struggle with! You're absolutely right to get clarification before making any mistakes. The short answer is that you can choose either approach - making one combined quarterly payment or separate payments for each spouse. Since you file jointly, the IRS treats your tax liability as one combined amount, so they don't care how the estimated payments are structured as long as the total covers what you owe. Given that you're already comfortable with handling quarterly estimates, I'd suggest sticking with one combined payment for simplicity. Just expand your current calculation to include your wife's gig income along with yours. Use the Form 1040-ES worksheet to determine the new quarterly amount that covers both of your self-employment incomes. One key advantage you have is that your wife's W-2 withholding will actually work in your favor here. That withholding applies to your joint tax liability, so it should reduce the total amount you need to pay through quarterly estimates. You might find that your quarterly payments don't increase as much as you initially expected. Don't forget to account for self-employment tax (15.3%) on both gig incomes when doing your calculations. And remember the quarterly deadlines remain the same: January 15, April 15, June 15, and September 15. Getting this sorted out now will save you headaches later - good thinking to plan ahead!

0 coins

Eli Butler

•

This comprehensive breakdown is super helpful! I'm actually facing a similar situation and was getting stressed about potentially messing up our tax obligations. Your point about the W-2 withholding reducing the quarterly payment burden is particularly reassuring - I hadn't thought about how that would factor into the joint liability calculation. One follow-up question: when you mention using the Form 1040-ES worksheet to calculate the new amount, should we base this on our projected annual income for both gig sources, or is there a way to adjust quarterly if one spouse's gig income varies significantly from quarter to quarter? My freelance work tends to be pretty inconsistent, so I'm wondering if we need to recalculate each quarter or if there's a safer approach to avoid underpayment issues. Thanks for laying this out so clearly - definitely taking your advice to get this figured out now rather than scrambling later!

0 coins

Great question about handling variable income! For inconsistent gig work, I'd recommend using the annualized income installment method, which lets you calculate each quarterly payment based on your actual income for that period rather than projecting the whole year upfront. You can use Form 2210 Schedule AI if your income varies significantly quarter to quarter. This method calculates each payment based on what you actually earned in that specific quarter, which can help avoid both underpayment penalties and overpaying when work is slow. Alternatively, you could use the safe harbor rule - pay 100% of last year's tax liability (or 110% if your prior year AGI was over $150,000) divided by 4 quarters. This gives you a predictable payment amount regardless of how much you actually earn, and you'll settle up any difference when you file your return. For your situation with inconsistent freelance work, I'd lean toward the safe harbor approach for simplicity, especially since your wife's W-2 withholding provides additional cushion. You can always make an additional payment in Q4 if you had a particularly good year and want to avoid a big balance due at filing time.

0 coins

Having been through this exact situation, I can confirm that making one combined payment is definitely the way to go for simplicity. My spouse and I both have gig income on top of our regular jobs, and we've been doing combined quarterly payments for the past two years without any issues. The key insight that saved us money was realizing that the withholding from our W-2 jobs significantly reduces the estimated tax burden. We were initially panicking about having to pay huge quarterly amounts, but it turned out our regular job withholdings covered a substantial portion of our joint tax liability. Here's what I'd recommend: Use the safe harbor rule for your first year doing this together - pay 100% of last year's total tax liability divided by 4 quarters (110% if your AGI was over $150k). This approach eliminates any guesswork about underpayment penalties while you get comfortable with the new arrangement. For making the actual payments, EFTPS.gov is great for electronic payments, or you can mail in Form 1040-ES vouchers. Just make sure whoever's name is on the payment matches your primary taxpayer on your joint return. One last tip: keep good records of both your quarterly payments and your individual gig income throughout the year. Even though you're making combined payments, you'll still need to report each spouse's self-employment income separately on Schedule C when you file.

0 coins

Kara Yoshida

•

This is really solid advice, especially the point about using the safe harbor rule for the first year. That takes so much stress out of trying to perfectly estimate what we'll owe! I hadn't considered that approach but it makes total sense to eliminate the guesswork while we're still figuring out this new dynamic. Your tip about keeping separate records for each spouse's gig income is something I definitely need to remember. Even though we'll be making combined payments, I can see how we'd still need those individual breakdowns come tax time for the Schedule C forms. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this - it's reassuring to hear from someone who's actually navigated this successfully rather than just theoretical advice!

0 coins

Ethan Brown

•

Just to add a data point - I've been in this exact situation (work in Nevada, live in Arizona) for 3 years. I use FreeTaxUSA and it handles it perfectly. You're right that Nevada has no state income tax so you only need to file an Arizona return, but you do need to report all your income to Arizona since you're a resident. One thing nobody mentioned yet - if you spend a lot on gas for that commute, keep track of those expenses! While you can't deduct commuting expenses generally, if your employer reimburses you for any business travel (separate from commuting), that could be tax-relevant.

0 coins

Caleb Stark

•

Great thread! I'm actually a tax preparer and wanted to clarify a few things I'm seeing in the responses. You're absolutely correct that Nevada has no state income tax, so ignore any "withholding" you think you're seeing for Nevada state taxes - that's likely something else on your paystub. Since you're an Arizona resident, you'll file a full Arizona resident return reporting ALL your income, including what you earned in Nevada. Arizona taxes you on worldwide income as a resident. A few practical tips: 1) Consider asking your employer to withhold additional federal taxes that you can apply toward your Arizona state tax liability, 2) You might want to make estimated quarterly payments to Arizona to avoid underpayment penalties, and 3) Keep excellent records of your work location if you ever work from home in Arizona - those days create Arizona-sourced income. The standard tax software like TurboTax, H&R Block, or FreeTaxUSA can absolutely handle this situation. You don't need a professional unless you have other complicating factors. This is actually one of the simpler multi-state scenarios since Nevada has no income tax!

0 coins

StormChaser

•

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! As someone who's been stressing about this for weeks, it's reassuring to hear from an actual tax preparer. Quick follow-up question - when you mention asking my employer to withhold additional federal taxes to apply toward Arizona state tax liability, how exactly does that work? Do I just increase my federal withholding on my W-4 and then use that overpayment as a credit when I file my Arizona return? Also, for the estimated quarterly payments to Arizona, is there a minimum threshold where this becomes necessary, or should I start doing this regardless of how much I might owe?

0 coins

This is such a common issue that causes unnecessary panic every tax season! I had the exact same problem with TurboTax last year - the summary screen showed $0.00 for my HSA contributions even though I had contributed the full amount. What I learned after digging into it is that TurboTax's summary screens are notoriously unreliable for showing the actual tax impact of various deductions. The software often displays $0.00 when it's already accounted for the benefit elsewhere in your return, or when there are display bugs in the interface. The key is to ignore those summary screens entirely and focus on the actual tax forms. Go straight to Form 8889 in the Forms section - that's where your HSA contributions are officially reported to the IRS. Then check Schedule 1, line 25 to see if your HSA deduction is properly reflected there. If those numbers look right, you're good to go regardless of what the summary screen says. I've found that TurboTax's interview process works fine for gathering information, but their summary and "tax breaks" displays are often misleading or incomplete. Always verify the actual forms before filing!

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

This is exactly the reassurance I needed! I've been stressing about this for days thinking I was missing out on thousands in tax savings. Your explanation about focusing on the actual forms instead of the summary screens makes perfect sense. I just checked Form 8889 and Schedule 1 like you suggested, and sure enough, my $7300 HSA contribution is properly reflected on line 25. The summary screen bug is definitely misleading - thanks for helping me understand that this is a known TurboTax issue and not a problem with my actual tax filing!

0 coins

Savannah Vin

•

I'm dealing with something similar right now! Just wanted to add that if you're still seeing weird display issues after checking the actual forms, try refreshing your TurboTax session or even logging out and back in. Sometimes the summary screens get stuck showing old data even after you've made corrections. I had a situation where I fixed the double-entry issue that others mentioned (where I'd entered HSA contributions in both the W-2 section and separately), but the tax breaks screen kept showing $0.00 for hours afterward. A simple logout/login fixed the display issue and suddenly showed the correct tax benefit amount. Also worth noting - if you're filing jointly and your spouse also has HSA contributions, make sure you're not accidentally combining them in the wrong sections. TurboTax sometimes gets confused when there are multiple HSA accounts in a household. Each person's contributions need to be entered separately even on a joint return.

0 coins

I'm new to this community but dealing with the exact same situation! I'm 64 and just filed for Social Security last month, with a 457b from my county job that I need to start tapping into soon. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly educational - I had no idea about the timing strategy for the year you reach full retirement age, or that Roth vs traditional 457b doesn't matter for the earnings test. The systematic withdrawal plan idea sounds perfect for my situation too. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen addressed - if you're married and your spouse is also receiving Social Security, do their 457b distributions affect YOUR benefits at all? Or is the earnings test calculated completely individually? My husband is 66 and already at full retirement age, but he's considering starting withdrawals from his 457b plan too. I want to make sure his decisions don't accidentally impact my benefit calculations while I'm still under the earnings limit. Thanks to everyone who's shared their real experiences here. It's so much more helpful than the generic information you find on government websites!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Great question about spousal impacts - the earnings test is calculated completely individually for each person's Social Security benefits. Your husband's 457b distributions won't affect your earnings test calculation at all, and vice versa. Since he's already at full retirement age, he's not subject to the earnings test anymore anyway, so he can withdraw as much as he wants from his 457b without any Social Security penalties. This is one of the few areas where being married actually simplifies things for Social Security purposes! Each spouse's benefits are calculated based solely on their own earnings and income. Just make sure you're both considering the tax implications of coordinating your withdrawals - while his 457b distributions won't affect your SS benefits, they will still count toward your household's overall tax situation and could potentially affect things like Medicare premiums down the road. It sounds like you've got a good handle on the planning aspects after reading through this thread. The systematic withdrawal approach really is a game-changer for staying organized with all these moving pieces!

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

I'm 65 and went through this same situation last year - yes, 457b distributions definitely count as income for the Social Security earnings test when you're taking benefits before full retirement age. What really helped me was calling my 457b administrator to ask about setting up quarterly distributions instead of annual lump sums. This way I could better control my timing and stay under the $21,840 limit (for 2025). One thing that surprised me was learning that the month you receive the distribution matters, not when you request it. So if you submit a withdrawal request in December but the check doesn't arrive until January, it counts toward the next year's earnings limit. This timing detail saved me from accidentally going over the limit in my first year of collecting Social Security. Also, keep really good records of exactly when each distribution hits your bank account. The Social Security Administration will eventually cross-check this with your tax returns, so having documentation helps avoid any confusion about which year the income should be counted in. I use a simple calendar to mark distribution dates and running totals throughout the year.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

This is such a helpful detail about the timing - I never would have thought about when the check actually arrives versus when you request it! I'm just starting to plan my 457b withdrawals for next year and this could definitely impact my strategy. Do you know if this same timing rule applies to direct deposits, or is it different than physical checks? I'm hoping to set up electronic transfers to make everything more predictable, but now I'm wondering if there could still be timing delays that might push distributions into the wrong tax year. Also, the quarterly distribution approach sounds much more manageable than trying to calculate everything annually. Did you find that spreading it out like that helped you stay well under the earnings limit, or were you still cutting it pretty close by the end of the year?

0 coins

Prev1...16621663166416651666...5644Next