IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Does anyone know if TaxSlayer handles 1042-S? Their website says they do, but when I tried to enter mine last year, the software kept crashing. Ended up having to use H&R Block which was way more expensive.

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

TaxSlayer technically "supports" 1042-S but does it poorly. It has space to enter the info but doesn't guide you through it correctly if you have status changes mid-year. H&R Block and TurboTax handle it better, but even they sometimes struggle with splitting the year between nonresident and resident status.

0 coins

I went through almost the exact same situation last year! F-1 to green card mid-year with a surprise 1042-S from my university. Here's what I learned: The 1042-S is likely for scholarship money that exceeded your tuition costs or for stipend payments made while you were still on F-1 status. Even though you're now a permanent resident, the university had to report those payments under the rules that applied when they were made. Since you got your green card in September 2025, you'll need to file as a "dual-status" taxpayer for 2025. This means you were a nonresident for part of the year and a resident for the rest. You'll still file Form 1040 (not 1040-NR), but you'll need to attach a statement showing your income for each period. The income on your 1042-S should NOT be duplicated on your W-2 - they report different types of payments. Double-check the dates and amounts to be sure. For software, I had the best luck with TurboTax Premier (the version that handles foreign income). FreeTaxUSA unfortunately doesn't handle these situations well. You might also need to file Form 8833 if you're claiming treaty benefits for the nonresident portion of the year. Definitely contact your university's payroll or international student office - they can explain exactly what triggered the 1042-S and confirm the timeline of payments.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The "dual-status" concept makes so much sense now. I didn't realize I'd need to split the year like that. Do you remember if TurboTax Premier walked you through the dual-status filing automatically, or did you have to manually calculate which income belonged to which period? Also, did you end up needing Form 8833? I'm trying to figure out if the treaty benefits would even apply since I was already filing as a resident last year.

0 coins

Quick tip - don't forget to separate out the land value! I made this mistake my first year with a rental property and had my depreciation rejected. You can only depreciate the building, not the land. Most tax assessor records break this out. Also, keep in mind that gifted property has different holding period rules for capital gains when you eventually sell. The holding period includes the time your dad owned it too!

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

I thought rental properties were depreciated over 27.5 years regardless of the actual building's age? My accountant took the purchase price minus the tax assessed land value and divided by 27.5. Is that wrong?

0 coins

Zoey Bianchi

•

You're absolutely right about the 27.5 year depreciation period for residential rental property - that's correct! What Yuki was emphasizing is that you need to make sure you're only depreciating the building portion, not the land. So your accountant's method of taking the total basis minus the land value and then dividing by 27.5 is exactly the right approach. The key point is that land never depreciates (since it doesn't wear out), so it has to be separated from the depreciable building value. Most people use the same ratio that the tax assessor uses - if the assessor says the land is 20% of the total value and the building is 80%, you'd apply that same ratio to your cost basis.

0 coins

This is a really complex situation, but you're asking the right questions! Based on what you've described, it sounds like you have a mixed gift/inheritance scenario which does complicate the basis calculation. One thing I'd suggest is checking if your dad filed Form 709 (gift tax return) when he added you to the deed in 2016. Even if no gift tax was owed (due to the annual exclusion or lifetime exemption), he may have filed one anyway. If he did, that form would show the fair market value of the property at the time of the gift, which would be incredibly helpful for your basis calculation. If you can't find a Form 709, using the 2016 tax assessment as a starting point isn't unreasonable, but as others mentioned, you might want to adjust it upward since assessments are typically below market value. You could research what similar properties in your neighborhood sold for in 2016 to get a sense of whether the assessment was in the right ballpark. Also, don't forget to account for any improvements your dad made to the property after his original purchase - those would increase his basis, which would then carry over to you for the gifted portion. The depreciation calculation can definitely be overwhelming, but taking it step by step and documenting your reasoning will serve you well if you're ever questioned about it later.

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

This is really helpful advice, especially about checking for Form 709! I never would have thought to look for that. Quick question though - if my dad didn't file a gift tax return, does that create any issues for me now? I'm worried that maybe he was supposed to file one and didn't, and that could somehow come back to bite me during my depreciation calculations or if I get audited later. Also, when you mention adjusting the tax assessment upward, is there a standard percentage that's typically used, or do I really need to do the research on comparable sales? I'm trying to balance being accurate with not spending weeks on this!

0 coins

The statute of limitations for the IRS to recover erroneous refunds is generally 2 years from the date the refund was issued, but there are some important exceptions to be aware of. If the IRS can show the refund was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, there's no statute of limitations - they can come back indefinitely. However, in your case where it appears to be an IRS processing error rather than anything you did wrong, the 2-year rule would likely apply. That said, the clock starts ticking from when the refund check was issued, not when you cash it. So even if you hold onto the money, the IRS still has that full 2-year window to realize their mistake and demand repayment. One thing to keep in mind - if this refund is related to your 2022 amendments that involved K-1s, the IRS might still be processing corrections from the partnership level that could affect your individual return. Partnership audits and corrections can take years to work through the system, and any adjustments could potentially impact this refund. I'd definitely recommend getting that account transcript and reviewing your amendment paperwork carefully. With complex K-1 situations, it's not uncommon for estimated payments to get misapplied or double-counted during the amendment process.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

This is really helpful information about the statute of limitations! I'm curious though - if the IRS does come back within that 2-year window saying it was an error, do you have any recourse to dispute it? Like what if you can show you made good faith efforts to verify the refund was legitimate before spending it? Also, you mentioned partnership audits can take years - that's kind of scary since my K-1 situation was already so complicated. Is there a way to find out if the partnership that issued your K-1s is currently under audit? That seems like something that would be good to know given how it could affect this refund.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I went through something very similar! Got an unexpected $8,400 refund in 2023 that I couldn't figure out. Turns out it was related to a quarterly payment my CPA had made on my behalf using a different bank account than usual, so I had completely forgotten about it. The key thing that helped me was getting my wage and income transcript (not just the account transcript) - it showed ALL third-party payments made to the IRS on my behalf, including ones made by my tax preparer. You can request this using Form 4506-T or get it online if you can access your IRS account. In my case, the payment had been sitting in a "suspense account" for almost 18 months because the IRS couldn't properly match it to my return due to a small error in how my SSN was entered. Once they figured it out, they issued the refund with interest. I'd definitely echo what others said about not spending the money right away. Even if it's legitimate, the IRS can be slow to process corrections if there are any issues. I kept mine in a high-yield savings account for 6 months before I felt comfortable that it wasn't going to be clawed back. One more tip - if you worked with a tax professional in 2022, check with them first. They might have records of payments you've forgotten about, especially if you were dealing with multiple K-1 corrections and amendments.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

This is super helpful - I didn't know about the wage and income transcript vs the regular account transcript! That could definitely explain what happened since I did use a tax preparer for all those amendments. The "suspense account" thing you mentioned sounds exactly like what might have happened to me. With all the back-and-forth amendments and K-1 corrections, there were so many different payments and adjustments that I honestly lost track of everything. I'm going to request both transcripts and also reach out to my CPA to see what records they have. The idea that a payment could sit in limbo for 18+ months before being processed is both reassuring (that it might be legitimate) and terrifying (that the IRS systems can be that slow and error-prone). Thanks for the tip about the high-yield savings account too - at least if I have to hold onto this money for months, it can earn some interest while I wait!

0 coins

I'm new to this community but have been following this thread closely since I'm in almost the exact same situation! Reading everyone's experiences has been incredibly helpful. I just want to add that if you're still hesitant about certified mail, I called my local post office yesterday and they confirmed that certified mail with return receipt is definitely the safest option for important financial documents. The postal worker told me they see a lot of tax-related certified mail during this season for exactly this reason. One thing I learned that might help others - if you go to the post office counter instead of dropping it in a mailbox, they can also provide you with a receipt showing the exact time and date it was processed, which gives you even more documentation. For a $4,000 payment, that extra layer of proof seems worth it. Thanks to everyone who shared their stories - it's really helped me feel more confident about this whole process!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Your post is really helpful - I hadn't thought about asking the post office for that detailed receipt showing the exact processing time. That's brilliant additional documentation to have. It's great to see someone else in the same boat as the original poster. This whole thread has been so educational for those of us new to mailing tax payments. The collective wisdom here has definitely convinced me that certified mail is the way to go. Thanks for taking the time to call your post office and share what you learned - that kind of real-world research really helps the rest of us make informed decisions!

0 coins

As a newcomer here, I just wanted to say thank you to everyone for this incredibly thorough discussion! I'm in a very similar situation - first time owing taxes and feeling pretty anxious about the whole process. Reading through all these experiences and advice has been so reassuring. I was initially planning to just use regular mail, but after seeing all the stories about delayed or lost payments, I'm definitely convinced that certified mail is the smart choice. The point about it being like insurance really resonates with me - spending $7-8 now to avoid potentially much larger penalties and stress later is a no-brainer. I especially appreciate all the specific tips about writing the SSN and tax year in the memo line, taking photos for documentation, and going to the post office counter for that immediate postmark. You've all made what seemed like a scary process feel much more manageable. Time to head to the post office with my Form 1040-V and get this sent certified mail!

0 coins

I'm dealing with this exact same frustrating situation at my local Citibank branch! I've been a resident alien since 2016 under the substantial presence test, and despite bringing my tax returns showing I've consistently filed as a resident alien, they keep insisting I need to complete the W8-BEN form. What's particularly maddening is that when I showed the branch manager the W8-BEN instructions that explicitly state "DO NOT use this form if you are a U.S. person (including a resident alien individual)," she just said their training manual overrides what the IRS form says. That makes absolutely no sense - how can a bank's internal policy override federal tax law? Reading through all these experiences has been incredibly eye-opening. I had no idea this was such a widespread problem with banks confusing immigration status and tax residency status. The strategies everyone has shared are really helpful - especially the approach of asking them to document their policy in writing. I'm definitely going to try calling Citibank's main customer service line to reach their tax compliance department before my next branch visit. It sounds like the corporate-level specialists actually understand these W8-BEN vs W9 distinctions much better than branch staff. Thanks to everyone for sharing your solutions and experiences. It's reassuring to know there are proven ways to resolve this issue without having to sign incorrect tax forms or switch banks entirely!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

I completely understand your frustration with Citibank! The idea that their "training manual overrides what the IRS form says" is absolutely ridiculous - federal tax law doesn't bow to internal bank policies. That kind of response shows exactly how undertrained their branch staff are on basic tax residency rules. Based on all the successful strategies shared in this thread, I'd definitely recommend the escalation approach. Call Citibank's main customer service line and ask specifically for their "Tax Compliance Department" or "BSA/AML Compliance" team. These corporate specialists seem to understand the W8-BEN vs W9 distinction much better than branch-level employees. Before making that call though, try the "put it in writing" strategy first. Ask that branch manager to provide written documentation stating that Citibank's policy requires resident aliens under the substantial presence test to complete W8-BEN forms despite contradicting IRS guidelines. When they realize they'd be documenting a policy that violates federal tax regulations, they'll probably escalate internally rather than put that liability in writing. Don't give up - you're absolutely correct about which form to use, and Citibank definitely has people who understand this once you reach the right department. The key is getting past the undertrained branch staff to specialists who actually know tax law!

0 coins

I'm currently experiencing this exact same issue with my local Navy Federal Credit Union! Been a resident alien since 2020 through the substantial presence test, but their staff keeps insisting I need the W8-BEN form despite me showing them my 2023 tax return where I clearly filed as a resident alien. What's been most helpful from reading everyone's experiences is realizing this is a systematic training problem across multiple financial institutions. Bank staff consistently confuse immigration status with tax residency status, not understanding that you can be a resident alien for tax purposes without having a green card. I'm going to implement the comprehensive strategy that's worked for others here: (1) asking them to document their policy in writing first - brilliant approach since no bank wants to be on record requiring potentially false federal tax certifications, (2) escalating to their tax compliance department if needed, and (3) bringing a complete documentation package including my tax returns, highlighted W8-BEN instructions showing the "DO NOT use" language, and IRS Publication 519. The key insight from this thread is being persistent but professional, and not being afraid to escalate when branch staff don't have the expertise to handle tax residency questions. Thanks to everyone for sharing their solutions - this should definitely be a pinned resource for anyone dealing with banks that don't understand basic tax law!

0 coins

Prev1...16621663166416651666...5643Next