IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lim Wong

•

Make sure you're setting aside money for taxes on your moonlighting income! This sounds obvious coming from a CPA but you'd be surprised how many tax professionals get this wrong. You'll likely need to make quarterly estimated payments unless you adjust your W-4 withholding at your day job. Also, track your time meticulously for billing and to justify deductions. I use toggl.com for easy time tracking between different clients.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

Been moonlighting for 2 years now and totally agree on the tax planning. Actually got hit with an underpayment penalty my first year cause I didn't make estimated payments. Rookie mistake from someone who should know better lol!

0 coins

Great question and congrats on the new baby! I started moonlighting about 2 years ago in a similar situation - corporate accounting role with a growing family needing extra income. A few things I learned the hard way: First, absolutely get your own E&O insurance before taking on any clients. Even if you think you're just doing "simple" returns, mistakes happen and the liability exposure is real. Second, be strategic about your client mix - I found that focusing on W-2 employees with maybe some investment income gives you predictable scope and timing. One thing that really helped me was being upfront with my day job employer early on. I scheduled a brief meeting with my manager and explained I was looking to do some part-time tax prep work that wouldn't compete with our business or interfere with my responsibilities. They appreciated the transparency and it actually opened up some conversations about potential advancement opportunities. The key is positioning it as professional development rather than just needing money. Frame it as staying current with individual tax law and building client service skills. Most employers understand that CPAs often do some side work, especially tax prep. Start small - maybe 3-5 clients your first year to see how you handle the workload during busy season. You can always scale up once you get a feel for the time commitment.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

This is really helpful advice, especially about framing it as professional development rather than just needing extra money. I hadn't thought about that approach but it makes so much sense from a career perspective. How did you handle the conversation with your manager? Did you give them specific details about what kind of tax work you planned to do, or did you keep it more general? I'm trying to figure out the right balance between being transparent and not over-sharing details they might not need to know. Also, when you say "start small with 3-5 clients," how did you find those first clients? I'm wondering if starting with friends/family is a good idea or if that creates more complications than it's worth.

0 coins

question - if I estimate now using FreeTaxUSA 2023 software and create an account, can I just log back in when I have my actual W-2 and 1099 forms and file from there? or would I need to start over?

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

You should be able to log back in and update the information without starting over. FreeTaxUSA saves your work, so when you receive your actual tax documents, you can simply replace the estimated numbers with the final figures. I recommend creating a separate account just for planning if you want to play around with different scenarios. That way your actual filing account stays clean with only your real data when you're ready to file.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Thanks for the heads up about the early release! I've been using FreeTaxUSA for the past few years and really appreciate being able to do tax planning before the rush. One tip I'd add - if you're estimating now, make sure to save different scenarios. I usually create versions with conservative estimates and then more optimistic projections to see the range of what I might owe or get back. Also worth noting that if you have any major life changes planned (marriage, new job, etc.), you can model those too to see how they'd impact your taxes. Really helps with financial planning for the year ahead.

0 coins

That's a great strategy about creating different scenarios! I'm new to using tax software for planning ahead like this. When you say "save different scenarios" - do you literally create multiple accounts, or is there a way within FreeTaxUSA to save different versions of your return? I'd love to model what happens if I max out my IRA contribution vs. not contributing at all, but I don't want to accidentally mess up my main estimate.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

Just wanted to add one more important detail that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you're actually qualifying as a "trader" rather than an "investor" before making the 475(f) election. The IRS has specific criteria for this, including trading frequency, holding periods, and whether trading is your primary business activity. If you don't meet the trader status requirements, the election won't be valid and you could face issues down the road. The basic test is whether you're engaged in trading as a trade or business, not just for investment purposes. Things like having substantial trading activity, short holding periods, and deriving income from daily market movements rather than long-term appreciation all support trader status. I'd recommend documenting your trading activity thoroughly to support your qualification if the IRS ever questions it.

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

This is such a crucial point that I wish I had known earlier! I made the 475(f) election last year without fully understanding the trader vs investor distinction, and it caused me some headaches during my tax prep. The IRS really does scrutinize this - they want to see that you're genuinely conducting a trade or business, not just frequently buying and selling investments. One thing I learned is that keeping detailed records of your trading plan, time spent on trading activities, and market research is really important. The IRS looks at factors like whether you have an office space dedicated to trading, how much time you spend on trading versus other activities, and whether you're trying to profit from short-term price movements rather than long-term growth. Thanks for bringing this up - it's definitely something everyone considering the election should research thoroughly before filing!

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been through this process, I wanted to add a few practical tips that helped me. First, when you create your election statement, make sure to keep multiple copies - one for your records, one with your tax return, and a backup. I actually sent mine via certified mail just to have proof of delivery, even though I was filing electronically. Also, once you make the 475(f) election, remember it's generally irrevocable without IRS consent. This means you'll need to use mark-to-market accounting for all future years unless you get permission to change. Make sure you're really committed to being a full-time trader because switching back requires filing Form 3115 and getting IRS approval. One last thing - start keeping meticulous records right away. With MTM accounting, you'll need to mark all your positions to market value at year-end, which means tracking the fair market value of every security you hold on December 31st. This becomes much easier if you start organizing your record-keeping system early in the year rather than scrambling at tax time.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially about the irrevocable nature of the election! I had no idea it was so permanent. Quick question - when you mention marking positions to market value at year-end, does this apply to all securities or just the ones you're actively trading? I have some long-term holdings that I don't really consider part of my trading business, but I'm not sure if the election covers everything or if there's a way to separate them. Also, did you run into any issues with your tax software handling the MTM accounting, or did you end up needing to work with a tax professional? I'm trying to figure out if this is something I can manage on my own or if I should budget for professional help.

0 coins

As someone who recently went through this exact same confusion with my CPA, I can confirm what everyone else is saying - your accountant is definitely wrong about the quarterly requirement. I ended up calling the SSA directly (after a very long hold) and spoke with a representative who explained that Social Security credits have been calculated annually since 1978. What's frustrating is how many tax professionals seem to have this outdated information. In my case, I had been artificially spreading out my consulting payments across quarters for two years because my CPA insisted it was necessary for Social Security credits. Turns out I was just making my cash flow more complicated for no reason! The SSA rep I spoke with was actually quite familiar with this misconception and mentioned they get calls about it regularly. She recommended always referring to the current year's "How You Earn Credits" publication directly from SSA rather than relying on secondhand information, even from tax professionals. Your example of earning $6,560 in December would absolutely give you all 4 credits for the year. The SSA computer systems look at your total annual earnings reported on your tax return - they don't care about the timing of when you received those payments.

0 coins

Jacob Lee

•

This is such a relief to read! I'm in a similar situation where my tax preparer has been telling me the same thing about quarterly requirements. It's honestly mind-boggling that this misconception is so widespread in the tax preparation industry. I'm curious - when you called the SSA directly, did they mention anything about where this confusion might be coming from? It seems like there's a systematic issue if multiple tax professionals are giving out the same incorrect information. I'm wondering if there's some continuing education material or professional guidance that's been spreading this misinformation, or if it's just older practitioners who learned the pre-1978 rules and never updated their knowledge. Either way, I'm definitely going to print out that SSA publication and have a frank discussion with my tax preparer. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's helpful to know I'm not the only one dealing with this!

0 coins

I'm a retired SSA claims representative with 30+ years of experience, and I can definitively confirm that your accountant is incorrect. Social Security credits have been calculated on annual earnings since 1978 - there is absolutely no quarterly requirement. The confusion likely stems from the fact that we still use the term "quarters of coverage" in some official documentation, which is a holdover from the pre-1978 system. Back then, you literally had to earn a minimum amount in each calendar quarter to get credit for that quarter. But that system was abolished decades ago specifically because it was unfair to people with irregular income patterns. Under the current system, you could earn your entire year's income in a single day and still receive all 4 credits, as long as you meet the annual threshold ($6,920 for 2024). The SSA's computer systems calculate credits based solely on the annual earnings amounts reported on your W-2s and 1099s. I've seen countless cases where tax preparers confused this with quarterly estimated tax payments or simply never updated their knowledge from the old system. Your accountant needs to review the current SSA guidelines immediately, as this type of misinformation can seriously impact clients' financial planning and business decisions.

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

This is incredibly valuable insight from someone with actual SSA experience! It's really eye-opening to learn that the terminology "quarters of coverage" is still used in official documentation even though the calculation method changed completely in 1978. That definitely explains why there's so much confusion - if even official SSA documents still reference "quarters," it's no wonder tax professionals might misinterpret how the system actually works. Your point about people potentially earning their entire year's income in a single day and still getting all 4 credits really drives home how the current system is designed to be fair for all types of income patterns. This makes me feel much more confident about pushing back on my accountant's advice and not unnecessarily restructuring my payment schedule. Thank you for taking the time to share your expertise - having confirmation from someone who actually worked within the SSA system for three decades is exactly what this conversation needed!

0 coins

Ethan Davis

•

Has anyone actually calculated the break-even point where a Blocker corp makes sense for a leveraged real estate investment in an IRA? I'm looking at buying a $400k rental property with about 40% down from my IRA funds.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

Based on your numbers, you'd have about $240k in debt financing (60% of $400k). Assuming typical rental returns of 6-8% annually on the property value, you'd generate around $24k-32k in income, and roughly 60% of that would be debt-financed income potentially subject to UBIT - so about $14.4k-19.2k. With current UBIT rates, you'd pay roughly $3k-4k in taxes. Corporate formation and maintenance costs vary, but typically run $1.5k-2.5k annually when you factor everything in. So you're potentially saving $1.5k-2.5k per year with a Blocker - definitely in the range where it makes sense.

0 coins

Great breakdown of the real estate calculation! For crypto investments in self-directed IRAs, the UBIT analysis is quite different. Most passive crypto holding doesn't generate UBTI, but if you're using leverage (like margin trading or DeFi borrowing), you could trigger UDFI similar to real estate debt financing. The key difference is that crypto trading activities might also create UBTI if they're considered a "trade or business" rather than passive investment. Frequent trading, mining operations, or yield farming could all potentially qualify as business activities subject to UBIT. For leveraged crypto positions, you'd calculate the debt-financed portion similarly to real estate - if you're borrowing 50% to purchase crypto that generates yield (staking rewards, lending income, etc.), that portion could be subject to UBIT. However, since crypto is more volatile and the income streams are different, the math can be trickier to predict than rental property cash flows. A Blocker corp might make sense for substantial leveraged crypto operations, but for most individual investors doing occasional leveraged trades, the compliance costs would likely outweigh the benefits.

0 coins

Prev1...16201621162216231624...5643Next