IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sara Unger

•

Another important thing about lottery timing - if you take the annuity option (payments over 30 years), you'll pay taxes on each payment as you receive it. This can sometimes be better than taking the lump sum because: 1) You might stay in lower tax brackets across multiple years 2) You protect yourself from spending it all at once 3) The total payout is actually significantly higher

0 coins

But with inflation, isn't getting all the money upfront better? Plus you could invest the lump sum and potentially make more than the annuity would pay out.

0 coins

Great question! I've been wondering about this too. One thing I'd add is that you should definitely consider making quarterly estimated tax payments once you claim, especially for large winnings. The IRS expects payment throughout the year, not just at filing time. If you win big and don't make estimated payments, you could face underpayment penalties even if you pay the full amount when you file your return. The standard withholding might not be enough to cover your actual tax liability, especially if the winnings push you into higher brackets. Also, don't forget about the "kiddie tax" if you're planning to gift any winnings to children - there are special rules that might apply. Definitely worth consulting a tax professional for the big wins!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice about quarterly payments! I had no idea about the underpayment penalties - that could be a nasty surprise. Quick question: how do you even calculate what your quarterly payments should be when you don't know your exact tax liability yet? Is there a safe harbor rule or percentage you can use to avoid penalties while you're figuring out the final numbers?

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

As someone who's been working in household employment for several years, I want to emphasize how crucial it is to get this right from the beginning. The confusion around payment apps is so common - I can't tell you how many nannies I've met who assumed Zelle/Venmo automatically meant contractor status. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of understanding state-specific requirements too. Some states have additional household employment rules beyond federal requirements. For example, if you're in New York, there are specific wage and hour laws that apply to domestic workers that might not exist in other states. Also, I'd recommend documenting not just your payments and work arrangement, but also any training or professional development the family requires or provides. If they're asking you to take CPR classes, follow specific childcare philosophies, or use particular apps for communication, that's additional evidence of the employer-employee relationship. The success stories in this thread are so encouraging! It really shows that most families want to do the right thing once they understand the requirements. Don't let fear of an awkward conversation lead to years of potential tax complications. The temporary discomfort of having "the talk" is so much better than dealing with IRS issues down the road. For anyone still on the fence about addressing their classification - think of it as professional development. Learning to navigate these conversations confidently will serve you well throughout your career in childcare.

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely invaluable for so many of us dealing with nanny tax confusion! I wanted to add a perspective from someone who's been on both sides - I used to work as a nanny and now I'm a parent employing one. When I was the nanny getting paid through Cash App, I had no idea about proper classification and just filed everything as contractor income. Looking back, I was clearly an employee based on all the factors discussed here - set schedule, family-provided supplies, specific instructions, etc. I got lucky and never had issues, but I realize now how risky that was. Now as an employer, when we hired our nanny, I made sure to research household employment laws thoroughly. We set up proper payroll from day one, got our EIN, and use a payroll service. Yes, it costs a bit more than just sending app payments, but the peace of mind is worth every penny. Plus we get to claim the dependent care credit, which offsets a lot of the additional costs. For families reading this who might be resistant to "complicating" things with proper payroll - trust me, it's not that complicated and it protects everyone involved. The horror stories about IRS audits and back taxes are real. Do yourselves and your nanny a favor and get it set up correctly from the start. For nannies - don't be afraid to advocate for proper classification. Most families genuinely don't know the rules and will appreciate you helping them stay compliant once they understand the benefits and risks.

0 coins

@d8db5f45b2f4 Your dual perspective is incredibly helpful! As someone currently navigating this exact situation, it's so reassuring to hear from a parent who actually made the effort to set things up correctly from the start. I'm particularly interested in your comment about the dependent care credit offsetting costs. When you calculated whether proper payroll was "worth it," did you factor in just the credit or were there other financial benefits that made the numbers work? I'm trying to build a compelling case for the family I work with, and having concrete examples of how this can actually save them money would be incredibly helpful. Also, I love your point about this being about protecting everyone involved. I think that framing really takes the confrontational aspect out of these conversations. Instead of "you're doing something wrong," it becomes "let's make sure we're both covered properly." One practical question - when you were hiring your nanny, did you proactively bring up the household employment requirements, or did they raise the topic? I'm wondering if more families would be open to proper classification if it was presented as standard practice rather than something unusual or complicated. Thanks for sharing your experience from both sides - it really helps normalize doing things the right way!

0 coins

@d8db5f45b2f4 This dual perspective is incredibly valuable! As someone who's been stressing about having "the conversation" with my family, your experience from the employer side really helps me understand how to frame this properly. I'm especially interested in your point about the dependent care credit making the numbers work. When families realize they could actually save money while staying compliant, it completely changes the dynamic from "this person is asking me to spend more" to "this person is helping me maximize my tax benefits." Your comment about it not being that complicated once you actually do it is so reassuring. I think a lot of families (and nannies!) get intimidated by the unknown, but hearing from someone who went through the setup process and found it manageable gives me confidence that this conversation doesn't have to be as scary as I'm imagining. One question - when you were setting up payroll as a new employer, did you find that leading with the compliance/protection angle or the potential savings angle was more effective? I want to approach my family in whatever way is most likely to get them on board with doing things properly. Thanks for sharing both perspectives - it really helps to hear that proper household employment practices benefit everyone involved, not just the worker pushing for compliance!

0 coins

The key thing missing from this whole conversation is the home office deduction. If u have a qualifying home office, then u can deduct miles from home to work sites because ur traveling from one business location to another. Without a qualifying home office, ur always "commuting" to the first location. So before worrying about vehicle deduction, make sure u have a legitimate home office (used regularly and exclusively for business). My accountant verified this saved me like $3800 last year on my taxes.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

This is the correct answer! I do handyman work and was able to deduct all my miles between jobs once I properly set up a dedicated home office space that I use only for business (scheduling, invoicing, etc).

0 coins

Exactly! The home office is the game changer for self-employed people. Just remember the "exclusive use" test - that room or space can't be used for anything else. You can't claim your dining room table as a home office if you also eat there. The IRS is pretty strict about this.

0 coins

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been self-employed for 5 years, I want to emphasize something that really helped me understand this: think of it as WHERE your business day starts, not what kind of vehicle you have. If you work from home (with a qualifying home office), your business day starts at home - so driving to clients/jobs is business travel. If you rent office space or have a shop, your business day starts there - so driving TO that location is commuting, but driving FROM there to other business locations is deductible. The "100% business vehicle" thing is a red herring - it just means you use that vehicle only for business purposes (never personal trips). It doesn't magically turn commuting miles into business miles. The IRS cares about the PURPOSE of the trip, not the vehicle. One more tip: if you're borderline on whether your home office qualifies, it's worth consulting a tax professional. The deduction potential is huge, but the IRS requirements are specific and strictly enforced.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

This is such a helpful way to think about it! I've been overthinking the vehicle designation part when really it's all about where my business operations actually begin. I think I need to get serious about setting up a proper home office since most of my work involves traveling to different client locations anyway. Do you know if there's a minimum amount of space required for the home office, or is it more about the exclusive use requirement?

0 coins

Instead of waiting for the letter, you might want to try scheduling an appointment at your local Taxpayer Assistance Center. I did this when my verification letter never showed up. You'll need to call 844-545-5640 to schedule the appointment, but once you're there, they can verify your identity in person. Bring multiple forms of ID (passport, driver's license, social security card) and copies of your tax returns for the current and previous year. This resolved my issue in one visit without having to wait for mail delivery.

0 coins

I'm dealing with something similar right now - my verification letter was supposedly sent on February 20th and still haven't received it. Reading through everyone's experiences here, it sounds like calling is definitely the way to go at this point rather than continuing to wait. One thing I'm curious about - for those who successfully got through to the IRS by phone, were you able to complete the entire verification process over the phone, or did they still require you to wait for a replacement letter? I'm trying to decide between calling the verification line directly or going the in-person route at a Taxpayer Assistance Center like Sean mentioned. My business return is also on hold, so I really need to get this resolved ASAP. Also, has anyone had success with the online verification option that Isabella mentioned? I checked the link but wasn't sure if my specific letter type qualifies for online verification.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I was in the exact same boat as Chris - finding conflicting information everywhere about home sale deductions. After reading through all these responses, I finally understand that the confusion comes from articles using "deductible" loosely when they really mean "reduces taxable gain through basis adjustment." It's frustrating that so many sources don't make this critical distinction clear. For anyone else struggling with this: the key takeaway is that if your home sale profit is under the exclusion amount ($250K single/$500K married), your selling costs won't provide any tax benefit at all. They would only matter if you exceeded those thresholds. The exclusion itself is already a huge tax break, so we can't double-dip by also deducting the selling expenses separately. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and clarified the actual tax mechanics. This is definitely one of those areas where the IRS could make their guidance much clearer for regular homeowners!

0 coins

This is such a great summary of the whole discussion! I'm new to homeownership and planning to sell in a few years, so this thread has been eye-opening. I had no idea there was such a big difference between "deductible expenses" and "basis adjustments" - those terms get thrown around interchangeably in so many articles online. The example Lucas provided earlier really drove it home for me. It's wild that you can spend tens of thousands in selling costs but get zero tax benefit if you're under the exclusion threshold. Makes me appreciate how generous that $250K/$500K exclusion really is though! I'm definitely bookmarking this thread for when I eventually sell. Thanks everyone for breaking down such a confusing topic in plain English!

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

This has been such a valuable discussion! As someone who just went through a home sale last month, I can confirm everything that's been said here. I spent weeks trying to figure out where to put my $15,000 in realtor commissions and closing costs on my tax forms, only to discover they don't go anywhere as separate deductions. What really helped me was keeping detailed records of everything anyway. Even though my gain was well under the exclusion limit, having all the documentation organized made me feel more confident about my tax situation. Plus, if tax laws ever change or if I have a future sale that does exceed the exclusion, I'll have everything I need. One thing I wish someone had told me earlier: don't stress about "losing" those selling costs to taxes. The capital gains exclusion is already saving most homeowners thousands or tens of thousands in taxes. When I calculated what I would have owed without the exclusion, it made those realtor fees seem much less painful! For anyone still confused about this topic, I'd recommend talking to a tax professional if your situation is at all complex. The peace of mind is worth the consultation fee, especially when you're dealing with your biggest financial asset.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

This is exactly the kind of real-world perspective I was hoping to find! I'm actually in the middle of preparing to sell my home right now, and reading about your experience with the $15,000 in costs really puts things in perspective. Your point about keeping detailed records even when they don't provide immediate tax benefits is really smart. I hadn't thought about potential future law changes or having multiple property sales over time where the documentation could become relevant. The way you framed the capital gains exclusion as already being a huge tax savings really helps shift my mindset. I was getting so focused on "losing" the deduction for selling costs that I wasn't appreciating how much the exclusion itself is saving me. When you put it that way, paying those realtor fees without getting a tax deduction feels a lot more reasonable! Thanks for sharing your recent experience - it's reassuring to hear from someone who just navigated this process successfully.

0 coins

Prev1...14111412141314141415...5644Next