IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Kaylee Cook

β€’

I went through this exact situation a few years ago and learned some hard lessons. The most important thing is to be conservative and realistic with your valuations. I made the mistake of being too aggressive with my estimates and got a letter from the IRS asking for documentation. Here's what I wish I had known: Keep it simple and reasonable. For clothes, use $2-5 per item for basic stuff, maybe $8-12 for nicer pieces in good condition. For household items, think about what you'd actually pay for them at a thrift store, not what you paid originally. Furniture can vary widely but be conservative. $3,500 isn't automatically a red flag, but make sure you can back it up with at least a general list of categories and quantities. I now keep a simple log throughout the year - just "10 shirts, 5 pairs pants, 1 coffee table, etc." Takes 2 minutes but saves headaches later. Also remember what others mentioned about the standard deduction - make sure itemizing actually benefits you before going through all this effort!

0 coins

Cass Green

β€’

This is really helpful advice, especially the part about getting a letter from the IRS! That sounds terrifying. Can I ask what kind of documentation they were looking for when they questioned your donations? Like did you need photos, receipts for every single item, or just a more detailed list? I'm worried I might have already been too aggressive with some of my past years' estimates and now I'm paranoid they might come after me too.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

β€’

@Cass Green - When I got the IRS letter, they weren t'looking for receipts for every individual item, which was a relief! They mainly wanted me to provide a reasonable breakdown of what I had donated and how I arrived at the values I claimed. What I ended up submitting was: 1 A) reconstructed list of major item categories with approximate quantities like (15 "men s'dress shirts, 8 pairs of jeans, 2 leather jackets, 1 dining table set, etc. ,")2 The) actual donation receipts from the organizations, and 3 A) copy of the valuation guide I used to estimate fair market values. The key was showing I had made a good faith effort to be reasonable rather than just pulling numbers out of thin air. They accepted my documentation and that was the end of it. Don t'panic about past years - as long as your estimates were in the ballpark of reasonable, you re'probably fine. The IRS generally goes after people who are obviously inflating values, not those making honest estimation errors.

0 coins

Khalid Howes

β€’

One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that you can actually deduct charitable donations even if you don't itemize, but only up to $300 ($600 if married filing jointly) for cash donations. This is called the "above-the-line" deduction and it's separate from itemizing. However, this only applies to cash donations, not goods like clothing and household items. For donated goods, you do need to itemize to get any benefit, which means your total itemized deductions need to exceed the standard deduction. Given that you mentioned donating physical items rather than cash, you'd need to itemize to claim these donations. Just make sure your total itemizable deductions (including state taxes, mortgage interest, medical expenses over 7.5% of AGI, AND your charitable donations) add up to more than the standard deduction ($14,600 for single filers in 2025) before spending too much time on valuation.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

β€’

This is really good clarification about the above-the-line deduction! I had no idea there was a separate rule for cash donations vs. goods. That makes the whole itemizing decision even more important to figure out before going through all this valuation work. Quick question - when you say "state taxes" as part of itemized deductions, is there a limit on how much state and local taxes you can deduct? I seem to remember something about a cap but can't recall the details. If there's a limit, that might affect whether it's worth itemizing for a lot of people.

0 coins

Hassan Khoury

β€’

Has anyone used TurboTax to calculate capital gains taxes? I'm trying to figure out if it accurately handles the step-up in brackets when you have a mix of ordinary income and capital gains.

0 coins

I use TurboTax every year and it does a decent job with capital gains. It walks you through entering all your income first, then your investment sales, and calculates the appropriate tax based on which bracket your gains fall into. It's actually pretty good about showing you which portion of your capital gains falls into each tax bracket (0%, 15%, 20%). There's even a feature that lets you play around with different scenarios to see how selling different amounts would affect your tax situation.

0 coins

Val Rossi

β€’

One thing that often gets overlooked when planning capital gains harvesting is timing throughout the year. I learned this the hard way when I sold a bunch of stock in December thinking I was staying in the 0% bracket, only to realize my year-end bonus pushed me over the threshold. The key is to track your running total of taxable income throughout the year, especially if you have variable income like bonuses, freelance work, or other irregular sources. I now use a simple spreadsheet to monitor where I stand relative to the capital gains brackets before making any major stock sales. Also worth noting - if you're married, make sure you're coordinating with your spouse's income too. We almost made a costly mistake one year when my wife got an unexpected promotion mid-year that changed our joint filing status calculations.

0 coins

Aisha Jackson

β€’

This is such great advice about timing! I made a similar mistake last year by not accounting for my quarterly estimated tax payments properly. I thought I was safely in the 0% bracket but forgot that my freelance income was higher than expected in Q4. Do you have any recommendations for tracking tools or spreadsheet templates? I've been trying to build something myself but I'm worried I'm missing important income categories that should be included in the running total. Especially things like retirement account distributions or rental income that might not be as obvious. Also wondering - when you mention coordinating with your spouse, do you both track this separately and then combine, or do you have a joint system? We're newlyweds and still figuring out how to handle our taxes together.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

β€’

I went through something very similar with my S-corp last year - had a massive negative adjustment that made me panic. Turns out it was due to inconsistent tracking of shareholder loans and distributions over multiple years. The key thing I learned is that this adjustment is essentially the IRS form trying to force your balance sheet to balance when there are discrepancies between your books and tax reporting. In my case, we had been treating some owner draws as distributions when they should have been recorded as loan repayments, which created a snowball effect over time. My advice: Don't just ask your CPA to explain it - ask them to show you a detailed reconciliation of every component that makes up that -$1,015,382. They should be able to break it down line by line. If they can't or won't do that, it might be time to find a new CPA who specializes in S-corp taxation. Also, this is a good reminder to track your shareholder basis carefully going forward. That large negative adjustment could potentially impact your basis calculation, which affects how much you can take in distributions without tax consequences.

0 coins

Ava Rodriguez

β€’

This is really helpful context! I'm curious - when you had your CPA do that detailed reconciliation, did you find that it was something that could be corrected retroactively, or did you just have to live with the adjustment and fix the tracking going forward? Also, how did you handle the shareholder basis issue? Did you have to recalculate your basis from the beginning of the S-corp election, or was there a simpler way to get back on track?

0 coins

Great question! In my case, we were able to make some retroactive corrections by filing amended returns for the previous two years, but it was expensive and time-consuming. The IRS allows you to correct certain errors through amendments, especially if they involve misclassification of transactions rather than omitted income. For the shareholder basis issue, we did have to go back to the beginning of the S-corp election and recalculate everything year by year. It was tedious but necessary - we created a spreadsheet tracking my initial basis (stock purchase + loans to company), then added/subtracted income, losses, and distributions for each year. This helped us identify exactly where the tracking went off the rails. The good news is that once we cleaned it up, my current basis was actually higher than I thought, which meant I could take more distributions without immediate tax consequences. Just make sure your CPA documents everything properly for future reference - the IRS can ask for basis substantiation at any time.

0 coins

Emma Davis

β€’

I've been through this exact scenario with my S-corp and that negative adjustment definitely warrants attention. In my experience, these large adjustments usually stem from one of three main issues: (1) distributions that weren't properly tracked as reducing shareholder basis, (2) inconsistent depreciation methods between book and tax records, or (3) shareholder loans that weren't correctly classified. The good news is this adjustment itself won't directly impact your current year tax liability since S-corp income flows through to your personal return via K-1. However, it could significantly affect your shareholder basis calculation, which is crucial for future distributions and loss deductions. I'd strongly recommend requesting a detailed breakdown from your CPA showing exactly what transactions or discrepancies are creating that -$1,015,382 figure. A competent CPA should be able to provide a line-by-line reconciliation. If they can't explain it clearly, that's a red flag about either their S-corp expertise or the quality of your underlying bookkeeping. Also, consider having them prepare a comprehensive shareholder basis schedule going back to when you elected S-corp status. This will help ensure you're properly tracking your basis for future tax planning and distribution decisions.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of thorough breakdown I needed to hear! Your point about the three main causes really resonates - I suspect our issue might be related to shareholder loans since we've had some back-and-forth lending between me and the company over the past two years. When you say "shareholder basis schedule," is this something most CPAs should know how to prepare, or do I need to specifically find someone who specializes in S-corp taxation? My current CPA seems knowledgeable but I'm starting to wonder if they have enough S-corp experience given how vague their initial explanation was about this adjustment. Also, did you find that cleaning up the basis tracking helped reduce these types of adjustments in subsequent years, or do they tend to be an ongoing issue once they start appearing?

0 coins

Jordan Walker

β€’

I've been dealing with bond accrued interest issues for years, and the key thing to remember is that this is essentially a timing difference that corrects itself. When you bought the bond in November 2024 and paid $125 in accrued interest, you were compensating the seller for interest that had built up during their ownership period. Think of it this way: that $750 payment you'll receive in March 2025 includes interest for the entire quarter, including the period before you owned the bond. By subtracting the $125 on your 2025 Schedule B, you're only claiming the interest income for the period you actually owned the bond. The IRS wants to see this matching occur in the same tax year because it provides a clearer picture of your actual economic income from the investment. If you deducted the $125 in 2024 but didn't report any offsetting interest income until 2025, it would distort your income across both years. Make sure to keep your purchase confirmation showing the accrued interest breakdown - you'll need this documentation when preparing your 2025 return.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

β€’

This is exactly the kind of clear explanation I needed! The way you broke down the economic reality behind the accounting treatment really helps me understand why the timing works this way. I was getting confused thinking about it as just a mechanical rule, but when you explain it as only claiming income for the period I actually owned the bond, it makes perfect sense. Thanks for emphasizing the documentation aspect too - I'll definitely keep that purchase confirmation handy for next year's filing.

0 coins

Nia Harris

β€’

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I had a similar situation with municipal bonds last year and made the mistake of deducting the accrued interest in the wrong tax year. The IRS sent me a notice asking for clarification, which led to months of correspondence. What I learned from that experience is that keeping detailed records is absolutely crucial. Beyond just the purchase confirmation, I now also keep a spreadsheet tracking each bond's purchase date, accrued interest paid, and expected interest payment dates. This helps me remember which adjustments to make when preparing returns the following year. For anyone dealing with multiple bond purchases throughout the year, consider setting up a simple tracking system. It's much easier to organize this information as you go rather than trying to reconstruct everything at tax time. The matching principle makes perfect sense once you understand it, but it's easy to forget the details when you're preparing returns months later.

0 coins

Zane Gray

β€’

Great advice about the spreadsheet tracking system! I'm just starting to build a bond portfolio and this thread has been a real eye-opener about the complexity of tax reporting. Your point about organizing information as you go is spot on - I can already see how easy it would be to lose track of these details by tax season. One question: when you track the "expected interest payment dates" in your spreadsheet, do you also note which tax year each payment will fall into? I'm thinking this could help flag situations where purchases near year-end might create these cross-year reporting scenarios like the original poster described.

0 coins

Lauren Wood

β€’

I've been dealing with similar volatility ETF K-1 complexity and wanted to share something that really helped streamline the process for me. Like others mentioned, the IRA vs taxable account distinction is crucial - your UVXY trades in the IRA don't need personal tax reporting, but those SVIX K-1s from your taxable account do need to be included even with all zeros. One thing I discovered that made a huge difference: I started using a simple tracking system where I immediately sort any K-1s by account type when they arrive. IRA K-1s go in one pile (for records only), taxable account K-1s go in another (for tax prep). This saved me so much confusion during tax season. Also, regarding the late timing issue others mentioned - I now proactively contact the partnerships in early March if I haven't received forms yet. Most have investor relations pages where you can check K-1 status or get estimated delivery dates. This helps me decide whether to file an extension or wait a bit longer. For anyone considering future volatility trades, the suggestion about keeping everything in IRAs really is worth considering. I moved all my volatility positions to my Roth IRA last year and the administrative simplification has been amazing. No more multi-state filing headaches, no more scanning through detailed K-1 schedules looking for tiny deductions - just clean, simple trading with no tax paperwork at the individual level. The learning curve on these partnership forms is definitely steep, but once you establish a good system for handling them, it becomes much more manageable!

0 coins

StarStrider

β€’

I've been through this exact same situation with volatility ETF K-1s and can confirm what others have said - the distinction between IRA and taxable accounts is key to handling these correctly. For your UVXY day trade in the IRA, you're absolutely right to question this. Those K-1s don't belong on your personal tax return since the IRA custodian handles all the partnership reporting internally. You can safely set those aside. For your SVIX shares in the taxable account, even with all zeros showing, you do need to include those K-1s on your return. The IRS computer matching system flags missing partnership forms regardless of amounts, and it's better to report them than risk getting a notice later. One thing I learned from experience - even when the K-1 summary shows all zeros, it's worth scanning through the detailed schedules. I once found a small Section 199A deduction buried in the middle pages that I would have missed otherwise. The timing can be frustrating too - these volatility ETF K-1s often don't arrive until mid-March or later, which can delay your filing if you're trying to get taxes done early. If you continue trading these products, you might want to plan for requesting an extension if forms are still missing by April 15th. For future reference, consider consolidating any volatility trades into your IRA if possible. Since these products rarely generate meaningful taxable distributions anyway, you'd get the same economic exposure without the annual K-1 paperwork headache.

0 coins

Prev1...13101311131213131314...5644Next