IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone tried the TaxAct import feature on FreeTaxUSA? I started my return on TaxAct but want to switch to FreeTaxUSA to save money. Will that help with this issue or just create more problems?

0 coins

JaylinCharles

•

I did this last year! The import feature works okay but isn't perfect. It got about 80% of my info transferred correctly, but I still had to go through and check everything. Some of my itemized deductions didn't come over properly. Honestly, if you're already part way through your return on TaxAct, it might be easier to just finish it there unless you're really trying to save on filing fees.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience! That's really helpful. I'm only about halfway through on TaxAct, so maybe it is worth switching to save the $40+ difference in filing fees. I'll give the import a try and just carefully review everything.

0 coins

Nalani Liu

•

I had the exact same issue with FreeTaxUSA last year! After spending way too much time looking for a delete button that doesn't exist, here's what I learned: The easiest approach is actually Option 2 that Riya mentioned - just go through your existing return section by section and fix what needs fixing. FreeTaxUSA's interface makes this pretty straightforward since you can jump between sections easily. If you're really concerned about accuracy, here's what I did: I printed out a summary of my first attempt, then went through each section systematically with my tax documents in hand. This way I could spot-check everything without losing the work I'd already done correctly. The review section at the end is really thorough too - it caught a couple small errors I missed during my manual review. Unless you made major structural mistakes (like filing status or number of dependents), you probably don't need to start completely over.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

This is really solid advice! I'm new to FreeTaxUSA and was getting overwhelmed thinking I'd have to redo everything from scratch. The idea of printing out a summary first is brilliant - gives you a roadmap to follow while double-checking each section. Quick question though - when you say "major structural mistakes," what exactly counts as that? I'm worried I might have selected the wrong filing status initially (chose single but I think I should be head of household). Is that the kind of thing where starting over would actually be worth it?

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

As someone who went through this exact situation two years ago, I want to add a few practical tips that really helped me maximize my deductions: **Document everything NOW while it's fresh** - Create a dedicated folder (physical and digital) for all home-related tax documents. Include your purchase agreement, closing disclosure, deed, first mortgage statement, property tax bills, and receipts for any improvements. You'll thank yourself later! **Don't overlook these lesser-known deductions:** - If you refinance later, any unused points from your original mortgage can be deducted in the year you refinance - Home security system installation (if you haven't already) - the sales tax on this counts toward your sales tax deduction - Any emergency repairs needed right after purchase might qualify as deductions vs. improvements **Itemizing vs. Standard Deduction tip:** With your mortgage interest starting mid-year plus property taxes, you're likely right on the borderline of whether itemizing makes sense. Run the numbers both ways, but don't forget to include charitable donations, state taxes, and other itemizable expenses in your calculation. **State-specific consideration:** Check if your state offers any homestead exemptions or first-year property tax reductions. Many states have programs specifically for new homeowners that can provide ongoing savings. The good news is that as a new homeowner, you're in the sweet spot where itemizing typically becomes beneficial for the first time. Just stay organized and you'll be in great shape come tax season!

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

This is such great practical advice! I wish I'd had this level of organization when I bought my first home. The point about creating both physical and digital folders is spot-on - I learned the hard way that relying on just one or the other can be risky. One thing I'd add to your excellent list: if you had to get any permits for immediate repairs or safety updates after closing (like electrical work or plumbing fixes), keep those permit documents too. While the repairs themselves might not be deductible, having proper permits can be important for establishing that the work was legitimate if questions ever arise. Also, regarding the homestead exemption you mentioned - definitely worth checking on this! In my area, I had to actively apply for it within the first year of ownership. It wasn't automatic, and the property tax savings have been substantial. Some counties have deadlines as early as January 1st following your purchase year, so don't wait too long to look into it. The organization tip really can't be overstated. Tax season is stressful enough without having to hunt down documents from months ago. Starting that system now while everything is still accessible will save so much hassle later!

0 coins

Jessica Nolan

•

Welcome to homeownership! As a newcomer here, I wanted to share something that helped me tremendously when I was in your exact situation last year. Beyond all the great advice already given about mortgage interest and property tax deductions, I'd suggest getting familiar with IRS Publication 530 (Tax Information for Homeowners) - it's surprisingly readable and covers scenarios specific to first-time buyers. One thing that caught me off guard: if you paid any loan origination fees or "discount points" at closing, these are often immediately deductible in your first year, unlike refinance points which must be spread out. Check your HUD-1 or Closing Disclosure for these - they might be labeled differently but can add up to significant deductions. Also, since you bought in April, you'll want to be extra careful about the property tax timing. You can deduct property taxes for the period you actually owned the home (April-December), plus any amount you reimbursed the seller for taxes they had prepaid for "your" portion of the year. Your closing documents should show this clearly. The mortgage interest deduction alone will likely make itemizing worthwhile, especially in your first few years when interest makes up the largest portion of your payments. Just remember to save that Form 1098 your lender will send in January - it makes filing so much easier! Congrats again on the new home, and don't hesitate to ask if you have specific questions about any of the documentation!

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Thank you for mentioning IRS Publication 530! As someone who's still navigating all this homeowner tax stuff, having an official IRS resource that's actually readable is incredibly helpful. I've been trying to piece together information from various sources, but having it all in one comprehensive publication sounds much more reliable. Your point about loan origination fees is particularly valuable - I'm definitely going to go back through my closing disclosure to look for those. The terminology on those documents can be so confusing, and it sounds like there might be deductions hiding under different names that I could easily miss. The property tax timing explanation is really clear too. I was getting confused about what exactly I could deduct for my first partial year of ownership, but the way you explained it makes sense - basically anything I paid that covers MY period of ownership, whether paid directly to the county or reimbursed to the seller at closing. Quick question: when you mention checking the HUD-1 vs Closing Disclosure - are those the same document, or should I be looking for both? We got so many papers at closing that I want to make sure I'm looking at the right ones for these potential deductions. Thanks for the warm welcome and the practical advice! This community has been incredibly helpful for understanding all these nuances.

0 coins

I actually went through this exact situation about 8 months ago and can share my experience. I had unreported unemployment benefits of around $8,200 from 2022 that I completely spaced on including in my return. Like many others have mentioned, I was torn between waiting for the inevitable CP2000 notice or being proactive with an amended return. After reading horror stories online about penalties and interest piling up, I decided to file Form 1040-X as soon as I discovered the error. The process was honestly much less scary than I built it up to be in my head. I calculated that I owed about $1,800 in additional federal tax, estimated around $200 in interest, and sent it all in with my amended return along with a letter explaining the oversight. About 2 months later, the IRS sent me an acknowledgment letter confirming they received my amended return and were processing it. They actually calculated my interest at slightly less than what I had estimated and sent me a small refund check for the overpayment. Most importantly - no penalties were assessed because I had corrected the error voluntarily. My state (California) also required an amended return since they tax unemployment benefits too. That was an additional $400 or so in state tax, but again, no penalties since I filed proactively. The relief of having it resolved properly was absolutely worth the temporary financial hit. Don't wait for them to catch it - file that 1040-X and get it behind you!

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the whole process! I'm in a similar boat with about $6,800 in unreported unemployment from 2023, and your experience gives me confidence that filing the amended return is definitely the right call. I'm curious about the timeline for your state amendment - did California process that as quickly as the federal return, or did it take longer? Also, when you calculated the interest you owed, did you use any specific tool or formula, or did you just estimate based on the months that had passed since your original filing deadline? The fact that both the IRS and your state waived penalties for voluntary correction is exactly what I was hoping to hear. I think I'm going to get my 1040-X ready this weekend and get it in the mail. Thanks for sharing such a detailed account of how it all played out!

0 coins

I've been dealing with a similar situation and wanted to share what I learned from speaking with a tax professional. The key thing to understand is that the IRS has automated systems that match third-party documents (like your 1099-G) against what you reported on your return. So yes, they will almost certainly discover this discrepancy eventually. The good news is that unreported unemployment income is incredibly common and the IRS deals with it routinely. It's not considered fraudulent - just an oversight that needs to be corrected. From what I've seen in this thread and my own research, you have two realistic options: 1. Wait for the CP2000 notice (could take 6-18 months) and pay the calculated tax, interest, and likely a 20% accuracy-related penalty 2. File Form 1040-X now to voluntarily correct the error, pay the additional tax plus interest, and likely avoid penalties altogether The math is pretty straightforward - that $6,800 will be taxed at your marginal rate. If you're in the 22% bracket, expect around $1,500 in additional federal tax, plus whatever your state charges if they tax unemployment. I'd strongly recommend going the amended return route. The penalties alone make waiting expensive, and the peace of mind is worth it. Plus, every person who's shared their experience here about filing proactively had a positive outcome with the IRS.

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive breakdown I needed to see! Your point about the automated matching systems really puts it in perspective - it's not a matter of IF they'll catch it, but WHEN. The cost comparison between waiting vs. filing proactively is pretty compelling too. Even if I'm in a lower tax bracket, that 20% penalty on top of accumulating interest makes waiting financially foolish. I've been going back and forth on this for weeks, but reading everyone's experiences here has convinced me that filing the 1040-X is clearly the smart move. One quick question - when you mentioned speaking with a tax professional, did they give you any guidance on how to calculate the interest portion? I want to make sure I send in enough to cover everything upfront like some of the other folks did successfully. Thanks for laying out the options so clearly. I think it's time to stop overthinking this and just get the amended return filed!

0 coins

Paolo Marino

•

I've been through a similar situation with a major plumbing repair on one of my rental properties, and I want to emphasize something that hasn't been fully addressed yet - the timing aspect of when you make this decision. You mentioned this just happened, so you're in a good position to gather all the right documentation now while everything is fresh. Beyond what others have mentioned about invoice wording, I'd also recommend getting a written statement from your plumber explaining why complete replacement was the only viable option (rather than a simple patch job). This helps establish that the extensive work was necessary for restoration, not an elective upgrade. Another consideration - if you're on the fence about the classification, remember that taking the repair deduction now gives you the immediate tax benefit, while capitalizing it spreads that benefit over nearly three decades. Given that most rental property owners are looking to optimize their current year tax situation, and the facts strongly support repair treatment in your case, I'd lean toward expensing it fully this year. Just make sure you're comfortable defending the position if questioned. The documentation suggestions from others in this thread (photos, detailed invoices, evidence of the failure) will serve you well. With a $12K expense, it's definitely worth getting right.

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

This is really excellent advice about the timing and documentation aspects! I'm actually dealing with a similar water line issue right now (though thankfully only about $4K), and your point about getting a written statement from the plumber explaining why replacement was necessary is brilliant. I hadn't thought about asking for that level of detail, but it makes perfect sense - having the contractor explicitly state that patching wasn't viable due to the extent of the damage really strengthens the case that this was restoration work rather than an elective improvement. Your comment about optimizing current year tax situation versus spreading benefits over decades really puts the decision in perspective too. Given the clear restoration nature of the work described in the original post, it seems like the repair classification is well-supported both factually and strategically. Thanks for adding this practical insight - the timing aspect of gathering documentation while everything is fresh is something I'll definitely keep in mind for my own situation!

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

I've been managing rental properties for about 8 years and have dealt with several major utility line repairs. Your water main situation definitely sounds like a repair expense to me based on the details you've provided. The key thing the IRS looks at is whether you're restoring the property to its previous operating condition or actually improving it beyond that. Since your water line failed and left tenants without adequate water pressure, you were essentially forced to restore basic functionality - that's textbook repair territory. I had a similar situation three years ago where a main sewer line collapsed under my property's driveway. Cost was about $10K with the excavation work. My CPA confirmed it was a repair since we were just getting the system back to working order, not upgrading capacity or materials beyond what was there before. The expensive drilling method doesn't change the nature of the work - sometimes repairs require costly techniques due to location or access issues. What matters is the underlying purpose: fixing something that broke so your property can function normally again. One tip: make sure your records clearly document that this was emergency repair work to restore water service, not a planned upgrade or improvement project. That distinction can be important if you ever face questions about the classification.

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear from someone with 8 years of experience! Your sewer line example is particularly helpful since it sounds almost identical to my situation - major underground utility failure requiring expensive excavation work to restore basic functionality. I really appreciate your point about the drilling method not changing the nature of the work. I was getting hung up on whether the directional drilling somehow made this "fancier" than a typical repair, but you're absolutely right that it's just the method required due to location constraints. Your tip about documenting this as emergency repair work is spot on too. The tenants literally had no usable water pressure, so this definitely wasn't some planned upgrade project - it was urgent restoration work to make the property habitable again. I'll make sure my records emphasize that emergency/restoration aspect. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with a similar situation. It gives me much more confidence in treating this as a repair expense rather than capitalizing it!

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

ppl saying payroll will go back to normal after big check - mostly true but not always!! my company's payroll system did a weird rolling average of my last 3 checks and when i got a huge comission check ($42k) it messed up my withholding for like 2 months after. had to go to HR to fix it. might wanna check with ur payroll dept about how THEIR specific system handles it. not all payroll software works exactly the same way!!

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

This is good advice. Some payroll systems do use look-back periods or averaging, especially for variable compensation like commissions or bonuses. Worth checking with your specific HR/payroll team.

0 coins

Caden Nguyen

•

Great point about checking with your specific payroll system! I work in payroll administration and can confirm that different systems handle large paychecks differently. Most modern systems like ADP and Paychex do calculate each check independently using the annualization method, but some older systems or custom payroll software might use averaging or other methods. Also worth noting - if your company processes this as "supplemental wages" (which they might since it's bonus-related), they could use the flat 22% federal withholding rate instead of the regular payroll withholding calculation. This might actually result in LESS withholding than the annualized method would produce on a $65k check. I'd definitely recommend asking your payroll team two questions: 1) How will this large payment be classified (regular wages vs supplemental wages)? and 2) What withholding method will they use? This will help you plan your cash flow much better than guessing.

0 coins

This is super helpful info! I hadn't even considered that it might be treated as supplemental wages. Given that the original poster mentioned their company has a "strange bonus structure" but it's running through as a regular paycheck, it sounds like it could go either way. @Evelyn Rivera - you might want to ask your payroll team specifically about the supplemental wage classification. If they do treat it as supplemental wages with the flat 22% rate, that could actually work in your favor compared to the annualized method on such a large check. The difference could be significant on $65k. Also wondering - does the supplemental wage rate apply to the entire check, or just the bonus portion if it s'mixed with regular salary?

0 coins

Prev1...13091310131113121313...5643Next