Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One important thing to consider before making your decision - document everything related to your bonus repayment now, even before you leave. I made the mistake of not keeping copies of my original offer letter and bonus documentation when I left my previous job, which made filing my taxes much more complicated. Make sure you have copies of your original offer letter showing the bonus amount and terms, your W-2 from 2023 showing the bonus income, and any other relevant documentation. When you do leave, get written confirmation from your employer about the exact repayment amount and date - this will be crucial for your 2025 tax filing. Also, if you're planning to leave early in 2025, keep in mind that the timing of the repayment within the tax year doesn't matter for tax purposes - whether you repay in January or December 2025, it will all be handled on your 2025 return. But having everything documented upfront will save you headaches later when dealing with the IRS forms and calculations.
This is excellent advice! I learned this the hard way when I had to repay a retention bonus a few years ago. I had to go back to my old employer months later asking for documentation, and by then the HR person who handled my exit had left the company. It took weeks to get the paperwork I needed. One thing I'd add - if your company uses a third-party payroll service, make sure you understand how they'll handle the repayment documentation. Some will issue a corrected W-2, others will just provide a letter. Knowing this upfront can help you prepare for tax filing season. Also, if you're considering leaving early in the year, you might want to factor in the cash flow impact. You'll be repaying the bonus in early 2025 but won't see any tax benefit until you file your return in 2026. Just something to consider in your financial planning.
Just wanted to chime in as someone who's been through this exact scenario. I left my previous employer 18 months into a 24-month sign-on bonus commitment and had to repay $15k in 2024. A few practical tips from my experience: 1. **Negotiate the repayment terms** - Even if your contract says you owe the full amount, some employers are willing to work with you on a payment plan or reduced amount, especially if you're leaving for career growth rather than performance issues. 2. **Get everything in writing** - When I left, HR initially told me verbally that I'd owe the full amount, but when I pushed for written documentation, they discovered my contract actually had a pro-rated clause that reduced what I owed by about 30%. 3. **Consider the timing strategically** - If you have flexibility on when you leave, think about your overall tax situation for both years. Depending on your income levels in 2024 vs 2025, the timing of the repayment could affect which tax treatment (deduction vs claim of right) works better for you. 4. **Keep detailed records** - Beyond what others mentioned, I'd also recommend taking screenshots of your online payroll records showing the original bonus payment before you lose access to company systems. The tax complexity is real, but don't let it be the only factor in your career decision. Sometimes the long-term career benefits outweigh the short-term tax hassle.
This is really helpful advice! The negotiation aspect is something I hadn't considered. Did you approach this during your resignation conversation or wait until you got the formal repayment request? I'm wondering if it's better to be proactive about it or see what they initially ask for first. Also, regarding the timing strategy you mentioned - I'm currently expecting a promotion and salary increase in early 2025, so my tax bracket might be higher next year. Would that generally make the claim of right provision more favorable, or does it depend on other factors too?
Join the conversation
I know this is slightly off topic, but which medical studies are paying so well? I've only been finding ones that pay like $50-100 for a day of testing, and you made $5,800? Are you doing pharmaceutical trials or something more involved?
Not OP but I've done several clinical trials for new medications. The longer studies with overnight stays can pay really well - I did one that was 3 overnight stays and numerous follow-up visits that paid $4,200. The compensation usually relates to the level of risk and time commitment.
I'm a tax professional and can confirm that your medical study income on 1099-MISC forms absolutely qualifies as earned income for Roth IRA contributions. The IRS considers compensation for your time, participation, and following study protocols as "payment for services rendered," which falls squarely under the earned income definition. The key test is whether you're being paid for your active participation versus just receiving reimbursement for expenses. Since you're undergoing tests, taking medications, attending appointments, and following specific protocols, you're clearly providing services that warrant compensation. A few important points to remember: - This income is subject to self-employment tax (15.3%), so plan accordingly - You'll need to file Schedule C to report this business income - Keep records of any unreimbursed expenses related to your participation (travel, parking, etc.) as these may be deductible - The $6,500 Roth IRA contribution limit for 2024 still applies regardless of your total earned income Your $5,800 from medical studies gives you plenty of room to make a substantial Roth contribution this year. Just make sure to set aside funds for the additional taxes you'll owe on this self-employment income.
This is really helpful confirmation from a professional perspective! I'm curious about the Schedule C requirement - since this isn't really a "business" in the traditional sense, do I still need to treat it like one? And for the business description on Schedule C, would I just put something like "Medical research participant" or is there a more official category the IRS expects? Also, when you mention keeping records of unreimbursed expenses, does that include things like time off work to attend appointments, or just direct out-of-pocket costs like transportation and parking?
Join the conversation
I'm currently in week 7 after verifying my identity on January 28th, and this thread has been such a sanity saver! Like everyone else here, this was my first verification letter ever and I was convinced I'd somehow filed incorrectly. The complete lack of useful information from the IRS has been maddening - "Where's My Refund" has been stuck on "still processing" for almost two months now with zero indication of progress. Based on everyone's shared experiences, it sounds like this is totally normal but it feels completely broken when you're going through it. What's really struck me is how many people are dealing with this for the first time this year. I've been filing taxes for 15+ years and never had to verify my identity before, but clearly the IRS has significantly increased their fraud detection efforts. It's probably necessary given all the tax-related scams, but the 9-week timeline with no updates is brutal when you're counting on that refund. Reading through all the real timelines shared here (mostly 5-8 weeks) has been way more helpful than anything on the official IRS website. Since I'm at 7 weeks now, I'm really hoping to see movement soon based on what others have experienced. The uncertainty is definitely the hardest part - if they just said "your refund will be processed on April 15th" you could at least plan around it! Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences so openly. It's incredibly reassuring to know we're all navigating this frustrating process together and that the long wait times are unfortunately just the new normal right now.
I'm in week 2 after verifying on March 22nd, so I'm just beginning this journey that everyone has described so thoroughly! Reading through all these experiences has been both enlightening and daunting - enlightening because now I understand what's actually happening behind the scenes, daunting because I realize I potentially have 6+ more weeks of this waiting ahead. Like so many others mentioned, when I first got that verification letter I was absolutely convinced I'd made some major error on my return. I spent an entire weekend going through every single line trying to figure out what I did wrong. It's actually a huge relief to learn this is happening to so many people as part of enhanced fraud prevention rather than something I messed up. The "Where's My Refund" tool already showing just "still processing" with no helpful details is frustrating, but at least now I know not to expect any meaningful updates from it for potentially months. Since you're at 7 weeks, you're definitely in that window where people have been getting their approvals - really hoping you see some positive movement very soon! Thanks for sharing your timeline, it helps newcomers like me understand what this process actually looks like in reality versus what the IRS website suggests.
I'm currently in week 3 after verifying my identity on March 18th, and finding this thread has been such a relief! Like so many others here, this was my first time ever getting the verification letter and I immediately thought I'd made some terrible mistake on my return. What's been most helpful from reading everyone's experiences is understanding that the "Where's My Refund" tool basically becomes useless during this period - I've been checking it daily and getting frustrated by the same "still processing" message, but now I know that's completely normal and it'll probably stay that way until everything suddenly processes at once. It's crazy how widespread these verification requests seem to be this year compared to previous years. I've talked to several people at work and it feels like at least half of us got hit with this. The IRS fraud prevention efforts are probably necessary, but the communication about realistic timelines could definitely be much better than the vague "up to 9 weeks" they mention. Based on all the real timelines shared here (mostly 5-8 weeks), I'm trying to set realistic expectations rather than hoping for a quick resolution. The waiting is definitely stressful when you're budgeting around that refund, but at least now I know I'm not alone in this process and that the long delays are unfortunately just the new normal. Thanks to everyone for being so open about sharing your experiences - it really helps to know what to actually expect during this frustrating waiting period!
Join the conversation
This discussion has been incredibly helpful! I'm also working with a non-profit that's launching a rental assistance program, and I was getting confused by all the different rules I was reading about online. One question I haven't seen addressed yet - what happens if we provide rental assistance to someone who later in the year receives other forms of government assistance like SNAP or Medicaid? Could our rental assistance somehow affect their eligibility for those programs, or create complications when they're reporting income for those applications? I want to make sure we're not inadvertently creating problems for the people we're trying to help by having them appear to have higher income than they actually do when applying for other assistance programs.
That's a really thoughtful question! Generally speaking, rental assistance that goes directly to landlords shouldn't affect eligibility for other government programs like SNAP or Medicaid because it's not considered income to the recipient. These programs typically look at actual cash income that flows through the person's hands. However, I'd recommend being proactive about this - when you provide the assistance, give recipients a letter clearly stating that the rental assistance was paid directly to their landlord and is not considered taxable income or countable income for most benefit programs. This documentation can be really helpful when they're applying for or recertifying other assistance. It's also worth noting that different assistance programs have different rules about what counts as "income," so having that documentation from your organization helps caseworkers at other agencies understand the nature of the assistance. Most experienced benefits caseworkers are familiar with these types of third-party housing payments and know they don't count against income limits.
This has been such a valuable discussion! I'm working with a community action agency that provides emergency rental assistance, and this thread has clarified so much for me. One additional point I'd like to add based on our experience - if your non-profit works with multiple landlords regularly, consider creating a simple one-page fact sheet explaining the program and its tax implications. We found that landlords sometimes had questions about whether they needed to handle these payments differently from regular rent, and having a standardized explanation saved everyone time. Also, for organizations just starting out, consider reaching out to other local non-profits who already run similar programs. Most are happy to share their policies and procedures, which can save you from reinventing the wheel. We based our initial documentation on templates from a more established organization in our area, then customized them for our specific program. The key takeaway for anyone reading this is that direct-to-landlord payments from qualified non-profits are generally not taxable income for tenants, but proper documentation and consistent procedures are absolutely critical. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical guidance our sector needs!
This is such great advice about creating fact sheets for landlords! I'm new to this community and just starting to help with our local food bank's housing assistance program. One thing I'm wondering about - do you have any tips for small organizations that might not have the resources to create formal policies right away? We're mostly volunteers and want to make sure we do this right, but some of the documentation requirements mentioned earlier seem pretty extensive for our current capacity. Also, has anyone dealt with situations where tenants are behind on multiple months of rent? Does it matter tax-wise if we're paying current rent versus back rent, or is the treatment the same as long as it goes directly to the landlord?
Esmeralda Gómez
I've been following this thread with great interest as we're facing the exact same dilemma at our company. Based on what I'm seeing here, it sounds like the key is really about proper documentation and structure rather than trying to find loopholes. What strikes me most is the emphasis on setting up a "bona fide wellness program" - this seems to be the legitimate way to offer some tax-free benefits while staying compliant. The $100 annual exclusion mentioned by several people here appears to be a real thing, though I'd definitely want to verify the specific IRS requirements. The hybrid approach that @Declan mentioned sounds like the most practical solution - offering a reasonable amount tax-free through a proper wellness program, then being transparent about tax implications for anything beyond that. It seems like this gives employees real value while keeping the company protected. I'm also intrigued by the various tools mentioned here for getting proper guidance. While I'm naturally cautious about new services, the experiences shared suggest there might be legitimate ways to get better clarity on these complex tax issues than just guessing or hoping for the best. Has anyone had experience with IRS audits specifically around wellness benefits? I'm curious what red flags they typically look for.
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
•Great question about IRS audit red flags! From what I've seen in the compliance world, they typically look for a few key things: inconsistent application of benefits (some employees getting different treatment), lack of proper documentation showing the program meets wellness requirements, and benefits that are clearly disguised compensation rather than genuine health initiatives. The biggest red flag seems to be when companies offer "wellness" benefits that don't actually require any health-related participation or goals. Just paying for gym memberships without any structured wellness component often gets scrutinized. That's why the documentation @Declan mentioned is so critical - you need to show your program has legitimate health promotion objectives and measurable outcomes. Another thing auditors look for is whether the benefit amounts are reasonable for wellness purposes versus excessive compensation. The $100 threshold mentioned throughout this thread appears to align with what's generally considered reasonable for wellness program exclusions. I'd recommend documenting everything from day one: program design documents, employee participation tracking, health outcome measurements, and clear policies about how benefits are administered. Better to over-document than scramble during an audit!
0 coins
Luca Conti
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone new to HR compliance, I really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences with wellness benefits. One thing I'm wondering about - for companies that don't have the resources to set up a full wellness program right away, would it be better to just start with the gym discount approach mentioned by @Ryder until we can properly structure a compliant wellness program? I'm thinking it might be safer to offer a smaller benefit correctly than risk getting a larger benefit wrong. Also, has anyone dealt with remote employees in this situation? With so many people working from home now, I'm curious how companies handle gym benefits when employees are scattered across different states with varying local gym options. The documentation requirements sound extensive but necessary. I'd rather be overly cautious than face audit issues down the road. Thanks again everyone for sharing your experiences!
0 coins
Maya Lewis
•Starting with gym discounts is actually a really smart approach while you're getting your compliance ducks in a row! It's much better to offer a smaller benefit correctly than risk audit issues with a larger program that isn't properly structured. For remote employees, many companies are exploring partnerships with national gym chains or offering virtual fitness app subscriptions instead. Some are even providing stipends for home fitness equipment as part of their wellness programs, though that brings its own tax implications to consider. You're absolutely right about being overly cautious with documentation. I've seen too many companies get burned trying to wing it with employee benefits. The IRS doesn't mess around with fringe benefit compliance, and the penalties can be significant for both the company and employees. Consider starting simple with discounts, then gradually building toward a comprehensive wellness program as you learn more about the requirements. That way you can offer something valuable to employees right away while taking time to structure the bigger program properly.
0 coins