IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Salim Nasir

•

One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is timing considerations for 529 distributions. If your parents-in-law took the distribution in 2024 but your daughter's scholarship was awarded for the 2024-2025 academic year, make sure you have documentation showing the scholarship applies to the tax year in question. Also, since they transferred the money to their own account first before gifting it to your daughter, this creates a clear paper trail that they (not your daughter) are responsible for the tax consequences. The 1099-Q should be issued in their names as the account owners who received the distribution. For future reference, if there are leftover 529 funds after a scholarship, consider changing the beneficiary to another family member (sibling, cousin, etc.) who might need education funding. This avoids the non-qualified distribution issue entirely while keeping the tax-advantaged growth intact for education purposes.

0 coins

Skylar Neal

•

This is really helpful advice about the timing and beneficiary change options! I'm curious though - if they change the beneficiary to another family member after taking a distribution, does that affect the tax treatment of the withdrawal they already took? Or would that only apply to future distributions from any remaining balance? Also, regarding the documentation for the scholarship exception, does it matter if the scholarship was for tuition only versus room and board? I know qualified education expenses include both, but I'm wondering if the type of scholarship affects how much you can withdraw penalty-free.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Great question about the timing! Changing the beneficiary after taking a distribution won't change the tax treatment of that withdrawal - once it's taken and reported as non-qualified, that's locked in. The beneficiary change would only affect future distributions from any remaining balance in the account. Regarding scholarship types, the penalty exception applies to the total amount of tax-free scholarships received, regardless of whether they're designated for tuition, room and board, or other qualified expenses. What matters is the scholarship amount that's excludable from the student's income under IRC Section 117. So if your daughter received a $10,000 scholarship (whether for tuition only or mixed expenses), you could withdraw up to $10,000 from the 529 without the 10% penalty - though you'd still owe income tax on the earnings portion of that withdrawal. @c86e83e24618 Just make sure you keep good documentation of the scholarship award letters showing the amounts and that they qualify as tax-free educational assistance.

0 coins

Just a heads up for anyone dealing with 529 distributions - make sure you understand the difference between who owns the account versus who the beneficiary is when it comes to tax reporting. In your situation, since your parents-in-law owned the account and received the distribution into their own bank account, they're the ones responsible for reporting the taxable earnings and paying any penalties on their tax return. The fact that they then gifted the money to your daughter is a separate transaction entirely. As long as the gift was under the annual exclusion limit ($17,000 for 2023, $18,000 for 2024), there shouldn't be any gift tax consequences either. One more thing - if your daughter received any scholarship money that was tax-free, make sure your in-laws claim the scholarship exception on Form 5329 to avoid the 10% penalty on up to that scholarship amount. They'll still owe income tax on the earnings portion, but avoiding the penalty can save a significant amount. Keep all scholarship documentation handy in case the IRS has questions later.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

This is really helpful clarification about the ownership vs beneficiary distinction! I'm new to 529 plans and wasn't sure how the tax responsibility flows when there are multiple parties involved. Just to make sure I understand correctly - even though the daughter was the beneficiary, since the grandparents were the account owners and received the distribution, all the tax consequences (both the income reporting and any penalties) fall on them, not the daughter or her parents? Also, regarding the gift tax exclusion limits you mentioned - does it matter that the money originally came from a 529 plan, or is it treated just like any other cash gift once it hits their bank account? I want to make sure there aren't any special rules I'm missing for gifts that originated from education accounts.

0 coins

Has anyone used tax software to help document this? I'm trying to sell my lake house next year and worried about the same issue.

0 coins

Daniel White

•

Neither TurboTax nor H&R Block have specific tools for this documentation process. They'll ask if you meet the 2-out-of-5 year requirement, but won't help you prove it. I'd recommend keeping a dedicated folder (physical or digital) with all your evidence organized chronologically. Date everything and make notes about why each document supports your residence claim.

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

I'm dealing with a similar situation right now with my cabin that I lived in for 2.5 years. One thing that really helped strengthen my documentation was getting a letter from my homeowner's insurance company showing when I changed my policy to reflect it as my primary residence rather than a vacation home. Insurance companies are pretty strict about this distinction, so having that official record carries weight. Also, if you had any home deliveries during that time (Amazon, FedEx, etc.), those delivery records can be surprisingly useful. I was able to get a summary from Amazon showing hundreds of deliveries to that address over my residency period, which clearly established it as my primary residence rather than just a vacation spot. Don't forget about banking records too - if you changed your address with your bank or credit union, or if you have ATM usage patterns showing regular transactions near the second home, those can help fill in gaps in your timeline.

0 coins

The insurance angle is brilliant - I hadn't even thought about that! I'm in a similar situation where I'm planning to sell my second home next year. Did you have to specifically request documentation from your insurance company, or was it easy to get? Also, how far back were you able to get Amazon delivery records? I'm wondering if they keep that information for several years or if there's a limit on how far back they'll provide summaries.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm facing a similar decision with my consulting business. The consensus here seems clear that a G Wagon for construction work would be extremely difficult to defend in an audit, but I'm curious about a related question. What about service-based businesses that genuinely need to transport clients? I run a high-end consulting firm where we regularly take C-suite executives to site visits and client meetings. Our current vehicle situation is limiting our ability to compete with larger firms who arrive in luxury vehicles. Would the business necessity argument be stronger for client-facing service businesses versus trade/construction companies? I'm specifically looking at vehicles like the BMW X7 or Mercedes GLS - still luxury SUVs over 6,000 lbs, but potentially more defensible given the nature of client entertainment and professional image requirements in consulting. I realize this might warrant its own thread, but given the excellent tax law expertise I've seen in this discussion, I thought it might be valuable to explore how industry type affects the business necessity analysis for luxury vehicle deductions. Any insights from the tax professionals here would be greatly appreciated!

0 coins

Madison King

•

Welcome to the community! Your consulting scenario is actually much more defensible than the construction G Wagon situation. Client-facing service businesses have significantly stronger business necessity arguments for luxury vehicles, especially when competing for high-value contracts where professional image directly impacts revenue. For your BMW X7 or Mercedes GLS consideration, you'd want to document several key factors: client contracts that specify or expect luxury transportation, evidence of lost business opportunities due to inadequate vehicles, and competitive analysis showing industry standards for client transportation in your market segment. The IRS recognizes that certain industries have legitimate image requirements. I've seen successful defenses for luxury vehicles in consulting, real estate, financial services, and other client-facing businesses where the vehicle choice directly supports revenue generation. The key is demonstrating that the luxury features serve a business purpose beyond personal preference. For your documentation, maintain records of: client meetings where the vehicle was used, contracts won/lost that may relate to professional presentation, mileage logs showing client transportation versus personal use, and any client feedback about your firm's professional image. Industry publications or competitor analysis showing luxury vehicle use as standard practice in your consulting niche would also strengthen your position. The business necessity test is much easier to meet when you can show direct correlation between vehicle choice and client acquisition/retention in professional services versus construction trades.

0 coins

Luca Ricci

•

This is exactly the kind of nuanced analysis that's been missing from some of the earlier discussion! @Madison King makes excellent points about industry-specific business necessity requirements. As someone new to this space, I m'really appreciating how the community breaks down these complex scenarios. The distinction between a construction company claiming they need a G Wagon versus a consulting firm needing luxury client transportation is significant from both a business logic and audit defense perspective. @Abby Marshall - one additional consideration for your consulting firm might be exploring certified pre-owned luxury vehicles. You could potentially get the professional image benefits at a lower cost basis, which reduces both your financial risk and the potential scrutiny from claiming massive depreciation deductions. A 2-3 year old BMW X7 or Mercedes GLS might achieve the same client-facing objectives while presenting a more reasonable expense profile if questioned. The documentation suggestions about tracking client contracts and competitive analysis are spot-on. Having quantifiable business outcomes tied to professional image requirements would make your case much stronger than the typical I need "this for business justification we" see challenged so often.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

As a newcomer to this community, I've been reading through this entire discussion and am really impressed by the depth of expertise here. This conversation has been incredibly educational for someone just starting to navigate complex business vehicle deduction scenarios. What strikes me most is how the conversation evolved from a simple "can I deduct this G Wagon" question to a comprehensive analysis of industry-specific business necessity, audit risk assessment, and strategic tax planning. The distinction between construction companies and client-facing service businesses really highlights how context matters so much more than just the technical tax rules. I'm particularly grateful for the real-world examples and case studies that several members shared. It's one thing to read about luxury auto limits in tax publications, but hearing about actual audit experiences and successful documentation strategies gives practical insight you can't get from textbooks. One question I have for the community: Are there any industry-specific resources or professional organizations that publish guidelines for reasonable vehicle choices by business type? It seems like having some objective industry standards to reference could strengthen the business necessity argument for any vehicle purchase, whether it's a work truck for construction or a luxury SUV for consulting. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion - it's exactly the kind of practical, experience-based guidance that makes this community so valuable for business owners trying to make informed decisions about major purchases and tax planning strategies.

0 coins

Welcome to the community, @Mason Davis! I'm also relatively new here but have found the expertise incredibly valuable. You raise a great point about industry-specific resources - this is something I've been researching as well. The IRS doesn't publish specific vehicle guidelines by industry, but there are some helpful resources. The National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP) occasionally publishes guidance on reasonable business expenses by industry type. Also, trade associations often have informal standards - for example, the National Association of Realtors has discussed reasonable vehicle expectations for luxury market agents. What I've found most useful is looking at IRS Revenue Rulings and Tax Court cases specific to your industry. Cases like "Fausner v. Commissioner" (luxury vehicle for real estate) and similar precedents give insight into what the courts consider reasonable business necessity versus personal preference. For anyone considering a significant vehicle purchase, I'd recommend documenting your research process - showing you considered industry standards, competitor practices, and client expectations demonstrates thoughtful business decision-making rather than just wanting an expensive car with tax benefits. The practical wisdom shared in this thread about focusing on audit defensibility first, tax savings second, really resonates. Sometimes the most tax-efficient strategy is simply choosing a vehicle that obviously belongs in your business rather than trying to justify luxury features that don't clearly serve business purposes.

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

That letter is definitely a red flag for identity verification issues! When the IRS can't process your transcript request and specifically mentions the Identity Theft hotline, it usually means there's a verification hold on your account that needs to be resolved. The 9-month delay combined with this letter suggests your return is stuck in their identity verification system. I'd absolutely call 800-908-4490 first thing tomorrow morning - don't put this off because these cases can drag on for months if not handled quickly. They'll be able to tell you exactly what documentation you need to verify your identity and get your return moving again. The "identity theft" language sounds scary, but it could just be their automated fraud detection being overly cautious. Before you call though, I'd recommend trying taxr.ai to analyze your transcript if you can access it. It decodes all those confusing codes and gives you a clear picture of what's happening with your return, which will help you have a much more productive conversation with the IRS rep. This is frustrating but totally fixable once you get through their verification process. Hang in there! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

This is really great advice! I've been so stressed about this whole situation, but you're right that at least now I have a clear action plan instead of just waiting around indefinitely. The identity verification angle makes way more sense than actual identity theft - I was starting to panic thinking someone had stolen my info. Definitely calling that number tomorrow morning and going to try taxr.ai beforehand like everyone's suggesting. Thanks for the encouragement and for explaining this in a way that doesn't make me want to pull my hair out! šŸ˜…

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

That letter is definitely concerning and points to an identity verification issue on your account. When the IRS can't process your transcript request and specifically directs you to the Identity Theft hotline (800-908-4490), it usually means their fraud detection system has flagged something that requires manual verification - not necessarily actual identity theft, but extra steps needed to confirm your identity. After waiting 9 months, this letter actually gives you a clear path forward! I'd call that number first thing tomorrow morning - they'll be able to tell you exactly what documentation you need to resolve the hold and get your refund processed. Don't delay on this because identity verification cases can drag on for months if not addressed quickly. Before calling, you might want to try taxr.ai to analyze your transcript if you can access it. It breaks down all those cryptic codes in plain English and will help you understand what's actually happening with your return, making your conversation with the IRS much more productive. A lot of folks here have found it super helpful for these exact situations. This is definitely frustrating but completely fixable once you provide whatever verification they need. Your refund should start moving again after that. Good luck! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Kaitlyn Otto

•

Just wanted to add another perspective - I used to process dealer incentive payments for a major RV manufacturer. If your husband calls the manufacturer's dealer relations department (not just general customer service), they can usually look up payments by dealership and salesperson. They absolutely have records of every spiff paid out. Have him ask for the "dealer incentives coordinator" or similar title. They field these calls all the time!

0 coins

Axel Far

•

This is super helpful! Do they need anything specific to look up the records? Like an employee ID or something? My sister has a similar issue with her car sales job.

0 coins

Usually they just need the dealership name, salesperson name, and the approximate time period. Some manufacturers might ask for a dealer code or the salesperson's employee ID if the dealership is large, but most can find records with just basic info. They keep pretty detailed databases since they have to report these payments for tax purposes anyway. Your sister should have her dealership's main contact person help her get in touch with the right department at each manufacturer they work with.

0 coins

As someone who works in tax preparation, I'd strongly recommend NOT filing without that expected 1099. Here's why: if the IRS receives a 1099 for $2500 that you didn't report, they'll send you a CP2000 notice (basically a bill for the unreported income plus penalties and interest). This usually happens 12-18 months after filing, and by then you could owe significantly more than the original tax due. Since 1099s were due January 31st, I'd give it until mid-February max before filing. In the meantime, have your husband contact his sales manager - they often have records of which manufacturers paid spiffs to which salespeople, even if they don't process the payments directly. Also check if his dealership uses any centralized payment systems like ADP or similar that might consolidate these payments. If you absolutely can't find the source by filing deadline, you can estimate the income and report it as "Other Income" on Form 1040. Better to overestimate slightly than underestimate and face penalties later.

0 coins

This is really solid advice! I'm new to dealing with this stuff since my husband just started in sales this year. Quick question - when you say "estimate the income and report it as Other Income," how do you come up with a reasonable estimate? Should we try to guess based on the sales he made, or is there a safer way to approach it? I'm worried about either dramatically over or underestimating and causing problems either way.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

Great question! For estimating, I'd recommend looking at his sales records and any paperwork he has about spiff programs he participated in. Most manufacturers have standard spiff amounts (like $100-500 per unit sold during a promotion). Have him check with his sales manager about which spiff programs were active during the year and what the typical payout amounts were. Even if he can't remember the exact manufacturer, he might remember selling certain models during promotional periods. If you absolutely can't get specifics, err on the side of overestimating by 10-15%. The IRS won't penalize you for reporting MORE income than you actually earned - you'll just get a refund if you overpaid. But underreporting can lead to penalties and interest. Document how you arrived at your estimate in case you need to explain it later.

0 coins

Prev1...122123124125126...5643Next