IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Myles Regis

•

Based on everything discussed in this thread, I think you're in an excellent position to make a well-informed decision. The systematic approach everyone has outlined is spot-on: contact Modo and Crown Coins for detailed CSV transaction histories, calculate your actual gambling losses, then compare itemized vs standard deduction. What's particularly encouraging is seeing multiple people achieve substantial tax savings ($1,400-$2,800) by properly documenting their losses rather than just paying taxes on gross withdrawals. With your $33k in withdrawals, if you deposited significantly more throughout the year (which sounds likely given your comment about losing more than you won), your potential gambling losses could be quite substantial. The documentation process seems much more manageable than initially expected. The fact that these platforms maintain comprehensive transaction records they can provide in CSV format really changes the game - it transforms what could be a documentation nightmare into organizing existing data. I'd definitely recommend starting with those platform transaction histories this week. Even if you ultimately decide the standard deduction works better for your situation, at least you'll have made an informed choice based on actual numbers rather than assumptions. And regardless of which deduction method you choose, you'll have solid documentation for reporting the $33k in gambling income. The community guidance here has been exceptional - this thread should be bookmarked by anyone dealing with social casino taxes!

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

As someone who's been following this entire discussion as a complete newcomer to social casino tax issues, I can't thank everyone enough for sharing such detailed, practical guidance! This thread has transformed what seemed like an impossible tax situation into a clear, manageable process. The systematic approach is brilliant - get those CSV transaction histories from the platforms first, then actually calculate the numbers instead of guessing. I had no idea these social casinos kept such comprehensive records that they could provide in usable formats! That completely changes the documentation game. What really gives me confidence is seeing real people share their actual tax savings results - $1,400 to $2,800 is serious money that makes the extra effort completely worthwhile. And knowing that others have successfully navigated IRS interactions with this type of documentation removes so much of the anxiety about potential audits. For the original poster with $33k in withdrawals, this proven approach seems like the clear path forward. The potential gambling losses could be substantial if you deposited more than you withdrew, and combined with other itemized deductions, that could result in significant tax savings. This community support makes dealing with complex tax situations so much less overwhelming. Thanks to everyone who took the time to share their real experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical wisdom you need when navigating these issues for the first time!

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

This has been such an incredibly thorough and helpful discussion! As a newcomer to dealing with gambling taxes, I was initially completely overwhelmed by the complexity of reporting social casino winnings properly. Reading through everyone's real experiences has been eye-opening. The systematic approach that's been outlined here is exactly what I needed - request detailed CSV transaction histories from the platforms, calculate actual net gambling losses, then make an informed decision about itemizing vs standard deduction based on real numbers rather than assumptions. I had no idea these social casinos maintained such comprehensive records! What really stands out is how many people achieved substantial tax savings ($1,400-$2,800) by taking the time to properly document their losses instead of just paying taxes on gross withdrawals. For someone with $33k in withdrawals like the original poster, those potential savings could be even more significant. The documentation requirements seem much more reasonable than I initially feared. Having the platforms provide detailed CSV files combined with bank statements and withdrawal confirmations appears to create adequate records for IRS purposes without needing perfect daily gambling logs. I'm definitely going to follow this proven approach for my own smaller social casino situation. Even if the math doesn't favor itemizing in my case, at least I'll know I made an informed decision. Thanks to everyone who shared their practical experiences - this community guidance makes navigating complex tax issues so much more manageable!

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

Is anyone using tax software to file for their kids' trust income? I tried using TurboTax last year and it got super confusing with the K-1 information from my daughter's trust.

0 coins

Roger Romero

•

I've used H&R Block's software for my son's trust income and found it worked pretty well. It has a specific section for K-1 entries and walks you through each line item. Much more straightforward than trying to figure it out manually. TaxSlayer also has decent K-1 support for a lower price if you're looking for alternatives.

0 coins

I've been dealing with a similar situation with my kids' trust distributions. One thing that really helped me was understanding that the type of trust matters a lot for tax purposes. If it's a grantor trust (where your in-laws are still considered the owners for tax purposes), the income might not even be taxable to your kids at all. Also, make sure you're looking at all the boxes on the K-1 form, not just the total distribution amount. Sometimes there are tax-exempt distributions or return of principal that don't count toward the filing threshold. I discovered my daughter's $1,600 distribution included $400 of tax-exempt municipal bond interest, so she actually only had $1,200 of taxable income. The trust administrator should be able to clarify what type of trust it is and explain the different components of the distributions. Don't hesitate to ask them for a breakdown if the K-1 isn't clear - they deal with these questions all the time.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding vehicle classification issues! As someone who primarily works with small business clients, I've been conservative and treating most commercial vehicles as listed property "just to be safe," but I can see now that I've probably been overcomplicated things. The distinction about vehicles that are clearly unsuitable for personal use makes so much sense. I have a client with a concrete mixer truck and a flatbed tow truck that I've been treating as listed property, which now seems completely unnecessary given their obvious commercial nature. What I find most valuable about this discussion is the emphasis on documentation and having a clear rationale for classification decisions. It's not just about following rules blindly, but understanding the underlying purpose of those rules. The listed property regulations are meant to prevent abuse, not create busywork for genuinely commercial assets. I'm definitely going to review my current client files to see if there are other vehicles that have been unnecessarily classified as listed property. The potential tax savings from proper classification - especially with bonus depreciation opportunities - could be significant for some of my clients.

0 coins

Your approach of being conservative makes sense when you're uncertain, but you're absolutely right that concrete mixer trucks and flatbed tow trucks are perfect examples of vehicles that clearly shouldn't be listed property! These are specialized commercial vehicles that no reasonable person would use for personal transportation. I'd definitely encourage you to review those client files - the tax savings could be substantial, especially if any of these vehicles were placed in service during years with 100% bonus depreciation. A concrete mixer truck, for instance, is obviously designed solely for commercial use and would qualify for the most favorable depreciation treatment available. The key insight you've highlighted about understanding the underlying purpose of the rules is so important. When you approach tax planning with that mindset, it becomes much easier to make confident classification decisions that serve your clients' best interests while staying fully compliant. Your clients are lucky to have someone who's willing to revisit past decisions and optimize their tax positions!

0 coins

Jayden Reed

•

I've been following this discussion with great interest as it touches on issues I see regularly in my practice. One additional point I'd like to emphasize is the importance of considering the election timing for bonus depreciation when reclassifying these vehicles. If you're amending returns to correct the listed property classification, remember that bonus depreciation elections are generally made on a timely filed return (including extensions). However, when you're correcting a fundamental classification error - moving from listed property to regular business property - you're often able to make the bonus depreciation election on the amended return since the original classification was incorrect. This is particularly relevant for the semi trucks and trailers mentioned in the original post. These vehicles were never appropriately classified as listed property to begin with, so claiming 100% bonus depreciation on an amended return should be permissible. Also worth noting: if your client has been claiming depreciation under the listed property rules with business use percentages less than 100%, you'll need to calculate the difference between what was claimed and what should have been claimed under regular MACRS or bonus depreciation. The adjustment could be quite significant, especially for expensive commercial vehicles. I'd recommend consulting with a tax attorney if the dollar amounts are substantial, just to ensure you're handling the amendments properly and have solid documentation for your position.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed guidance I was hoping to find! The point about election timing for bonus depreciation on amended returns is particularly valuable - I hadn't considered that correcting a fundamental classification error might allow for elections that wouldn't normally be permitted on amendments. Your mention of calculating the difference between what was claimed under listed property rules versus what should have been claimed is really important too. I imagine this gets complicated when you have vehicles that were being depreciated with less than 100% business use percentages over multiple years. Do you have any recommendations for software or worksheets that help track these adjustments accurately? The suggestion about consulting a tax attorney for substantial amounts makes a lot of sense. These amendments could potentially trigger significant refunds, and having proper legal backing for the position seems like good risk management. Thanks for adding this practical perspective to what's already been an incredibly helpful discussion!

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

18 Pro tip: Always take screenshots of your payment confirmation page when e-filing. I've had issues in the past where the IRS claimed they never received payment authorization, but having that screenshot saved me from penalties. Also, never cut it too close to the deadline - IRS systems get overwhelmed and banking transfers can take longer than expected.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

2 This is great advice. Do you also recommend keeping copies of the actual bank statements showing the withdrawal? I'm wondering what counts as proof of payment if there's ever a dispute.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

Absolutely! Bank statements showing the withdrawal are crucial backup documentation. I'd also recommend downloading a copy of your tax transcript from the IRS website about 2-3 weeks after filing - it shows exactly what payments they have on record for your account. The combination of filing confirmation screenshot, bank statement, and tax transcript creates a complete paper trail that's pretty much bulletproof if any disputes arise later.

0 coins

Based on my experience, the IRS usually processes direct debit payments within 1-3 business days after accepting your return, but it can extend to 5-7 business days during peak filing season. Since you filed Monday and it's Thursday, you're still within the normal timeframe. A few things to check: 1. Log into your IRS online account to verify the payment is scheduled 2. Make sure you didn't accidentally select a future payment date (like April 15th) when filing 3. Check that your bank account has sufficient funds - some banks may delay processing if the account balance is low If the payment fails, the IRS will mail you a notice, but you won't get immediate penalties. You'd have time to make alternative payment arrangements. The key is acting quickly once you receive any failure notification. Don't stress too much yet - Thursday after a Monday filing is pretty normal timing for the withdrawal to appear.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation - filed on Tuesday and still waiting to see the withdrawal. Your point about checking for a future payment date is especially good since I think I might have accidentally selected April 15th instead of immediate payment. Quick question though - when you log into the IRS online account to verify the payment is scheduled, what section should I be looking at? I've never used their online portal before and it seems pretty confusing to navigate.

0 coins

This is a really common issue that catches a lot of people off guard! The main problem is that when you have multiple jobs, each employer's payroll system calculates your withholding as if that's your only source of income. So they're both using tax tables based on lower annual earnings than what you're actually making combined. Here's what's likely happening: Your first job sees $45,500 annual income ($1,750 Ɨ 26), and your second job sees $54,600 ($2,100 Ɨ 26). For a single person or head of household with 2 dependents at those individual income levels, the standard deduction and child tax credits would significantly reduce or eliminate federal tax liability. But your actual combined income of about $100,100 puts you in a much higher tax situation. The fix is definitely updating your W-4 forms using the multiple jobs worksheet or the IRS withholding calculator. I'd recommend: 1. Use the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator online first 2. Fill out Step 2 on both W-4 forms following the calculator's guidance 3. Consider having extra amount withheld from the higher-paying job to catch up Don't wait too long to fix this - the sooner you update your withholding, the less likely you'll face underpayment penalties next year!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This is exactly what happened to me last year! I had two jobs with similar pay ranges and ended up owing over $3,000 because I didn't understand how the withholding calculations work with multiple employers. What really helped me was realizing that I needed to treat my tax situation more proactively. Since you're already partway through the tax year, you might also want to consider making quarterly estimated tax payments in addition to fixing your W-4s. This can help ensure you don't get hit with underpayment penalties even if your updated withholding doesn't fully catch up. The IRS withholding calculator is definitely the way to go - it walks you through exactly which boxes to check and how much additional withholding to request from each job. Just make sure you have recent paystubs from both jobs when you use it so the calculations are accurate. Thanks for sharing such a detailed explanation of how this works! It would have saved me a lot of stress last year if I'd understood this earlier.

0 coins

I went through this exact same situation a couple years ago with two W-2 jobs! The zero withholding definitely caught me off guard at first. What I learned is that each employer's payroll system has no idea about your other job, so they calculate withholding based only on what they pay you. When you claim 2 dependents on each W-4, both employers think you're a single parent making around $45-55k per year, which after the standard deduction and child tax credits would result in very low tax liability. But your actual combined income of ~$100k puts you in a completely different tax bracket. The withholding tables just aren't designed to handle this automatically. Here's what worked for me: - Used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator (it's free and pretty accurate) - Updated both W-4s following their recommendations - Had to check the "multiple jobs" box on just one form (the higher paying one) - Added extra withholding amount to make up for the underwithholding earlier in the year Since you're already adding $75 extra to one job, you're on the right track, but you'll probably need more than that. The estimator will tell you exactly how much based on your specific situation with the dependents and filing status. Don't stress too much - this is fixable! Just get those W-4s updated soon so you have the rest of the year to catch up on withholding.

0 coins

Jamal Brown

•

This is such helpful advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with three part-time jobs instead of two full-time ones. It's reassuring to know this is a common issue and not just me messing something up. Quick question - when you used the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator, did you have to input information from both jobs at the same time? I'm wondering if it can handle multiple W-2s or if I need to calculate everything manually first. Also, how long did it take for the withholding changes to show up on your paystubs after you submitted the new W-4s? I'm definitely going to try this approach since manually trying to figure out the multiple jobs worksheet has been confusing me. Thanks for breaking down exactly which steps worked for you!

0 coins

Prev1...11851186118711881189...5643Next