IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Ava Thompson

•

Thanks for bringing this up! I just checked and you're absolutely right - there's definitely a discrepancy between what the IRS site shows and what Pay1040 is actually charging. I've been dealing with similar fee confusion lately. It's really frustrating when you're trying to plan your payment strategy and the official IRS page isn't current. From what I've seen in other tax forums, these processor fee changes happen pretty regularly, but the IRS website updates can lag behind by weeks or even months. For anyone else running into this, I'd recommend always double-checking the actual processor website before making your payment. The fees listed there are what you'll actually be charged, regardless of what the IRS page says. Learned this the hard way last year when I budgeted based on outdated fee info! Also worth noting that if you're making a large payment, even a 0.12% difference (1.87% vs 1.75%) can add up to real money. On a $10k tax bill, that's an extra $12 - not huge, but still annoying when you thought you were getting a better rate.

0 coins

Kaylee Cook

•

Exactly this! I just went through the same thing last week and ended up paying more than I budgeted for. It's so annoying that there's no centralized place to get real-time fee information. I wish the IRS would either update their site more frequently or just link directly to the processor sites instead of maintaining their own fee tables. Would save everyone a lot of confusion and unexpected costs. Thanks for the tip about always checking the processor site directly - definitely doing that going forward!

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

This is exactly why I always recommend checking multiple sources before making tax payments! I've been burned by outdated fee information before too. One thing that might help everyone here - the IRS actually has a disclaimer (though it's buried in small print) that says the payment processor fees are subject to change and to verify current rates on the processor's website. I only noticed this after getting hit with a higher fee than expected last year. For what it's worth, I've found that Pay1040's fees tend to fluctuate more than some of the other processors. If you're planning ahead for next year, it might be worth keeping an eye on their rates throughout the year to see if there's a pattern to when they increase or decrease fees. Also, don't forget that some credit cards offer bonus categories that might change the math on whether the fee is worth it. My Discover card had 5% back on "government services" one quarter last year, which made even higher processing fees totally worth it for the rewards.

0 coins

That's a really good point about the credit card bonus categories! I hadn't thought about timing my tax payments to coincide with quarterly bonus categories. Do you happen to remember which quarter Discover offered the government services bonus? That could be a game-changer for planning next year's payments. Also, thanks for mentioning that disclaimer about fees being subject to change. I probably glossed over that fine print when I was comparing options. It's frustrating that they bury important info like that, but at least now I know to look for it. Going to screenshot the actual processor fees before I make my payment this year just so I have a record of what I was quoted!

0 coins

This is such a helpful discussion! I'm dealing with similar issues in my web development business where I regularly help local non-profits with website maintenance and updates at reduced rates. One thing I've learned that might help others here: if you're providing ongoing services (like monthly website maintenance or regular social media management), consider creating annual service agreements that clearly outline both the services and any marketing benefits you receive. This makes it easier to track everything consistently throughout the year. Also, don't overlook the networking value of working with non-profits. Many board members are business owners or executives who could become paying clients. While you can't quantify this for tax purposes, it's a legitimate business development strategy that supports treating these relationships as marketing investments rather than pure charity. For anyone considering the AI tax tools mentioned earlier - I'd recommend using them as a starting point but definitely verify any advice with a qualified CPA, especially for business deduction strategies. The tax code around business charitable activities can be tricky, and you want to make sure your approach will hold up if questioned. The sponsorship agreement approach sounds promising though - I'm definitely going to explore that with my accountant for next year's non-profit work.

0 coins

Freya Ross

•

Great point about the networking value! I run a small graphic design studio and never thought about quantifying the business development aspect of non-profit work. You're absolutely right that board members often become valuable connections. I'm also curious about your mention of annual service agreements - do you structure these as traditional contracts with payment terms, or more like the sponsorship agreements @Anastasia Popova described? I m'wondering if having a formal annual agreement might make it easier to justify treating the work as marketing expense rather than donated services. The verification point about AI tax tools is spot on. I ve'found them helpful for initial research and understanding concepts, but tax law has so many nuances that professional review is essential, especially for business scenarios like this where the line between charity and marketing can get blurry. Have you had any experience with the IRS questioning reduced-rate work for non-profits, or do they generally accept it as long as you re'not claiming charitable deductions for the service value?

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

As a tax professional who's worked with many service-based businesses, I want to emphasize a few key points that haven't been fully addressed yet: **The "economic benefit" test is crucial** - The IRS looks at whether you received any economic benefit from the arrangement. If a non-profit provides meaningful marketing exposure, mentions your business in newsletters, or gives you access to their donor network, you're moving into legitimate business expense territory rather than pure charity. **State tax implications vary significantly** - While we've focused on federal rules, don't forget that state tax treatment of business charitable activities can differ substantially. Some states are more restrictive, others more generous. Make sure your approach works for both federal and state returns. **Audit risk considerations** - Large discrepancies between your reported income and industry norms can trigger scrutiny. If you're doing significant free work, document your rationale clearly. The IRS wants to see business purpose, not tax avoidance schemes. **Cash flow timing matters** - If you're considering the "charge full price then donate back" approach mentioned earlier, be aware this affects your quarterly estimated payments. You'll owe tax on the full income when received, even if you donate it back later in the year. I'd strongly recommend working with a CPA who understands service businesses and has experience with charitable/sponsorship arrangements. The strategies discussed here can work, but they need proper structure and documentation from day one.

0 coins

This is incredibly valuable insight from a professional perspective! The "economic benefit" test you mentioned is something I hadn't fully considered - it really helps clarify when discounted work crosses the line from charity into legitimate business expense territory. Your point about state tax implications is especially important. I've been focusing entirely on federal rules and completely overlooked that my state might have different requirements. Definitely need to research that before implementing any of these strategies. The audit risk consideration really resonates with me. I've been doing quite a bit of free work for non-profits, and now I'm wondering if the discrepancy between my reported income and what would be typical for my industry size could be a red flag. Having clear business rationale documented sounds essential. Quick question about the cash flow timing issue - if someone were to pursue the "charge full price then donate back" approach, would it be better to structure those donations quarterly to align with estimated payment periods? Or does the timing of the donation within the tax year not matter as much as having it documented properly? Also, when you mention working with a CPA experienced in service businesses - are there specific certifications or specializations I should look for, or is it more about finding someone who's dealt with similar charitable/sponsorship arrangements before? @Ethan Clark, thanks for bringing the professional perspective to this discussion - it's exactly what we needed to ground all these strategies in reality!

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

I'm just getting started with the injured spouse process myself - filed Form 8379 with my joint return about 3 weeks ago and already feeling anxious about the timeline! Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly eye-opening and honestly a huge relief. I had no idea that 11-14+ weeks was normal for these claims - I was expecting the typical 21-day refund timeline and would have been in full panic mode by week 6 without finding this discussion. The tip about checking account transcripts for TC codes around week 8-10 is brilliant advice that I never would have known about otherwise. It's so frustrating that the IRS doesn't clearly communicate these realistic timelines upfront. The "Where's My Refund" tool apparently gives you nothing useful, but at least I know now that doesn't mean something's wrong. My state return is still processing too, so I don't even have that small win yet, but it sounds like state and federal move on completely different timelines anyway. Thank you to everyone who's shared their real experiences and timelines - this community discussion has been more helpful than hours of searching official IRS resources. I'll definitely be checking back to share updates as I progress through this lengthy but apparently normal process!

0 coins

Welcome to the injured spouse waiting club! You're so smart to find this thread early in the process - I wish I had discovered it sooner when I was going through this last year. Three weeks in, you're still in the very early stages, so try not to stress too much yet (though I totally understand the anxiety when you need that refund!). Your state return might actually process faster than federal even though they're both still showing as processing. Many states handle these more quickly than the federal manual review process. And you're absolutely right that this community has been way more informative than anything official - the real experiences and practical timelines people share here are invaluable. Since you're just starting out, I'd suggest setting a reminder for yourself around week 8 to pull your transcript and look for those TC codes everyone mentioned. That way you won't be checking obsessively every day and can focus on other things while the wheels slowly turn. The waiting is definitely the hardest part, but knowing what to expect makes it much more manageable!

0 coins

Just wanted to jump in as someone who's been through this process twice now. The injured spouse form really is like navigating uncharted waters the first time! I filed my Form 8379 both times electronically with my joint return, and both years took right around 12-13 weeks to process. The first year I was constantly checking "Where's My Refund" and driving myself crazy, but the second time I knew to just be patient and check my transcript around week 10. One thing I learned is that the IRS actually has a separate department that handles injured spouse allocations, which is why it takes so much longer than regular returns. They have to manually calculate how much of the refund belongs to each spouse based on income, withholdings, and payments made. It's not just a computer automatically processing it like normal returns. The good news is that once they complete the allocation, the refund usually deposits pretty quickly. Both times I got my money within a week of seeing the final processing codes on my transcript. Hang in there - I know the waiting is stressful when you're counting on that money, but it will come through!

0 coins

This is so helpful to hear from someone who's been through it multiple times! The detail about there being a separate department for injured spouse allocations really explains why the timeline is so different from regular returns. I'm currently at week 5 myself and was starting to worry, but knowing that 12-13 weeks is typical gives me a much better frame of reference. Your point about the manual calculation process makes total sense - they literally have to figure out what portion of income, withholdings, and payments belongs to each spouse, which obviously can't be automated like a standard return. That's probably why the transcript codes are so important for tracking actual progress behind the scenes. The fact that both your refunds deposited quickly once the allocation was complete is really encouraging! It sounds like the bulk of the time is spent in that manual review phase, but once they finish the calculations, things move fast. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's exactly the kind of real-world timeline that helps set proper expectations for those of us going through this process!

0 coins

As someone who's been through the exact same situation (married filing separately due to student loans with a young child), I'd strongly recommend being conservative with your withholding changes. The student loan repayment strategy that requires separate filing often means you're already in a more complex tax situation. Here's what worked for me: I kept claiming 0 on my W-4 but had my spouse claim 2 allowances on theirs (or use the equivalent on the new W-4 form). This way we weren't both over-withholding, but we also weren't risking a big tax bill. The person with the higher income (sounds like your husband) can usually handle claiming more allowances safely. Also, make sure you've agreed on who will claim your child each year - this needs to be consistent and strategic since that parent gets the child tax credit. We alternated years based on who had higher income that year to maximize the benefit. I'd suggest running the numbers through the IRS withholding calculator first before making any changes, especially with your income levels. Better to get a small refund than scramble to pay a tax bill!

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm in a similar situation but just starting out - my spouse and I are both new to the workforce and trying to figure out the whole married filing separately thing for student loans. When you say you alternated years for claiming the child, how did you coordinate that with your loan servicer? Did changing who claims the child affect your income-driven repayment calculations significantly from year to year?

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

I'd definitely recommend starting with the IRS withholding calculator that Emma mentioned - it's free and will give you the most accurate picture for your specific situation. With your combined income of around $133k and filing separately, there are definitely some nuances to consider. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is timing. If you do decide to change your withholding, consider doing it at the beginning of a quarter so you can more easily track the impact. Also, since you mentioned your incomes are stable, you might want to do a mid-year check using the calculator again to see if you're on track. The child tax credit coordination that Miguel mentioned is crucial - whoever claims your 2-year-old will get up to $2,000 in credit, which can significantly impact your withholding needs. This should definitely factor into your decision about whether to change from 0 to 1. Given that you've successfully avoided owing taxes in previous years, I'd lean toward being conservative. Maybe try the IRS calculator first, and if it shows you're significantly over-withholding, then consider the change. You can always adjust again later in the year if needed.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I was looking for! The timing suggestion about changing at the beginning of a quarter makes a lot of sense - I hadn't thought about that. And you're absolutely right about being conservative since we've managed to avoid owing in the past. I think I'll start with the IRS calculator to see where we actually stand before making any changes to my withholding. Better safe than sorry with a toddler depending on us! Thanks for breaking down the child tax credit impact too - that's definitely something we need to factor in when deciding who claims our little one.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly impressed by the depth and quality of advice shared in this thread! Reading through everyone's experiences has been like getting a masterclass in handling property tax issues after casualty losses. I'm actually facing a somewhat similar situation - my home was severely damaged in a hailstorm last year (roof destroyed, significant structural damage), and while insurance covered most of the repairs, I'm now considering whether to sell the property or continue living there. The complexity of tax implications you've all discussed is making me realize I need to be much more proactive about understanding my situation before making any decisions. A couple of observations from reading through this discussion: **The documentation theme is crystal clear** - it sounds like gathering and organizing paperwork early is absolutely critical, whether you're selling immediately or just planning ahead. The tip about contacting the title company for old assessment records is brilliant. **Multiple strategies exist** - From 1031 exchanges to Opportunity Zones to installment sales, there are clearly many different approaches depending on individual circumstances. It's reassuring to know there are options beyond just accepting a large tax hit. **Professional guidance seems essential** - While this community discussion has been incredibly valuable, the complexity of these situations really seems to warrant getting expert help from tax professionals who specialize in casualty losses and real estate transactions. For those who've successfully navigated these waters, what's your biggest piece of advice for someone just starting to think through their options? Should I be taking any specific steps now even though I'm not ready to sell immediately? Thank you all for creating such a valuable resource with your shared experiences!

0 coins

Paolo Marino

•

Welcome to the community! Your hailstorm situation definitely has some similarities to what we've all been discussing here. Since you're still in the early stages of thinking through your options, you're actually in a great position to get organized before you need to make any decisions. My biggest advice based on everything I've learned from this thread would be to start documenting everything NOW, even if you're not planning to sell immediately. Gather your insurance settlement paperwork, find your original purchase documents, and get copies of your property tax assessments from before the damage. The title company tip mentioned earlier could be really helpful for this. Also, keep detailed records of any repairs or improvements you make with insurance proceeds, as these could affect your basis calculations later. If you do decide to sell in the future, having all this documentation organized will make the tax planning much smoother. One thing specific to your situation - since you're still living in the property, you might have more flexibility with the Section 121 primary residence exclusion if you do decide to sell down the road. That's potentially a huge advantage compared to those of us who moved away after our casualty losses. The consensus here seems to be that getting professional tax advice early is worth it, especially for understanding how your specific insurance settlement affects your property basis. Better to know your options now than scramble later!

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

Welcome to the community! This has been such an educational thread to read through as someone new here. I'm dealing with a property situation after a flood damaged my home last year, and seeing all the different experiences and strategies shared here has been incredibly valuable. One thing I wanted to add that might help others is about timing your documentation gathering. I learned the hard way that some records become harder to access over time - my insurance company only keeps detailed settlement breakdowns readily available for a certain period before they get archived. Same with some county offices that digitize older records differently. If anyone reading this thread is in the early stages after a casualty loss, I'd recommend requesting and organizing all your documentation sooner rather than later. The specific breakdown of insurance payments (structure vs. contents vs. additional living expenses vs. loss of use) that several people mentioned can be crucial for tax planning, but insurance companies sometimes summarize these details differently in later correspondence. Also, for those considering the various tax strategies discussed here - the 1031 exchanges, Opportunity Zone investments, installment sales - it's worth noting that some of these have planning requirements that need to be set up well before you actually sell. Having your documentation organized early gives you more time to explore these options properly. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and knowledge throughout this discussion. This community is an amazing resource for navigating these complex situations!

0 coins

Liam Duke

•

This is such excellent advice about the timing of documentation gathering! I'm relatively new to dealing with casualty loss situations, and I hadn't considered that insurance companies and county offices might archive or reorganize their records differently over time. That's a really practical insight that could save people a lot of headaches down the road. Your point about insurance payment breakdowns being more detailed in initial correspondence versus later summaries is particularly valuable. It makes sense that the specific categorization of payments (structure, contents, living expenses, etc.) would be most clearly documented in the immediate settlement paperwork rather than in annual statements or other follow-up communications. The advance planning requirement for some tax strategies is another great observation. Reading through this entire thread, it's clear that many of the most beneficial approaches (like 1031 exchanges and Opportunity Zone investments) require setting up the framework before you're actually ready to sell. Having that documentation organized early definitely provides more flexibility to explore these options properly. As someone just starting to navigate this type of situation, I really appreciate how this community has shared not just the technical aspects of tax planning, but also these practical tips about timing and process. It's exactly the kind of real-world wisdom that you can't easily find in tax guides or official publications. Thank you for contributing to what's been an incredibly comprehensive and helpful discussion!

0 coins

Prev1...11851186118711881189...5643Next