


Ask the community...
LOL at "I did it myself for the first time" - welcome to the club of "I'll never do that again"! š But seriously, don't panic. I was shocked when I got a $4,200 bill from the IRS two years ago. Turned out I had completely messed up reporting my crypto trades (who knew you had to report EACH transaction?!). The good news is that if you respond to them with a reasonable explanation and are willing to work with them, they're actually not the monsters everyone makes them out to be. They put me on a payment plan with minimal hassle.
Before you do anything else, make sure to carefully read through every page of the notice you received. The IRS notice should include a detailed breakdown showing exactly what they believe you reported incorrectly versus what they have on file. Look for things like: - Unreported W-2 or 1099 income that employers/clients sent to the IRS - Incorrect Social Security numbers or dependent information - Math errors in calculating your tax liability - Incorrectly claimed deductions or credits The notice should also clearly state your response deadline (usually 30 days) and provide instructions for how to respond if you disagree. If you agree with their assessment, you can simply pay the amount owed. If you disagree, you'll need to send a written response with supporting documentation. One thing to keep in mind: if this is legitimate, acting quickly is important. The longer you wait, the more interest and penalties will accumulate. But don't rush into paying without understanding what went wrong - you have rights as a taxpayer to dispute incorrect assessments.
This is excellent advice! I just went through something similar myself and Lucas is absolutely right about reading every single page carefully. When I got my notice, I was so panicked that I almost missed the detailed breakdown on page 2 that showed exactly which 1099 form I had forgotten to include. The IRS actually makes it pretty clear what they think went wrong if you take the time to read through all their documentation. Also want to emphasize the deadline point - I waited almost 3 weeks before responding and the interest had already started adding up. Don't make my mistake!
wait but what about the taxable portion of social security benefits?? my dad gets social security AND takes 401k money and says his social security gets taxed more cuz of the 401k withdrawls... is that different?
Your dad is correct, but that's a different tax concept. 401k withdrawals can increase the taxable portion of Social Security benefits, but that's not the same as paying FICA taxes on the 401k money. Up to 85% of Social Security benefits can become taxable if your "combined income" (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of Social Security benefits) exceeds certain thresholds. Since 401k withdrawals increase your AGI, they can push more of your Social Security benefits into the taxable range. It's an income tax calculation, not a FICA tax issue.
This is such a common source of confusion! I went through the exact same worry when I was approaching retirement. The key thing to remember is that FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare) are only on "earned income" - basically wages and self-employment income. Your 401k withdrawals are considered "unearned income" or investment income, so they're completely exempt from FICA taxes. What helped me understand it better was thinking about it this way: when you were working and contributing to your 401k, you were still paying FICA taxes on your full gross salary before any 401k deductions. So you've already "paid your dues" to Social Security and Medicare on that money. Now when you withdraw it in retirement, the government just wants their income tax cut, not another round of FICA taxes. The only thing to watch out for is if you're still working part-time in retirement - those work wages will still have FICA taxes, but your 401k withdrawals won't. Hope this helps ease your mind about retirement planning!
Thank you for that clear explanation! As someone just starting to plan for retirement, this really helps put things in perspective. I never thought about it that way - that we've already paid our FICA taxes on that money when we earned it originally. One follow-up question though - does this same rule apply to traditional IRA withdrawals? I have both a 401k through work and a traditional IRA I contribute to separately. Want to make sure I understand the tax implications for both types of accounts when I retire.
This is such great advice from everyone! I'm actually in a similar boat with my partner and we ended up going the separate accounts route after doing a lot of research. One thing that's worked really well for us is using a shared spreadsheet where we both track our individual investment performance and holdings. We can still discuss strategies, share research, and even coordinate our asset allocation across both accounts (like if I'm heavy in tech stocks, he might balance that with more utilities in his account). It gives us that transparency and collaboration we wanted without any of the tax headaches or breakup complications people have mentioned. Plus we can still celebrate wins and losses together - it just makes the paperwork way cleaner come tax time. Sometimes the simplest solution really is the best one!
That's such a brilliant approach! The shared spreadsheet idea is genius - you get all the benefits of working together on investments without any of the legal or tax complications. I love how you can still coordinate your overall portfolio allocation across both accounts. That's actually more sophisticated than what most married couples do with their finances! It shows you can build that financial partnership and transparency without necessarily combining everything legally. Thanks for sharing this - it's given me some great ideas for how my girlfriend and I could approach this.
This has been such a valuable thread! As someone who works in financial planning, I see couples struggle with these decisions all the time. The separate accounts with shared transparency approach that several people have mentioned is really the sweet spot for unmarried couples. One additional thought - if you do decide to go the joint account route despite the complications, make sure to draft a simple investment partnership agreement. It should outline contribution percentages, how decisions get made, what happens if someone wants out, and how you'll handle the tax reporting. Most brokerages won't require this, but having it documented can save you major headaches later. That said, after reading all these experiences, I'd probably lean toward the separate accounts approach too. You can always revisit the joint account idea after marriage when the tax treatment becomes much simpler!
This is exactly the kind of professional perspective I was hoping to see! The investment partnership agreement idea is really smart - even if you go with separate accounts, having something in writing about how you'll coordinate your investing strategies and share information could be valuable. It's like a prenup for your investment approach. I'm curious about the tax treatment difference for married couples - does having a joint investment account become much simpler once you're married? Is it just that you're filing jointly anyway so the income allocation doesn't matter as much?
Make sure you explore all benefits you might be eligible for as a widower with children. If your children are eligible for Social Security survivor benefits, those are generally tax-free to the children. You might also be entitled to a $255 lump-sum death benefit from Social Security.
The lump-sum death benefit is so ridiculously small compared to actual funeral costs! $255 barely covers anything these days. The system should really update that amount - it's been the same for decades.
I completely agree that $255 is inadequate for today's funeral costs. When this benefit was first established in 1935, it was meant to be meaningful, but it hasn't been adjusted for inflation like many other benefits. The average funeral today costs between $7,000-$10,000, making the lump-sum payment cover just a tiny fraction. That said, the Social Security survivor benefits for children can be substantial until they turn 18 (or 19 if still in high school), often ranging from hundreds to over a thousand dollars monthly per child depending on the deceased parent's earnings record. These benefits can provide significant financial support for families dealing with the loss of a parent.
I'm so sorry for your loss, Sunny. Dealing with taxes while grieving is incredibly difficult, and you're asking exactly the right questions. Yes, you can file as Head of Household for the year your wife passed away since she died before July 1st. The IRS considers you unmarried for the entire tax year in this situation, and since you're supporting your children who live with you, you meet the HOH requirements. A few additional things to keep in mind: - When filing your wife's final return, write "DECEASED" and the date of death across the top - You'll sign her return as "Filing as surviving spouse" - Make sure to claim any income she earned up to her date of death on her final return - Consider whether any of her medical expenses paid after death might be deductible on either return The separate filing approach you're considering is completely valid - her final return as married filing separately, and yours as HOH. This gives you flexibility with deduction choices too. Don't hesitate to consult a tax professional who has experience with widower situations if you need additional guidance. There are often overlooked deductions and credits that can help during this transition. Take care of yourself during this difficult time.
Thank you for the comprehensive information, Dmitry. I wanted to add that when dealing with the final return for a deceased spouse, it's also important to consider any retirement account distributions that might need to be reported. If your wife had any 401k or IRA accounts, there may be required minimum distributions or other tax implications to address on her final return. Also, if she received any life insurance payouts before her death, those generally aren't taxable, but the interest earned on delayed payouts might be. The rules around inherited retirement accounts have changed recently too, so it's worth double-checking those requirements with a professional who understands the current regulations.
Jamal Anderson
Former tax preparer here. The confusion might be because you mentioned "claiming your wife" which isn't actually how it works anymore. You file either as "married filing jointly" (MFJ) or "married filing separately" (MFS). If you file jointly, which most couples do because it's usually more beneficial, then the refund belongs equally to both spouses under tax law, regardless of who earned what. It's a joint return with joint liability and joint benefits.
0 coins
Nia Wilson
ā¢Thanks for clearing that up. I was using outdated terminology. We do file jointly, and I was confused about the legal status of the refund itself. So even though I'm the only one working and earning income, the refund is legally considered owned by both of us equally? That makes sense for a joint return.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
ā¢Exactly right. When you file jointly, the IRS views you and your wife as one tax unit. All income, deductions, credits, and resulting refunds belong to both of you equally from a legal perspective. The fact that you're the only one earning income doesn't change this - that's actually one of the benefits of filing jointly, as it recognizes the partnership aspect of marriage where different contributions (income earning vs other support) are equally valued.
0 coins
Mei Wong
This is actually more complicated than just tax law. While the IRS treats the refund as belonging to both of you when filing jointly, state laws about marital property can also come into play. In community property states, most assets acquired during marriage are generally considered owned equally by both spouses. But in equitable distribution states, it could be treated differently in certain contexts.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
ā¢What are community property states? Is there a list somewhere? This is the first time I'm hearing about this.
0 coins
Malik Davis
ā¢Community property states are: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. In these states, most assets and income acquired during marriage are considered jointly owned by both spouses. Alaska also allows couples to opt into community property laws. The remaining states follow "equitable distribution" where assets are divided fairly but not necessarily equally in divorce situations. For tax refunds though, federal tax law generally takes precedence - if you file jointly, the IRS considers the refund as belonging to both spouses regardless of which state you live in.
0 coins