IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm currently working as a tax analyst at a regional CPA firm and have been following this thread with great interest. The insights about NYU's MSL program have been incredibly helpful, especially regarding the work experience flexibility and networking opportunities. One aspect I'd love to hear more about is the international tax component that several people have mentioned. My firm primarily handles domestic clients, but I'm really interested in developing expertise in cross-border taxation. For those who've been through the program, how robust is the international tax curriculum? Are there specific courses focused on transfer pricing, treaty analysis, or international compliance issues? Also, I'm curious about the technology integration in the program. With all the changes in tax technology and AI tools becoming more prevalent in practice, does the curriculum address these developments? I want to make sure any graduate program I choose will keep me current with how the profession is evolving. The discussion about career advancement has been really encouraging too. It sounds like the NYU network and brand recognition really do translate into tangible opportunities, which is exactly what I'm hoping for in taking this next step in my career.

0 coins

Great questions about the international tax component! As someone who's been researching various tax graduate programs, I've found that NYU's international tax offerings are actually one of their strongest differentiators compared to traditional MST programs. From what I've gathered through program materials and talking to current students, they offer dedicated courses in transfer pricing, international tax planning, and treaty interpretation. The faculty includes professors who have worked directly with the OECD on BEPS implementation, which gives students exposure to cutting-edge international tax policy development. Regarding technology integration, this is such an important consideration given how rapidly the field is changing. I've heard that NYU has been incorporating tax technology tools into their coursework, including exposure to research databases and compliance software that firms actually use in practice. They've also started addressing how AI is impacting tax research and planning methodologies. Your background at a regional firm actually sounds similar to mine - mostly domestic work but with growing interest in international issues. The cross-border expertise you'd gain at NYU could really set you apart in the job market, especially as more mid-size firms are developing international practices to serve clients with global operations. The career advancement stories in this thread have been really encouraging for all of us considering this investment in our professional development!

0 coins

As someone who went through a similar decision process a few years ago, I wanted to add my perspective on the MSL vs MST comparison. I ultimately chose a different route (Georgetown's MST), but I did extensive research on NYU's program during my decision-making process. One thing that really impressed me about NYU's MSL program was how integrated it is with their broader tax law ecosystem. Unlike standalone MST programs, NYU students get to participate in the same seminars and workshops as their world-renowned LLM students and tax law faculty. This creates a much richer academic environment than what you'd typically find in a business school-based MST program. The practical focus that others have mentioned is real - when I visited NYU, I sat in on a class where students were working through actual IRS private letter ruling requests and analyzing how different fact patterns might change the outcomes. That level of real-world application is something you don't always get in more theoretical programs. Regarding your work experience concern, I'd echo what others have said about quality over quantity. Your Big 4 background working on partnership and corporate matters is exactly the kind of sophisticated experience they're looking for. The admissions committee understands that two years at a major firm often provides more comprehensive exposure than three years elsewhere. Even though I chose differently, I have tremendous respect for NYU's program and know several graduates who've had excellent career outcomes. The NYC location really is a huge advantage for building the professional network that can accelerate your career in tax.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with an added wrinkle - my family LLC has been making distributions to partners even during loss years, which I think has been reducing my basis below the loss amounts. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like I need to track two separate things: the passive activity loss carryforwards (Form 8582) AND my basis limitations from the partnership. Can someone clarify - if my basis went to zero in say 2015 due to distributions exceeding my share of income, does that mean I can't claim ANY of the passive losses from 2016 onward until I restore my basis? Also, when people mention getting documentation from a tax professional, what's a reasonable cost range for having someone reconstruct 15-20 years of this analysis? I'm trying to decide if it's worth pursuing or if the accumulated losses might not be as valuable as I initially thought due to the basis limitations.

0 coins

You're absolutely right that you need to track both limitations separately! If your basis went to zero in 2015, then losses from 2016 onward would be suspended due to insufficient basis, NOT due to passive activity limitations. These are called "suspended losses" and they don't carry forward on Form 8582 until you restore basis. Here's how it works: First, losses are limited by your basis in the partnership. Any losses that exceed your basis are suspended and wait for you to increase basis (through additional contributions or future income allocations). Only losses that pass the basis test then go to Form 8582 for the passive activity limitation test. So if you had zero basis in 2015, your Form 8582 carryforward would only include pre-2015 losses that were disallowed due to passive activity rules, not the post-2015 losses that were suspended due to basis limitations. For cost - I've seen reconstructions like this range from $1,500-4,000 depending on complexity and years involved. Given the potential basis issues in your situation, it's definitely worth having a professional evaluate whether you actually have significant usable passive losses before investing in the full analysis. Many CPAs will do an initial consultation to assess the situation for a few hundred dollars.

0 coins

This thread is incredibly thorough - thank you everyone for sharing your experiences! I'm in a similar boat with a family LLC that's had losses for years, and I never realized I should have been tracking these on Form 8582. One thing I want to add for anyone else reading this: make sure you understand the "material participation" aspect too. Even if you think you're not materially participating in the LLC activities, the IRS has specific tests for this. If you accidentally qualify as a material participant in some years, those losses wouldn't be subject to passive activity limitations and the carryforward calculations get more complicated. I learned this when reviewing my situation - there were a couple years where I spent significant time helping with property management that might have pushed me over the material participation threshold. This means some of my losses might not have been passive losses at all, which affects both the Form 8582 carryforward amounts and how much I can actually claim. Has anyone else run into this material participation complication when reconstructing their passive loss history? I'm wondering if it's worth the extra complexity to analyze each year individually or if most people just treat all LLC losses as passive for simplicity.

0 coins

Oliver Becker

•

You raise an excellent point about material participation! This is actually a crucial consideration that can significantly impact your passive loss calculations. The IRS has seven specific tests for material participation, and if you meet any of them in a given year, your losses from that activity are NOT subject to passive activity limitations. The most common test that trips people up is the 500+ hour test - if you spent more than 500 hours in any year on the rental activities (including management, maintenance, tenant relations, etc.), you'd be considered a material participant for that year. There's also a "significant participation" test and several others that could apply. For your reconstruction, I'd strongly recommend analyzing this year by year rather than assuming all losses are passive. Here's why: if you were a material participant in certain years, those losses could have been used immediately against your ordinary income, meaning they wouldn't carry forward as passive losses at all. This could actually reduce your accumulated passive loss carryforward but might mean you already got the tax benefit in those years. Keep detailed records of your time and activities for each year if possible. Even rough estimates based on calendars, emails, or bank records showing property-related activities can help establish your participation level. A tax professional experienced with passive activity rules can help you work through each year's classification - it's definitely worth the complexity given the potential tax impact!

0 coins

You've gotten good advice about the gift tax exemption for education, but don't forget to look into potential education tax credits too! If your relative is claiming you as a dependent, they might be eligible for the American Opportunity Credit or Lifetime Learning Credit based on the tuition they're paying. If you're not a dependent, YOU might be able to claim those credits yourself, even though someone else paid your tuition. The tax benefits could be worth thousands!

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

This is so important! My parents paid my tuition directly to my university and we almost missed out on the American Opportunity Credit because we didn't realize I could still claim it on my own return even though I didn't personally pay the tuition. Saved me $2,500 on my taxes last year!

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Wow, I had no idea about the education tax credits! I'm definitely not a dependent on their taxes, so it sounds like I might be able to claim the credit myself. That would be amazing if I could get a tax break from this too. Thanks for bringing this up - I'll look into these credits right away!

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

Just wanted to add another perspective here - I'm a tax preparer and see this situation all the time. Everything mentioned about direct tuition payments being exempt from gift tax is absolutely correct, but I always remind clients to be specific about what qualifies. The exemption applies to "qualified tuition" which includes tuition and fees required for enrollment, but NOT room and board, books, supplies, or equipment (unless they're required fees paid directly to the school). Also, since you mentioned your relative gave you $18k for investments, they're still under the $20k annual exclusion limit for 2025, so no gift tax issues there either. But if they plan to give you more money throughout the year for other purposes, just keep track so you don't accidentally go over that threshold. The tuition payment won't count toward it at all though! Your relative sounds incredibly generous - just make sure you both understand exactly what expenses qualify for the unlimited education exemption versus what counts toward the annual gift limit.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

This is really helpful to hear from a professional! I'm glad to know we're handling everything correctly. Quick question - when you say "qualified tuition and fees required for enrollment," does that include things like lab fees or technology fees that the university charges as part of tuition? My school has several mandatory fees that show up on the same bill as tuition, so I want to make sure my relative knows exactly what they can pay directly without it counting as a gift.

0 coins

Does anyone know if the payment voucher changes each year? I found one in some old tax papers but I'm not sure if I can use it for this year's taxes.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Don't use an old voucher! The form itself might look similar but the processing information and routing details can change year to year. Always use the current year's Form 1040-V. You can download the current one directly from irs.gov or get it from your tax software if you're using any. Using an outdated form might delay your payment processing.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Don't use an old voucher! The form itself might look similar but the processing information and routing details can change year

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Great question! I went through this exact same confusion a few years ago when I had to mail in my return. Yes, you definitely need Form 1040-V (the payment voucher) when sending a check with your tax return. Think of it as a "routing slip" that tells the IRS exactly where to apply your payment. The voucher is pretty straightforward - it's just a one-page form where you fill in your name, address, SSN, the tax year, and payment amount. It creates a paper trail so your payment gets credited to the right account and tax year. Without it, your check might sit in limbo while they try to figure out what it's for. Pro tip: Make sure you're using the current year's Form 1040-V (not an old one from previous years) and double-check that all the info matches exactly what's on your tax return. The IRS can be picky about consistency!

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

This is super helpful, thanks! I'm new to paper filing and honestly feeling pretty overwhelmed by all the different forms and procedures. One more question - when you say "double-check that all the info matches exactly," does that mean if I made a small typo on my return (like a slight address formatting difference), I need to make sure the voucher has the same typo? Or should I fix it on the voucher to match my official records?

0 coins

Dont forget that u still have to pay regular income tax on any IRA withdrawl even if u avoid the 10% penaltly! this hit me hard last yr when i did this for my kids college. my tax bill was WAY bigger than i expected!!

0 coins

This is so important! I made this mistake too. My withdrawal pushed me into a higher tax bracket and I ended up with a huge tax bill in April. Definitely consider taking the money out across two calendar years if its a large amount.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Great advice from everyone here! Just want to emphasize one more important point - make sure you understand the timing requirements. The IRA withdrawal needs to be made in the same tax year that you pay the qualified education expenses, OR in the year immediately before or after. So if you're paying tuition for the spring 2025 semester, you could make the withdrawal in 2024, 2025, or 2026. This timing flexibility can be really helpful for tax planning, especially if you want to spread the income tax impact across multiple years like Fatima mentioned. Also keep detailed records of all qualified expenses and your withdrawal - the IRS may ask for documentation if they review your return.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

This timing flexibility is really valuable information! I didn't realize you could make the withdrawal in the year before or after paying the expenses. That gives me some options for managing the tax impact. One question though - if I make the withdrawal in 2024 but don't actually pay the tuition until January 2025, do I report the penalty exception on my 2024 tax return or wait until 2025? I want to make sure I handle the paperwork correctly.

0 coins

Prev1...11811182118311841185...5643Next