IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Omar Farouk

•

Question - if a trust has zero income for the year, do you still need to file a 1041? Our family trust just holds some property but didn't generate any income last year.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Generally no. If the trust has no income and no taxable activity for the year, you typically don't need to file a 1041. However, it's sometimes good practice to file a "zero return" just to keep the filing history current and avoid questions later about "missing" years.

0 coins

AaliyahAli

•

Great question! I went through this exact situation last year. As others have mentioned, you don't need the grantors to file personal 1040s just for your trust filing purposes. However, I'd recommend getting a clear understanding of whether your trust is actually a "grantor trust" or not - this makes a huge difference. If it's a standard irrevocable trust (not a grantor trust), then the trust files its own 1041 and issues K-1s to beneficiaries for any distributions. The grantors' personal income levels are irrelevant to the trust's filing requirements. One thing to watch out for: even if the grantors don't normally need to file because of low income, if they receive distributions from the trust that push them above the filing threshold, they'll need to file to report the K-1 income. But that's their responsibility, not yours as trustee. Make sure you have the trust's EIN and keep good records of all trust income and distributions. The 1041 filing requirements are based on the trust having $600+ in gross income OR any taxable income, regardless of the grantors' situation.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you! I'm still learning the ropes here. One follow-up question - you mentioned keeping good records of trust income and distributions. What specific documentation should I be maintaining as trustee? I want to make sure I'm not missing anything important for future filings or if there's ever an audit. Also, when you say the trust needs its own EIN - is that something I should have gotten when the trust was first established, or do I need to apply for one now that I'm handling the tax filings?

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

Quick practical question - does anyone know if electric vehicle charging at work can be covered under these commuter benefits? My company just installed chargers but they're not free to use. Wondering if I can set up pre-tax dollars for that or if it only applies to parking and transit?

0 coins

EV charging specifically isn't covered under the standard commuter benefits unfortunately. The IRS only recognizes parking, transit passes, and vanpool expenses under Section 132(f). HOWEVER, your employer could potentially offer EV charging as a separate fringe benefit. Some companies classify it as a de minimis fringe benefit if the value is low enough. Worth asking your HR department if they've considered this!

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

This is a really thoughtful question that gets at some fundamental issues with how we structure transportation policy through the tax code. From my perspective working in local government, these benefits are essentially a political compromise that emerged in the 1980s when direct transit subsidies were politically difficult to pass. They're what policy folks call "tax expenditures" - spending money through the tax code rather than direct appropriations. The parking vs transit contradiction you've identified is spot on. It's a classic example of how we ended up with competing policy goals within the same program. The parking benefit exists largely because of equity concerns - not everyone lives in areas with good transit access, and excluding those workers from commuter benefits would have made the whole program politically untenable. You're absolutely right that direct transit investment would be more effective environmentally and economically. But here's the reality: expanding Metro funding requires legislative battles every budget cycle, while these tax benefits fly under the radar once they're established. They're also easier for employers to administer than negotiating with multiple transit agencies. The irony is that your $600 annual savings probably costs the federal government more in lost tax revenue than it would cost to just improve your train service directly. But that's American transportation policy in a nutshell - we love indirect subsidies that hide the true costs.

0 coins

This is such a helpful explanation! As someone new to navigating these benefits, it's eye-opening to understand the political history behind why they exist in this seemingly contradictory form. Your point about tax expenditures being "stealthier" than direct spending really clicks for me. I hadn't considered how these benefits essentially survive because they're less visible in budget discussions compared to direct transit funding. Do you know if there's been any recent movement toward reforming these programs? It seems like with all the focus on climate policy lately, there might be appetite for restructuring them to prioritize transit over parking, or at least removing the parking benefit entirely? I'm also curious - from your local government experience, do you see employers actually promoting the transit benefits effectively, or are most people just stumbling into them like I did?

0 coins

Another independent contractor here! Just want to add that you DEFINITELY need to file Schedule C regardless of LLC status. An LLC is just a liability protection layer, it doesn't change your tax filing. I've been filing Schedule C for 5 years with no LLC.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Which tax software do you use? I've been trying to use FreeTaxUSA but it gets confusing with all the business expense categories.

0 coins

Great question! Yes, you definitely need to file Schedule C even without an LLC. As an independent contractor, you're automatically considered a sole proprietor for tax purposes, and Schedule C is how you report that business income and expenses. The good news is that since you have legitimate business losses, filing Schedule C will actually benefit you by allowing those losses to offset other income on your tax return. Just make sure to keep detailed records of all your business expenses - even though you're using personal accounts, you can still deduct legitimate business costs as long as you can document them properly. Don't worry about not having separate business accounts yet - many independent contractors start this way. The key is being able to distinguish between personal and business expenses. Consider getting a simple accounting app or spreadsheet to track everything going forward. You're on the right track planning to set up separate accounts once you form your LLC!

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm in almost the exact same situation - doing freelance writing work but haven't set up an LLC yet. I've been putting off filing because I wasn't sure if I needed Schedule C without the formal business structure. Question though - when you say "legitimate business expenses," does that include things like my home internet bill since I work from home? Or does it have to be expenses that are 100% business only? I'm trying to figure out what percentage of my utilities I can reasonably deduct.

0 coins

How to correctly understand the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator results for 2025?

I've been frustrated the past couple years because my spouse and I end up owing money when we file taxes. Trying to avoid that headache for next year. So yesterday I decided to try the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator, but now I'm completely confused by the results it's giving me. At the top of the results page, it shows our expected withholding, expected tax obligation, and then calculates how much we'll owe: Projected amount owed $2,145 That seems pretty accurate since we owed about $2,100 this year, so I'm guessing the estimator is working correctly there. What I can't figure out is that the estimator recommends I put **$5,580** on Step 4(a) Other Income (not from jobs) on my W4, and then enter **$216** on Step 4(c) Extra withholding. I get paid every two weeks (26 paychecks annually). By my calculations, $216 Ɨ 26 = $5,616 in extra withholding for the year. How does that make sense? If we're projected to owe an additional $2,145 beyond what's already withheld, why would we need to withhold an extra $5,616 to cover a $2,145 shortfall? A couple things that might matter: 1. I entered our income as gross amounts from our payroll portal (the estimator wasn't super clear about this) 2. My spouse has health insurance premiums deducted from each check, while I contribute to an HSA plus have vision and dental deductions (but no health insurance). It looks like the $5,580 they want me to list on 4a of the W4 might actually be related to our HSA and health insurance contributions. But why would that be "additional"? Those amounts were already included in the gross income figures I entered earlier in the estimator. Should I be entering our income MINUS health insurance and HSA contributions to get this to make sense?

I've been struggling with this exact same issue! Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly helpful. I'm a government employee with health insurance and TSP contributions (similar to HSA), and the IRS estimator kept giving me those same confusing Step 4(a) recommendations that made no sense. After reading the advice from the tax preparer and others who've been through this, I'm going to abandon the estimator completely and use the simple math approach. We owed about $1,900 last year, so I'll add a small buffer and divide by my remaining paychecks to get an extra withholding amount for Step 4(c). It's honestly frustrating that the IRS's own tool is so problematic for common situations like married couples with pre-tax deductions. You'd think they would have figured this out by now! But I'm glad to see there's a straightforward workaround that actually works for real people. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this thread probably saved me hours of continued frustration with that calculator.

0 coins

I'm so glad this thread has been helpful for you too! As someone who just discovered this community, it's amazing to see how people share their real-world solutions to these confusing tax situations. The TSP contributions definitely work similarly to HSA in terms of how they mess up the IRS estimator - it's the same pre-tax deduction problem that everyone's been describing. Government employees seem to hit this issue a lot because of all the various pre-tax benefits we typically have. Your math approach sounds solid - taking last year's shortfall plus a buffer and spreading it across remaining paychecks is so much cleaner than trying to decode what that estimator thinks it's doing. I'm planning to do something similar after reading everyone's advice here. It really is frustrating that the IRS's own tool struggles with such common tax situations, but at least we have this community to share practical solutions!

0 coins

I've been dealing with this same frustrating issue! As someone who's been through multiple rounds with the IRS Withholding Estimator, I can confirm it's genuinely broken for situations involving pre-tax deductions. The key insight that finally clicked for me was understanding that Step 4(a) is telling your employer "tax me on this additional income" - it's not an adjustment or correction field. When you have HSA contributions and health insurance premiums being deducted pre-tax, putting those amounts in 4(a) is essentially double-taxing yourself on money that shouldn't be taxed at all. I ended up using the simple math approach that several others have mentioned: took what I owed last year, added about 15% as a buffer, and divided by my remaining paychecks for this year. Put that amount on Step 4(c) and ignored everything else the estimator suggested. The frustrating part is that this is such a common tax situation - married couples with employer health insurance and retirement/HSA contributions - yet the IRS's own tool can't handle it properly. But the good news is the manual calculation approach actually works better and is way less confusing. One tip I'd add: make sure to set a reminder for January to recalculate your withholding for next year, since you'll need less extra withholding once you're not catching up on this year's shortfall.

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

This is such a helpful summary of the whole issue! I'm new to this community and dealing with tax withholding problems for the first time. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been eye-opening - I had no idea that the IRS's own tool could be so problematic for what seems like a pretty standard tax situation. Your explanation about Step 4(a) being "tax me on this additional income" rather than an adjustment field finally makes it click why the estimator was suggesting such bizarre numbers. I was thinking of it as some kind of correction mechanism, but it's actually telling them to tax income that's already been excluded from taxation through pre-tax deductions. The manual calculation approach everyone's describing sounds so much more straightforward than trying to wrestle with the estimator. Take last year's shortfall, add a buffer, divide by remaining paychecks - simple math that actually makes sense. Thanks for the January reminder tip too! I definitely would have forgotten to adjust the withholding back down next year and ended up over-withholding instead.

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

I went through almost exactly this situation last year with silver jewelry from estate sales! The lack of documentation was stressful at first, but it's actually more manageable than you think. Here's what I learned: FreeTaxUSA is just looking for a reasonable summary statement to satisfy their system requirements. Since you don't have a 1099-B, you'll need to create your own. I made a simple document titled "Capital Gains Summary - Precious Metal Sales 2024" with these sections: - Asset Description: "Scrap gold from estate sale jewelry" - Acquisition Method: "Cash purchases at various estate sales" - Sale Method: "Cash sales to local coin dealer as scrap" - Holding Period: "Short-term (various periods under 1 year)" - Total Cost Basis: $XXX (your 50% portion only) - Total Proceeds: $XXX (your 50% portion only) - Net Gain/Loss: $XXX I added a note: "Amounts are estimates based on available records. Original receipts not available for cash transactions." The IRS completely understands that small cash transactions don't always have formal documentation. What matters is that you're reporting the income and making a good faith effort to be accurate. Since your profit is under $1,000, you're very unlikely to face any scrutiny. Save it as a PDF and upload when FreeTaxUSA prompts for the statement. Worked perfectly for me and no issues during processing!

0 coins

This is super reassuring to hear from someone who went through the exact same situation! I was really worried about not having proper receipts, but your approach makes it clear that reasonable estimates with proper documentation format should be sufficient. I especially appreciate the specific template you provided - having that structure to follow makes this feel much more manageable. The note about "amounts are estimates based on available records" seems like the right balance between being honest about limitations while still showing good faith effort. One quick question: when you specified "short-term" holding periods, did FreeTaxUSA ask for specific dates, or was it okay to just indicate they were all under a year? I'm trying to figure out how detailed I need to get about the timing since I honestly can't remember exact purchase and sale dates for most pieces. Also, did you end up treating this as capital gains rather than business income? With the small amounts involved, I'm leaning toward capital gains treatment, but I want to make sure I'm thinking about it correctly.

0 coins

Noah Irving

•

I had a very similar situation a couple years ago with buying and selling vintage jewelry at estate sales. The documentation headache is real, but it's definitely manageable once you know what the IRS actually expects. The key thing to understand is that FreeTaxUSA is prompting you for a "summary statement" because their system is designed around formal brokerage transactions. Since you're dealing with cash purchases and sales, you'll need to create your own documentation - and that's completely legitimate and accepted by the IRS. Here's exactly what I did that worked: Created a simple Word document titled "Investment Sales Summary - Gold Scrap 2024" with columns for: - Description: "Gold scrap from estate sale jewelry" - Dates acquired: "Various dates Jan-Nov 2024" - Dates sold: "Various dates 2024" - Cost basis: [Your 50% share of total expenses] - Proceeds: [Your 50% share of total sales] - Gain/Loss: [The difference] I included a footnote: "Amounts are good faith estimates based on available records for cash transactions." The IRS completely understands that small-scale cash transactions often lack perfect documentation. They just want to see that you're making a reasonable effort to report accurately. With under $1,000 in profit, you're well below any audit thresholds. Save as PDF and attach it when FreeTaxUSA asks for the summary statement. Since you held everything less than a year, it'll be taxed as short-term capital gains at your regular income rate. Start keeping a simple log going forward - even just notes in your phone will save you this stress next year!

0 coins

Prev1...11791180118111821183...5645Next