IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Dmitry Petrov

•

One thing nobody mentioned - did you set up your HSA yourself or through your employer? If you set it up through your employer, they might have a cafeteria plan (Section 125 plan) where your contributions are considered employer contributions for tax purposes, even though they're deducted from your pay.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

This is exactly right. Most workplace HSAs are part of a Section 125 Cafeteria Plan, which is why they get this tax treatment. It's actually beneficial because you avoid BOTH income tax AND payroll taxes (FICA) on those contributions. If you contributed directly to your HSA outside of payroll, you'd still get the income tax deduction but you'd have already paid FICA taxes on that money.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Just wanted to add another perspective here - I'm a tax preparer and see this HSA confusion ALL the time during tax season. The key thing to remember is that Box 12 Code W on your W-2 shows the TOTAL amount that went into your HSA through payroll deduction, regardless of whether you think of it as "your" money or "employer" money. When contributions are made pre-tax through payroll (which yours were), the IRS considers them "employer contributions" for Form 8889 purposes. This is actually BETTER for you tax-wise because you're avoiding both income tax AND the 7.65% FICA taxes (Social Security + Medicare). Your TurboTax is handling this correctly. Don't second-guess it or you might end up double-claiming deductions. The fact that your HSA provider statement matches your W-2 Box 12W amount ($3,600) confirms everything is being reported properly. You're getting the full tax benefit - just in a different way than you initially expected!

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Thank you so much for that clear explanation! As someone who's new to HSAs, this whole thread has been incredibly helpful. I was getting ready to mess with my TurboTax entries because I thought there was an error, but now I understand the pre-tax payroll deduction system makes perfect sense. One quick follow-up question - if I wanted to contribute MORE to my HSA next year (still under the limits), would it be better to increase my payroll deduction amount rather than making additional contributions from my bank account? Sounds like the FICA tax savings make payroll deduction the better choice?

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

I'm going through something similar right now! My tax preparer just quoted me $350 for adding my rental property K-1 to my return - said it's their "new standard rate" for partnership documents. The K-1 is from a simple rental LLC with just rental income and depreciation, nothing complicated. What really bothers me is that they didn't mention this fee increase when I scheduled my appointment. I've been a client for 4 years and this is the first time they've charged extra for the K-1. When I asked why the sudden increase, they gave me some vague explanation about "increased professional liability" and "new compliance requirements." I'm seriously considering switching preparers or trying to do it myself. Has anyone had luck negotiating these fees down, especially as a long-term client? It feels like they're taking advantage of people who don't want to deal with the hassle of finding someone new during tax season.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

$350 for a rental property K-1 is absolutely outrageous! That's even worse than what the original poster is dealing with. A rental LLC K-1 is typically one of the simpler types since it's usually just rental income, expenses, and depreciation flowing through. I'd definitely try negotiating first - mention that you've been a loyal client for 4 years and this sudden fee increase with no advance notice isn't acceptable. If they won't budge, I'd start calling other preparers in your area to get quotes. Most would probably handle a simple rental K-1 for $75-150 max. The "increased professional liability" excuse sounds like complete nonsense to me. What liability? They're literally just transferring numbers from your K-1 to the appropriate lines on your Schedule E. Don't let them take advantage of you just because it's tax season and they think you won't want to switch.

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

I just went through the exact same thing! My CPA suddenly wanted an extra $150 for my S-corp K-1 this year after handling it for the past 3 years with no additional charge. When I pushed back, he couldn't give me a straight answer about what had actually changed. I ended up switching to a different CPA who charged me $50 extra for the K-1 and actually took the time to explain why there's an additional fee (liability coverage, additional forms that need to be checked, etc.). The difference in service was night and day - my new preparer walked me through exactly how the K-1 numbers flowed into different parts of my return. My advice would be to call around and get quotes from other preparers in your area. I found that most charge between $50-100 for a straightforward K-1, not $200. Don't let them take advantage of you just because you're an existing client - there are plenty of qualified preparers who would be happy to earn your business at a fair price. Also, since you mentioned the K-1 is already completely prepared by your business accountant, make sure to emphasize that when getting quotes from other preparers. That should definitely factor into their pricing since they're not starting from scratch.

0 coins

This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the same situation! I'm definitely going to start calling around for quotes. The fact that your new CPA only charged $50 extra and actually explained their reasoning shows there are still reasonable professionals out there. You make a great point about emphasizing that the K-1 is already prepared by my business accountant. I hadn't thought to mention that when getting quotes, but you're right - that should definitely reduce the work involved and hopefully the fee too. Did you have any trouble with the transition to a new preparer mid-season? I'm worried about the timing since we're already into tax season, but paying $200 extra for essentially data entry just feels wrong.

0 coins

A lot of good advice here but something important is being missed - the SECURE Act changed the RMD age from 70½ to 72, and then SECURE 2.0 changed it again to 73 for people born 1951-1959. Your father being 79 now (born around 1945?) would have hit RMD age under the old rules. Also, depending on how small the Simple IRA is, you might want to consider a full withdrawal to simplify things going forward, especially if managing annual RMDs will be challenging with his condition.

0 coins

That's not quite right. The SECURE Act changes were effective beginning in 2020. If OP's father turned 70½ before 2020 (which seems likely given his age), he would have been required to take RMDs under the old rules starting at 70½, not 72.

0 coins

You're totally right, my mistake. Since OP's father is 79 now, he would have turned 70½ around 2015-2016, before the SECURE Act took effect. So he would have been subject to the original 70½ rule. Thanks for the correction. That actually makes the missed RMD situation even more significant since it would include more years. This further emphasizes why getting proper documentation of his cognitive decline is crucial for requesting penalty waivers.

0 coins

Amun-Ra Azra

•

This is a challenging situation but you're taking the right steps to get your father back into compliance. Based on my experience helping elderly clients with similar issues, here are a few additional considerations: 1. **Documentation timing is crucial** - Get a letter from his doctor that specifically states when his cognitive decline began affecting his ability to manage financial affairs. This will be key for the penalty waiver requests. 2. **Consider the timing of distributions** - Rather than taking all missed RMDs immediately, you might want to spread them across 2024-2025 to manage the tax impact, while still filing the 5329 forms for each missed year. 3. **State tax implications** - Don't forget to check if your state has any additional requirements or penalties for missed RMDs. 4. **Future planning** - Once you get this resolved, consider setting up automatic distributions from the IRA to prevent future missed RMDs, especially given his condition. The IRS really is understanding in these situations when there's documented medical cause. Focus on getting that medical documentation first, then work through each year systematically. A tax professional experienced with elder financial issues would be a good investment here given the complexity and multiple years involved.

0 coins

Aisha Ali

•

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially the point about spreading the distributions across multiple years. I hadn't thought about the tax impact of taking everything at once. One question - when you mention getting medical documentation about when the cognitive decline began, does this need to be from a specialist like a neurologist, or would documentation from his primary care physician be sufficient? We haven't had him formally evaluated by a specialist yet, but his regular doctor has been noting memory and decision-making issues in his chart for the past few years. Also, regarding the automatic distributions for the future - is that something the IRA custodian can set up, or does it require special arrangements?

0 coins

Welcome to the US tax system! I totally get the anxiety - I remember my first refund had me checking my account every hour šŸ˜… The good news is that IRS direct deposit dates have become much more reliable in recent years. Here's what you can realistically expect: • **90% of the time**: Your refund arrives exactly on the date shown in WMR or 1 business day after • **The IRS typically sends payment 1-2 days BEFORE** the date they show you • **Your bank's processing time** is the main variable - some post immediately, others take 24-48 hours Since you're new to the US system, here are some practical tips: - Set up account alerts so you're notified when it hits (saves obsessive checking!) - Check your account early morning (around 6 AM) on the deposit date - that's when most banks post overnight transfers - Weekend/holiday dates will process on the next business day - Don't panic if it's one day late - that's still within normal range The 3+ week wait is completely normal, especially for first-time filers. You haven't done anything wrong! The IRS is just methodical with their processing. Once you see that deposit date in WMR, you're in the home stretch. Trust the system - it works better than all those scary stories online would have you believe! šŸ™‚

0 coins

Adrian Connor

•

This is such a reassuring breakdown! As another newcomer to the US tax system (just filed my second return), I can confirm that the anxiety is totally real when you're waiting for that first refund. Last year I was convinced something had gone wrong when my refund didn't show up at exactly midnight on the date WMR showed - turns out my bank just processes government deposits during business hours! One thing I'd add for @TechNinja - if you have a smartphone banking app, definitely enable push notifications for deposits. I found it way less stressful than constantly logging in to check. My refund actually came through at 3 AM on the exact date shown, and I woke up to the notification instead of spending the whole day refreshing my account balance. The US tax system definitely has a learning curve, but once you go through it a few times, you'll feel much more confident about the timeline and process!

0 coins

Hey there! First-time filer anxiety is totally understandable - I went through the same thing when I moved here from Canada a few years ago. The good news is that IRS direct deposit dates are actually quite reliable these days. Here's what I've learned from my experience and from this community: **Timeline Reality Check:** • The date in WMR is when the IRS *sends* the payment, not necessarily when you'll see it • Most people get their refund on that exact date or within 1-2 business days • The IRS often initiates the transfer 1-2 days before the date shown **Bank Processing Factors:** • Credit unions tend to be fastest (often same-day posting) • Major banks like Chase, BofA usually post within 24 hours • Online banks can be unpredictable • Government deposits often get priority processing **Pro Tips for Peace of Mind:** • Set up mobile banking alerts for deposits over $X amount • Check your account early morning (6-8 AM) on the deposit date • If it doesn't arrive on the scheduled date, give it one more business day before worrying • Keep your WMR info handy in case you need to call your bank Your 3+ week wait is completely normal - I waited 25 days for my first refund, and it arrived exactly when WMR said it would. The system works, it's just nerve-wracking when you're new to it! What bank are you using? That might help others give you more specific timing expectations.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

Does the 1065 instructions specifically address this situation? I'm looking at the 2023 instructions and I don't see clear guidance on partner-to-partner sales...

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

The 1065 instructions don't have explicit step-by-step guidance for this specific scenario. The general principles are covered in various sections (particularly around partner capital accounts and changes in partner interests), but you often need to refer to broader partnership tax principles and regulations. If you look at Treasury Regulation section 1.741-1, it clarifies that a sale of partnership interest between partners is treated as a sale of a capital asset, with the purchasing partners getting a cost basis in the acquired portion. The partnership itself is mostly just tracking and reporting the changes in ownership percentages and capital accounts.

0 coins

Layla Mendes

•

One thing to keep in mind is the timing of when you recognize the ownership change during the year. You'll need to determine the exact date when the buyout was completed (when ownership officially transferred) to properly allocate the partnership's income, deductions, and credits. For the K-1s, use the "varying interest rule" under Section 706(d) to prorate each partner's share of items based on their ownership percentage during different periods of the year. So if the buyout happened mid-year, Partner D gets 25% allocation up to the buyout date, then 0% after. Partners A & B get 25% allocation before the buyout, then 37.5% after. Also make sure you update Schedule K-1, Part II (Partner's Share of Liabilities) to reflect the new ownership percentages. Partners A & B will need to pick up their additional share of partnership liabilities as part of their outside basis calculation, even though they paid cash for the interest. The partnership agreement should specify how these mid-year changes are handled - whether you use the closing-of-books method or proration method for allocating partnership items. This affects how precisely you need to calculate each partner's share.

0 coins

This is really helpful detail about the timing aspects. I'm curious about the practical mechanics - when you say "exact date when ownership officially transferred," what documentation should I be looking for to establish this date? Is it when the purchase agreement was signed, when payment was made, or when the partnership agreement was amended to reflect the new ownership percentages? Also, regarding the varying interest rule - do you typically recommend the closing-of-books method or proration method for situations like this? I imagine the closing-of-books method would be more precise but also more complicated to implement.

0 coins

Prev1...11781179118011811182...5643Next