IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been through this exact scenario with multiple PTP investments over the years, and you're definitely not alone in this frustration! The good news is that receiving K-1s after filing is extremely common with PTPs, and the IRS is generally understanding about this timing issue. For your Section 751 statement, you'll need to file Form 1040-X to amend your return. The key information should be on the transaction schedule that came with your K-1 - look for any amounts labeled as "Section 751(a) ordinary income" or similar language about "hot assets." A few practical tips from my experience: - Don't stress about penalties - if you file the amendment within a reasonable time after receiving the K-1, you're usually fine - The Section 751 statement itself is just a simple document showing the breakdown between ordinary income and capital gain portions of your sale - Keep copies of everything, including the date you received the K-1, in case you need to explain the timing later Since you mentioned the profit wasn't huge, the actual tax impact might be smaller than you're worried about. The main thing is getting it reported correctly. Consider this a learning experience for future PTP investments - now you know to expect these complications!

0 coins

This is really helpful advice, thank you! I'm curious about something you mentioned - when you say "within a reasonable time" for filing the amendment, is there a specific timeframe the IRS considers acceptable? I'm worried because my K-1 arrived about 6 weeks after I filed my original return. Also, did you ever have issues with the IRS questioning why you didn't wait for all your tax documents before filing initially?

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

@Natasha Volkova Six weeks is totally reasonable - I ve'seen people file amendments 3-4 months after receiving late K-1s without any issues. The IRS doesn t'have a specific published timeframe, but generally anything within the same tax year or shortly after is considered acceptable, especially when you can document that the K-1 arrived late. I ve'never had the IRS question why I filed before receiving all documents. The reality is that many taxpayers don t'realize they re'going to receive K-1s, and even experienced investors sometimes get surprised by timing. PTPs are notorious for sending K-1s right at the deadline or even requesting extensions. In your situation, you actually did the right thing by filing on time with the information you had. The IRS would much rather see you file timely and then amend when you get additional information than file late waiting for documents that may or may not arrive. Just include a brief note with your 1040-X explaining that you received the K-1 after your original filing date - that shows you re'being proactive about compliance.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

I went through this exact nightmare with Energy Transfer (ET) two years ago! The Section 751 reporting requirements caught me completely off guard too. Here's what I learned that might help you: First, don't panic about the timing - late K-1s are incredibly common with PTPs, and the IRS knows this. You're actually in good company since most PTP investors end up filing amendments. For your Section 751 statement, look at your K-1's transaction schedule for any line items showing "ordinary income under Section 751" or similar language about unrealized receivables. That's the amount that gets treated as ordinary income instead of capital gains when you sold your MMP position. The process is pretty straightforward once you know what to do: 1. File Form 1040-X (amended return) 2. Create a simple Section 751 statement showing the breakdown 3. Report the ordinary income portion on Form 4797 4. Report the remaining capital gain on Schedule D Since you only held for 3 months and the profit wasn't huge, the actual tax difference might be minimal. The important thing is getting it reported correctly. I'd recommend just biting the bullet and filing the amendment ASAP - better to deal with it now than worry about it later. Also, lesson learned for future reference: if you're thinking about investing in any more PTPs, maybe wait until after tax season to buy them, or at least be prepared for this complexity!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience with ET - it's reassuring to know this is such a common issue! Quick question about the timeline: how long did it take for your amended return to be processed? I'm worried about this dragging on for months and potentially causing issues if I have any other tax situations come up this year. Also, did you end up owing additional tax from the Section 751 ordinary income treatment, or was the difference pretty minimal like you expected?

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

I've been following this entire discussion and it's been incredibly valuable for someone in my position. I was actually planning to have this exact conversation with my boss next week, but after reading through all these responses, I'm realizing I need to completely rethink my approach. The reality check about IRS classification rules really opened my eyes. I was thinking about this as a simple preference choice, but the behavioral control, financial control, and relationship factors make it clear that my current work arrangement wouldn't qualify for 1099 status anyway. I work set hours, use company equipment, follow their procedures, and don't have other clients - that's textbook employee classification regardless of what we might want to call it. The financial analysis everyone provided was particularly eye-opening. Between the additional 7.65% self-employment tax, loss of employer benefits, need for quarterly payments, and potential lending complications, I'd probably need at least a 30-35% rate increase just to break even. That's assuming my employer would even agree to such a significant increase, which seems unlikely. Instead, I think I'm going to focus on two things: optimizing the business deductions I can already take through my existing side business, and exploring whether my employer has any flexibility on compensation structure while keeping me as W2 - things like FSA contributions, retirement matching, or other benefit adjustments. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise. This thread probably saved me from making a costly mistake and helped me find a much better path forward!

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

Amara, I'm so glad you found this discussion helpful before having that conversation with your boss! It really shows the value of doing research first. I was in almost the exact same position a few months ago - ready to march into my manager's office asking for a 1099 switch without understanding any of the legal implications. The behavioral control aspect was the biggest wake-up call for me too. When you break it down to the basics - working their schedule, using their tools, following their processes - it becomes really obvious that the IRS would still consider that an employment relationship no matter what paperwork we signed. Your two-pronged approach sounds really smart. I ended up doing something similar and was surprised by how much my employer was willing to work with me on the benefits side. We increased my 401k match and set up an FSA, plus they were more flexible about some work-from-home arrangements that actually saved me money on commuting and meals. Sometimes the solution is simpler than we think! The side business optimization route has been great too. I was already missing out on a lot of legitimate deductions I could have been taking. Good luck with whichever path you choose!

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

This has been such a thorough and educational discussion! As someone who's been lurking here trying to understand employment classification issues, I really appreciate how everyone shared their real experiences and broke down the complex IRS rules. What stands out to me most is how this isn't really about personal preference at all - the IRS has very specific criteria that determine classification regardless of what you or your employer might want. The behavioral control test seems like the biggest factor: if your employer controls when, where, and how you work, you're an employee period. The financial reality check was sobering too. I hadn't considered that you'd need such a significant rate increase (30-35%+) just to break even as 1099, and that's before factoring in all the administrative complexity and lost protections like unemployment benefits. I think the consensus advice here is spot-on: focus on maximizing the tax advantages you can already get through your existing side business while keeping the stability and benefits of W2 employment. Sometimes the best solution is optimizing what you already have rather than trying to force a change that creates more problems than it solves. Thanks to everyone who contributed their expertise - this thread should be required reading for anyone considering this type of employment classification switch!

0 coins

Justin Chang

•

This thread has been incredibly enlightening for someone just starting to navigate tax and employment issues! I'm relatively new to having multiple income streams and had similar misconceptions about being able to just "choose" 1099 status for better tax treatment. The breakdown of the IRS's three-part test (behavioral control, financial control, and relationship type) really clarifies why this isn't a personal preference decision. I was getting caught up in the potential deductions without understanding the strict legal requirements that have to be met first. What really resonates with me is the advice about maximizing existing opportunities rather than trying to force changes that could create compliance risks. I'm starting to realize that having a stable W2 base income plus a legitimate side business might actually provide the best tax optimization without the headaches of misclassification issues. For newcomers like me, this discussion really highlights the importance of understanding the rules before making assumptions about what's possible or beneficial. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and real-world experiences!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly comprehensive and helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my mother's old stock certificates, and I wanted to share one additional approach that worked for us. If your dad ever used a financial advisor or investment firm in the past, even if he moved his accounts elsewhere later, they sometimes maintain archived client records that could include the original purchase information. I found records at an old Edward Jones office where my mom had briefly held an account in the early 2000s - they had notes about stock transfers from other accounts that included original cost basis information. Also, don't overlook checking with your state's unclaimed property division. Sometimes when old paper certificates get lost or forgotten, dividend payments or proceeds from corporate actions end up there with detailed records about the original holdings. For anyone still struggling with the AT&T to Warner Discovery calculation specifically, I used the exact 71%/29% allocation that's been mentioned throughout this thread and it worked perfectly. Just make sure you're applying it to the adjusted basis after accounting for all the splits and corporate actions between 1999 and 2022. The documentation advice everyone has given is spot on - I kept detailed records of every resource I tried, and it gave me confidence when filing. Between all the approaches mentioned in this thread (AT&T investor relations, Computershare, library databases, historical price research, old tax returns, and potentially consulting a CPA), you should be able to reconstruct a defensible cost basis even without the original purchase records.

0 coins

Philip Cowan

•

This is such a comprehensive thread - thank you all for sharing so many different approaches! As someone who's completely new to dealing with inherited stock situations, I had no idea there were so many potential resources available. The suggestion about checking with old financial advisors is really smart - even if accounts were moved years ago, those archived records could be invaluable. And I never would have thought to check the state's unclaimed property division for dividend payments that might have ended up there. It's reassuring to see multiple confirmations of the 71%/29% allocation for the AT&T to Warner Discovery spinoff throughout this discussion. Having that consistency across different sources gives me confidence in those numbers. What strikes me most about this thread is how important it is to try multiple approaches rather than giving up after one or two dead ends. Between calling AT&T directly, checking with transfer agents like Computershare, using library financial databases, looking through old tax returns for dividend records, potentially consulting an experienced CPA, and all the other creative suggestions people have shared, there are so many ways to piece together the information needed. The emphasis everyone has placed on documenting the research process is also really valuable advice. I'm definitely going to create that detailed log of every attempt and resource I use - it sounds like having that paper trail could be crucial if the IRS ever has questions. Thanks to everyone who has contributed their experiences and suggestions. This community has turned what seemed like an impossible puzzle into a manageable step-by-step process!

0 coins

Ella Knight

•

I've been helping several family members with similar old stock situations, and this thread has covered most of the key approaches really well. One additional tip that saved me a lot of time: if you end up calling multiple departments (AT&T investor relations, Computershare, etc.), ask each representative for their direct extension or email if possible. I found that building relationships with specific people who understood my situation meant I could call back with follow-up questions without having to re-explain everything from scratch each time. The AT&T investor relations specialist I worked with even proactively sent me additional corporate action documentation when she found it in their system. Also, regarding the historical price research - don't forget to check if the purchase was made during a holiday period when markets were closed. December 1999 had some unusual trading days around Christmas/New Year's that could affect which date you use for the cost basis calculation. For anyone feeling overwhelmed by all these options, I'd recommend starting with the AT&T investor relations call first (1-800-348-8288, ask for "historical corporate actions"). That single call can often provide 70-80% of what you need to know, and then you can use the other approaches to fill in any gaps. The key is having that foundational information about splits and corporate actions before you start trying to reconstruct the original basis.

0 coins

A little-known trick: if you make a large estimated payment in January of the following year (before filing), you might be able to apply it to the previous year's Q4 estimated payment. I've done this before when I realized I might face an underpayment penalty. The key is to specify on the payment voucher that you want it applied to the previous tax year's Q4 payment. This won't help with penalties from Q1-Q3 underpayments, but it can reduce the Q4 portion of any penalty.

0 coins

Dylan Baskin

•

Does this really work? I thought Q4 estimated payments had to be made by January 15th to count for the previous year. Are you saying you can make them even later?

0 coins

You're right to question this - Q4 estimated payments for the previous tax year must be made by January 15th, not later. I think Hunter might be confusing this with making an estimated payment for the current year in January, which wouldn't help with the previous year's underpayment penalty. Once the January 15th deadline passes, your only options are to pay the penalty or request a waiver/abatement. You can't retroactively fix underpayments after that date.

0 coins

This is such a common area of confusion! I went through the same thing last year with my mixed W-2 and consulting income. One thing that really helped me understand the penalty calculation was realizing that the IRS essentially wants you to "pay as you go" rather than catch up at year-end. So even if your total payments exceed your tax liability, you can still owe a penalty if those payments weren't distributed properly throughout the year. For your 2025 planning, increasing withholding is definitely the right move since it's treated as paid evenly throughout the year. But don't completely eliminate estimated payments if your self-employment income is substantial - you might just need to adjust the timing and amounts. Also worth noting: if your prior year tax liability was under $1,000, or if this is your first time owing an underpayment penalty, you might qualify for first-time penalty abatement even after filing. The IRS is surprisingly reasonable about waiving penalties for taxpayers with good compliance history.

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

This is really helpful context! I'm dealing with a similar situation and your point about "pay as you go" really clarifies why the penalty exists even when total payments are sufficient. Question about the first-time penalty abatement - do you know if there's a specific form to request this, or do you just call the IRS? I've never had an underpayment penalty before and my prior year tax liability was definitely over $1,000, but I have a clean compliance history for the past several years. Would love to explore this option before just paying the penalty. Also, when you increased your withholding for the following year, did you adjust it evenly or weight it more toward the beginning of the year to be extra safe?

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

VA taxpayer here! I'm actually going through this exact same thing right now - just completed my ID verification 4 days ago and have been anxiously waiting. Based on all the experiences shared here, it sounds like 7-14 business days is pretty standard after verification. The most helpful tip I've seen is to stop obsessing over the Where's My Refund portal (guilty as charged!) and just check your bank account directly each morning. Seems like that portal is notoriously unreliable and often doesn't update until after you've already been paid. Fingers crossed we all get our refunds soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

I'm in the exact same boat! Just verified 3 days ago and have been refreshing that portal way too much. Reading everyone's experiences here is so helpful - sounds like we just need to be patient and check our bank accounts instead of that useless portal. Hopefully we'll both see our refunds in the next week or so! The waiting game is brutal but at least we're not alone in this šŸ˜…

0 coins

PixelPioneer

•

VA taxpayer here! Just wanted to share my recent experience to help ease some anxiety. I completed my ID verification exactly 2 weeks ago and my refund hit my account yesterday morning - took 10 business days total. Like everyone else is saying, the Where's My Refund portal is absolutely useless! Mine still showed "processing" even AFTER the money was already in my account šŸ¤¦ā€ā™€ļø My best advice: stop torturing yourself with that portal and just check your bank account each morning. From reading all these comments, it seems like 8-12 business days after verification is pretty typical for VA this year. You're definitely in the home stretch since you just completed verification! The hardest part is behind you - now it's just the waiting game. Hang in there! šŸ’Ŗ

0 coins

Prev1...11621163116411651166...5643Next