IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Household Employee FUTA/FICA Exemption: Hiring Mother-in-Law as Nanny

We already have an EIN from when we had to hire a part-time nanny between daycare situations last year. That person was definitely non-exempt, so we did the whole FUTA/FICA thing properly. Now we're planning to bring my wife's mother on as a more permanent nanny solution for our kids. I've been reading through Publication 926, and it mentions the "your parent" exception, which as I understand it means we wouldn't need to pay FUTA or FICA taxes when hiring a parent. We'd still handle federal/state/local withholding and SUI payments. Here's my confusion though - since my wife and I file our taxes jointly, can I use my existing EIN to hire her mother (my mother-in-law)? Or does the "your parent" exception only apply to biological parents, not in-laws? Would I need to set up a completely new EIN under my wife's name instead of using mine since it's her mother? I'm trying to make sure we handle this correctly from the beginning!

Just want to add something that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you consider workers' comp insurance regardless of which tax exemptions apply. Many states require it even for household employees, and the parent exemption for FUTA/FICA doesn't necessarily exempt you from state workers' comp requirements. We learned this the hard way when we hired my mom as a nanny. We correctly handled the federal tax exemptions but completely missed that our state still required workers' comp coverage. Had to pay some penalties to get that straightened out.

0 coins

Great point! Do you remember where you got your workers comp policy from? I'm trying to figure out where to get one for our household employee.

0 coins

This is a really helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with my husband's father potentially helping with our kids. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like the biological relationship is key for the parent exemption. One question I haven't seen addressed - does the exemption still apply if the parent is receiving Social Security benefits? I've heard conflicting information about whether that affects the FICA exemption for household employees. Want to make sure we're not missing anything before we set up the EIN and payroll. Also, @Debra Bai, your point about workers' comp is spot on. We almost missed that requirement too when researching this. Definitely worth checking your state's specific requirements since they can vary a lot from the federal tax rules.

0 coins

Can I claim this as a legitimate business expense write-off?

Hi everyone! I'm in a bit of a pickle with my small business finances. I started a web design company about 8 months ago, and I've been working mostly from home. Recently, I purchased a fairly expensive laptop ($1,800) that I use for client work about 75% of the time, but I also use it for personal stuff like Netflix and gaming when I'm not working. I also bought a nice office chair ($350) and desk ($575) for my home office, which is in a corner of my living room - not a separate room. I use this setup exclusively for work. My question is: Can I write off the full cost of these items as business expenses on my Schedule C? Or do I need to calculate some percentage for the laptop since I use it partially for personal stuff? And does it matter that my workspace isn't a dedicated room? This is my first year filing taxes as self-employed and I want to make sure I'm doing everything correctly. Thanks for any advice!

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - if your business equipment (like that laptop) costs over $2,500 total, you might want to look into Section 179 deduction vs. regular depreciation. Section an let you deduct the whole business portion in year 1 instead of spreading it out over 5 years. I did this with my photography equipment last year and it made a huge difference in my tax bill! Just remember that if you sell the equipment later, you might have some "recapture" to deal with.

0 coins

Can you still do Section 179 if you're showing a loss in your business? My side gig isn't profitable yet but I bought a lot of equipment.

0 coins

That's an important point - Section 179 is limited to the amount of business income you have. If your business shows a loss or you don't have enough business income to cover the equipment cost, you can't fully use Section 179 in the current year. In your case, with a side gig that's not profitable, you might be better off using regular depreciation to spread the deduction over several years. That way you can use those deductions in future years when your business hopefully becomes profitable.

0 coins

Just be careful about claiming too many business expenses if your business isn't showing a profit yet! The IRS has a "hobby loss rule" where if you don't show a profit in 3 out of 5 years, they might classify your business as a hobby and disallow all your deductions. I learned this the hard way when my crafting business got audited. Make sure you're keeping good records and can show that you're running things in a businesslike manner with the intention to make a profit.

0 coins

Is this still true? I thought they changed some rules around the hobby loss presumption recently.

0 coins

The basic hobby loss rule (3 out of 5 years profit test) is still in effect, but you're right that there have been some clarifications. The IRS now looks more at the "facts and circumstances" test - things like whether you keep good business records, have a separate business bank account, actively market your services, and can show you're trying to improve profitability. So even if you don't meet the 3-out-of-5 test, you can still prove legitimate business intent through your business practices. The key is documenting that you're running it like a real business, not just a hobby that happens to occasionally make money.

0 coins

How is Interest Income from HYSA (1099-INT) Taxed Differently than Brokerage Account Interest (1099-DIV)?

I've been comparing my tax documents and I'm confused about how interest is reported differently between my accounts. My High Yield Savings Account (HYSA) gave me a 1099-INT showing about $627 in interest income and $0 federal income tax withheld. But when I look at my brokerage account, which also holds cash that earns interest at a similar rate to my HYSA, I don't see any 1099-INT at all. Instead, it looks like the interest is being reported on my 1099-DIV from the brokerage. I'm trying to understand the tax implications here. Do I owe taxes on both types of interest payments? If my HYSA shows $0 federal income tax withheld, does that mean I still need to pay taxes on that $627, or is it somehow already covered? And why would interest be reported on a 1099-DIV instead of a 1099-INT for my brokerage cash? I'm preparing my 2024 taxes for the upcoming filing season and want to make sure I'm reporting everything correctly. Any help understanding the difference between these interest payments and how they're taxed would be greatly appreciated!

Anyone else notice their HYSA interest rates dropping this year? I got $531 in interest on my hysa last year (on 1099-INT) but the rates are down by almost a full percent now. Wondering if it's better to move cash to my brokerage sweep account since they're paying similar rates now but with easier access to investment options.

0 coins

I'd be careful with that. Brokerage sweep accounts often have lower rates than dedicated HYSAs. Check the fine print - my Fidelity sweep account was only paying 1.2% while my HYSA was at 3.7%. The convenience isn't worth the lost interest.

0 coins

Thanks for the heads up! I just double-checked and you're right - my brokerage's default sweep account is significantly lower than advertised. Apparently I need to specifically choose their "higher yield" cash option to get the competitive rate. The marketing was a bit misleading there.

0 coins

Great question! I had similar confusion when I first started earning significant interest income. One important thing to keep in mind is the timing of when you'll owe taxes on this income. Since your HYSA shows $0 federal tax withheld on that $627, you'll want to consider whether you need to make estimated tax payments for 2024 if this represents a significant increase in your income compared to prior years. The IRS generally expects you to pay taxes throughout the year, not just at filing time. Also, don't forget that interest income can push you into a higher tax bracket if you're close to the threshold. At $627, it's probably not a concern, but it's worth checking if you have multiple high-yield accounts or other interest-bearing investments. For your brokerage account, definitely look at Box 11 on your 1099-DIV as others mentioned. Some brokerages also provide supplemental statements that break down exactly what type of fund your cash is invested in, which can help you understand why it's reported as dividends rather than interest.

0 coins

How do I calculate my yearly losses from sportsbetting for tax reporting?

So I've been trying to figure this out for days and can't find a straight answer anywhere for my situation. Here's my dilemma - my yearly sportsbetting winnings are actually higher than my total amount wagered. Like I've won more than I put in overall (lucky me I guess). But now I'm confused about how to properly report this for taxes. I found the right tax form to use but it only has 2 boxes - seems like one for winnings and one for losses. But given my situation, how do I calculate what goes in the "losses" box? Is it just the individual bets I lost, or is there some other way to figure this out? I know gambling winnings are taxable and I want to do this right. Just not sure how to properly document the losses when I'm technically "up" for the year. Any help would be super appreciated!

I'm still confused about the practical side of tracking all this. I place hundreds of bets throughout the year on different apps. Am I really expected to log every single one manually? That seems insane.

0 coins

Most of the major betting apps/sites have an option to download your annual betting history as a CSV or PDF. Usually under Account โ†’ History โ†’ Tax Documents or something similar. I download mine quarterly so it's easier to manage. Then I just use a spreadsheet to separate wins and losses.

0 coins

That's super helpful, thanks! I didn't realize you could download everything like that. Definitely going to check that option on my apps.

0 coins

Just want to add a quick tip for anyone dealing with this - make sure you keep records of your deposit and withdrawal amounts too, not just individual bets. The IRS considers your "session" winnings and losses, so if you deposit $500, bet it all on various games, and cash out $800, that $300 difference is what matters for tax purposes in many cases. But you still need the detailed bet-by-bet records to support your calculations. Also, don't forget about any bonuses or free bets you received - those count as income when you use them, even if you didn't deposit your own money. I learned this the hard way when I got audited and had to explain $2,000 in "mystery" winnings that were actually from signup bonuses I'd forgotten about. The key is being consistent in your record-keeping method. Whether you track every single bet or go by session totals, just make sure you can justify your numbers if the IRS comes asking.

0 coins

Advice on Neil Jesani mineral funds for tax planning?

Hey all, I'm wondering if anyone has experience with Neil Jesani's mineral fund investment approach for tax purposes? Recently came across his seminars where he talks about using mineral rights/funds as a tax strategy for high-income professionals. I'm a dentist making around $340K annually and looking for legitimate ways to reduce my tax burden. I've maxed out my 401k, do backdoor Roth, and have some real estate investments already, but I'm intrigued by these mineral funds he promotes specifically for dentists and doctors. The tax benefits sound almost too good to be true - he claims we can get significant deductions in the first year while maintaining income streams. Has anyone here actually invested with Neil Jesani or similar mineral funds? What was your experience with the tax implications? Did the IRS ever question these deductions? Just trying to do my due diligence before jumping in.

As someone who's been researching tax strategies for high earners, I'd strongly recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional who isn't selling these investments. I've seen too many colleagues get burned by complex tax strategies that sounded great in presentations but fell apart under scrutiny. One thing that concerns me about Neil Jesani's approach specifically is that when someone markets primarily to one profession (dentists/doctors), it often means they're exploiting our lack of investment knowledge rather than offering genuinely superior opportunities. We're easy targets because we have high incomes but limited time to do proper due diligence. Before considering any mineral rights investment, I'd suggest: 1) Get an independent analysis of the investment's economics (not just tax benefits) 2) Understand the full fee structure 3) Ask what happens if tax laws change 4) Consider simpler alternatives like maximizing defined benefit plans or conservation easements The fact that you're asking these questions here shows you're being smart about it. Don't let FOMO or aggressive sales tactics rush you into something this complex.

0 coins

I appreciate everyone sharing their real experiences here. As someone who's been through IRS audits before (unrelated to mineral investments), I can't stress enough how important it is to have bulletproof documentation if you're going to pursue these strategies. The IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing tax shelter-like investments, especially those marketed to high-income professionals. Even if the deductions are legitimate, you need to be prepared to defend them. This means keeping detailed records of: - Your profit motive beyond tax benefits - All due diligence you performed - Documentation showing this is a real business investment, not just a tax scheme I'd also suggest looking into the IRS's "Listed Transactions" and "Transactions of Interest" lists to see if similar structures have been flagged. The last thing you want is to unknowingly participate in something the IRS has already identified as abusive. One final thought: remember that aggressive tax strategies often have a shelf life. What works today might not work tomorrow, and you could be stuck in an illiquid investment that no longer provides the benefits you bought it for. Sometimes the boring approaches (maxing out retirement accounts, establishing a cash balance plan) are boring for a reason - they work consistently over time.

0 coins

Professional representation absolutely made a difference in my audit outcomes. Tax attorneys understand the process and can communicate with the IRS in ways that often lead to better resolutions. I'd recommend establishing that relationship early - many attorneys offer consultation services to review investment structures before you commit, which is much cheaper than hiring them after problems arise. For Listed Transactions, you can search the IRS website directly. Go to irs.gov and search for "Listed Transactions" - they maintain a current list with detailed descriptions. Also check "Transactions of Interest" which are arrangements the IRS is watching but hasn't yet classified as abusive. The descriptions are technical but usually clear enough to identify if your proposed investment fits the pattern. Another resource is the IRS's "Dirty Dozen" tax scams list they publish annually. While mineral investments aren't typically on there, you can get a sense of what triggers their attention. The common thread is usually investments marketed primarily for tax benefits rather than economic returns.

0 coins

Having professional representation absolutely made a huge difference during my audits. The tax attorney I worked with knew exactly how to present information to the IRS agent and could speak their language in a way I never could have. More importantly, they helped me avoid saying things that could have expanded the scope of the audit. As for establishing that relationship early - yes, definitely worth it. Many tax attorneys offer initial consultations where you can discuss potential strategies and they can flag issues before you invest. It's much cheaper than trying to fix problems after the fact. For the Listed Transactions, you can search them on the IRS website under "Abusive Tax Shelters and Transactions." The technical term to look for is "reportable transactions" - these include both Listed Transactions and Transactions of Interest. If you're considering any investment that sounds similar to something on those lists, that's a major red flag. The descriptions can be pretty technical, but your tax professional should be able to help you understand if what you're considering falls into any of those categories.

0 coins

Prev1...10441045104610471048...5645Next