IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This has been such an educational thread for a transcript newbie like me! I filed in early March and have been completely mystified by my transcript codes until reading everyone's explanations here. Like so many others, I was convinced there was some kind of FedEx-style tracking number I could use to get real-time updates on my refund. I'm currently showing TC 150 from mid-March and have been checking my transcript way too frequently (guilty of the multiple-times-daily obsession everyone mentioned!). The "Where's My Refund" tool has been stuck on "processing" since I filed, which was starting to make me nervous. Understanding what TC 150 actually means (return accepted and filed) versus what I'm hoping to see next (TC 846 for refund issued) has been incredibly helpful. I don't have EITC but I do have Child Tax Credit, so based on the experiences shared here, it sounds like I should expect the 4-6 week processing timeline. The advice about switching to weekly transcript checks instead of daily is definitely something I need to implement - the constant monitoring has been adding unnecessary stress! It's such a relief to know that my timeline is completely normal and that I'm not the only one who was confused by these mysterious codes. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge and experiences. This community has been way more helpful than any official IRS resource I've found! šŸ™

0 coins

Dylan Fisher

•

Welcome to the transcript decoding journey, Zainab! 😊 I'm also pretty new to all this and had the exact same expectation about there being some kind of package tracking system for tax refunds. This thread has been such an eye-opener! Your timeline sounds very typical based on what I've learned here - filed in early March, TC 150 from mid-March, and that unchanging "processing" status on WMR. With Child Tax Credit on your return, the 4-6 week processing window that others have mentioned definitely applies to your situation too. I was absolutely guilty of the obsessive multiple-daily checking until reading the advice here about weekly checks. It really does help reduce the anxiety without missing any actual updates! Now I understand that TC 150 means your return is safely in the system and being processed, rather than something being wrong. This community has been amazing for understanding that we're all in the same waiting boat and that these timelines are completely normal this year. It's so much better than trying to decode those confusing official IRS explanations! Thanks for sharing your experience - hopefully you'll see that TC 846 soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely incredible for someone completely new to understanding tax transcripts! I filed my return in late February and have been staring at TC 150 for about 3 weeks now, feeling totally lost about what those codes meant. Like so many others here, I was desperately searching for some kind of Amazon-style tracking number that would give me instant updates on my refund status. Reading everyone's explanations about transaction codes has been a huge revelation - especially learning that TC 150 just means "return received and accepted" rather than something being stuck or wrong. Understanding that I'm waiting for either TC 570 (additional review) or TC 846 (refund issued) makes this whole process feel much less mysterious! I've definitely been guilty of the obsessive daily checking that everyone mentioned - sometimes refreshing my transcript multiple times a day hoping to catch an update immediately. The advice about switching to weekly checks is something I really need to follow since the constant monitoring has been adding so much unnecessary stress. Since I claimed EITC on my return, the 4-6 week timeline that several people shared gives me confidence that I'm still well within normal processing time. It's such a relief to know this waiting period is completely typical and that I'm not alone in trying to decode these confusing codes! Thanks Katherine for starting this amazing discussion and to everyone who shared their knowledge. This community has taught me more about tax transcripts in one thread than hours of trying to navigate official IRS websites! The support and shared experiences here are invaluable! šŸ™

0 coins

Has anyone had issues with FreeTax USA calculating capital gains incorrectly? I manually entered my ETrade 1099-B info last year and my calculated tax seemed way off compared to what ETrade's tax summary showed.

0 coins

This usually happens because of wash sale adjustments or if you didn't properly classify long-term vs short-term gains. When you enter the data manually, it's easy to make small errors that compound. FreeTax USA's calculations are generally accurate, but garbage in = garbage out. Double check that your cost basis method matches what's on your ETrade forms, and that you've properly accounted for any wash sales that ETrade has flagged.

0 coins

The Boss

•

I've been using FreeTax USA for about 4 years now and while it doesn't have direct import from ETrade like TurboTax does, I've found a pretty efficient workflow for handling my investment income. For your 50+ transactions, definitely use the summary method that was mentioned earlier. ETrade actually provides a tax summary document along with your 1099-B that groups transactions by holding period and acquisition dates. You can use this to enter blocks of transactions rather than each individual trade. Also, make sure you're using ETrade's "Gain/Loss Realized" report which you can download as a CSV. While FreeTax USA can't import it directly, you can at least copy/paste chunks of data rather than typing everything from scratch. Just be extra careful about wash sales - ETrade marks them clearly but you need to make sure FreeTax USA applies the adjustments correctly. The time savings vs TurboTax fees has been totally worth it for me, even with the extra manual work.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

Thanks for the detailed workflow! This is really helpful. I'm curious though - when you use ETrade's "Gain/Loss Realized" report, do you find that FreeTax USA's wash sale calculations match up exactly with what ETrade shows? I've heard some people mention discrepancies and I want to make sure I don't mess anything up on my first year switching from TurboTax. Also, do you happen to know if there's a limit to how many transactions you can group together in the summary method? With 50+ trades, I'm hoping I can consolidate them into just a few summary entries.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly valuable! I'm the operations manager at a small manufacturing company (about 30 employees) and we've also been getting calls from R&D credit firms, though not ABGi specifically. What's really encouraging is seeing the range of activities that actually qualify - we've been doing custom fixture development, modifying our assembly processes to handle new product variants, and spent months last year troubleshooting issues with a new coating system that required extensive testing and adjustments. Reading through these examples, it sounds like a lot of this problem-solving work could qualify as R&D. The documentation concern resonates with me too. We're pretty informal - most of our engineering discussions happen on the shop floor or in quick emails. But based on what others have shared, it sounds like even basic records showing we were solving technical problems rather than just following instructions could support a claim. I'm definitely going to pursue preliminary assessments from multiple providers now. The potential recoveries mentioned here ($80k+) would be significant for a company our size. Even if we only recover half that amount, it would more than justify the time investment and fees. Thanks everyone for sharing your real experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight you can't find in generic online reviews!

0 coins

Brianna, your situation sounds very similar to what many of us have experienced! The custom fixture development and coating system troubleshooting you mentioned are exactly the types of activities that often qualify but get overlooked. What really helped me was realizing that "research" in the tax credit context isn't about lab coats and beakers - it's about solving technical problems where the solution wasn't obvious upfront. Your months of testing and adjustments with the coating system sounds like a perfect example of iterative development that involved technical uncertainty. For a 30-employee company, even a smaller recovery could be really impactful. I'd encourage you to be thorough when discussing your activities with potential providers - sometimes the projects we think are "routine" actually involved significant technical problem-solving that qualifies. The informal documentation shouldn't hold you back. From what others have shared, even basic email threads showing your team was experimenting with different approaches or troubleshooting technical challenges can support a claim. The key is demonstrating that you were solving problems, not just implementing known solutions. Definitely get those multiple assessments - the differences in approach and fees that people have mentioned here make it worth shopping around. Good luck!

0 coins

This discussion has been incredibly helpful! I work in tax advisory for manufacturing clients and wanted to add a few points that might help others considering these services. First, ABGi-USA is indeed a legitimate company in the R&D tax credit space. They're part of a larger international firm that specializes in government incentives and tax credits. However, as others have mentioned, it's definitely worth getting multiple quotes since the quality of service and fee structures can vary significantly between providers. One thing I'd emphasize is the importance of working with a provider that really understands manufacturing operations. The best firms will have staff who can walk your production floor and identify qualifying activities that you might not recognize as R&D. Manufacturing R&D often looks different from traditional research - it's more about solving production challenges, developing custom processes, and improving existing systems. Regarding documentation, don't let informal records discourage you. I've seen successful claims supported by maintenance logs showing troubleshooting efforts, email chains discussing technical problems, and even purchase orders for experimental materials. The key is demonstrating that your team was engaged in systematic problem-solving rather than routine operations. For those concerned about audits, the IRS examination rate for R&D credits is actually quite low (under 5% in most years), and most reviews focus on documentation quality rather than questioning the legitimacy of the credit itself. Having a provider that offers audit support is valuable, but it shouldn't be your primary concern. The potential recoveries mentioned here are realistic for mid-sized manufacturers. I regularly see companies recover $50k-$200k+ when they properly document their qualifying activities across multiple tax years.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

Daniel, thanks for providing that professional perspective! It's really reassuring to hear from someone who works directly in tax advisory for manufacturing clients that ABGi is legitimate and that the recovery amounts discussed here are realistic. Your point about finding providers who understand manufacturing operations is crucial. As someone new to this whole R&D credit world, I wouldn't have known to look for that specifically, but it makes total sense. Our "research" activities are so embedded in day-to-day operations that we probably need someone who can recognize the technical problem-solving we do without thinking about it. The audit rate being under 5% is also encouraging - I think a lot of us get scared off by horror stories, but it sounds like the risk is much lower than expected if you're working with reputable providers and have decent documentation. One follow-up question - for companies that have been doing qualifying work for several years but never claimed credits, is there typically a sweet spot for how far back to go? I know the IRS allows three years, but I'm wondering if older claims become harder to support or if it's worth pursuing the full lookback period. This thread has definitely convinced me that this is worth exploring properly rather than just dismissing it. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences!

0 coins

This is such a common source of confusion! I went through the same thing when I started making higher income. The key thing to remember is that there are really three separate federal tax buckets: federal income tax, Social Security tax, and Medicare tax. For your $270k income, you're also hitting that Medicare surtax threshold, so you'll pay the extra 0.9% on income over $200k (assuming you're single). That's an additional $630 on top of the regular Medicare tax. One thing that helped me was setting up quarterly estimated payments to cover all three components. Since you're in a higher income bracket, you'll likely need to make estimated payments anyway to avoid underpayment penalties. I calculate 25% of my expected annual liability for each component and pay that quarterly. Also, don't forget that if you have any self-employment income on top of your W-2 wages, that gets hit with the full self-employment tax rate, which can really add up!

0 coins

Thanks for breaking this down! The quarterly payment approach sounds smart. I'm curious - when you calculate those quarterly payments, do you base it on your previous year's tax liability or try to project the current year? I've heard conflicting advice about whether to use the "safe harbor" rule (paying 100% of last year's taxes) versus trying to estimate what you'll actually owe this year. Also, you mentioned self-employment income on top of W-2 wages - does that mean if I have some freelance work on the side, I'd pay both regular FICA on my W-2 AND self-employment tax on the freelance income? That seems like it could get expensive fast!

0 coins

For quarterly payments, I typically use the safe harbor rule (110% of last year's tax since I'm over $150k AGI) to avoid penalties, then true up at year-end. It's much simpler than trying to project current year income, especially if you have variable income streams. And yes, you'd pay both! Your W-2 wages get hit with regular employee FICA (7.65%), while your freelance income gets the full self-employment tax (15.3%). However, there's a small benefit - once your combined W-2 and self-employment income hits the Social Security wage base ($168,600), you stop paying the Social Security portion of SE tax on additional freelance income. You'd still pay the Medicare portions though. The double-taxation aspect is definitely something to factor into your freelance rates. I always tell people to add at least 20-25% to their desired hourly rate to cover the extra SE taxes plus the fact that you're not getting employer benefits.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with high income and was completely lost on how FICA worked. One thing I wanted to add that I learned the hard way - if you get stock options or RSUs that vest, those count as wages for FICA purposes too, not just your base salary. I got surprised last year when my company's stock did well and a bunch of my RSUs vested, pushing me way over the Social Security wage base limit I had calculated based on just my salary. The good news was I got some of that excess Social Security tax back, but it threw off my quarterly payment planning completely. Also wanted to mention that if you're married, the Medicare surtax threshold is $250k for joint filers, so that might affect your calculations depending on your filing status. The IRS doesn't make any of this easy to understand, but threads like this really help connect the dots!

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Great point about RSUs and stock options! I'm just starting to get into higher compensation packages and hadn't even thought about equity compensation affecting FICA calculations. That's definitely something I need to factor in for my planning. Quick question - when RSUs vest, does the company automatically withhold the FICA taxes on the vested amount, or do you need to handle that separately? I'm worried about getting hit with a surprise tax bill if I'm not prepared for it. Also, thanks everyone for all the detailed explanations in this thread. As someone new to dealing with higher income tax complexity, this has been way more helpful than any of the generic tax advice articles I've been reading online!

0 coins

This discussion has been incredibly enlightening! As a newcomer to rental property taxation, I had no idea the 7-day rule even existed. I've been struggling with a small mountain retreat rental that averages about 11 days per stay, and I've been frustrated watching my losses pile up without being able to use them against my regular income. Reading through everyone's real-world experiences, especially the detailed audit account from Emma and the practical implementation strategies shared by others, has given me the confidence to seriously consider restructuring my approach. I'm particularly intrigued by the seasonal minimum stay strategy - it seems like a smart way to balance revenue optimization during peak periods while strategically lowering the annual average. I already handle most of the property management myself (guest relations, maintenance coordination, cleaning oversight), so I believe I'd meet the material participation requirements once I start proper documentation. The smartphone app tracking approach mentioned by several members sounds like the most practical way to build those contemporaneous records. One question for the experienced members: for someone just starting to transition, would you recommend making gradual changes to minimum stay policies, or is it better to implement the new strategy more aggressively to see faster results? I'm trying to balance getting under the 7-day threshold with maintaining steady revenue during the learning curve. Thanks to everyone for sharing such valuable, real-world insights - this thread is exactly what I needed to finally tackle this tax challenge!

0 coins

Taylor To

•

Welcome to the community, AstroAdventurer! Your mountain retreat situation sounds very similar to what many of us have faced with those frustrating passive loss limitations. An 11-day average gives you some room to work with, which is actually encouraging. Regarding your question about implementation speed, I'd lean toward a more gradual approach based on what I've learned from this thread. Making dramatic changes to your minimum stay policies could shock your existing guest base and potentially hurt revenue while you're figuring out the optimal pricing strategy. I'd suggest starting with small adjustments - maybe reducing your minimum stay by one day during slower periods first, then gradually implementing the weekend warrior packages and holiday specials that others have mentioned. This lets you test what works for your specific location and guest demographic without completely upending your business model. The documentation piece is really crucial though - I'd start tracking your hours immediately regardless of how quickly you implement the stay length changes. Even if you don't hit the 7-day average this year, you'll have a solid foundation of records for next year and a better understanding of exactly how much work you're already putting in. The seasonal strategy definitely seems to be the winning approach from everything I've read here. Your mountain location probably has natural peak periods where you can maintain higher minimums, then use off-seasons to bring that average down. Good luck with the transition!

0 coins

Alice Coleman

•

This thread has been absolutely fascinating to read through! I had no idea about the 7-day rule and how it could completely change the tax treatment of rental properties. As someone who's been struggling with passive loss limitations on my vacation rental, this feels like discovering a hidden treasure. I currently have a lakeside cottage that averages about 8.5 days per stay, so I'm tantalizingly close to the threshold. Reading through everyone's real-world experiences - especially Emma's detailed audit story and all the practical implementation strategies - has me convinced this is worth pursuing seriously. What strikes me most is how many people mentioned actually INCREASING revenue despite the shorter stays and higher turnover costs. The ability to charge premium rates for weekend getaways and holiday specials seems to more than offset the additional cleaning and management time. I'm already brainstorming ways to attract shorter-stay guests: romantic weekend packages, corporate retreat specials, and "digital detox" getaways instead of just focusing on week-long family rentals. The documentation requirements sound intensive but manageable since I already handle guest communications, maintenance coordination, and marketing myself. Starting my hour tracking system today based on all the advice shared here. The potential to finally use my accumulated losses against regular income would be transformative for my tax situation. This community is incredible - getting real experiences from people who've actually navigated this successfully is invaluable!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Alice! Your lakeside cottage situation sounds perfect for this strategy - being at 8.5 days average means you're really close to qualifying already. The premium weekend pricing angle you mentioned is spot on based on what I've been learning from this thread. I'm also just starting to explore this strategy after discovering it here, and what's been most encouraging is seeing how many people actually improved their revenue while getting under the 7-day threshold. The lakeside location seems ideal for those "romantic weekend getaway" and "digital detox" packages you mentioned - there's definitely a market for people who want a quick escape without committing to a full week. The documentation aspect initially seemed overwhelming to me too, but after reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like starting simple with a smartphone app or basic spreadsheet to track activities in real-time is the way to go. The key seems to be building that habit of contemporaneous recording rather than trying to reconstruct everything later. One thing that really struck me from this thread is how the seasonal approach lets you maintain those premium rates during peak periods while strategically using slower times to bring down your average. Your cottage probably has natural busy weekends and quieter weekdays where you could experiment with different minimum stays. Thanks for sharing your plans - it's encouraging to connect with others who are just starting this journey too! This thread has been such a goldmine of practical insights.

0 coins

Prev1...10451046104710481049...5643Next