


Ask the community...
Has anyone looked into TaxDome as a ProSystem fx Engagement alternative? We're considering it mainly for the client communication features and project management capabilities. Their pricing model is per firm rather than per user which could be a big savings for us. Curious if anyone has experience using it alongside a tax prep solution?
We use TaxDome in conjunction with UltraTax CS and it works quite well. TaxDome handles all our client management, document collection, and e-signatures, while we use UltraTax for the actual tax preparation. The integration isn't automatic (would be nice!), but the workflow is smooth once you establish your processes. TaxDome's client portal is miles better than what comes with most tax software, and clients actually find it easy to use. That alone has reduced our administrative headaches by probably 30%.
We went through this exact same evaluation process last year with our firm of about 400 returns. After testing several alternatives to ProSystem fx Engagement, we ended up going with a hybrid approach that's worked really well for us. We switched to Drake Tax Software for the actual tax preparation (much more affordable and surprisingly robust) and paired it with SmartVault for document management. The total cost savings was about 40% compared to our ProSystem fx setup, and honestly the Drake software is more intuitive than ProSystem ever was. The key was not trying to find one system that does everything ProSystem fx Engagement does, but rather finding specialized tools that do each function better. For workpapers and review notes, we use a combination of Excel templates and SmartVault's annotation features. It took some adjustment, but our team actually prefers the new workflow now. One tip: if you do switch, plan to start the transition in May/June so you have the full off-season to get comfortable with the new system. We did a parallel run with about 50 clients to work out the kinks before committing fully.
@Grace Patel This is incredibly helpful! I m'in almost the exact same situation - mid-sized firm looking to escape ProSystem fx s'increasing costs. A few follow-up questions on your hybrid approach: 1. How do you handle the year-end organizer process with SmartVault? Do clients upload documents directly there, or do you still email organizers? 2. For Drake s'business returns - we do a lot of 1120S and partnership returns with multiple K-1s. How does Drake handle the K-1 generation and distribution compared to ProSystem fx? 3. The Excel workpaper templates sound interesting. Did you recreate the standard lead sheets TB, (depreciation schedules, etc. or) find templates that work well with Drake s'data export? The 40% savings would be huge for us, but I want to make sure we re'not sacrificing too much functionality. Your approach of specializing each tool instead of finding one do-everything solution makes a lot of sense. Thanks for sharing your experience!
@Grace Patel This hybrid approach is really intriguing! As someone who s'been wrestling with ProSystem fx Engagement s'limitations and costs, I m'very interested in your Drake + SmartVault combination. A couple of specific questions: How does Drake handle multi-entity returns where you have flow-through entities with individual owners? We have several clients with complex structures S-Corp (owning rental properties, partnerships with corporate partners, etc. and) ProSystem fx Engagement at least keeps all the related returns organized in one client file. Also, with SmartVault handling your document management, how do you maintain the audit trail between source documents and specific line items on returns? That s'something ProSystem fx does reasonably well with its workpaper linking system. The 40% cost savings is definitely appealing, especially if we can maintain or improve efficiency. Did you find any unexpected challenges during your first busy season with the new setup that you wished you d'prepared for differently?
I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm in a similar situation with a mixed-use property I'm preparing to sell. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of keeping detailed records of your actual living expenses versus business expenses during the time you occupied the property. The IRS may look at patterns like whether you deducted utilities, insurance, and maintenance costs as business expenses for the entire property, or if you properly allocated them between personal and business use. If you claimed 100% business deductions on utilities while living there, it could undermine your argument that 40% was truly residential. Also, for anyone dealing with this situation: make sure you understand the "non-qualifying use" rules. If you ever rented out the residential portion or used it for business purposes after May 6, 2008, those periods of non-qualifying use could reduce your available exclusion even if you otherwise meet the ownership and use tests. The tax implications can be substantial, so definitely worth getting professional guidance, but it's encouraging to see that others have successfully navigated similar situations with proper documentation and planning.
This is such an important point about the expense allocation! I hadn't thought about how claiming business deductions on utilities could contradict a residential use claim. I'm curious - if someone did mistakenly claim full business deductions on utilities while living there, is there a way to correct this retroactively? Would you need to file amended returns for those years, or could you just adjust the calculations when determining the capital gains exclusion percentages? Also, the non-qualifying use rules you mentioned are really concerning. If I had a friend stay in my residential area for a few weeks and they paid me some rent money, would that count as non-qualifying use? I'm starting to realize there might be more complexity here than I initially thought.
Great questions about retroactive corrections and non-qualifying use! For the utility deduction issue, you'd likely need to file amended returns for any years where you incorrectly claimed 100% business deductions while living there. The IRS prefers to see consistent treatment - if you're claiming residential use for capital gains purposes, your historical expense allocations should support that position. Regarding your friend paying rent - that's exactly the kind of situation that could trigger non-qualifying use rules. Even short-term rental income from the residential portion could affect your exclusion. The IRS looks at whether you received rental income, not just the duration. However, having a roommate who contributes to household expenses (versus formal rental arrangements) is typically treated differently. The non-qualifying use calculation is complex - it reduces your exclusion based on the ratio of non-qualifying use periods to your total ownership period after 2008. So a few weeks might have minimal impact, but it's still something to factor in. This is definitely an area where the details matter enormously. Given the potential tax savings from the exclusion, it's probably worth having a tax professional review your specific situation and help determine if any amended returns or special calculations are needed.
This is a really comprehensive discussion! As someone who works in tax preparation, I want to add one practical tip that might help with documentation: create a detailed timeline of your property use right now while the details are still fresh in your memory. Document month-by-month what percentage of the property you lived in versus used for business, any changes in the setup, when you completed major renovations, and any periods where the use might have been different (like if you temporarily used part of your living space for business during busy periods, or vice versa). Also keep records of how you filed your taxes each year - did you claim home office deductions from the residential portion? Did you properly allocate expenses? This timeline will be invaluable whether you're working with a tax professional, using a service like the ones mentioned above, or if you ever get questioned by the IRS. One more thing - don't forget that you might be able to add the cost of the residential renovations to your basis, which could reduce your overall capital gain. Keep all those receipts for kitchen, bathroom, flooring, and other improvements that were specifically for making the space livable as a residence.
This timeline approach is brilliant! I wish I had thought to document everything systematically from the beginning. I'm realizing now that I have scattered records but no coherent narrative of how my property use evolved over time. One question about adding renovation costs to basis - do all residential improvements qualify, or only certain types? I spent quite a bit on making the space comfortable (new HVAC system, upgraded electrical for residential use, etc.) but I'm not sure what counts as "capital improvements" versus regular maintenance that I might have already deducted as business expenses. Also, for anyone else reading this thread, I found it really helpful to go back through old photos on my phone - they actually provided great timeline evidence of when different areas were converted and how the space was being used at different points. Sometimes we have better documentation than we realize!
Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like calling the IRS is definitely the way to go if you're concerned about the biometric data requirements. I've been putting off dealing with my own tax debt because I was also uncomfortable with the ID.me verification process, but reading through all these responses has given me the confidence to just pick up the phone. The fee difference ($76 extra for phone setup) really isn't that significant in the grand scheme of things, especially when you consider you're paying interest and penalties on the full balance anyway. And it sounds like the Direct Pay system for making monthly payments works seamlessly without needing any online account creation. I'm planning to call Tuesday morning around 7:30 AM based on the timing advice here. Having all my documents ready beforehand seems to be the key to making the call go smoothly. Thanks to everyone who shared their actual experiences - it's so much more helpful than just reading the official IRS guidance that doesn't address the privacy concerns at all. For anyone else reading this thread who's in a similar situation, it's reassuring to know there are still options that don't require compromising your privacy just to pay what you owe.
I'm glad this thread has been helpful for you! I was in the exact same boat a few months ago - avoiding dealing with my tax debt because I didn't want to go through the biometric verification process. It's frustrating that the IRS made this the default option without clearly explaining alternatives. One thing I'd add to the great advice already shared: when you call on Tuesday morning, consider having a backup plan in case you still can't get through. I ended up calling three different days before I successfully connected with an agent, even with good timing. Don't get discouraged if the first attempt doesn't work - the phone system can still be unpredictable. Also, once you get your payment plan set up, you might want to set calendar reminders for your monthly payments. Even though Direct Pay is convenient, I found it helpful to have a routine for making payments a few days before the due date to account for processing time. The privacy aspect was definitely worth the extra fee for me. It's one of those situations where you shouldn't have to choose between financial compliance and personal privacy, but at least there's still a reasonable alternative available.
I went through this exact same situation about 6 months ago and can definitely confirm that calling the IRS is still a totally valid option for setting up payment plans without dealing with the biometric data requirements. The phone process was honestly more straightforward than I expected. I called 1-800-829-1040 on a Wednesday morning around 7:45 AM and got through in about an hour. The agent was able to set everything up just by verifying my identity with my SSN, last year's AGI, and some basic info from my tax return - no facial recognition or any of that invasive stuff required. Yes, the phone setup fee is higher ($107 vs $31 for online), but for me the privacy trade-off was absolutely worth it. Plus, once it's set up, making payments through IRS Direct Pay is super simple and doesn't require any account creation. I've been making my monthly payments that way for months now with zero issues. One thing I'd recommend - when you call, be very clear that you want to avoid creating any online accounts due to privacy concerns. The agents are totally used to this request now and will make sure to note it in your file. They'll send you payment coupons by mail, but honestly Direct Pay is way more convenient than mailing checks anyway. The wait times can be brutal, so definitely try calling early in the morning on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday if possible. Having all your paperwork ready before you call will make the actual conversation much quicker once you get through to someone.
Thank you for sharing your experience! As someone new to dealing with IRS payment plans, this is incredibly reassuring. I've been putting off addressing my tax debt specifically because of the biometric verification concerns, and it's really helpful to hear from people who have successfully gone the phone route recently. One question - when you mentioned that the agent noted your privacy preference in your file, does that help if you ever need to call back in the future? I'm wondering if that notation prevents them from suggesting online options or trying to push you toward creating an account during future interactions. Also, I'm curious about the payment coupons they send by mail - are those just for record-keeping, or do you actually need them for anything when using Direct Pay? I want to make sure I understand the full process before I make the call. The timing advice about early Wednesday mornings is really valuable too. I'll definitely plan to call then with all my documents organized. Thanks for taking the time to share such detailed information!
Has anyone else noticed their employer HSA contributions sometimes show up with different dates on different forms? My December 2023 contribution appeared on my 2024 5498-SA even though it was deducted from my last 2023 paycheck.
Yeah this happens all the time! The actual deposit date is what matters for the 5498-SA, not when it was withheld from your paycheck. If your employer processed the December 2023 withholding but the money didn't actually hit your HSA account until January 2024, it shows up on the 2024 5498-SA. The key is to keep good records of which tax year each contribution was designated for. My employer gives us a report that shows the tax year designation for each contribution, which helps a lot when there's confusion.
This is exactly the kind of HSA timing confusion that trips up so many people! You're absolutely right to trust your W-2 over the 5498-SA for tax filing purposes. The $173 showing up on your 2024 Form 5498-SA is just documenting when the money physically moved into your account, not which tax year it applies to. Since you mentioned this was from your final paycheck in January 2024 but designated for 2023, you should have already reported that contribution on your 2023 tax return. For your 2024 filing, you'll report $0 in HSA contributions, which matches what your W-2 shows. One tip for the future: when you make contributions in January for the previous tax year, make sure to clearly specify the tax year designation with your HSA provider. Some people get caught off guard when they see contributions on forms that don't match their expectations. Your situation is totally normal and you're handling it correctly!
This is really helpful! I'm new to HSAs and had no idea about the timing differences between forms. Quick question - when you say "clearly specify the tax year designation," how exactly do you do that? Do you have to call your HSA provider or is there usually an option when you make the contribution online? I want to make sure I don't run into this same confusion next year.
Great question! Most HSA providers have gotten much better about this. When you make a contribution online, there's usually a dropdown or checkbox where you can select which tax year the contribution is for. You'll typically see options like "2024 tax year" or "2023 tax year" (if it's still before the April deadline). If you're making the contribution by phone or check, you should explicitly tell them or write on the memo line which tax year it's for. Some providers will assume it's for the current tax year unless you specify otherwise, which can cause exactly the confusion you're trying to avoid. Also, keep screenshots or confirmation emails showing your tax year designation - it's helpful documentation if there are ever questions later. Your HSA provider should also send you a year-end statement that breaks down contributions by tax year, which makes tax filing much easier!
Natasha Petrova
This thread has been incredibly educational! I'm a newcomer to HSAs and honestly had no idea these kinds of over-contribution issues were so common. Reading through everyone's experiences has been eye-opening. I just opened my first HSA this year when I switched to a high-deductible health plan, and I was planning to max out my contributions without really understanding all the nuances involved. After reading this discussion, I realize I need to be much more careful about tracking my contributions throughout the year and understanding exactly how the limits work. The advice about keeping detailed records, reviewing statements regularly, and setting up mid-year check-ins seems really smart. I'm also bookmarking that IRS Publication 969 that was mentioned - seems like required reading for anyone with an HSA! One question for the group: for someone just starting out with HSAs, are there any common mistakes beyond over-contribution that I should be aware of? I want to make sure I'm not setting myself up for problems down the road. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that's so hard to find elsewhere!
0 coins
Jace Caspullo
ā¢Welcome to the HSA world! You're smart to educate yourself early - I wish I had done the same when I first started. Beyond over-contributions, here are some common HSA mistakes to watch out for: 1. Using your HSA for non-qualified expenses before age 65 - you'll pay income tax plus a 20% penalty 2. Not saving receipts for qualified medical expenses - you can reimburse yourself years later, but you need documentation 3. Forgetting that some "medical" expenses aren't HSA-qualified (like vitamins or cosmetic procedures) 4. Not understanding the "last month rule" - if you're HSA-eligible on December 1st, you can contribute for the full year, but there are testing period requirements The IRS has a great list of qualified medical expenses in Publication 502. Also consider keeping your HSA invested for long-term growth rather than just using it as a checking account - it can be an amazing retirement tool since withdrawals for any purpose are penalty-free after age 65 (though you'll pay income tax on non-medical withdrawals). You're already ahead of the game by asking these questions upfront!
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
This is such a valuable thread for anyone dealing with HSA issues! I'm a tax preparer and see these over-contribution situations fairly regularly, especially this time of year. One thing I'd emphasize is the importance of getting everything documented properly before you file your return. Make sure you have written confirmation from your HSA administrator about the correction and keep copies of all correspondence. I've seen cases where taxpayers thought everything was fixed, but the HSA provider's records didn't match what was actually reported on the tax forms. Also, when you're completing Form 8889, be very careful with Line 2 (your total contributions). This should reflect your actual contributions after the correction, not what appears on your W-2. Include a brief statement with your return explaining the discrepancy - something simple like "HSA contribution amount reflects correction of employer over-contribution as documented in attached correspondence." The good news is that you handled this exactly right by catching it early and having it properly reclassified. That saved you from the 6% excise tax and a lot of additional paperwork. Just make sure all your forms align with the correction when you receive them!
0 coins
Carter Holmes
ā¢Thank you so much for the professional perspective! As someone new to HSAs, it's really reassuring to hear from a tax preparer who sees these situations regularly. Your advice about getting written confirmation and keeping copies of all correspondence is especially helpful - I definitely want to make sure I have a proper paper trail. The tip about including a brief explanatory statement with the return is something I wouldn't have thought of, but it makes total sense. Better to proactively explain the discrepancy than have the IRS question it later and potentially delay processing. One follow-up question: when you say "make sure all your forms align with the correction," are there specific things I should be looking for when I receive my 5498-SA and 1099-SA? I want to make sure I catch any errors before filing rather than discovering them after the fact. Thanks again for sharing your expertise - this kind of professional insight is invaluable for those of us navigating these issues for the first time!
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
ā¢Great question! Here are the key things to verify when you receive your forms: On your 5498-SA: Make sure Box 2 (total contributions) shows only the corrected amount (excluding that $780). If it still shows the higher amount, contact your HSA provider immediately for a corrected form. On your 1099-SA: Look for Box 1 (gross distribution) to show the $780 removal, and Box 3 should have a distribution code indicating it was a return of excess contribution (usually code 4). The distribution should be dated in the year the correction was made. Most importantly, your 5498-SA total plus any employer contributions shown on your W-2 Box 12 code W should reconcile with your actual intended contribution amount. If there's still a $780 discrepancy after the correction, something wasn't processed right. I always tell my clients to request these forms early (HSA providers must issue them by January 31st) so there's time to fix any errors before the filing deadline. Don't wait until you're ready to file to discover form errors - it can significantly delay your return! The documentation trail you're building now will make my job as your preparer much easier too!
0 coins