Will letting someone else claim my kids on taxes affect my CalWORKs Cash Aid eligibility?
I'm in a complicated situation with my ex. We've been going back and forth about who claims our kids (3 and 5) on taxes. He's offering to give me half of what he gets back if I let him claim them this year. I currently receive CalWORKs cash aid and CalFresh for me and my kids, and I'm worried this might cause problems with my benefits. Has anyone ever let someone else claim their children as dependents on taxes while getting benefits? Will the county find out and cut my cash aid since it's based on me having the kids? I don't want to mess up my benefits but really need the extra money he's offering.
34 comments


Maya Lewis
This is a really important question because it ABSOLUTELY affects your benefits. When you apply for CalWORKs, you declare that your children live with you and you're claiming them as dependents. If someone else claims them on taxes, it creates a contradiction that can trigger a fraud investigation. The tax system and benefit system do communicate with each other. I've seen cases where people lost benefits entirely and had to repay thousands in overpayments because of this exact situation.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•Oh no, I had no idea it was that serious! So even if the kids do live with me full-time, letting him claim them on taxes could still get me in trouble with CalWORKs?
0 coins
Isaac Wright
my cousin got into big truble for this last yr. her ex claimed the kids and she got a notice 4 months later saying she had an overpayment of like $4500 cuz she wasnt sposed to be getting benefits for kids that "dont live with her" according to taxes. she had to fight it for like 5 months to prove the kids actually lived with her even tho she let him claim them
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•That's terrifying! I had no idea they would assume the kids don't live with me just because of taxes. Did your cousin eventually get it resolved or did she have to pay back all that money?
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
i let my kids dad claim them last year and nothing happened with my calfresh but now im worried reading these comments lol
0 coins
Maya Lewis
•You might have just gotten lucky so far. Sometimes the systems take time to catch up or flag these inconsistencies. I would strongly recommend not doing it again in the future to avoid potential problems.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
The problem is that when someone claims a child as a dependent on their taxes, they're declaring that the child lives with them for more than half the year. If you receive CalWORKs for those same children, you're declaring they live with you. These contradictory statements can trigger what's called an "IEVS match" (Income and Eligibility Verification System) where tax data is compared to benefit data. You have a few options: 1. Only allow him to claim the children if you have court documentation showing a legal right to do so despite the children living with you (some custody agreements specify this) 2. Report to your eligibility worker if you do let him claim them (but this could reduce your benefits) 3. Decline his offer and claim the children yourself as you're legally entitled to do if they live with you The monetary offer he's making isn't worth the risk of benefit termination and potential overpayment recovery.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•Thank you for explaining this so clearly. We don't have any formal custody agreement, just a verbal understanding. I had no idea I could end up owing thousands back to the county. Definitely not worth the risk for a few hundred dollars from him.
0 coins
KhalilStar
Has anyone tried calling the county to ask about this without giving their name? I'm curious if they have a clear policy. Sometimes I feel like different workers tell you different things.
0 coins
Amelia Dietrich
•Tried that once for a similar question and they wouldn't give me a straight answer without my case info. Getting through to a CalWORKs worker was impossible anyway - I kept getting disconnected after waiting forever. I finally used Claimyr (claimyr.com) and got through in like 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/jzISHxCPLwE. It was worth it because I actually got to talk to someone who could look at my specific case and give me the right answer instead of general info.
0 coins
Kaiya Rivera
OMG THE COUNTY WILL ABSOLUTELY FIND OUT!! I made this mistake in 2024 and I'm STILL dealing with the fallout! My ex claimed our daughter on his taxes even though she lives with me 100% of the time and I get CalWORKs. Six months later I got a Notice of Action saying I was overpaid almost $6,000 because my daughter "wasn't in the home" according to tax records!!!! I had to get proof from her school, doctor, and even neighbors writing statements that she lives with me. It was a NIGHTMARE and I'm still fighting it. DON'T DO IT!!!
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•That's absolutely terrifying. I had no idea they would just assume she wasn't living with you. Did you have any warning this might happen or did the notice just show up out of nowhere?
0 coins
Kaiya Rivera
•NO WARNING AT ALL!!! Just a notice in the mail one day saying I owed all this money back! And they reduced my current benefits while investigating too which made everything worse. The worst part is they act like YOU did something wrong even when you're trying to explain. Get everything in writing if you talk to them about ANYTHING!
0 coins
Connor Murphy
There's another important aspect to consider: the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). If you qualify for CalWORKs, you likely qualify for EITC when filing taxes, which could be worth more than what your ex is offering to give you. By letting him claim the children, you're potentially losing out on tax credits that would benefit you more than his offer. Additionally, there's a specific question on the Semi-Annual Report (SAR7) about whether anyone else has claimed your child as a dependent. If you answer no but someone else has, that's considered misrepresentation.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•I didn't even think about the EITC! I've always gotten a decent refund because of it. You're right - I might be giving up more than he's offering me. And I definitely don't want to lie on my SAR7. Based on everyone's advice, I'm going to tell him I can't let him claim the kids. Thank you all so much for the warnings and advice!
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
wat if ur not on the lease where u live? can they still check if kids live with u?
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Yes, they absolutely can. The county has many ways to verify residency besides a lease. They can look at school records, medical records, statements from landlords (even without a formal lease), utility bills, and can even do home visits if they suspect fraud. Being off the lease doesn't prevent them from investigating where your children actually live.
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
I work at a legal aid clinic and see this issue constantly. What everyone is telling you is 100% correct - this is one of the fastest ways to trigger a fraud investigation and lose your benefits. The county uses automated data matching systems that compare tax filings with benefit records. When they find discrepancies (someone else claiming your kids while you receive aid for them), they assume YOU are committing fraud, not that it's a family arrangement. Even if you eventually prove the kids live with you, you'll likely face months of reduced or suspended benefits while they investigate, which could leave you unable to pay rent or buy food. I've helped families who lost their housing because of this exact situation. The "extra money" your ex is offering isn't worth potentially losing thousands in benefits or facing fraud charges. Claim your own children - you have every legal right to do so if they live with you more than half the year.
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
•Thank you so much for this perspective from someone who works with these cases professionally. It really drives home how serious this is. I was tempted by the money but hearing about families losing housing over this makes it clear it's not worth the risk. I'm definitely going to claim my kids myself and tell my ex no. Better to be safe than sorry with something this important to my family's stability.
0 coins
Chloe Green
This is such an important thread - I wish I had found this information sooner! I made a similar mistake two years ago and it took me over a year to get everything straightened out. The county not only demanded repayment but also put me on "enhanced monitoring" which meant I had to report every single change in my situation within 10 days instead of the usual monthly reports. They also required additional documentation for everything - proof of where I shop for groceries, school attendance records, even receipts for children's clothing purchases. It was incredibly stressful and humiliating. The worst part is that even after proving my kids lived with me the entire time, it's still noted in my file and they scrutinize everything more closely now. Don't let anyone convince you this is "just a technicality" - the consequences are very real and long-lasting.
0 coins
Luca Russo
•This is exactly the kind of real-world consequence I needed to hear about. Enhanced monitoring sounds absolutely awful - having to report every little change within 10 days and provide receipts for everything? That would be so stressful on top of everything else. I can't imagine having to constantly prove that my kids live with me when they obviously do. Thank you for sharing your experience - it really shows how this isn't just about paying back money, but about how they treat you going forward. I'm definitely not going to risk putting myself in that situation. My ex will just have to understand that I can't jeopardize our benefits for his tax situation.
0 coins
Noland Curtis
Just wanted to add another perspective as someone who's been through the CalWORKs system for 4 years - the county workers are trained to look for red flags, and tax discrepancies are one of the biggest ones. When I had my last redetermination appointment, the worker specifically asked me if anyone else had claimed my son as a dependent and warned me that they cross-reference this information. She said it's become such a common issue that they now ask about it directly during interviews. What really stuck with me was when she said "we understand families have complicated situations, but the law is the law - if your child lives with you, YOU should be claiming them on taxes, not making deals with other people." She also mentioned that even if you think you're being smart by splitting the refund, you're actually giving up money you're entitled to through credits like the Child Tax Credit and EITC that could be worth way more than whatever someone else is offering you. Save yourself the headache and potential fraud investigation - claim your own kids if they live with you. The system is designed to catch these things and it's just not worth the risk to your family's stability.
0 coins
Daniel Price
•Wow, I really appreciate you sharing what the worker told you directly. It's helpful to know they're actually asking about this during interviews now - that shows how big of an issue it's become. You're absolutely right about the Child Tax Credit and EITC potentially being worth more than what my ex is offering. I just looked it up and with two kids, I could be eligible for thousands in credits that I'd be giving up. Plus hearing from everyone about the fraud investigations and enhanced monitoring has made it crystal clear this isn't worth the risk. I'm going to file my own taxes and claim my kids like I should. Thank you for the reality check!
0 coins
Emma Wilson
I'm new to this community but not new to CalWORKs unfortunately. Reading through all these responses really hits home - I went through something similar about 18 months ago. My sister convinced me to let her claim my daughter for "just one year" because she was getting a bigger refund and promised to split it with me. Biggest mistake I ever made. The county didn't just investigate - they suspended my benefits completely while they "reviewed my case." For three months I had no cash aid, no CalFresh, nothing. I had to borrow money from family just to keep the lights on and feed my kid. Even after I proved my daughter lived with me the whole time (school records, pediatrician letters, neighbor statements), they made me jump through hoops for months. What really got me was the attitude - like I was some kind of criminal trying to scam the system when really I was just a single mom trying to make ends meet. They treated every interaction like I was lying, even when I had mountains of proof. The worst part? My sister only ended up giving me $300 of what she promised, and I lost out on over $2,000 in benefits during the suspension period. Do the math - it cost me way more than I ever could have gained. Please don't make the same mistake I did. Your kids live with YOU, so YOU claim them. Period. The temporary money your ex is offering isn't worth the permanent stress and scrutiny you'll face if the county flags your case. Trust me, I'm still dealing with the aftermath and probably will be for years.
0 coins
Alejandro Castro
•Emma, thank you so much for sharing your story - it's heartbreaking but so important for people like me to hear. Three months with no benefits at all? That's terrifying. I can't imagine trying to keep my family afloat with no cash aid or CalFresh while they "review" something that should be obvious. And then to only get $300 out of what your sister promised while losing $2,000+ in benefits? That's such a perfect example of why this is never worth it. I'm really sorry you went through all that stress and scrutiny. Your experience, along with everyone else who's shared here, has completely convinced me to say no to my ex and file my own taxes. The temporary money isn't worth years of being treated like a criminal by the system. I hope things get better for you soon.
0 coins
Jake Sinclair
As someone who's been on CalWORKs for almost 2 years, I can't stress enough how right everyone here is. The county has gotten really aggressive about catching these tax discrepancies - they have automated systems that flag cases immediately when someone else claims your kids but you're getting benefits for them. What people don't realize is that when you sign your CalWORKs application, you're swearing under penalty of perjury that the information is true. So when you say your kids live with you but then let someone else claim them on taxes (which legally means they lived with that person more than half the year), you've technically committed perjury. The county can and will pursue fraud charges if they want to make an example. I've seen this happen to three different people in my neighborhood. One lost benefits for 6 months, another had to do community service, and the third is still paying back over $8,000 in "overpayments" - money the county says she wasn't entitled to because her kids supposedly didn't live with her. The thing is, your ex probably doesn't understand the legal implications of what he's asking you to do. When he claims them, he's legally stating they lived with him for over 6 months of the year. That directly contradicts your CalWORKs case. Even if you both know it's just a "paper arrangement," the government systems don't care about your personal agreements. My advice? Tell your ex that letting him claim the kids would jeopardize your family's basic needs like food and shelter. Any reasonable person should understand that your benefits are more important than his tax refund. If he really wants to help financially, he can pay child support instead of asking you to risk everything.
0 coins
Honorah King
•Jake, this is such a comprehensive breakdown of the legal and practical issues. You're absolutely right about the perjury aspect - I hadn't even thought about that part of it. When you put it that way, it's not just about benefits being cut, it's about potentially facing criminal charges for something that seemed like a simple family arrangement. The fact that you've personally seen three neighbors go through this really drives home how common this problem has become. Six months without benefits, community service, $8,000 in repayments - these aren't just theoretical consequences, they're happening to real people in real neighborhoods. Your suggestion about framing it to my ex as jeopardizing basic needs is perfect. You're right that most reasonable people would understand that keeping food on the table and a roof over our heads is more important than a tax refund. And if he genuinely wants to help financially, proper child support through the system would actually strengthen my case rather than create problems with it. Thank you for laying out all the legal implications so clearly. Between your explanation and everyone else's experiences, I feel like I finally understand the full scope of what I'd be risking. Definitely not worth it!
0 coins
Sofia Torres
Reading through all these responses has been eye-opening - I had no idea this was such a widespread problem or that the consequences could be so severe. I'm a single mom who's been on CalWORKs for about 8 months now, and my ex has made similar offers in the past that I've always turned down, mostly just out of instinct that it didn't feel right. What really stands out to me from everyone's stories is how the county assumes YOU are the one committing fraud, not that it's just a family arrangement. That seems so backwards - like they're guilty until proven innocent. And the fact that even after you prove your kids live with you, you still get put on enhanced monitoring or have it noted in your file permanently? That's terrifying. The part about automated systems flagging these discrepancies immediately really caught my attention too. It sounds like there's no flying under the radar anymore - they WILL catch it, it's just a matter of when. And then you're stuck trying to prove something that should be obvious while your benefits get suspended. For anyone else reading this who might be tempted by similar offers from exes or family members - don't do it. The temporary money is never worth the permanent headaches and scrutiny. These stories have convinced me to stick with my gut instinct and always claim my own kids. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences, especially the really difficult ones. It takes courage to admit these mistakes, but it's helping other families avoid the same traps.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Sofia, your instincts were absolutely right to turn down those offers! It's scary how backwards the system seems - you're right that it feels like guilty until proven innocent. What really struck me from everyone's stories is how the county doesn't seem to care about the reality of your situation, just what the paperwork says. Even when people had mountains of proof their kids lived with them, they still had to fight for months or years to get things straightened out. And like you said, the permanent consequences - enhanced monitoring, notes in your file, ongoing scrutiny - make it clear this isn't something that just goes away once you prove your case. I'm definitely sticking with claiming my own kids from now on. Better to trust our gut feelings about what feels right than risk our families' stability for temporary money.
0 coins
Ryan Vasquez
I'm so glad you posted this question because I almost made the same mistake last year! My ex was pressuring me to let him claim our 4-year-old daughter, offering me $800 from his refund. I was really tempted because money was tight, but something felt off about it. After reading all these responses, I'm horrified at what could have happened. The stories about benefit suspensions, fraud investigations, and people owing back thousands of dollars are absolutely terrifying. It never occurred to me that letting someone else claim my child could make the county think she doesn't live with me anymore. What really hit me was when someone mentioned the Semi-Annual Report question about whether anyone else claimed your child as a dependent. I fill out that SAR7 every six months and never thought about how answering that question wrong could be considered fraud. To the original poster - please don't do it. The stress, investigations, and potential loss of benefits that everyone has described here sound like absolute nightmares. Your kids live with YOU, so you should be the one claiming them and getting those tax credits. The money your ex is offering might seem helpful now, but it could end up costing your family so much more in lost benefits and legal troubles. Thank you to everyone who shared their difficult experiences. It's clear this community really looks out for each other, and these warnings could save families from making devastating mistakes.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•Ryan, I'm so glad you trusted your instincts and didn't let your ex claim your daughter! $800 might have seemed like a lot when money was tight, but reading all these horror stories shows you dodged a huge bullet. The fact that your ex was pressuring you about it makes it even worse - like he didn't understand (or didn't care) about the risk he was asking you to take with your benefits. It's scary how many people almost fall into this trap because the immediate money seems helpful, but the long-term consequences are so much worse. Thank you for sharing your near-miss - it shows that sometimes our gut feelings about these situations are right even when we can't fully explain why something feels wrong. Stories like yours and everyone else's are exactly what families need to hear to avoid these mistakes!
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
As a newcomer to this community, I just want to say thank you to everyone who shared their experiences here. Reading through these stories has been both heartbreaking and incredibly educational. The level of detail and real-world consequences you've all described - from benefit suspensions to fraud investigations to owing thousands in repayments - really shows how serious this issue is. What strikes me most is how the system seems designed to assume the worst about families who are already struggling. The fact that automated matching systems can flag cases immediately, but then it takes months or years to prove your innocence while your benefits are suspended, seems so unfair to families who depend on those benefits for basic needs like food and housing. I'm grateful for communities like this where people are willing to share difficult experiences to help others avoid the same mistakes. The warnings about enhanced monitoring, permanent file notes, and ongoing scrutiny really drive home that this isn't just about temporary money - it's about how you'll be treated by the system going forward. For anyone facing similar pressure from exes or family members, these stories make it clear: your children's stability and your family's access to benefits is worth more than any temporary financial arrangement. Thank you all for looking out for each other and providing such valuable real-world guidance.
0 coins
Olivia Evans
•Kyle, you've really captured what makes this community so valuable - people willing to share their difficult experiences to protect others from making the same mistakes. As someone new to both CalWORKs and this community, I've been amazed by how generous everyone has been with sharing really personal and sometimes embarrassing situations just to help others avoid similar problems. You're absolutely right about how unfair the system seems - the idea that automated systems can flag you instantly but then you have to spend months or years proving your innocence while struggling without benefits is heartbreaking. It really shows how the burden falls on families who are already in vulnerable situations. What's been most helpful to me is seeing the long-term consequences that people don't think about in the moment - the enhanced monitoring, permanent file notes, and ongoing scrutiny that follows people even after they prove their case. It's not just about the immediate financial impact, but about how it changes your relationship with the system forever. This thread has completely changed my perspective on what seemed like a simple financial arrangement with my ex. I had no idea I could be risking fraud charges, benefit suspension, or years of enhanced scrutiny. The community's willingness to share these experiences has literally saved my family from a potentially devastating mistake.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
I'm new to this community and to CalWORKs, but reading through all these responses has been incredibly eye-opening and honestly pretty scary. I had no idea that letting someone else claim your kids on taxes could trigger such serious consequences with benefits. The stories about fraud investigations, benefit suspensions, and people owing back thousands of dollars are absolutely terrifying. What really stands out to me is how many people mentioned that the county assumes YOU'RE committing fraud rather than understanding it might just be a family arrangement. The fact that automated systems flag these discrepancies immediately but then families have to fight for months to prove their kids actually live with them while benefits are suspended seems so backwards and unfair. The detail about the SAR7 form asking specifically if anyone else claimed your child as a dependent really hit home too - I never realized that answering that question incorrectly could be considered fraud. And hearing about enhanced monitoring and permanent file notes even AFTER people prove their case shows this isn't something that just goes away. To the original poster - please don't risk it. Your kids live with you, so you should claim them and get those tax credits yourself. The Child Tax Credit and EITC that others mentioned could be worth way more than what your ex is offering anyway. These stories make it clear the temporary money isn't worth potentially losing your family's stability and benefits. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences - you're helping so many families avoid these devastating mistakes.
0 coins