

Ask the community...
This is such an important thread - I see this household composition mistake ALL the time! What's really frustrating is how it affects people for months or even years before they realize they're not getting the benefits they're entitled to. For anyone else reading this who might be in a similar situation: if you're unsure about whether someone should be on your CalWORKs case, here's the simple test: Are they 1) related to you by blood or marriage, 2) the parent of a child on your case, or 3) legally responsible for your children? If the answer is no to all three, they shouldn't be included - regardless of living arrangements. @Omar Zaki - you've gotten excellent advice here. I'd especially emphasize documenting everything in writing and being prepared with those regulation numbers that @Luca Conti mentioned. Don't let anyone make you feel like you're doing something wrong by correcting their mistake. Your children's wellbeing depends on getting the full benefit amount you're legally entitled to under CalWORKs policy. Stand firm and advocate for your family - you've got this! Really hoping your renewal goes smoothly and you see that benefit increase reflected in your next payment!
This whole thread has been such an eye-opener for me! I had no idea how many people were dealing with this exact same issue. Your simple three-question test is perfect - I'm definitely going to write that down and reference it during my renewal. It's so straightforward compared to all the confusing information I got initially. I really appreciate how everyone here has shared their real experiences and specific steps that worked. It's given me the confidence to advocate properly for my family instead of just accepting what I was told before. I'm planning to go into my renewal appointment fully prepared with documentation, regulation numbers, and a clear written explanation of what needs to be corrected. Thank you and everyone else for turning what felt like an overwhelming situation into something I can actually handle! I'll make sure to update after my appointment.
I'm going through the exact same situation right now and this thread has been a lifesaver! My worker also incorrectly told me to include my boyfriend when I first applied, and I've been getting reduced benefits for over a year because they're counting his income. What really stood out to me from everyone's advice is how important it is to document everything and have the specific policy references ready. I'm planning to call the CalWORKs Policy Unit that @Luca Conti mentioned to get official confirmation before my renewal, and I love the idea of preparing a one-page summary like @Miguel Alvarez suggested. It's both frustrating and reassuring to know this mistake happens so frequently - frustrating because it means workers aren't properly trained on the household composition rules, but reassuring because it shows I'm not alone in dealing with this. The fact that multiple people have successfully gotten $150-200+ monthly increases after fixing this gives me hope that I can get my family's benefits corrected too. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences and specific steps. This community support is exactly what I needed to feel confident about advocating for my children's benefits!
I'm really new to this community and just applied for CalWORKs last week - this whole thread has been such an education! I had no idea that BenefitsCal could be so unreliable with status updates. Reading everyone's experiences here is both reassuring and a little concerning at the same time. It's great to know that verbal confirmation from workers is what really matters, but it's also frustrating that the system is so poorly designed that it causes this much stress for people who are already dealing with financial hardship. I'm definitely going to save all the tips from this thread - taking notes during interviews, getting confirmation numbers, checking EBT balance before payment dates, and most importantly, not panicking if the website doesn't update right away. Thank you all for creating such a supportive space where we can learn from each other's experiences. It's clear that this community knowledge is way more valuable than any official documentation when it comes to actually navigating these systems!
Welcome to the community, Luca! Your observation about the system being poorly designed is spot on - it's really unfortunate that people already dealing with financial stress have to also navigate these confusing and unreliable systems. I'm also relatively new here and have found this community to be incredibly valuable for getting real-world advice that you just won't find in official materials. The fact that so many of us have had similar experiences with BenefitsCal delays really shows how widespread this issue is. It's great that you're getting this information upfront before your case gets processed - hopefully it will save you from some of the anxiety that others have experienced. This thread is definitely worth bookmarking for future reference!
I'm brand new to this community and currently going through my first CalWORKs application process. This entire thread has been incredibly enlightening and honestly a bit of a wake-up call about what to expect with the system! I had assumed that BenefitsCal would be a reliable way to track my case status, but clearly that's not the case based on everyone's experiences here. It's both reassuring and frustrating to learn that these delays and inaccuracies are so common. Reassuring because it means I won't panic if the website doesn't update properly, but frustrating because it seems like such a basic thing for a government system to get right. People depending on these benefits are already stressed enough without having to worry about whether the online portal is telling them the truth! I'm definitely taking notes on all the advice shared here - especially about getting confirmation numbers during appointments, writing down what workers tell you, and checking EBT balance before payment dates instead of relying on BenefitsCal. This community knowledge is so much more practical than anything I've found in official resources. Thank you all for being so open about sharing your experiences - it's making me feel much more prepared for what's ahead!
Welcome to the community, Chloe! Your feelings about this being both reassuring and frustrating are exactly what I went through when I first learned about these system issues. It really is mind-boggling that in 2025 we still have to deal with such unreliable government portals - you'd think basic status updates would be a given! But you're absolutely right that having this knowledge upfront is so valuable. I wish I had known about BenefitsCal's quirks before my first recertification experience. The anxiety of thinking your benefits might not come through when the website shows outdated info is really intense. It's great that you're already taking notes on everyone's advice - that proactive approach will definitely serve you well as you navigate the system. This community has been such a lifesaver for getting real, practical information that you just can't find anywhere else!
Once you submit your SAR-7 and paystubs online, I'd recommend taking a screenshot or printing the confirmation page. In my experience working with benefit programs, having proof of submission can be crucial if there's any dispute later about whether you submitted on time. Also, don't forget to include information about any changes in your household composition, housing costs, or other income sources - not just your new job. The SAR-7 requires reporting all changes that occurred during the report month.
Hassan, definitely get that moving expense and rent change reported along with your Target paystubs! Since you moved to a cheaper place, that could actually help your case since lower housing costs might mean you qualify for more benefits. When you're filling out the SAR-7 online, there should be a section for housing expenses where you can update your new rent amount. Also, if you have any receipts from your move (truck rental, deposits, etc.) keep those handy in case they ask for verification. The combination of new job income + lower rent might actually work out better for your benefit amount than you think!
That's really good to know about the lower rent potentially helping with benefits! I honestly had no idea that moving to a cheaper place could actually increase my CalWORKs amount. I've been so stressed about the job income affecting my eligibility that I didn't even think about how the reduced housing costs might balance things out. Do you know if I need to provide a copy of my new lease agreement when I report the housing change, or is just putting in the new rent amount enough?
@Luis Johnson For housing changes, they usually want some kind of verification - could be a lease agreement, rent receipt, or even a letter from your landlord stating the monthly rent amount. When I had to report a housing change, they asked for my lease within 30 days of submitting the SAR-7. But honestly, requirements can vary by county, so when Hassan calls his caseworker or (uses that Claimyr service Benjamin mentioned ,)he should ask specifically what housing verification they need. Better to have it ready than get hit with another delay!
u shud also apply 4 WIC if u havent already. its seprate from calworks but gives u food 4 pregnant women and kids under 5. formula is expensive AF so get on that program now
I want to add something important that others haven't mentioned. The pregnancy special need payment is separate from the Maximum Aid Payment (MAP) increases. If you're in the second trimester and verified your pregnancy, you get both: (1) the $47 special needs payment AND (2) your MAP increases because your household size is considered one larger while pregnant. So you actually get more than just the $47 that people are mentioning. When I was pregnant last year, my cash aid went up by about $150 total between both changes.
@Mateo Martinez You can find ACL 21-43 on the CDSS website under All County Letters - just search for pregnant "woman assistance or" the ACL number. I had to specifically ask for both benefits because my worker initially only processed the special needs payment. Once I brought up the household size increase, they recalculated my case and I got the full amount retroactively. Definitely print out that ACL and bring it with you when you report your pregnancy, just in case your worker isn t'familiar with the updated policy. Some counties are better at training their staff on these changes than others.
This is really valuable info! I'm new to this community but I've been dealing with CalWORKs for a few years now and I had no idea about the MAP increase during pregnancy. My sister is currently pregnant and only got the $47 - sounds like her worker didn't apply everything correctly either. @Mateo Martinez do you happen to know if there s'a time limit on requesting the MAP adjustment retroactively? And thank you @Jacob Lewis for the tip about printing the ACL - that s smart'advice for anyone dealing with workers who might not know all the current policies.
Max Knight
Good to hear your friend is taking action! Just wanted to add - when he goes to the tax prep place, he should be completely honest with them about the situation. Tax preparers are bound by confidentiality and they've seen this before. They'll need to know the full story to properly amend the return and calculate what he owes. Also, he should keep records of everything - the amended return, any payments made, correspondence with the IRS, etc. If the CalFresh office or any other agency asks about it later, having documentation that he proactively corrected the error will work in his favor. One more thing - if he can't afford to pay back the full amount right away, the IRS does offer payment plans. It's better to set up a payment plan than to ignore the debt.
0 coins
Christian Burns
•This is really solid advice! I'm new to this community but have been lurking and learning a lot. The payment plan option is huge - I didn't know the IRS offered that for situations like this. @Sean O'Connor - make sure your friend asks the tax preparer about installment agreements if he can't pay everything upfront. The IRS would rather get paid over time than not at all, and it shows he's trying to make it right. Also, since he's getting CalFresh now, there might be free tax preparation services in his area through VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) programs. They often help with amended returns too and it could save him money on prep fees when he's already struggling financially.
0 coins
PixelWarrior
As someone who's worked with families in similar situations, I want to emphasize how important it is that your friend is taking this seriously now. The fact that he admitted the truth to the CalFresh eligibility worker actually puts him in a vulnerable position - that statement is now documented in his case file. A few additional things to consider: 1. When he files the amended return, he should also be prepared for potential questions about WHY he originally filed incorrectly. Having a consistent explanation ready is important. 2. The CalFresh office may follow up on this discrepancy even if they approved his benefits initially. They sometimes conduct post-eligibility reviews, especially when fraud indicators are present. 3. Since he's paying child support through county enforcement, there's already a paper trail showing he's the non-custodial parent. This makes his original tax filing even more questionable from an investigative standpoint. The good news is that voluntary correction usually results in much better outcomes than waiting to be caught. He's doing the right thing by addressing this immediately. Make sure he keeps copies of everything and considers getting legal advice if the situation becomes more complicated.
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
•This is such helpful information, thank you! I'm new here and still learning about how all these systems work together. The point about the child support paper trail making his tax filing more suspicious is something I hadn't thought of - that really does create a clear contradiction that investigators could easily spot. I'm curious though - when you mention "post-eligibility reviews" for CalFresh, how common are those? Is it something that happens randomly or are they more likely to review cases where there were already red flags during the initial interview? My friend is probably going to be worried about this for months now. Also, do you think it would be worth having him proactively contact the CalFresh office to update them once he files the amended return? Or would that just draw more attention to the situation?
0 coins