UCC security filing rejected twice - debtor name issues driving me crazy
I'm at my wit's end here. We've had our UCC security filing rejected twice now by the Secretary of State's office and I'm losing sleep over this. The issue seems to be with the debtor name but I can't figure out what's wrong. We're securing a $180,000 equipment loan for a construction company and the debtor is listed as 'Martinez Construction LLC' on all our loan documents. But the SOS keeps kicking it back saying the debtor name doesn't match their records. I've checked the Articles of Incorporation three times and it matches exactly. Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm worried we're going to miss our perfection window and the whole deal will fall apart. The borrower is getting nervous and asking questions I don't have answers for.
45 comments


Mikayla Brown
Been there! This exact thing happened to me last month. The issue is usually that the official registered name in the state database has some tiny variation you're not seeing. Like maybe there's a period after 'LLC' in their system, or it's registered as 'Martinez Construction, LLC' with a comma. You need to do a business entity search on the SOS website to see the EXACT name format they have on file.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Oh man, that makes so much sense. I never thought about punctuation differences. Going to check that right now.
0 coins
Sean Matthews
•This is so frustrating about the whole system. Why can't they just accept reasonable variations? A comma shouldn't void a filing.
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
•I know it seems petty but the UCC system is pretty strict about exact matches. Better to be safe than sorry when you're dealing with secured transactions.
0 coins
Ali Anderson
What state are you filing in? Some states are pickier than others about debtor names. Also, did you check if there are any DBA names involved? Sometimes the company operates under a different name than what's on the Articles.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•We're in Texas. And yeah, I should probably check for DBAs too. This is getting complicated fast.
0 coins
Zadie Patel
•Texas can be tough on name matching. Make sure you're using their exact database format.
0 coins
A Man D Mortal
I had a similar nightmare with a UCC-1 filing last year. Turned out the company had amended their name slightly after incorporation but we were still using the old version. The secretary of state's office doesn't always update things immediately. Have you tried calling their UCC division directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what name they have on file.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Good idea. I'll try calling them tomorrow morning. Hopefully they can just tell me what format they need.
0 coins
Declan Ramirez
•Pro tip: when you call, have the filing number ready from your rejected attempts. Makes it easier for them to look up.
0 coins
A Man D Mortal
•Exactly! And don't be afraid to ask them to spell out the exact name character by character. I've done that before.
0 coins
Emma Morales
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for document verification. You can upload your UCC-1 and the company's Articles of Incorporation and it'll instantly flag any name discrepancies before you even submit. Would have saved you two rejections and a lot of stress. The tool cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Never heard of that but sounds like it could have helped. Is it expensive?
0 coins
Emma Morales
•They focus more on the value than cost. For avoiding filing rejections and potential lien perfection issues, it's worth it. You just upload PDFs and get instant verification.
0 coins
Katherine Hunter
•I'm skeptical of these automated tools. How does it know what the state database actually has?
0 coins
Emma Morales
•Fair question. It checks document consistency and flags potential issues. Doesn't replace doing your due diligence but catches things you might miss.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
THE WHOLE UCC SYSTEM IS BROKEN!!! I've been dealing with this garbage for 15 years and it gets worse every year. They reject filings for the stupidest reasons. A missing comma, a period, spacing issues - it's ridiculous. Meanwhile your client is freaking out and you look incompetent.
0 coins
Donna Cline
•I feel your pain. Had a filing rejected because I had 'Inc.' instead of 'Incorporated' even though both are legally equivalent.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•EXACTLY! And then they act like you're an idiot when you call to complain. The system needs a complete overhaul.
0 coins
Harper Collins
•While frustrating, the strict name matching does serve a purpose for search accuracy. But I agree the system could be more user-friendly.
0 coins
Kelsey Hawkins
Check if the company has any recent amendments to their Articles. Sometimes there's a lag between when amendments are filed and when they show up in the UCC system database. Also, verify you're using the correct state - if it's a multi-state company, make sure you're filing in the state of incorporation, not just where they do business.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Good point about the state. They do business in multiple states but incorporated in Texas. Should be the right state.
0 coins
Dylan Fisher
•Also worth checking if there are any pending name changes or mergers that might affect the filing.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
I've seen this issue probably 50 times in my career. The most common culprits are: 1) Extra spaces in the name, 2) Punctuation differences (commas, periods), 3) Abbreviated vs. spelled out words (Corp vs Corporation), 4) Recent name changes not reflected in your documents. Pull up the exact business entity record from the SOS website and copy the name exactly as it appears there, including any weird formatting.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•This is super helpful. I'm going to do a complete name comparison character by character.
0 coins
Gianna Scott
•Question about abbreviations - do most states accept both forms or are they strict about one version?
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•It varies by state, but generally you want to use exactly what's in their database. Don't assume they'll accept variations.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
Had this exact problem last week with a different company. Turns out there was an invisible character in the name field that got copied from a PDF. Try retyping the name manually instead of copy-pasting. Also, some states are case-sensitive believe it or not.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Wow, invisible characters? That's something I never would have thought of. Technology is both amazing and terrible.
0 coins
Sydney Torres
•This happens more than you'd think with PDF forms. Always better to manually type names.
0 coins
Alfredo Lugo
•Yep, learned that lesson the hard way. Now I always type everything manually for UCC filings.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
Following this thread because I might be dealing with something similar soon. Are continuation filings just as picky about name matching? I've got some coming up and don't want the same headaches.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•Yes, continuation filings (UCC-3) need to match the original UCC-1 exactly. Same rules apply.
0 coins
Kaitlyn Jenkins
•Great, something else to worry about. Thanks for the heads up though.
0 coins
Caleb Bell
One more thing to check - make sure the entity is still in good standing. If they're dissolved or suspended, that could cause rejection issues too. You can usually check this on the same SOS website where you verify the name.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Good thinking. I'll verify their status while I'm checking the name format.
0 coins
Danielle Campbell
•This is a good reminder to always do a full entity status check before filing. Saves headaches later.
0 coins
Emma Morales
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm curious if it ends up being something simple like punctuation. And seriously, check out that Certana.ai tool I mentioned - it would have caught this issue before your first filing attempt.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
•Will do! And I'll definitely look into that verification tool. Could save me a lot of stress in the future.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•I might need to check that out too. Tired of these filing rejections.
0 coins
Logan Stewart
UPDATE: Found the issue! You all were right about the punctuation. The official name has a comma before LLC that wasn't in our loan documents. 'Martinez Construction, LLC' vs 'Martinez Construction LLC'. Resubmitted and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help!
0 coins
Mikayla Brown
•Glad you got it sorted! Amazing how something so small can cause such big problems.
0 coins
Edwards Hugo
•Classic case. Happens all the time. Good catch on getting it resolved quickly.
0 coins
Lucas Parker
•See? This is exactly what I'm talking about. A COMMA shouldn't cause all this drama. But glad you got it fixed.
0 coins
Emma Morales
•Perfect example of why document verification tools are so valuable. Anyway, glad it worked out!
0 coins