uniform commercial code filing rejected - debtor name mismatch nightmare
Been dealing with a UCC-1 filing that keeps getting bounced back from the Secretary of State office. The debtor company changed their legal name about 8 months ago but we filed using their old corporate name by mistake. Now I'm stuck in this loop where the SOS keeps rejecting it because the name on our security agreement doesn't exactly match what's in their database. Has anyone dealt with this uniform commercial code mess before? I'm worried we're going to lose our perfected security interest if this drags on much longer. The loan is for $340K in equipment financing and my boss is breathing down my neck about getting this sorted out ASAP.
41 comments
Join the conversation
Fidel Carson
Ugh this is the worst! I had something similar happen last year. The key thing with uniform commercial code filings is that the debtor name has to be EXACTLY what's on file with the state. Even one letter off and they'll bounce it back. You might need to do a UCC-3 amendment once you get the original filing accepted, or start over completely with the correct name. Check the SOS database first to see exactly how they have the company name listed.
0 coins
Isaiah Sanders
•This is so true about the exact name match requirement. I've seen filings rejected for missing a comma or having 'Inc' instead of 'Incorporated'. The uniform commercial code rules are super strict about this stuff.
0 coins
Xan Dae
•Starting over might actually be faster at this point. The amendment process can take just as long as a new filing depending on your state.
0 coins
Fiona Gallagher
Before you panic, pull the debtor's articles of incorporation or certificate of good standing to see their exact legal name as registered with the state. That's what needs to match your UCC-1. If they did a name change, there should be articles of amendment on file. You can usually search this stuff online through the SOS corporate database. Once you have the correct name, you'll need to decide whether to amend the existing filing or withdraw and refile completely.
0 coins
Ana Rusula
•Good point about checking the corporate records first. I should have done that before filing originally. Do you know if there's a way to verify the name format without calling the SOS office? Their phone system is terrible.
0 coins
Fiona Gallagher
•Most states have online corporate search tools. Just google '[your state] secretary of state business search' and you should find it. Way faster than calling.
0 coins
Thais Soares
•Also check if they have any DBAs filed. Sometimes companies operate under assumed names that aren't their legal entity name.
0 coins
Nalani Liu
I actually found a solution for this exact problem recently. There's this tool called Certana.ai that lets you upload your security agreement and UCC documents to automatically check for name inconsistencies before you file. I wish I'd known about it earlier - would have saved me weeks of back and forth with rejected filings. You just upload the PDFs and it flags any mismatches between your loan docs and the UCC forms. Super helpful for catching this stuff upfront.
0 coins
Axel Bourke
•That sounds interesting. Does it check against the actual state databases or just compare your documents to each other?
0 coins
Nalani Liu
•It does document comparison first, then you can verify against state records. Really streamlined the whole process for me.
0 coins
Aidan Percy
•Anything that helps avoid these uniform commercial code filing disasters is worth checking out. The manual review process is such a pain.
0 coins
Fernanda Marquez
Wait, are you sure you need to start over? If the security agreement has the old name but was signed before the name change, that might still be valid. The key is when the security interest attached vs when the name change happened. You might be able to file an amendment referencing both the old and new names. Check UCC 9-507 for the specifics on name changes affecting filings.
0 coins
Ana Rusula
•The security agreement was signed 6 months ago, but the name change happened 8 months ago. So we definitely screwed up by using the old name.
0 coins
Fernanda Marquez
•Ooof yeah that's not ideal. Since the name change predates your security agreement, you really do need the current legal name on the UCC-1.
0 coins
Norman Fraser
•This is why I always run a corporate status check before any loan closing. Saves so much headache later.
0 coins
Kendrick Webb
•Hindsight is 20/20 but yeah, always verify entity status as part of due diligence.
0 coins
Hattie Carson
The uniform commercial code filing system is honestly broken. I've had filings rejected for the most ridiculous reasons - wrong font size, missing periods, you name it. And then it takes forever to get a human on the phone to explain what went wrong. Some states are better than others but it's still a nightmare across the board.
0 coins
Destiny Bryant
•Preach! I had one rejected because I used 'Street' instead of 'St' in the address. Like, really? We all knew what I meant.
0 coins
Dyllan Nantx
•At least most states have moved to electronic filing now. Remember when you had to mail paper forms and wait weeks just to find out they were rejected?
0 coins
Hattie Carson
•True, electronic filing is definitely an improvement. But the error messages are still cryptic half the time.
0 coins
TillyCombatwarrior
For what it's worth, you're probably still OK on the perfection timeline as long as you get this sorted reasonably quickly. Most courts are pretty forgiving about technical filing errors if you can show you were trying to perfect in good faith. But definitely don't let it drag on for months. File a corrected UCC-1 with the right debtor name as soon as you can verify it.
0 coins
Ana Rusula
•That's somewhat reassuring. I was worried we'd lose priority to other creditors if this takes too long to fix.
0 coins
TillyCombatwarrior
•Priority usually relates back to when you first attempted to file, assuming you fix any errors promptly. But check with your attorney to be sure.
0 coins
Anna Xian
•Yeah don't rely on forum advice for priority questions. That's definitely attorney territory given the loan amount.
0 coins
Jungleboo Soletrain
Similar thing happened to me but with a continuation filing. Spent 3 months going back and forth with the state because the original UCC-1 had a slightly different version of the company name than what was in their system. Ended up having to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name, then refile the continuation. Total mess. The uniform commercial code rules seem designed to trip you up sometimes.
0 coins
Rajan Walker
•Continuation filings are their own special kind of hell. At least with an initial UCC-1 you can start over if needed.
0 coins
Jungleboo Soletrain
•Exactly! With continuations you're stuck working with whatever mistakes were in the original filing.
0 coins
Nadia Zaldivar
Just curious - what state are you filing in? Some are definitely more picky than others about debtor names. California and New York seem to be the worst for nitpicky rejections, while others are more forgiving of minor variations.
0 coins
Ana Rusula
•I'd rather not say the specific state publicly, but it's one of the stricter ones unfortunately.
0 coins
Nadia Zaldivar
•Fair enough. Good luck getting it sorted out!
0 coins
Lukas Fitzgerald
•The state-by-state differences in uniform commercial code filing requirements are crazy. Should be more standardized IMO.
0 coins
Ev Luca
I've started using Certana.ai for all my UCC filings now after getting burned on a name mismatch issue similar to yours. You can upload your loan documents and UCC forms together and it automatically flags any inconsistencies before you submit to the state. Would have caught your debtor name issue right away. Really saves time and prevents these rejection cycles.
0 coins
Avery Davis
•Does it work with all document types or just certain formats?
0 coins
Ev Luca
•Works with standard PDFs. I've used it for security agreements, UCC-1s, UCC-3s, all the common stuff.
0 coins
Collins Angel
•Might be worth trying. These manual document reviews are so error-prone.
0 coins
Marcelle Drum
UPDATE: Finally got this resolved! Turns out the debtor had filed a DBA that matched their old name, so I was able to use that as an alternative. Filed a new UCC-1 with both the legal name and the DBA listed as debtor names. State accepted it without any issues. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this uniform commercial code stuff is trickier than it should be but we got there in the end.
0 coins
Fidel Carson
•Awesome! Glad it worked out. The DBA approach is a good solution when available.
0 coins
Fiona Gallagher
•Nice work figuring that out. DBAs can definitely save the day in situations like this.
0 coins
Nalani Liu
•Great outcome! For future filings, definitely consider using a document verification tool upfront. Would have spotted the name issue before filing.
0 coins
Tate Jensen
•Thanks for posting the update. Always good to know how these situations get resolved.
0 coins
Serene Snow
Great to hear you got it sorted out! The DBA solution is clever - I wouldn't have thought of that approach. This whole thread is a good reminder to always verify entity names and check for DBAs before filing. The uniform commercial code system really doesn't give you much room for error, but at least there are usually workarounds if you dig deep enough into the corporate records.
0 coins