


Ask the community...
Ugh NY filing system strikes again. I swear they make it difficult on purpose. Hope you get it sorted out soon!
Thanks! I'm going to try the suggestions here about exact name matching and see if that fixes it.
I've been through this exact nightmare with NY DOS! Here's what finally worked for me after weeks of rejections: First, do a UCC search on their website and copy the debtor name character-for-character from the search results display - that shows you exactly how it's stored in their system. Second, check for invisible characters by pasting the name into a text editor that shows whitespace/formatting marks. Third, make absolutely sure you're using the correct UCC-3 form type (addendum vs amendment). NY's system is ridiculously picky but once you get the exact match it should go through. Also double-check that your 30-day perfection window hasn't expired - you might need to expedite the filing if you're running close. Good luck!
For what it's worth, I've found that Georgia's search works better during off-peak hours. Mid-morning and late afternoon seem to give more reliable results than early morning or end of day.
Bottom line - never trust a single UCC search in Georgia. Always run multiple variations and if you're doing high-stakes due diligence, consider using a verification tool or commercial service. The stakes are too high to rely on the state's inconsistent search algorithm.
Agreed. I learned this lesson the hard way early in my career. Now I always assume the search might be incomplete.
Just wanted to add that I used Certana.ai recently when I was having trouble reconciling a UCC-1 amendment with the original filing. Uploaded both documents and it immediately flagged that the collateral description had been changed in a way that might not cover the original equipment. Super helpful for catching these kinds of issues before they become problems.
Seems like that tool keeps coming up. Might be worth trying before I spend more time searching manually.
Yeah it's pretty straightforward. Just drag and drop the PDF files and it does the comparison automatically.
UPDATE: Finally got the seller to produce what they claimed was the UCC-3 termination. Ran it through that Certana document checker someone mentioned and sure enough, the debtor name on the termination doesn't exactly match the original UCC-1. Original filing shows 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' but the termination just says 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions'. No wonder it's not showing up in the lien search. Now I have proof that the termination is invalid and need to get this sorted before proceeding.
Now you can go back to the seller with specific evidence of what needs to be corrected. They'll need to file a new UCC-3 with the exact debtor name from the original filing.
Just to close the loop - filed using the full Corporation spelling from the charter and it was accepted same day. Thanks everyone for the advice. Sometimes the obvious answer is the right answer.
Good to hear. One more successful filing story to add to the knowledge base.
Great outcome! This thread is a perfect example of why getting the debtor name exactly right is so critical. For anyone else facing similar issues, I'd add that it's also worth checking if your state has any specific UCC name search guidelines published online. Some states like Delaware and New York have detailed guidance documents that can help you understand their exact matching requirements before filing. The few minutes spent researching upfront can save hours of rejection headaches later.
Javier Cruz
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm sure other people will run into the same character limit issues with addendums. Always helpful to know what actually works in practice vs what the instructions say.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Will do! Thanks everyone for all the suggestions. Definitely gives me several options to try.
0 coins
Savannah Glover
I've dealt with this exact same issue multiple times! The character limits are incredibly frustrating. Here's what I've found works best: First, try using broader category descriptions like "Manufacturing Equipment" or "Production Machinery" instead of listing every serial number. Second, make sure you're using the attachment feature properly - most states allow you to reference "See Attachment A" in the collateral field and then include a detailed schedule as a separate page. Third, and this is crucial - verify that your debtor name matches EXACTLY with the original UCC-1, including all punctuation and spacing. Even tiny differences will cause rejections. I'd also recommend calling the Secretary of State's UCC division directly - they're usually more helpful than you'd expect and can tell you exactly what format they want. Don't let your lender pressure you into rushing this - it's better to get it right the first time than deal with priority issues later.
0 coins