UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Been following this thread because I'm about to file my first UCC in Georgia. Sounds like I definitely need to be more careful than I thought. Is there a checklist somewhere of all the things that can go wrong?

0 coins

That's what I was afraid of. Learning the hard way gets expensive fast.

0 coins

Start with the entity search tip I mentioned earlier. That alone will save you from most debtor name issues.

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

•

Update on my situation - tried the Certana.ai tool that people mentioned and it caught the issue immediately. Had an extra period in my company name that I never noticed. Fixed that and the filing was accepted same day. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about the document verification service. Would have saved me weeks of frustration if I'd known about it earlier.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

•

Great to hear it worked for you too. These tools are game-changers for avoiding filing headaches.

0 coins

Perfect timing on this update. Definitely using this before I file mine.

0 coins

Nora Brooks

•

With your deadline next week, I'd suggest getting a second opinion on the fixture analysis. Oil field equipment can be tricky and you don't want to discover perfection problems months later.

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

Smart approach. For complex collateral like this, it's worth the extra review time.

0 coins

Nora Brooks

•

Absolutely. And document your analysis in the file so future amendments are consistent.

0 coins

One more thought - if this equipment does get moved to other states, you'll need to think about where to file and potential multi-state perfection issues. Texas filing might not be enough if equipment regularly operates in Oklahoma or Louisiana.

0 coins

Vanessa Chang

•

Good point. The equipment does sometimes cross into New Mexico. I'll need to research the four-month rule for relocated collateral.

0 coins

Exactly. UCC 9-316 governs continued perfection when collateral is relocated. Worth reviewing now rather than scrambling later.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

For what it's worth, I've found NY to be more reasonable on continuation filings than initial UCC-1s. They seem to allow minor variations on continuations that they reject on new filings. Might be worth noting for future reference.

0 coins

Interesting observation. Have you noticed the same pattern with amendments?

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Haven't done enough amendments to say definitively but continuations definitely seem more forgiving.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Final update: Refiled with the correct entity name including comma and it was accepted within 24 hours. Lost about 4 weeks of priority but at least the lien is now perfected. Definitely using document verification tools going forward. Thanks everyone for the advice and shared experiences.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Great outcome. This thread has been really educational about NY filing requirements.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Thanks for the follow-up. Always good to know how these situations get resolved.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

I actually started using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier after having a continuation rejected last year. Really simple - just upload your PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies between your original UCC-1 and the continuation form. Found two small discrepancies I never would have caught manually. Definitely worth using before you submit, especially for high-value collateral like equipment.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Sounds like multiple people have had good luck with that service. I'll check it out before filing.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

Yeah, the PDF upload workflow is super straightforward. Beats trying to compare documents line by line yourself.

0 coins

One more thing - make sure you get a filed copy back from the SOS with the filing stamp. Don't just assume it went through correctly. I've had filings that appeared to process but were actually rejected days later due to system glitches. Always verify the continuation was actually accepted and filed.

0 coins

Rhett Bowman

•

Good point. I'll make sure to follow up and get confirmation that it's properly filed.

0 coins

Abigail Patel

•

Most states have online systems where you can check filing status, but definitely get the official stamped copy for your records.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

Glad you got it working! Those continuation deadlines are no joke. I missed one by two days last year because of portal issues and the client was NOT happy about their lien potentially lapsing. Now I always file continuations at least a month early.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

Yeah, I'm definitely building in more buffer time after today. The stress of watching a $2M lien potentially expire because of website problems is not worth cutting it close.

0 coins

Smart move. I tell all my clients that UCC filings should be treated like tax deadlines - if you wait until the last minute, technology will find a way to screw you over.

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

This thread convinced me to check that Certana verification tool someone mentioned. Just uploaded a UCC-1 and UCC-3 pair and it immediately caught that I had the wrong middle initial on the debtor name. Would have been rejected for sure. Pretty slick tool.

0 coins

Nice! That's exactly the kind of error that causes rejections. The tool really shines at catching those tiny inconsistencies that are easy to miss when you're rushing to meet deadlines.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

Good to know it actually works. I'll probably give it a try on my continuation forms before submitting just to be safe. Today was too stressful.

0 coins

Prev1...246247248249250...684Next