UCC and charter search verification - catching name discrepancies before filing
Been working on a complex equipment financing deal and realized I need to do a thorough UCC and charter search verification process. The debtor entity has gone through some name changes over the years and I'm worried about potential mismatches between what's on the charter documents vs what we'll file on the UCC-1. Last time I had a similar situation, we ended up with a rejected filing because the legal name on our UCC didn't exactly match what was in the state records. Anyone have experience with cross-referencing charter information against UCC filings to make sure everything aligns properly? This is for a $850K equipment loan so we can't afford any perfection issues.
38 comments
Join the conversation
Micah Franklin
This is such a common problem! I've seen so many deals get held up because of name discrepancies between charter docs and UCC filings. The key is to pull the most current certificate of good standing and compare every single character in the legal name. Even something like 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' can cause rejection in some states.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Exactly right about the certificate of good standing. I always get the most recent one possible, sometimes even calling the state directly if the online version looks old.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Wait, so if the charter says 'ABC Company, Inc.' but our credit agreement has 'ABC Company Incorporated' - that could cause the UCC-1 to be rejected?
0 coins
Micah Franklin
•Yes, absolutely. Some states are very strict about exact name matching. Better to be precise than sorry.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
I just went through this nightmare scenario last month. Had a UCC-1 rejected THREE times because we couldn't get the debtor name exactly right. The company had changed names twice in the past 5 years and there were multiple variations floating around in different systems. What finally saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload both the charter docs and your UCC-1 draft and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies. Saved me hours of manual comparison work.
0 coins
Owen Devar
•Never heard of Certana but that sounds incredibly useful. Is it specifically designed for UCC work?
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
•Yeah, it's built for exactly this kind of document cross-checking. You just upload PDFs and it does the comparison automatically. Really wish I'd found it before my three-rejection disaster.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•Three rejections? Ouch. That must have been stressful with timing deadlines.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
The real trick is not just checking the current name but also looking at any predecessor entities or merged companies. Sometimes you need to file against the old name too, especially if there were asset transfers involved. Have you verified whether this entity has any corporate structure changes that might affect the collateral ownership?
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•Good point about predecessor entities. There was a merger about 3 years ago so I should probably check if any of the collateral was owned by the predecessor.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
•Definitely check that. You might need multiple UCC-1s or at least need to research the chain of ownership for the equipment.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•This is getting complicated fast... I thought UCC filings were supposed to be straightforward!
0 coins
Molly Hansen
Pro tip: always do your charter search in the state of incorporation AND the state where you're filing the UCC if they're different. I've seen situations where the legal name was slightly different between states due to registration variations.
0 coins
Brady Clean
•That's a great point. Interstate entities can be tricky with name variations.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•So if we're incorporating in Delaware but filing UCC in California, we need to check both state records?
0 coins
Molly Hansen
•Exactly. Delaware charter might show one variation, California foreign entity registration might show another.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
Don't forget about the UCC search too - you want to see what other lenders have filed against this debtor to make sure you're using consistent naming. If there are existing UCC-1s with slightly different name variations, that could indicate which version the state prefers.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•Smart approach. Using the existing UCC filings as a guide for acceptable name formats.
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
•Yeah but you have to be careful because other lenders might have made the same mistakes you're trying to avoid.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
•True, which is why you still need to verify against the charter docs. But if 3 different lenders used the same name format successfully, it's probably safe.
0 coins
Norah Quay
UGH the whole UCC system is so frustrating with these name requirements. Why can't they just use EIN numbers or something consistent instead of relying on exact text matching that changes every time a company breathes differently??
0 coins
Leo McDonald
•I feel your pain. The system definitely has room for improvement.
0 coins
Jessica Nolan
•At least most states moved to electronic filing. Remember when you had to mail paper forms?
0 coins
Angelina Farar
For your $850K deal, I'd also recommend doing a comprehensive lien search to see the full picture of existing encumbrances. Sometimes the name discrepancies reveal other issues in the corporate structure that could affect your collateral position.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•Good suggestion. I'll add that to my due diligence checklist.
0 coins
Sebastián Stevens
•Yeah, name changes sometimes coincide with financial restructuring that creates other complications.
0 coins
Angelina Farar
•Exactly. Better to discover those issues now than after closing.
0 coins
Bethany Groves
Just wanted to add that I started using Certana.ai recently for this exact workflow - uploading charter docs and UCC drafts to catch inconsistencies before filing. It's been a game changer for avoiding rejections. The automated verification catches things I would miss doing manual comparison.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
•Sounds like Certana is becoming popular for UCC work. Might have to check it out.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
•Is it expensive? We do a lot of UCC filings and manual checking is killing our efficiency.
0 coins
Bethany Groves
•It's definitely worth it for the time savings and error prevention. Much cheaper than dealing with rejected filings and delays.
0 coins
Nathan Dell
Update us on how it goes! These name verification situations always make me nervous but sounds like you're being thorough with your approach.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•Will do! Hopefully it goes smoother than some of the horror stories shared here.
0 coins
Maya Jackson
•Good luck! The fact that you're asking these questions upfront shows you're on the right track.
0 coins
Tristan Carpenter
One last thing - make sure you're checking the debtor name formatting requirements for your specific state. Some states have quirky rules about punctuation, abbreviations, or character limits that aren't obvious until you get a rejection.
0 coins
Amaya Watson
•This is why I keep a state-by-state reference guide for UCC naming conventions.
0 coins
Grant Vikers
•That sounds incredibly useful. Do you mind sharing what the key differences are between states?
0 coins
Tristan Carpenter
•Each state's SOS website usually has specific guidelines, but yeah, they vary quite a bit on punctuation and abbreviation handling.
0 coins