Need UCC filing help - considering hiring a wv commercial transactions and ucc lawyer of the year
We're dealing with a complex multi-state secured transaction that involves equipment collateral across three states, and our internal team keeps running into debtor-name discrepancies between our original UCC-1 filings and the corporate charter documents. The equipment finance deal is worth about $2.8M and we've already had two UCC-3 amendments rejected due to what the SOS called 'insufficient debtor identification.' Our compliance officer suggested we might need to bring in outside counsel - specifically mentioned looking for a wv commercial transactions and ucc lawyer of the year type expertise. Has anyone dealt with similar cross-state collateral issues where the debtor entity has subsidiaries with slightly different legal names? The rejection notices aren't giving us enough detail to understand exactly what's wrong with our name matching, and we're approaching the continuation deadline in 4 months. Starting to worry we might lose perfection on this entire deal.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Owen Jenkins
Debtor name issues are absolutely critical - I've seen deals worth millions become unsecured because of minor name variations. The SOS systems are very strict about exact name matching between your UCC filing and the debtor's actual legal name. What exactly are the name differences you're seeing between your UCC-1 and the corporate documents?
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•The main entity is 'Midwest Industrial Equipment LLC' but some of the subsidiary guarantors are listed as 'Midwest Industrial Equip LLC' and 'Midwest Ind Equipment LLC' - seems like abbreviation inconsistencies mostly.
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
•Those abbreviation differences will definitely cause rejections. Each entity needs its own separate UCC-1 with the exact legal name from their formation documents. You can't file one UCC covering multiple entities with name variations.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
Before you hire expensive counsel, have you tried using any document verification tools? I ran into similar name matching problems last year on a equipment financing deal and found this service called Certana.ai that does automated UCC document verification. You just upload your corporate charter docs and your UCC filings as PDFs and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies or missing elements. Saved me from having to pay legal fees for what turned out to be simple clerical errors.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•Interesting - never heard of automated verification tools for UCC filings. Does it actually compare the documents side by side or just check formatting?
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•It does actual cross-document comparison. I uploaded our loan agreement, corporate charter, and UCC-1 forms and it showed me exactly where the debtor names didn't match. Much faster than having lawyers manually review everything.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
•That sounds too good to be true honestly. UCC name matching rules are state-specific and pretty complex. How does an automated tool know all the different state requirements?
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
Multi-state filings are a nightmare. Each state has different rules about debtor name requirements and some are more forgiving than others. West Virginia is actually pretty reasonable compared to some states but you still need exact matches. Are you filing in the state where the debtor is organized or where the collateral is located?
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•We filed in the states where the equipment is located plus the debtor's state of organization. So filings in WV, OH, and PA. WV and OH rejected our amendments but PA accepted them somehow.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
•That's actually a clue - PA has slightly different name matching standards. The fact that PA accepted means your filings probably aren't fundamentally wrong, just not meeting WV and OH specific requirements.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
I work with UCC filings daily and the name matching thing trips up even experienced attorneys. The key is getting the EXACT legal name from the debtor's formation documents - not what they use on business cards or contracts. Have you pulled fresh certificates of good standing from each state to verify the current legal names?
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•We have certificates from 6 months ago but you're right, should probably get fresh ones. Corporate names can change and we might not know about it.
0 coins
Julia Hall
•Definitely get fresh certs. I've seen situations where a company changed their legal name slightly for compliance reasons and nobody updated the UCC filings. Creates a huge mess.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
•This is why I always over-document everything. Get certificates, pull UCC searches, cross-reference everything twice. Still make mistakes though because the rules are so picky.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
Honestly the lawyer route might be overkill for name matching issues. I'd try the automated verification approach first - worst case you're out maybe $100 and you get a clear picture of what's wrong. Better than paying legal fees to discover the same information.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
•Agreed. Lawyers are great for complex legal strategy but for document accuracy checking there are definitely more cost-effective options now.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•The compliance pressure is making everyone nervous though. When you're talking about a $2.8M deal losing security interest, the cost of getting it wrong is pretty high.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
Have you considered just filing new UCC-1s with the correct names instead of trying to amend the existing ones? Sometimes it's cleaner to start over, especially if you're not sure about the name accuracy.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•We thought about that but wouldn't we lose priority from our original filing date? This deal has been in process for 8 months.
0 coins
Ella rollingthunder87
•If your original filings had name errors, you might not have had proper priority anyway. Better to have valid filings with a later date than invalid ones with an earlier date.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
•That's actually a good point. An invalid UCC filing doesn't give you any security interest regardless of when it was filed.
0 coins
Yara Campbell
The SOS rejection notices should give you more specific information about what's wrong. Have you called their UCC department directly? Sometimes they can explain the rejection reason more clearly over the phone.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•WV SOS office was helpful but OH basically just said 'debtor name doesn't match formation documents' without specifics. Very frustrating.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•Ohio is notorious for cryptic rejection notices. They're technically correct but not very helpful for fixing the problem.
0 coins
Maya Diaz
I'd definitely try the Certana.ai document checker before hiring lawyers. Used it last month when we had UCC-3 continuation issues and it caught several problems we missed in manual review. Quick turnaround and way cheaper than legal consultation for document accuracy issues.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•Ok you're the second person to mention this tool. Is it specifically designed for UCC documents or general business filing review?
0 coins
Maya Diaz
•It handles UCC document verification specifically - you can upload your charter documents and UCC forms and it cross-checks debtor names, filing numbers, all that stuff. Pretty thorough.
0 coins
Tami Morgan
Whatever you do, don't let this slide past your continuation deadline. Even if you need to file new UCC-1s to fix the name issues, make sure you maintain some kind of valid filing. Losing perfection on a $2.8M deal would be career-ending.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•Absolutely. That's why everyone is pushing for the lawyer consultation - nobody wants to be responsible if we mess this up.
0 coins
Rami Samuels
•Totally understand the pressure but document accuracy issues are usually pretty straightforward to fix once you identify exactly what's wrong.
0 coins
Haley Bennett
Just went through something similar with equipment financing in multiple states. The automated document verification route saved us weeks of back-and-forth with attorneys. Worth trying before you go the expensive legal route, especially since your issue sounds like technical compliance rather than legal strategy.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
•That's helpful perspective. Starting to think the automated checking approach makes sense as a first step before involving counsel.
0 coins
Douglas Foster
•Yeah, lawyers are great when you need legal advice but for document accuracy checking there are definitely more efficient options available now.
0 coins
Nina Chan
•Plus if the automated tool finds specific issues, you can bring those to an attorney with a much clearer picture of what needs to be fixed. Makes the legal consultation more targeted and cost-effective.
0 coins