UCC Virginia search showing incorrect debtor name - filing at risk
Running into a nightmare scenario here. Did a UCC Virginia search on our borrower and found our UCC-1 from 2022 but the debtor name is showing up wrong in the search results. We filed under "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but the Virginia SCC search is displaying "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" with that comma. Our loan docs all show no comma. Credit committee is freaking out because they think our lien might not be perfected properly. The original filing shows the correct name without comma in our records, but something got messed up in their system. Has anyone dealt with Virginia SCC having search result discrepancies like this? We have a $2.8M credit facility at stake and need to figure out if we need to file a UCC-3 amendment or if this is just a display issue. Searched their help docs but found nothing about name formatting differences.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Grace Johnson
Virginia SCC search can be tricky with punctuation. The search algorithm sometimes normalizes names differently than how they appear in the actual filing. Did you try searching both ways - with and without the comma? Sometimes the search results display formatting doesn't match the actual filed document.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Yes tried both ways. With comma pulls up our filing, without comma shows nothing. That's what's got me worried - if other searchers use the no-comma version they won't find our UCC-1.
0 coins
Jayden Reed
•This is exactly why I always do multiple search variations. Virginia's system has been known to have these formatting quirks. Pull the actual UCC-1 document image to see how it was filed originally.
0 coins
Nora Brooks
Had this exact issue with a Delaware corp filing in Virginia last year. Turns out the SCC system auto-formats certain business entity names during indexing but it doesn't change the actual filing. Your perfection should be fine if the original UCC-1 has the correct legal name that matches your security agreement.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•How did you confirm your lien was still valid? Did you get a legal opinion or just rely on the original filing matching your docs?
0 coins
Nora Brooks
•We pulled the original filing document which showed our exact name format. The search display issue was just cosmetic. But we did file a UCC-3 amendment anyway for extra protection since it was a large facility.
0 coins
Eli Wang
Before you panic about filing amendments, try using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your UCC-1 and security agreement PDFs and it'll instantly cross-check if the debtor names match properly. Takes like 30 seconds and shows you exactly where any discrepancies are. Way faster than trying to figure out Virginia's search quirks manually.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Never heard of Certana.ai but that sounds useful. Does it work with Virginia SCC filings specifically?
0 coins
Eli Wang
•Works with any UCC documents. You just upload the PDFs and it analyzes the text to flag name mismatches, missing info, formatting issues etc. Really helpful for catching these kinds of problems before they become bigger headaches.
0 coins
Cassandra Moon
•I've used Certana for document checks too. Super helpful when you're dealing with multiple state filing systems that all have their own formatting quirks.
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
VIRGINIA SCC IS THE WORST FOR THIS STUFF!!! Filed a continuation last month and their search showed the debtor name completely different from what we actually filed. Took 3 phone calls to get someone who understood the issue. Their tech support kept insisting the search results were correct even when I had the original filing right in front of me showing different formatting.
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
•Feel your pain. Virginia's system definitely has issues with name formatting consistency. Did they eventually fix the search display or did you have to file corrective documents?
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
•They said it's a "known issue" but won't fix it. Basically told me as long as the actual filing document is correct, the search display doesn't matter for perfection purposes. Still makes me nervous though.
0 coins
Ethan Scott
You need to distinguish between the search algorithm's display formatting and the actual filed document. Virginia SCC search results often show normalized versions of names that don't exactly match the original filing. What matters for perfection is that your UCC-1 filing contains the exact legal name from your security agreement.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•So if the original UCC-1 document shows "ABC Manufacturing LLC" without comma, but search results show it with comma, my lien is still perfected properly?
0 coins
Ethan Scott
•Correct. The filed document governs perfection, not the search result display. But I'd still recommend downloading the actual UCC-1 image from Virginia SCC to confirm the name appears correctly in the original filing.
0 coins
Lola Perez
This happened to us with a $4.2M credit line. Virginia SCC search showed our debtor name with extra spaces and punctuation that wasn't in our original filing. Gave us a heart attack during a compliance audit. Turns out their search indexing system adds punctuation in certain cases but doesn't change the underlying filing.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Did your auditors accept that explanation or did you have to file corrective documents?
0 coins
Lola Perez
•Auditors were satisfied once we showed them the original filing document matched our security agreement exactly. The search display issue is just a system quirk that doesn't affect legal perfection.
0 coins
Nathaniel Stewart
•Good to know. We're dealing with annual loan compliance reviews and this kind of stuff always makes everyone nervous.
0 coins
Riya Sharma
Check Article 9 requirements for Virginia - what matters is that the financing statement provides the name of the debtor as it appears in the public records. If your entity was formed as "ABC Manufacturing LLC" without comma, and that's how it appears in Virginia SCC entity records, then your UCC-1 should match that format exactly.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Good point about checking the entity records. I'll pull the Articles of Incorporation to see the exact name format that was filed with Virginia SCC originally.
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•That's the key comparison. Your UCC-1 debtor name should match the entity's name as it appears in the Secretary of State records where it was formed.
0 coins
Santiago Diaz
Had a similar scare with a Virginia filing last year. Used Certana.ai to double-check our document consistency and found that while the search displayed the name weird, our actual UCC-1 filing was correct. The tool flagged that our security agreement and UCC-1 matched perfectly, which gave us confidence the lien was properly perfected despite the search display issue.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•That's reassuring. Did Certana.ai specifically identify the Virginia search display issue or just confirm your documents matched?
0 coins
Santiago Diaz
•It confirmed our docs matched which was the main thing. The search display issue is just a Virginia SCC system quirk that doesn't affect the legal validity of the filing.
0 coins
Millie Long
Virginia SCC search has been problematic for years. I always tell clients to focus on the actual filed document rather than search result formatting. If your UCC-1 shows the correct legal name that matches your security docs, you're fine. The search algorithm just formats things differently for display purposes.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Thanks, that's what I needed to hear. Will pull the actual UCC-1 document to verify the name appears correctly in the original filing.
0 coins
KaiEsmeralda
•Smart approach. Always go back to the source documents when there's any question about UCC filings.
0 coins
Debra Bai
update: pulled the actual UCC-1 filing document from Virginia SCC and it shows "ABC Manufacturing LLC" exactly as it appears in our security agreement. The comma in the search results is just a display formatting issue in their system. Lien is properly perfected. Thanks everyone for the guidance - saved me from filing an unnecessary UCC-3 amendment.
0 coins
Grace Johnson
•Glad you got it sorted out. Virginia SCC really needs to fix their search display issues - causes unnecessary stress for everyone.
0 coins
Nora Brooks
•Great outcome. Always good to verify with the actual filing documents when there's any doubt about UCC perfection.
0 coins
Gabriel Freeman
For future reference, when doing Virginia UCC searches, always check both the search results and pull the actual filing documents if there's any discrepancy. Their system has known formatting quirks that don't affect legal validity but can cause confusion.
0 coins
Aurora St.Pierre
•Definitely learned that lesson. Will always verify with source documents going forward.
0 coins
Laura Lopez
•Good practice for any state's UCC system really. Search algorithms can be quirky but the filed documents are what matter legally.
0 coins