New Jersey UCC filing fees hit our budget hard - alternatives?
Just got hit with a surprise when calculating our New Jersey UCC filing fees for multiple equipment loans this quarter. We're looking at 8 UCC-1 filings plus 3 continuations and the costs are adding up fast. Our finance dept wasn't expecting the state fees to be this high compared to other states we file in. Anyone know if there are bulk filing discounts or fee schedules that might help? We're also concerned about accuracy since one rejected filing means paying the fee again. The debtor names on these equipment leases are complex (multiple LLCs with similar names) and we can't afford mistakes that would require refiling fees.
31 comments
Join the conversation
Ravi Gupta
NJ doesn't offer bulk discounts unfortunately. The fee structure is pretty straightforward but yeah, it adds up quick when you're doing volume filings. Make sure you're double-checking those debtor names against the state business registry before filing - that's usually where the rejections come from.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•This is so true. We had 3 rejections last month just from debtor name variations. Cost us an extra $150 in fees plus the time to research and refile.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•What's the current fee per UCC-1 in NJ? I haven't filed there in a while and need to budget for a client.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
The fees are what they are, but you can definitely minimize rejections. I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after getting burned on similar debtor name issues. You just upload your documents and it cross-checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, document consistency. Saved me probably $300+ in refiling fees this year.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•How does that work exactly? Do you upload the UCC-1 before filing?
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•Yeah, you can upload your draft UCC-1 along with the corporate charter or loan docs and it flags any inconsistencies. Takes like 2 minutes and catches stuff you might miss manually.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
We budget about 15% extra for potential refiling fees when doing NJ filings. The portal is decent but their debtor name matching is stricter than some other states. Have you considered timing your filings differently to spread the cost impact?
0 coins
StarStrider
•That's actually a good point about timing. Most of these are tied to loan closings though so we don't have much flexibility.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•15% buffer sounds about right. We use 10% but probably should bump it up based on our recent experience.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
UGH the fees are ridiculous! And then when they reject for some tiny formatting issue you're out the money AND have to pay again. The whole system feels like a money grab sometimes.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•I feel this so hard. Had a rejection because of a comma in the wrong place on a collateral description. $50 down the drain.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•At least NJ processes pretty quickly. Some states take forever and then hit you with the rejection.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
For complex debtor names like you mentioned, definitely worth the extra time to verify against the NJ business entity database. Those LLC names can be tricky with all the variations (LLC vs L.L.C. vs Limited Liability Company). Also make sure you're using the exact legal name from their formation documents.
0 coins
NebulaNova
•This is key advice. We always pull the entity info directly from the state database now rather than relying on what the client tells us the name is.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•Good point about the LLC variations. I've seen filings rejected for stuff like that.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yeah we're definitely going to be more careful about the entity name verification. Thanks for the reminder about checking the formation docs.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
Have you looked into whether any of these could be filed as fixture filings instead? Sometimes the fee structure is different, though I'm not sure about NJ specifically.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•Fixture filings are usually more expensive, not less. Plus they have different requirements about real estate descriptions.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•Yeah fixture filings are a whole different animal. Wouldn't recommend unless the collateral actually qualifies.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
Just went through this same thing with a multi-state filing project. NJ was definitely one of the pricier states. What helped us was creating a standardized checklist for each state's requirements to minimize errors. Also, that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier has been helpful for catching mistakes before filing.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Checklists are clutch. We have templates for each state now with the common rejection reasons highlighted.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Second the Certana recommendation. Used it last week and it caught a debtor name mismatch between my UCC-1 and the security agreement.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
One thing that might help with budgeting - NJ usually processes same day if you file early morning. So at least you'll know quickly if there are any issues that need fixing.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•True, their turnaround is pretty good. Better than waiting days to find out about a rejection.
0 coins
Mei Lin
Are these all new filings or do you have any continuations mixed in? Continuation fees are usually less than initial filings, so that might help your budget a bit.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Mix of both - 8 new UCC-1s and 3 continuations. The continuations are definitely cheaper but still adds up.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Make sure you're not filing continuations too early. You can file up to 6 months before expiration but no point paying the fee earlier than needed.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Bottom line - NJ fees are what they are, but you can definitely minimize the pain by being super careful with accuracy. Double-check debtor names, collateral descriptions, and all the technical details. One rejected filing that needs to be refiled basically doubles your cost for that transaction.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•Exactly. The fee itself isn't the killer, it's the refiling fees when things go wrong.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•We've started treating the verification step as seriously as the filing itself. Worth the extra time upfront.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Thanks everyone. Sounds like the consensus is to focus on accuracy and use better verification tools rather than trying to avoid the fees. Really appreciate all the advice.
0 coins