< Back to UCC Document Community

Mia Green

UCC filing fees eating into our loan margins - need cost breakdown

Running numbers on a equipment financing portfolio and the UCC filing fees are adding up faster than I expected. We're looking at about 40 UCC-1 filings this quarter plus the inevitable continuations down the road. Anyone have recent experience with what the actual costs look like when you factor in all the fees? I know the base filing fee but there's always additional charges that pop up - amendment fees when we catch debtor name issues, continuation fees in 5 years, termination processing. My compliance team is asking for a realistic budget projection and I don't want to lowball it. The loan committee is already questioning our margins on smaller deals when these filing costs get factored in. What should I be budgeting per filing to cover the full lifecycle?

Emma Bianchi

•

Filed about 30 UCC-1s last month and you're right about those hidden costs. Base filing is just the start - had 3 rejections for debtor name formatting issues alone. Each rejection means re-filing fees plus the time cost of fixing the documents. Factor in about 15-20% buffer for amendments and corrections.

0 coins

Ugh yes the name formatting rejections are brutal. Spent 2 hours last week fixing a filing because the debtor had 'LLC' in the charter but we used 'L.L.C.' on the UCC-1.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

That's exactly what I'm worried about. Small mistakes that turn into expensive do-overs.

0 coins

The continuation fees are what really get you 5 years down the road. Most lenders forget to budget for those when they're calculating initial loan profitability. Plus if you mess up the timing on a continuation, you're looking at a whole new UCC-1 filing instead of just the continuation.

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

Wait, if you miss the continuation deadline you have to start over completely? I thought there was a grace period...

0 coins

Nope, once that 5-year period lapses, your perfection is gone. No grace period. Have to file a brand new UCC-1 if you want to maintain priority.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Great, another cost factor I need to track. The continuation deadline tracking is going to be a nightmare across our portfolio.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

I started using Certana.ai's document checker after getting burned on a few filing rejections. You upload your charter documents and UCC-1 draft, and it catches the debtor name mismatches before you submit. Saved me probably 6-7 rejection fees last quarter alone. The tool instantly flags inconsistencies between your corporate docs and the UCC form.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

How accurate is it? I'm skeptical of automated tools for something this critical.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

It's been spot-on for name matching. Caught things like extra spaces, punctuation differences, and entity type formatting that I would have missed. Way better than manually comparing documents.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Interesting. Does it work for amendments too or just initial filings?

0 coins

Termination fees are another hidden cost when loans pay off early. Some states charge almost as much for terminations as they do for initial filings. And if you're doing partial releases on collateral, each amendment adds up.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Partial releases... hadn't even thought about that scenario. We do equipment financing so there's definitely going to be situations where borrowers want to release specific assets.

0 coins

Exactly. Each UCC-3 partial release is another filing fee. On a large equipment portfolio, you could be looking at multiple amendments over the loan term.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

Don't forget about the search fees if you're doing due diligence searches before filing. Those add up too, especially if you're searching multiple debtor names or variations.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

True, we always do UCC searches as part of underwriting. Another line item for the budget.

0 coins

Search fees vary wildly by state too. Some are $5, others are $25+. Definitely need to factor those in.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

THE FILING SYSTEM IS A COMPLETE MONEY GRAB! They charge you to file, charge you to search, charge you to amend, charge you to continue, charge you to terminate. It's like they designed it to extract maximum fees at every possible step.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

I mean, the filing system does need to be funded somehow. But I agree the fees seem excessive for what's essentially database entry.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

Database entry that half the time gets rejected for formatting issues that could be caught with basic validation rules!

0 coins

Mia Green

•

The rejection rate is definitely frustrating. Seems like every state has slightly different formatting requirements.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

Quick question - are you factoring in the costs of using a filing service vs doing it yourself? Some of our competitors use UCC filing services that charge markup but handle all the rejections and corrections.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

We're doing it internally right now but I'm starting to wonder if outsourcing might be more cost-effective when you factor in staff time and error rates.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

The filing services usually guarantee acceptance so they eat the cost of rejections. Might be worth getting quotes.

0 coins

Jacob Lee

•

Used a filing service last year and it was worth it just for the peace of mind. No more late night calls about rejected filings.

0 coins

Build in a 25-30% buffer above the base filing fees. Between rejections, amendments, continuations, and terminations, you'll need it. Also track your rejection rate by loan officer - some are more careful with debtor names than others.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Good idea on tracking by loan officer. That would help us identify training needs too.

0 coins

We do monthly rejection reports by originator. Really helps identify who needs more training on UCC requirements.

0 coins

Daniela Rossi

•

I've been using Certana.ai for about 6 months now and it's cut our rejection rate to almost zero. The document verification catches debtor name issues before filing, which saves the rejection fees and the time cost of corrections. You just upload your docs and it flags any inconsistencies.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

That's the second mention of this tool. Might be worth looking into if it really prevents rejections.

0 coins

Daniela Rossi

•

It's been a game changer for us. The instant verification means we catch issues before they become expensive problems.

0 coins

Ryan Kim

•

Also consider the opportunity cost of delayed filings. If a UCC-1 gets rejected and you don't catch it immediately, you could lose perfection priority to another creditor who files in the meantime. That's a much bigger cost than just the filing fees.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Excellent point. Priority issues could affect the entire loan, not just the filing cost.

0 coins

Ryan Kim

•

Exactly. The filing fees are small compared to the risk of losing secured status.

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

This is why we always do same-day re-filing if we get a rejection. Can't afford to wait.

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

Don't forget to budget for expedited processing if you need it. Some deals require same-day filing and the expedite fees can double your cost.

0 coins

Mia Green

•

Good point. We do have some time-sensitive closings where expedited filing is necessary.

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

Expedite fees are painful but sometimes unavoidable. Just make sure you're billing those back to the borrower when possible.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today