< Back to UCC Document Community

Mei Lin

North Carolina UCC filing fees hitting our budget hard - any ways to reduce costs?

We're a small equipment finance company and the NC UCC filing fees are really starting to add up this quarter. Between UCC-1 initial filings, continuations, and amendments, we're looking at almost $2,800 just in state fees alone for our current pipeline. That's not counting the time our compliance team spends double-checking everything before submission. Anyone else dealing with NC UCC filing fees eating into margins? We file maybe 15-20 UCCs monthly and each UCC-1 is $35, continuations are $30, amendments $25. The terminations are free at least. But when you multiply that out over a year it's significant money for a smaller shop like ours. Wondering if there are any bulk filing options or strategies other lenders use to manage these costs better? We can't really pass all the fees to borrowers since we're competing on pricing. Any insights appreciated.

I feel your pain on NC UCC filing fees. We do similar volume and it definitely hits the bottom line. One thing that helps us is batching filings when possible - instead of filing UCCs as soon as loans close, we batch them weekly unless there's a specific timing reason not to. Saves some administrative overhead even if the per-filing cost stays the same.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

Good point on batching. We've been filing individually as loans close but weekly batches could streamline things. Do you ever run into issues with the gap between closing and filing? I know technically the security interest isn't perfected until the UCC-1 is filed.

0 coins

We only batch for deals where we're comfortable with that brief gap - usually repeat customers with good payment history. For new borrowers or larger amounts we still file immediately. It's a risk management call.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

The NC fees aren't terrible compared to some states but I get how they add up. What's killing us more than the fees is the rejections. Had three UCC-1s rejected last month for debtor name mismatches that cost us refiling fees plus the delay. Make sure your name verification process is bulletproof because those extra fees hurt worse than the base filing costs.

0 coins

This is so true. We started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after getting burned on rejections. You just upload your charter docs and UCC-1 and it flags any name inconsistencies before you file. Saves the refiling fees and delays.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

Haven't heard of that but name mismatches are definitely our biggest headache. How accurate is it at catching the subtle differences that cause rejections?

0 coins

Really accurate from what I've seen. It caught things like missing commas and abbreviation differences that I probably would have missed. Worth checking out if rejections are costing you.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

NC SOS is actually pretty reasonable on fees compared to places like California. But $2,800 quarterly does add up. Have you looked into whether some of your amendments could be consolidated? Sometimes we see lenders filing separate amendments when one comprehensive amendment would cover multiple changes.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

Interesting point on consolidating amendments. We probably are filing some that could be combined. Need to review our procedures there.

0 coins

Yes! We reduced amendment costs by about 30% just by reviewing whether multiple changes could go on one UCC-3. Especially when borrowers are refinancing or modifying terms.

0 coins

Are you factoring in the soft costs too? Staff time, system processing, error correction - the filing fees are just part of it. We calculated our true cost per UCC at almost double the state fees when you include everything.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

You're absolutely right. The staff time for preparation and verification probably doubles our real cost. Haven't done a full analysis but should.

0 coins

Yeah it's eye-opening when you calculate the fully loaded cost. Makes you really focus on getting things right the first time.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

This is why automation tools pay for themselves pretty quickly. Even if they cost a few hundred monthly, the time savings and error reduction usually justify it.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

Question - are you filing continuations early enough to avoid any rush situations? NC requires continuation within 6 months before the 5-year lapse, but filing earlier in that window can help with workload planning and avoid any last-minute fees if there are delays.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

We try to file continuations about 90 days before the lapse date. Gives us buffer time but not so early that we forget about active loans.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

That's a good window. We've seen lenders get caught off guard when they have a bunch of continuations due in the same month.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

The fees are what they are unfortunately. Focus on reducing the errors and rejections because those duplicate costs hurt more than the base fees. Double-check entity names against secretary of state records, verify addresses, make sure collateral descriptions are consistent with loan docs.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

Agree completely. We made our own checklist but kept missing things. Finally switched to using verification software that catches the details we humans miss.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

What software are you using? Always looking for ways to reduce human error in the filing process.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

Certana.ai - they have a UCC verification tool that cross-references all the documents. Upload your files and it flags inconsistencies before filing.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Consider whether you really need to file in NC for all your deals. If the collateral is mobile equipment that might move between states, you might have flexibility on where to file based on debtor location vs collateral location.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

Most of our deals are NC-based businesses so we're pretty much stuck with NC filings. But good point for deals that might have flexibility.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Right, just worth double-checking the jurisdictional rules occasionally. Sometimes there are opportunities to file in lower-cost states.

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

Have you negotiated with borrowers about covering filing fees? We include UCC filing costs in our loan origination fees for most deals. Helps offset the direct costs even if it doesn't eliminate the administrative burden.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

We do charge borrowers for filing fees on larger deals but on smaller loans the fees eat into our competitive position. Market pressure keeps us from passing through all costs.

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

Yeah it's tough in competitive markets. We've found borrowers generally accept filing fees as legitimate costs but you have to be transparent about it upfront.

0 coins

We bundle filing fees into our documentation fee rather than calling them out separately. Borrowers seem more accepting of a single doc fee than multiple line items.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

NC UCC filing fees are pretty standard but the volume adds up quick. Main thing is avoiding the mistakes that force refiling. Get a good verification process in place and the fees become predictable at least.

0 coins

Predictable is key. We budget based on expected filing volume and treat it like any other cost of doing business. The unpredictable part is rejections and corrections.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Exactly. Budget for the expected fees, then focus on eliminating the surprise costs from errors and delays.

0 coins

Worth asking - are you doing your own UCC prep or using a service provider? Sometimes outsourcing the filing process can be cost-effective when you factor in staff time and error rates, even if the per-filing cost is slightly higher.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

We do our own prep currently but haven't done a cost comparison with outsourcing. Might be worth analyzing especially if it reduces errors.

0 coins

The error reduction alone might justify outsourcing. Plus you get back staff time to focus on revenue-generating activities instead of UCC prep.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

We tried outsourcing but found we lost too much control over timing and quality. Brought it back in-house but invested in better verification tools to reduce errors.

0 coins

The NC filing fees are definitely manageable compared to some other states, but I totally get how they add up with volume. We're doing similar numbers and found a few things that help: First, we implemented a monthly UCC fee budget tracking system so we can forecast costs better and adjust pricing accordingly. Second, we started doing quarterly reviews of our collateral descriptions to make sure we're not over-filing - sometimes simpler descriptions work just as well and reduce amendment needs later. Finally, we negotiated annual contracts with our UCC search providers for better rates on due diligence, which helps offset some filing costs. The key is treating it as a predictable operating expense and building those costs into your loan pricing models from the start.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today