Kansas SOS UCC Search Results Not Matching My Filed Documents
I'm having a weird issue with the Kansas Secretary of State UCC search system. Filed a UCC-1 about 6 months ago for equipment financing on a customer's manufacturing line, and when I run searches using their exact business name, sometimes the filing shows up and sometimes it doesn't. The debtor name on our UCC-1 is 'Midwest Industrial Solutions LLC' but when I search that exact phrase, I get inconsistent results. If I search just 'Midwest Industrial' it usually appears, but our loan agreement requires the full legal name match. Has anyone else run into search functionality problems with Kansas SOS UCC database? I'm worried our lien might not be properly searchable by other creditors, which could create priority issues down the road. The filing number is valid and shows as active when I pull it directly, but the search inconsistency is making me nervous about our security interest being discoverable.
43 comments


Taylor Chen
I've seen this exact problem with Kansas SOS search. Their system seems to have trouble with LLC designations in business names. Try searching without the 'LLC' part first, then search with it. Sometimes punctuation or spacing throws off their search algorithm too.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•Good point about the LLC designation. I tried that and got better results searching 'Midwest Industrial Solutions' without LLC. Still concerning that the full legal name doesn't always work though.
0 coins
Keith Davidson
•This is why I always run multiple search variations before filing. Kansas system is notorious for being picky about exact matches.
0 coins
Ezra Bates
The Kansas UCC search has been problematic for years. I usually search by filing number directly if I know it, or try different combinations of the business name. Have you verified that your debtor name exactly matches what's on their articles of incorporation?
0 coins
Avery Saint
•Yes, I pulled their articles from Kansas business entity search and the name matches exactly. That's what's so frustrating - everything should be working correctly.
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
•Articles name might be different from what they're actually doing business as. Did you check for any DBA filings?
0 coins
Ezra Bates
•Good catch on the DBA angle. Also worth checking if they've filed any amendments to their articles that might have changed the legal name slightly.
0 coins
Sophia Carson
I had a similar headache with inconsistent search results last year. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your UCC-1 and it cross-checks the debtor name against multiple databases to catch any discrepancies. Found out my debtor had a slight variation in their registered name that wasn't showing up in regular searches. Saved me from a potential lien priority issue.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•That sounds really useful. Did it help you identify what was causing the search problems?
0 coins
Sophia Carson
•Yeah, turned out there was an extra space in the middle of the company name in one database versus another. Tiny difference but enough to mess up search matching. The tool caught it immediately when I uploaded the PDFs.
0 coins
Elijah Knight
•Never heard of that service but sounds like it could prevent a lot of filing headaches. How accurate is it with catching those kinds of name variations?
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
Kansas SOS search function is honestly terrible. I've had filings that I KNOW are active not show up in searches, then appear days later. Their database seems to have indexing problems that create inconsistent results.
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
•THIS. I've complained to their office multiple times about search reliability. They always say it's working fine on their end.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Exactly! And when you're dealing with lien priority issues, you can't afford to have unreliable search results. It's a serious problem for secured transactions.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
Have you tried calling the Kansas SOS office directly? Sometimes they can run manual searches or explain why certain filings aren't appearing in online results. I've had luck getting them to identify database glitches.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•I might have to do that. Was hoping to avoid the phone tag game but this is getting frustrating.
0 coins
Marcus Williams
•Their phone support is actually pretty helpful once you get through. Had them walk me through search techniques that weren't obvious from the website.
0 coins
Lily Young
Check if your debtor has any subsidiaries or related entities with similar names. Sometimes the search picks up those instead of the exact entity you're looking for, especially if there are parent/subsidiary relationships.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•Interesting thought. I'll check their corporate structure to see if there are related entities that might be confusing the search.
0 coins
Lily Young
•Yeah, I've seen cases where searches return results for affiliated companies instead of the specific debtor entity. Can be really confusing.
0 coins
Kennedy Morrison
•This happened to me with a holding company structure. The search kept pulling up the parent company instead of the subsidiary we actually filed against.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
Document everything about these search inconsistencies in case you need to prove your filing was properly discoverable later. Screenshot the search results at different times, save the search terms you used, etc.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•Smart advice. I'll start documenting the search behavior to build a record of the system issues.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
•Yeah, if there's ever a dispute about lien priority, having documentation of the search system problems could be important for your defense.
0 coins
Justin Chang
I wonder if this is related to recent updates to their system? I noticed the Kansas SOS website interface changed a few months ago and search behavior has been different since then.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•You might be onto something. The search definitely seems less reliable since they updated the site.
0 coins
Justin Chang
•System updates often introduce bugs that take months to get fixed. Especially with government databases.
0 coins
Grace Thomas
•Classic government IT project. Update the interface, break the search functionality, take forever to acknowledge the problem.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
Try searching with wildcards or partial names if the system supports it. Sometimes that helps work around exact match problems with business entity names.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•I don't think the Kansas system supports wildcards but I'll experiment with different partial name searches.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•Worth a try. Some state systems have hidden search features that aren't well documented on their help pages.
0 coins
Dylan Baskin
Had a client run into this same issue last month. We ended up having to file an amendment just to ensure the debtor name was exactly right in the system. Cost extra but gave us peace of mind about searchability.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•That's an expensive solution but I can see why you'd want the certainty. Did the amendment fix the search issues?
0 coins
Dylan Baskin
•Yeah, after the UCC-3 amendment was processed, searches became much more consistent. Still not perfect but way better than before.
0 coins
Lauren Wood
•Filing an amendment for search problems seems like overkill, but I get wanting to eliminate the uncertainty about lien priority.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
This thread convinced me to double-check all my Kansas filings. Found two that aren't showing up reliably in searches either. Definitely going to try that Certana document checker someone mentioned earlier.
0 coins
Sophia Carson
•It really does help catch these kinds of inconsistencies before they become bigger problems. Just upload your filing documents and it flags any name mismatches across databases.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
•Perfect, exactly what I need. These search reliability issues are making me paranoid about all my UCC filings.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
Update: Called Kansas SOS this morning and they confirmed there are ongoing issues with their search indexing. They said filings are still valid and properly recorded, but search results may be inconsistent while they work on fixes. At least now I know it's a system problem and not an issue with my filing.
0 coins
Ezra Bates
•Great follow-up! Good to have official confirmation that it's a system issue rather than filing problems.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Typical that they acknowledge the problem only when pressed. How long did they say fixes might take?
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
•They couldn't give a timeline but said they're 'working on it.' Government speak for who knows when it'll be fixed.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
•At least you have documentation now that the search issues are on their end, not your filing.
0 coins