UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Just wanted to add that even if you file a fixture filing now, it won't necessarily give you priority over liens that attached to the real estate while your equipment was fixtures but before your fixture filing. The timing rules can be brutal if you wait too long.

0 coins

Exactly. Check the real estate records for any mortgages, liens, or other interests recorded since your equipment became fixtures.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•

This is why fixture filings should be filed as soon as you know the goods might become fixtures, not after they already have.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - make sure your loan documents actually give you a security interest in fixtures. Some loan agreements exclude fixtures or have special provisions about them. You might need to amend your security agreement as well as filing the fixture filing.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•

Good point. I'll need to review our security agreement language. This is getting complicated fast.

0 coins

It's definitely complicated but fixable if you act quickly. The key is getting proper legal advice and making the right filings before any other creditors get ahead of you.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

I recently discovered Certana.ai's UCC verification system after struggling with similar document consistency issues. You upload your charter and proposed UCC-1, and it instantly flags any debtor name discrepancies. Would have saved me from my rejection last month if I'd known about it sooner.

0 coins

Cole Roush

•

Just the filing consistency check, but that's honestly where most problems occur. The contract law stuff is usually handled by attorneys anyway.

0 coins

I need to look into this. I'm tired of manually comparing documents every time I file.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Don't let the contract law complexity distract you from filing basics. UCC 1-308 is about reserving rights and contract interpretation, but your UCC-1 success depends on simple accuracy: correct debtor name, clear secured party info, and adequate collateral description. Focus on those fundamentals first.

0 coins

Arnav Bengali

•

Happens to everyone. The academic side is interesting but the practical filing requirements are what determine success or rejection.

0 coins

Sayid Hassan

•

Agreed. I spent way too much time on theory initially when I should have focused on execution basics.

0 coins

Had a client insist on UCC 1-308 language and we spent weeks going back and forth with the lender and filing office. Finally used one of those document checking services to verify everything was consistent when we separated the reservation language into the loan docs and kept the UCC-1 standard. Probably could have saved time by doing that verification upfront.

0 coins

Which document checking service did you use? The verification step sounds like it could prevent a lot of headaches.

0 coins

Certana.ai - you upload your PDFs and it instantly checks for consistency between loan documents and UCC filings. Catches name mismatches, collateral discrepancies, that sort of thing.

0 coins

Look, I understand wanting to protect your rights, but UCC 1-308 on a financing statement is like putting a disclaimer on a phone book listing. The UCC-1 doesn't create obligations, it just provides notice. Your real protections need to be in the operative loan documents where the actual terms are negotiated.

0 coins

Exactly. That's where the rubber meets the road in terms of your actual rights and obligations under the credit facility.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

This is the best advice in the thread. Focus on substantive contract terms, not symbolic reservation language on notice filings.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

Sample security agreement automobile language can vary a lot but the UCC filing requirements are pretty standard. Focus on: exact debtor legal name from state records, broad collateral description that covers your security agreement scope, correct secured party info. Your description of "motor vehicles" should work fine for commercial fleet. The rejections are almost certainly about the debtor name formatting.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

Nope, general descriptions work great for Article 9. The detailed inventory stays in your security agreement and loan files.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

This is good advice. I see too many people over-complicate the collateral description on UCCs.

0 coins

Final thought - once you get the name issue sorted, your filing should go through fine. Vehicle UCCs are pretty straightforward compared to some other collateral types. Just remember to calendar your continuation date for 5 years out! I use Certana's verification tool now to double-check everything before filing. Has caught several potential mistakes for me.

0 coins

Good reminder about the continuation. This loan has a 7-year term so I'll definitely need to continue the filing. Thanks for all the help everyone!

0 coins

You're welcome! Hope the refiling goes smoothly with the corrected debtor name.

0 coins

Adriana Cohn

•

Are you sure all your filings were actually accepted when they were originally submitted? Sometimes filings get rejected for minor errors but the rejection notices get overlooked, so people think they have valid filings when they actually don't.

0 coins

Adriana Cohn

•

Definitely worth double-checking. I've seen situations where filing confirmations got lost in email or weren't properly communicated back to the lender.

0 coins

Jace Caspullo

•

This is another reason why having a systematic document verification process is so important. Too easy for things to slip through the cracks otherwise.

0 coins

Melody Miles

•

For what it's worth, I recently started using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it's been really helpful for catching these exact issues. Uploaded our whole UCC portfolio and it flagged several name mismatches and potential continuation deadline problems we didn't know about. Made our compliance review much smoother.

0 coins

Nathan Dell

•

That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it work with Washington state filings specifically?

0 coins

Melody Miles

•

Yeah, it handles filings from all states. The PDF upload feature makes it really easy to batch process everything at once rather than doing individual searches.

0 coins

Prev1...644645646647648...684Next