UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

William Schwarz

UCC filing complications when debtor name doesn't match vehicle title exactly

I'm handling a commercial vehicle loan where we need to file a UCC-1 but running into issues with the debtor name matching the title. The borrower's legal business name on their LLC formation docs is "Mountain Ridge Construction LLC" but the vehicle title shows "Mountain Ridge Construction, LLC" (note the comma). Our lending compliance team is concerned this discrepancy could invalidate our security interest if we need to repossess. The vehicle is a 2024 Ford F-550 work truck valued at $68,000. I've seen mixed advice about whether the comma matters for UCC purposes vs title work. Some sources say UCC filings are more forgiving with punctuation but I need to be absolutely certain before we fund this deal. Has anyone dealt with similar name variations between UCC filings and vehicle titles? What's the safest approach here?

Laura Lopez

•

Just to add another tool option - we started using Certana.ai for these kinds of name verification questions. You upload your LLC docs and title, and it analyzes whether the name variations could cause filing issues. Really takes the guesswork out of these decisions and gives you confidence in your filing approach.

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

It's been really reliable. The tool is specifically built for UCC workflows, so it understands the name matching rules better than general document comparison tools.

0 coins

That's good to know. Having that kind of verification backup could be really valuable for documenting compliance decisions.

0 coins

UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the input. I ended up filing using the formation document name (without comma) and documented the decision thoroughly. Also ran it through Certana to double-check the name variation analysis. Feeling much more confident about the approach now. Really appreciate this community's expertise!

0 coins

JaylinCharles

•

Smart to document everything. That's always the key to good compliance practices.

0 coins

Thanks for the update! These kinds of follow-ups are really helpful for others who might face similar situations.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

UCC release of lien filing - bank says they submitted but nothing showing up

Really frustrated here. Our company paid off a equipment loan back in October and the bank assured us they filed the UCC termination statement right away. It's now January and I'm still seeing the original UCC-1 active when I search the state database. The bank keeps telling me "it's processing" but shouldn't a release of UCC show up within a few weeks max? We're trying to refinance with another lender and they're flagging this active lien. Has anyone dealt with banks dragging their feet on UCC releases? The original filing was for $180K in manufacturing equipment and we need this cleared ASAP. Starting to think they never actually filed the termination paperwork despite what they claim.

UPDATE: Called the bank this morning and finally got transferred to someone who admitted they had a "processing error" and the termination was never actually submitted. They're filing it today and giving me the confirmation number. Unbelievable.

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

At least you finally got it resolved. Definitely file that banking commission complaint anyway - this kind of negligence shouldn't go unreported.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Glad you got it sorted! For future reference, tools like Certana.ai can help verify all your UCC documents are properly aligned before issues like this become problems.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This thread is making me paranoid about my own equipment loan payoff last month. Going to check our state database right now to make sure the termination actually got filed.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Smart move. Better to catch it early than deal with problems later when you need financing.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

Yeah, always verify independently. Banks make mistakes on this stuff way more often than they should.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

UCC filing confusion with CMAS security agreement - debtor name verification help needed

Running into a headache with our CMAS security agreement filing. We're trying to get the UCC-1 submitted but keep getting rejections from the SOS office. The debtor entity name on our security agreement shows as "CMAS Holdings, LLC" but when I search their corporate records, sometimes it shows up as "C.M.A.S. Holdings LLC" (with periods) and other times without. The collateral involves specialized medical equipment worth about $180K. Our lender is getting impatient since we're already 3 weeks past the original target filing date. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name variations? I'm worried we're going to lose perfection if we don't get this straightened out soon. The security agreement itself is solid but this name mismatch is killing us.

The key thing is you now know to use "CMAS Holdings, LLC" from the Articles. File it exactly like that and you should be golden. Don't overthink it at this point.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

You're right, I'm probably overthinking it now. Going to submit with the Articles version and see what happens.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Keep us posted on how it goes! These debtor name issues come up so often, it's good to hear how they get resolved.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

Will do. Hopefully the next update is a successful filing confirmation!

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

Fingers crossed for you. The name from the Articles should definitely work.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

NC UCC lookup showing weird results - anyone else having portal issues?

Been trying to do a NC UCC lookup on some older filings from 2019 and the search results are all over the place. Sometimes shows terminated filings as active, other times can't find filings I know exist. My client's asking about lien status on equipment they're trying to sell and I need to give them accurate info. Has anyone else noticed the NC Secretary of State portal acting up lately? I've tried different search methods (debtor name, filing number) but getting inconsistent results. This is making me nervous about relying on the system for due diligence work.

Ava Williams

•

Just wanted to add that I've noticed the NC portal problems seem worse on Mondays and Fridays. Maybe try your search mid-week when there's less traffic?

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Interesting observation. I was actually searching on a Friday afternoon when I noticed the worst inconsistencies.

0 coins

Ava Williams

•

Yeah, I think their servers get overloaded on those days. Mid-week searches have been more reliable for me.

0 coins

Amara Adebayo

•

UPDATE: I tried the Certana.ai tool someone mentioned and it immediately caught the discrepancy in my NC UCC lookup. Turns out the termination was filed correctly but the portal wasn't displaying it in the search results. Really glad I found a reliable way to verify document status.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

•

Glad it worked for you too. It's become my go-to solution when portal searches are acting up.

0 coins

Sounds like this tool might be the answer to a lot of our UCC lookup problems. Going to check it out myself.

0 coins

NightOwl42

ISPC UCC lien search shows conflicting records - need help understanding results

Running into a weird situation with an ISPC UCC lien search that's showing conflicting information and I'm not sure how to interpret the results. Did a debtor name search for a commercial borrower and the system is pulling up what looks like the same UCC-1 filing but with different status indicators. One entry shows 'Active' while another shows 'Lapsed' for what appears to be the same filing number. The debtor name formatting is slightly different between the two entries (one has a comma after LLC, the other doesn't) but the filing dates and secured party info look identical. This is for a $750K equipment financing deal and I need to make sure I'm not missing an active lien before we proceed. Has anyone dealt with ISPC database inconsistencies like this? The original UCC-1 was filed in 2019 so we're past the 5-year mark, but I'm seeing conflicting continuation status. Not sure if this is a system glitch or if there are actually two separate filings I'm not catching.

Just wanted to add that I've had good luck with the Certana tool mentioned earlier for resolving these types of database conflicts. Upload your search results and it flags inconsistencies automatically rather than having to manually compare everything. Saved me a lot of time on a recent deal with similar ISPC database issues.

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

Thanks for the recommendation. Going to check that out along with requesting the official documents.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Yeah it's really helpful for catching details you might miss when manually reviewing multiple conflicting entries.

0 coins

Update us when you get it sorted out! These database inconsistency cases are always interesting to hear the resolution on.

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

Will do. Hopefully it's just a database glitch and not multiple active liens I need to worry about.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Fingers crossed it's just a display issue and not multiple secured parties with conflicting interests.

0 coins

Prev1...646647648649650...684Next