Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This reminds me of when I was trying to file a UCC-3 continuation in Iowa and kept getting rejections. Turned out I was using the wrong filing number format - they wanted the full number including the year prefix. Maybe check if you're using any reference numbers or filing codes incorrectly?
This is an initial UCC-1 so there shouldn't be any reference numbers needed. But good to know about the filing number format for future amendments.
Right, for UCC-1s you wouldn't need that. But Iowa is just really particular about formatting in general. Even small details can cause rejections.
Final thought - try calling Iowa SOS UCC division directly at their dedicated line. I know it's a pain to wait on hold but they can often spot the issue immediately when they review your filing details over the phone. Much faster than the back-and-forth rejection process.
Good plan. Hope you get it sorted out soon - financing deadlines are stressful enough without portal problems adding to it.
Keep us posted on what ends up working! Always good to know what fixes Iowa filing issues for future reference.
Join the conversation
Lola Perez
Had this happen with my restaurant equipment financing. The notice of assignment came but no UCC-3 was ever filed. Caused major problems when I tried to get an SBA loan 8 months later because the lien records were inconsistent.
How did you eventually resolve it? I'm definitely going to stay on top of this now.
Lola Perez
•Had to get both the old and new lender involved to sort out the documentation. The new lender finally filed the assignment but it delayed my SBA approval by 6 weeks. Could have been avoided if I'd checked sooner.
Bottom line: the notice of assignment transfers the debt legally but doesn't update public UCC records automatically. New lender should file UCC-3 assignment within reasonable time. You should verify it gets done because it affects future financing and lien releases. Don't assume it happens automatically.
Perfect summary, thank you. I'm going to contact the new lender tomorrow to make sure they understand they need to file the UCC-3 assignment and ask for confirmation when it's done.
Riya Sharma
•Smart move. Most lenders are good about it when you ask directly, they just sometimes forget in the shuffle of processing loan transfers.
Join the conversation
Andre Dupont
Texas SOS phone support is actually pretty helpful if you call early morning. They can confirm which form version to use.
Good luck getting through though. Their hold times are brutal.
Andre Dupont
•Call right at 8am when they open. Usually get through in under 10 minutes.
Jamal Wilson
Just went through this exact situation last week. Used the Rev 10/2024 form, verified debtor name matched perfectly, paid the $15 fee, and it went through without issues. You've got this!
Zara Rashid
•Love success stories. Gives me hope for my own filing headaches.
Mei Lin
•The document verification tools really do help catch issues before submission. Worth the peace of mind.
Join the conversation
Leo McDonald
This reminds me of when I was dealing with a messy UCC termination situation last year. I ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to make sure all my paperwork was consistent before fighting with the state office. Being able to upload my original UCC-1 and the termination statement to verify everything matched perfectly really helped my case. The automated cross-checking caught a couple of minor discrepancies I would have missed, and having that clean documentation made the whole dispute process much smoother.
Ruby Blake
•That sounds like exactly what I need. Having bulletproof documentation would definitely strengthen my position with their accounting department.
Document verification tools are becoming essential for UCC work. Too many small errors can turn into big headaches later.
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious to know if it was actually a system error or if there was some other explanation for the duplicate UCC termination fee. These kinds of billing issues seem to be getting more common with electronic filing systems.
Ruby Blake
•Will definitely post an update once I get to the bottom of this. Hopefully it's just a simple system glitch that they can reverse quickly.
Ella Harper
•Please do! I'm sure other people will run into the same issue and your experience could save them a lot of time and frustration.
Amelia Dietrich
Just went through UCC authorization review with our legal team last month. They confirmed that security agreement authorization is sufficient as long as it's clear and the debtor actually signed it. Sounds like you have both covered.
0 coins
Hannah White
•That's very helpful confirmation. Did your legal team recommend any specific language for future security agreements?
0 coins
Amelia Dietrich
•They suggested being very explicit about UCC filing rights but said our current language was already adequate.
0 coins
Kaiya Rivera
For what it's worth, I've never seen a court invalidate a UCC filing over authorization issues when there was a properly signed security agreement with filing rights language. The debtor's attorney is probably just creating noise to improve their negotiating position.
0 coins
Hannah White
•Thanks for that perspective. It's good to know this isn't typically a winning argument for debtors in court.
0 coins
Kaiya Rivera
•Courts are generally protective of secured creditor rights when the documentation is proper. Don't let intimidation tactics work.
0 coins