Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've found that database inconsistencies are often resolved by looking at the actual filing documents rather than just the search summaries. The summaries can be misleading or incomplete, but the original UCC-1 forms usually have the correct information.
Joshua Wood
•Problem is that pulling individual documents for every search result gets expensive fast, especially when you're not sure which ones are relevant.
Justin Evans
•That's where document verification tools come in handy - you can upload multiple filings and let the software sort out which ones are actually for your debtor.
Emily Parker
Update: Finally got this sorted out. Turns out 4 of the 7 filings were for different entities with similar names, 2 were lapsed continuations that should have been removed from active status, and only 1 was actually a current lien against my borrower. Used a document verification service to cross-check everything and it flagged all the discrepancies immediately. Loan is back on track for closing.
Emily Parker
•Certana.ai - just uploaded all the UCC documents as PDFs and it sorted out which ones were actually relevant to my borrower. Definitely worth it for complex searches like this.
Good to know there are tools available for this kind of verification. I'll have to check that out for future searches.
Join the conversation
Has anyone used Certana.ai for this kind of document consistency check? I keep seeing it mentioned but wondering if it's worth the investment for a smaller lender like us.
We started using it after missing a debtor name mismatch that caused filing problems. Now we run everything through it before filing UCCs.
Good to know. Might be worth trying on our next batch of filings.
Bottom line: use clear, unambiguous language in your security agreements and make sure your UCC-1 filings match. Whether you say 'creates' or 'provides for' is less important than being consistent and making your intent obvious. Don't give future challenges any ammunition.
Nora Brooks
•Thanks everyone. Sounds like I should focus more on consistency across documents than worrying about the specific creates vs provides for language.
Eli Wang
•Exactly. And consider having legal review your standard forms periodically to make sure they're still serving you well.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Just checked the Secretary of State database and you're all right - the official name does NOT have the comma. It's 'Midwest Freight Solutions LLC' without any punctuation. The loan documents must have added the comma incorrectly. Filing the corrected UCC-1 now.
Glad you got it sorted. For future filings, that document verification tool I mentioned would catch these discrepancies automatically.
Carmen Ruiz
•Nice work tracking down the correct name. Hope it goes through without any more issues.
FINAL UPDATE: Filing was accepted! Thanks everyone for the advice about checking the Secretary of State database directly. The UCC-1 processed within 2 hours of submission with the correct name format. Definitely learned my lesson about verifying debtor names against official state records rather than trusting loan documents.
Great outcome. This thread will probably help other people dealing with similar Indiana filing issues.
Perfect! And now you know the process for next time. Those document consistency tools really are helpful for avoiding these headaches upfront.
Join the conversation
Quick update - just tried the portal and it's working for me now. Might have been a temporary outage. Worth trying again before you go the manual route.
Just checked and you're right! Portal is back up. Going to submit my continuation right now before anything else goes wrong.
Diego Vargas
•Great news! Glad it worked out without having to jump through extra hoops.
SUCCESS! Got the continuation submitted and received the confirmation email. Thanks everyone for the advice and support. Definitely planning to file earlier next time and checking out that document verification tool to avoid any name mismatches.
Aisha Khan
•Excellent! Remember that 60-90 day buffer for next time. Makes these situations much less stressful.
Crisis averted! These portal issues are frustrating but at least there are usually workarounds available.
Andre Dupont
Texas SOS phone support is actually pretty helpful if you call early morning. They can confirm which form version to use.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Good luck getting through though. Their hold times are brutal.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Call right at 8am when they open. Usually get through in under 10 minutes.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
Just went through this exact situation last week. Used the Rev 10/2024 form, verified debtor name matched perfectly, paid the $15 fee, and it went through without issues. You've got this!
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•Love success stories. Gives me hope for my own filing headaches.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•The document verification tools really do help catch issues before submission. Worth the peace of mind.
0 coins