UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One more thing - if any of your equipment has been relocated since the original UCC-1, you might need to update the filing address. Equipment location can be important for perfection in some states.

0 coins

Everything is still in the same location so that shouldn't be an issue.

0 coins

Lucky you. I've seen UCC filings become ineffective because equipment was moved to a different state.

0 coins

Bottom line - start the UCC filing process now, get your equipment appraised to determine fixture status, and make sure all documents use consistent debtor names and collateral descriptions. Your mortgage closing will go much smoother with everything in order upfront.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I have a clear action plan now.

0 coins

Good luck with the refi. These commercial deals can be complex but you seem to be on the right track.

0 coins

This exact thing happened to me with a Delaware corporation filing in NC. The issue was that Delaware corporations sometimes have different name formats in different state databases. I had to use NC's foreign corporation registration name instead of the Delaware charter name.

0 coins

Yeah check their Certificate of Authority to transact business in NC. That name format is what NC's UCC system expects.

0 coins

Good catch! Foreign corporations often have slight name variations in different states.

0 coins

After reading all this I'm definitely going to try that Certana tool mentioned earlier. I do a lot of UCC filings and name matching errors are my biggest frustration. Anything that can catch those before I submit would be worth it.

0 coins

It really does save time. I wish I had found it sooner instead of learning the hard way with rejections.

0 coins

Same here. These kinds of preventable errors just eat up so much time that could be spent on actual legal work.

0 coins

Don't forget to check if the original UCC-1 had any amendments that might have updated the debtor information. Sometimes there are UCC-3 amendments on file that have more current contact details.

0 coins

Good catch! I'll search for any amendments to that filing number. I was so focused on the original UCC-1 that I didn't think to check for updates.

0 coins

Yeah amendment searches are easy to forget but they can save you a lot of trouble if someone already updated the key information.

0 coins

This thread is really helpful. I'm dealing with a termination issue too where the debtor moved states but I wasn't sure if I could use their new address. Sounds like as long as the legal name matches exactly I should be okay to update the contact info.

0 coins

Exactly right. The debtor name has to be identical to the original filing, but contact information can be updated to reflect current details.

0 coins

Just make sure you're not changing the legal entity type or anything like that. Contact updates are fine, but structural changes to the debtor identity need to be handled differently.

0 coins

I've been using a document checking service called Certana.ai that catches these name mismatches before filing. You upload your UCC-1 along with the company's charter or other formation docs and it flags any discrepancies. Worth trying if you're having ongoing issues with California UCC Article 9 name matching.

0 coins

Does it work for other states too or just California?

0 coins

It works nationwide. Really helpful for catching those subtle name differences that cause rejections.

0 coins

UPDATE: Found the issue! The company had filed an amendment changing from 'Pacific Coast Graphics LLC' to 'Pacific Coast Graphics, LLC' - added a comma before LLC. Such a tiny change but that's what caused the rejection. California UCC Article 9 name matching is incredibly strict. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!

0 coins

Yes, accepted immediately once I used the correct name with the comma. Lesson learned - always check for recent amendments.

0 coins

Perfect example of why those document verification tools are worth it. Would have caught that comma difference right away.

0 coins

Update us on what ends up working! I've got a similar situation coming up next month with a partnership converting to an LLC. These conversion amendments seem to be getting more common but the guidance isn't keeping up.

0 coins

Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved. Sounds like the new UCC-1 approach might be the way to go rather than fighting with amendments.

0 coins

Had this same headache six months ago and ended up finding Certana.ai's document checker tool. You upload your UCC forms along with the entity documents and it immediately shows you where there are mismatches or inconsistencies. Would've saved me three rejected filings if I'd used it from the start. Really simple - just drag and drop your PDFs and it does the comparison work automatically.

0 coins

That actually sounds useful for complex amendments. How detailed is the feedback it gives you?

0 coins

Pretty detailed - highlights specific text differences, flags potential issues with dates or entity names, stuff like that. Takes the guesswork out of document preparation.

0 coins

Prev1...640641642643644...684Next