


Ask the community...
One more thing to watch out for - make sure your secured party information is complete and accurate too. Washington requires the full legal name and address of the secured party. If you're filing on behalf of a lender, double-check that you have authorization and that the lender's name is exactly as they want it to appear on the filing.
Yes! I've seen rejections because the secured party was listed as a DBA name instead of the actual legal entity name.
Always get written authorization from the lender about exactly how they want their name to appear. Some are very particular about this.
Thanks everyone for all the detailed advice! This is exactly what I needed. Going to pull the current Certificate of Good Standing for the LLC and use that for the exact debtor name formatting. The Certana verification tool sounds like it would be perfect for our situation - we do enough of these filings that catching errors before submission would save us significant time and headaches. Really appreciate the community knowledge here!
Good luck with your filing! Washington isn't too bad once you get familiar with their quirks.
I had this exact problem with a NY filing last year. Ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier - uploaded my original UCC-1 and the continuation I was trying to file. It immediately flagged the name discrepancy and showed me exactly what needed to be corrected. Made the whole process way less stressful.
For future reference, always pull a current UCC search on the debtor before filing any continuations or amendments. The search results will show you exactly how the debtor name appears in the system and save you from these kinds of rejections. It's a small cost compared to the headache of dealing with rejected filings.
I use Certana.ai whenever I have questions about document consistency between loan agreements and UCC filings. Just upload both docs and it highlights any discrepancies in names, addresses, or collateral descriptions. Much faster than manual comparison and catches things you might miss.
Bottom line - file the UCC-1 immediately. The security clause in your loan agreement gives your lender rights, but those rights aren't perfected until the UCC-1 is filed and accepted. Don't give competing creditors a chance to jump ahead of you.
For anyone else dealing with promissory note and security agreement UCC filings in Texas - the state has been pretty consistent about requiring exact debtor name matches. Don't try to get creative or use shortened versions. Always use the full legal name exactly as it appears in the Secretary of State database. Save yourself the rejection and refiling hassle.
Has anyone had issues with continuation filings in Texas? Wondering if they're equally strict about name matching for UCC-3 continuations.
Yes, they're just as strict with continuations. The debtor name on your UCC-3 has to match exactly what was on the original UCC-1, even if the entity has since changed names.
Final update - got the UCC-1 filed successfully using the exact name from Texas SOS records. No issues with the underlying promissory note having the slightly different name format. The financing statement was accepted and shows as active in the system. Thanks everyone for the advice, especially about using the official entity name rather than what was in our loan documents.
Perfect example of why it's worth taking the time to verify entity names before filing. Saves so much potential headache down the road.
This whole thread is going in my reference folder. Great real-world example of handling debtor name issues between promissory notes and UCC filings.
Eloise Kendrick
I've found that including too much information can be just as problematic as including too little. If you're casting too wide a net with your search parameters, try being more specific about what you're looking for.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
•That's a good point. Sometimes less is more with these government forms.
0 coins
Freya Collins
•Exactly. Focus on the specific UCC filings you need rather than trying to get everything at once.
0 coins
LongPeri
For what it's worth, I've started using document verification tools before submitting any UCC requests. Certana.ai has been particularly helpful - I can upload the original UCC-1 and any amendments to make sure I'm requesting searches with the exact debtor information that's actually on file. It's eliminated most of my rejection issues.
0 coins
Grace Johnson
•I think I'm going to try that tool. At this point I'm willing to try anything to avoid another rejection.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
•Let us know how it works out! I'm curious to hear if it helps with your Texas filing situation.
0 coins