


Ask the community...
Actually just resolved a synergy ucc file issue using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded our problem UCC-1 and it immediately flagged that one of our subsidiary names had a period after 'Inc' in our form but not in the state database. Fixed that and the filing went through perfectly.
Just as a follow-up - make sure your collateral description is specific enough too. Sometimes synergy ucc file rejections aren't about the debtor names at all but about vague collateral language.
Our collateral description is pretty standard equipment language. But you're right, could be worth reviewing that too.
Better to check everything. These synergy ucc file situations have so many moving parts.
For future reference, New York also requires the organizational ID number for LLCs. Make sure you include that in your UCC-1 - it's in addition to getting the name right. The state's pretty good about rejecting filings that are missing required info.
One more thing to consider - if you're doing a lot of New York filings, it's worth getting familiar with their electronic filing system. It's actually pretty user-friendly once you learn the quirks. And they process electronic filings faster than paper ones.
Electronic filing also gives you immediate confirmation, which is nice when you're dealing with tight deadlines.
Plus electronic filings are cheaper. Every little bit helps when you're doing multiple filings.
This exact thing happened to me with a Delaware corporation filing in NC. The issue was that Delaware corporations sometimes have different name formats in different state databases. I had to use NC's foreign corporation registration name instead of the Delaware charter name.
Yeah check their Certificate of Authority to transact business in NC. That name format is what NC's UCC system expects.
After reading all this I'm definitely going to try that Certana tool mentioned earlier. I do a lot of UCC filings and name matching errors are my biggest frustration. Anything that can catch those before I submit would be worth it.
It really does save time. I wish I had found it sooner instead of learning the hard way with rejections.
Same here. These kinds of preventable errors just eat up so much time that could be spent on actual legal work.
This thread is making me paranoid about my own Wisconsin filings now. Going to go double-check everything I filed this year to make sure the searches work properly.
Update us when you figure out what was causing the search problems! Always helpful to know what actually worked for future reference.
Will do! I'm going to try the filing number search and organization vs individual search type first. Then maybe check out that document verification tool if I'm still having issues.
Good plan. The filing number approach should definitely work if the name searches are being problematic.
Omar Fawaz
Just remember the 14-day clock starts ticking when you receive the request, not when you get around to processing it. Had a colleague learn that the hard way when a request sat in someone's inbox too long.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
•Yikes. Good reminder about the timing requirements. I'll make sure to emphasize that in the training.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•We set up automatic alerts in our system whenever an accounting request comes in. Too important to let slip through the cracks.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations. This really helps clarify what seemed like a confusing provision. I feel much better about explaining this to our lending team now. The practical tips about response templates and verification tools are especially helpful.
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
•Glad we could help! UCC Article 9 can be tricky but once you understand the key provisions like this one, it all starts to make more sense.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
•Definitely. I appreciate everyone taking the time to break this down. The real-world examples really make the legal concepts more concrete.
0 coins