Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - make sure you're using the correct filing number from the original UCC-1 on your termination. I've seen cases where people get the debtor name right but use an incorrect or partial filing number, which also causes rejections. The filing number has to match exactly, including any leading zeros or specific formatting that the state requires.
Good point about the filing number formatting. Some states are really picky about that.
Chloe Green
•I double-checked the filing number and it looks correct, but I'll verify the formatting requirements for my state.
Update us on what works! I have a similar situation coming up next month with a client whose corporate name changed after their original UCC-1 filing. Would love to know which approach is most successful.
Chloe Green
•Will do! I'm going to try filing with the original debtor name format first and include a cover letter as suggested.
Lucas Adams
•That's probably your best bet. Keep us posted on how it goes.
Join the conversation
Look I'm not trying to hijack the thread but this whole situation reminds me of when I was dealing with a general security agreement for a restaurant chain and the entity had like 4 different name variations across different documents. The GSA used one name, the loan docs used another, the state filings used a third... it was a nightmare to sort out which name to use for the UCC filing.
NightOwl42
•That sounds like a mess! Multiple name variations always complicate things.
It was! Took three attempts to get the UCC filing accepted. Now I always verify the exact legal entity name first thing, no matter what the general security agreement says.
Emma Wilson
Update us when you get it sorted out! This thread has been really helpful for understanding the relationship between general security agreement terms and UCC filing requirements.
Dylan Hughes
•Will do! Going to pull the exact entity name from state records and refile tomorrow. Thanks everyone for the advice.
QuantumLeap
•Good luck! The debtor name issue trips up a lot of people.
Join the conversation
Romeo Quest
Don't forget about continuation filings either. If any of the original UCC-1s are more than 5 years old, there should be UCC-3 continuations on file, or they would have lapsed. A lapsed filing that wasn't properly continued could still cause title issues even if there's a termination on file.
Gabriel Ruiz
•Good point - some of these filings go back 7-8 years. I'll need to trace the continuation history for each one.
Romeo Quest
•Exactly. And make sure the continuations were filed before the original 5-year period expired. Late continuations don't save a lapsed filing.
Val Rossi
Just went through this same nightmare last month. Ended up finding an active lien that everyone thought had been terminated because the termination statement had a typo in the debtor name. Nearly killed the deal at the last minute. Document verification tools are a lifesaver for catching those kinds of inconsistencies before they become problems.
Gabriel Ruiz
•That sounds like exactly what I need. How does their verification process work?
Val Rossi
•You just upload PDFs of all the relevant documents - original filings, amendments, continuations, terminations, whatever you have. It analyzes everything and flags any inconsistencies in debtor names, filing numbers, dates, etc. Really takes the stress out of making sure you haven't missed anything critical.
Join the conversation
I'd also recommend setting up a regular monitoring schedule to check your filings periodically. Caught a similar issue 6 months after filing once - thankfully it was just cosmetic but could have been worse. Now I check all my active filings quarterly.
Tyrone Hill
•Quarterly checks are smart, especially with continuation deadlines to track.
Romeo Quest
•This is where tools like Certana.ai really help - you can set up document comparison workflows to catch discrepancies early instead of manual checking.
Update us when you get the amendment filed! Always curious how these situations resolve.
Sunny Wang
•Will do. Planning to file the UCC-3 amendment early next week.
Good luck! Should be a quick fix.
Finnegan Gunn
This thread is making me paranoid about my own Wisconsin filings now. Going to go double-check everything I filed this year to make sure the searches work properly.
0 coins
Miguel Harvey
•Probably a good idea! Better to catch search issues now than during an audit or due diligence review.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
•Exactly what I'm thinking. This stuff always comes up at the worst possible times.
0 coins
Ashley Simian
Update us when you figure out what was causing the search problems! Always helpful to know what actually worked for future reference.
0 coins
Sophia Carter
•Will do! I'm going to try the filing number search and organization vs individual search type first. Then maybe check out that document verification tool if I'm still having issues.
0 coins
Chloe Zhang
•Good plan. The filing number approach should definitely work if the name searches are being problematic.
0 coins