Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just to add another verification option - I started using Certana.ai after making an embarrassing mistake on a fixture filing where I mixed up the legal property description. Now I upload all my fixture filing documents before submission and it catches those kinds of errors. The peace of mind is worth it, especially on larger commercial deals like yours.
How detailed does it get with the verification? Does it actually check that the legal description matches the property records?
It focuses more on document consistency - making sure your debtor names match across all documents, that you've included all required elements for fixture filings, that sort of thing. Really helpful for catching the technical filing requirements.
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses - this is incredibly helpful! Just to clarify my situation: our debtor does own the manufacturing facility (not leasing), and the HVAC units are definitely being permanently installed with concrete mounting and full electrical integration. Based on what you've all said, it sounds like I definitely need to go the fixture filing route rather than a standard UCC-1. A few follow-up questions: 1) Do I need to get the legal property description from the county recorder's office, or can I use what's on the deed? 2) For the $340K loan amount, are there any additional requirements or just the standard fixture filing process? 3) Should I file this concurrently with closing or can I do it a few days before? Really appreciate this community - fixture filings always made me nervous but you've all helped clarify the key requirements!
Welcome to the community! Great questions. For the legal property description, you can usually use what's on the deed, but make sure it's the complete legal description - sometimes deeds have abbreviated versions that won't work for fixture filings. The county recorder can provide the full version if needed. For timing, I'd recommend filing at or before closing to ensure you get proper priority, especially since you mentioned this is a purchase-money security interest. The loan amount doesn't trigger additional requirements - fixture filing process is the same regardless of the dollar amount. Sounds like you're on the right track!
Join the conversation
Update: ended up going with "all accounts, chattel paper, instruments, documents, general intangibles, payment intangibles, supporting obligations, and proceeds thereof" based on everyone's advice. Filed yesterday and got accepted in all three states. Thanks for the help sorting out the UCC accounts receivable definition mess!
Glad it worked out. The broad approach is usually safer than trying to get too clever with narrow descriptions.
Perfect example of why the document verification tools are so helpful. Would have taken you weeks to research all those collateral categories manually.
This thread is incredibly helpful - I'm dealing with a similar issue right now with a debtor who has SaaS subscription revenue, professional services contracts, and equipment leasing income. The UCC accounts receivable definition gets murky when you're dealing with recurring subscription payments that might be considered executory contracts rather than traditional A/R. Has anyone run into issues where subscription revenue didn't qualify as "accounts" because the services haven't been fully performed yet? I'm wondering if I need to specifically include "contract rights" or if the general intangibles category would cover ongoing subscription obligations.
Great question about SaaS revenue! You're right to be cautious - subscription payments for services not yet performed typically don't qualify as "accounts" under UCC Article 9 since accounts are for goods sold or services already rendered. For ongoing subscription obligations, I'd definitely include "general intangibles" to cover the contractual rights to future payments. You might also want "payment intangibles" for any subscription streams that are purely payment rights rather than tied to specific service delivery milestones. The equipment leasing income should fall under accounts if it's for equipment already delivered, but general intangibles if it covers future lease obligations.
@Eloise Kendrick makes excellent points about the SaaS revenue classification. I d'add that for subscription models, you really need to look at the specific contract terms. If customers pay upfront for annual subscriptions, that creates a different collateral profile than monthly recurring billing. The prepaid portions might be considered accounts "since" payment has been received, while future billing cycles would be general intangibles. Also watch out for subscription contracts with termination clauses - those contingencies can affect whether you have a perfected security interest in the payment stream. The equipment leasing piece is usually more straightforward, but make sure you re'not accidentally trying to perfect in the equipment itself if you only want the lease payment rights.
Join the conversation
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone new to commercial lending, I had no idea UCC filings were so complex. Just to make sure I understand the basics: banks file UCC-1 forms to claim security interests in business collateral, these need to be renewed every 5 years, and the debtor name has to match exactly with official state records. Are there any other "gotchas" that commonly trip up new people in this field?
Welcome to the world of UCC filings! A few other common pitfalls: always check if the debtor has changed their legal name or merged with another entity since your last filing - you might need amendments. Also, be careful with collateral descriptions - too narrow and you miss assets, too broad and it might be legally insufficient. And definitely keep track of lapse dates in your system - I've seen lenders lose their secured position because someone forgot to file a continuation statement. The learning curve is steep but you'll get there!
This whole thread has been a goldmine for understanding UCCs! I've been working in loan operations for about 6 months and kept seeing UCC references in our files without really grasping what they meant. The car title analogy really clicked for me - it makes perfect sense that we need to publicly record our claim on business assets just like a lien on a vehicle. I'm definitely going to start paying more attention to these filings in the loan packages I review. Thanks everyone for breaking this down in such plain English!
I'm so glad this thread helped you too! I was in the exact same boat when I started - seeing all these UCC references and feeling completely lost. The car title comparison really is perfect for wrapping your head around the concept. One thing I'd add is to not be afraid to ask your more experienced colleagues about specific UCC situations you encounter. I've found that most people are happy to explain the "why" behind certain filing decisions, and those real-world examples really help cement the concepts. Good luck with your loan reviews!
Join the conversation
The fact that you're asking this question shows you understand the issues better than your loan officer. Equipment loans require UCC filings even when the equipment sits on real estate. This is fundamental secured transactions law. Don't let someone else's confusion put your lien position at risk.
Trust your instincts on this one. Better to over-protect than under-protect your security interest.
Absolutely. And document your rationale in the loan file so there's no question later about why you filed.
This is a classic example of why it's so important to understand the distinction between real estate and personal property in secured transactions. Your loan officer is applying an oversimplified rule that's causing confusion. Manufacturing equipment like CNC machines and compressors are almost always personal property requiring UCC-1 filings, regardless of whether they're bolted to a concrete floor. The key legal test isn't just physical attachment - it's whether the equipment is so integral to the real estate that removing it would substantially damage the property or defeat its essential purpose. Production machinery that can be unbolted and relocated clearly doesn't meet that standard. I'd recommend filing the UCC-1 in Texas (where the equipment will be located) and making sure your loan documentation clearly describes the collateral as personal property throughout all agreements.
This is incredibly helpful - you've laid out the legal framework perfectly. I'm definitely going to use this explanation when I talk to my loan officer tomorrow. The distinction between physical attachment and integral purpose makes so much sense. For $850K in collateral, I can't afford to get this wrong.
Natalie Chen
Really comprehensive advice here! Just wanted to add that Arizona's electronic filing system also has a helpful preview function before you submit - it shows exactly how your UCC-1 will appear in their records. This is especially useful for catching any formatting issues with the debtor name or address before you pay the filing fee. I've found it catches things like extra spaces or punctuation that might cause problems. Also, make sure you have your secured party information exactly as you want it to appear on searches - I've seen lenders use slightly different variations of their names across filings which can make it harder to track everything later.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•That preview function sounds incredibly useful - wish more states had that feature! The point about consistent secured party naming is really important too. I've seen situations where slight variations in how the lender's name appears across multiple filings created confusion during enforcement. Good to establish a standard format early and stick with it across all your UCC filings.
0 coins
Carmen Flores
Arizona's UCC system has definitely improved over the years. One thing that might help with your tight timeline - their customer service line (602-542-6187) is actually pretty responsive if you run into any technical issues during filing. I had a problem with their system timing out during a large filing last month and they walked me through it over the phone. Also, since you mentioned this is equipment financing, make sure your security agreement language matches your UCC collateral description as closely as possible. Arizona courts have been particular about that consistency in recent enforcement cases. The broad language others suggested is definitely the way to go - "all equipment, machinery, tools, and personal property now owned or hereafter acquired" covers most scenarios without being too restrictive.
0 coins