< Back to UCC Document Community

Nathaniel Mikhaylov

Washington Secretary of State UCC Forms - Which One for Equipment Financing?

Been going in circles trying to figure out which washington secretary of state ucc forms I need for our equipment financing deal. We're securing a $450K line of credit against manufacturing equipment and I'm drowning in all these different form options on their portal. The debtor is an LLC that just changed its name last month (filed articles of amendment) and I'm paranoid about getting the entity name wrong since that could void our security interest. Anyone dealt with WA state filing requirements recently? Their online system seems different from other states I've worked with and I don't want to mess this up. The loan closes next week and I'm second-guessing everything about collateral descriptions and whether we need fixture filing language since some equipment will be bolted down. Really need guidance from someone who's navigated their system successfully.

Eva St. Cyr

•

Washington state is pretty straightforward once you know the ropes. For equipment financing you'll want the standard UCC-1 form through their Corporations Division portal. The key thing with WA is they're strict on exact entity names - you'll need to pull the current registered name from their business entity database, not rely on what the borrower tells you. Since you mentioned the LLC amended its name recently, definitely verify the current legal name before filing. For collateral description, be specific about the equipment but don't over-describe. Something like 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' usually works unless your lender wants more specificity.

0 coins

This is exactly right about the name verification. I learned this the hard way when a filing got rejected because I used the DBA name instead of the registered LLC name. WA Secretary of State database search is free and shows you the exact legal entity name to use.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Otto

•

How recent is recent for the name change? If it was within the last 30 days there might be a delay in their system updating. I'd call their office directly to confirm the name is showing correctly in their database before filing.

0 coins

Axel Far

•

Had a similar situation last month with WA state filings. Their online portal is actually pretty user-friendly compared to some states, but you're right to be careful about the entity name. One thing that saved me a lot of headaches was using Certana.ai's document checker before submitting. I uploaded the LLC's articles of amendment and my draft UCC-1 and it caught a discrepancy in how I was formatting the entity name. Turns out I had an extra comma that would have caused issues. The automated cross-check between the charter documents and my UCC filing was exactly what I needed to feel confident about the submission.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana.ai before - that sounds really useful for catching those kinds of mistakes. How does their verification work exactly? Do you just upload both documents and it compares them automatically?

0 coins

Axel Far

•

Yeah, super simple. You just upload the PDFs and it cross-references everything - entity names, addresses, any inconsistencies between your charter documents and UCC forms. Takes like 2 minutes and gives you a detailed report. Way better than trying to manually compare everything and hoping you didn't miss something.

0 coins

This is brilliant! I've been manually checking documents against each other for years and still manage to miss things occasionally. Definitely going to try this for my next batch of filings.

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

WA Secretary of State requires the standard UCC-1 form but here's what most people don't realize - they have some quirky requirements about the secured party address format. Make sure you're using the complete mailing address format they expect, including proper punctuation. Also, for your fixture filing question, if any of that equipment is becoming a fixture (permanently attached to real estate), you might need to do a separate fixture filing with the county recorder where the property is located, not just the Secretary of State UCC filing.

0 coins

Good point about the fixture filing. Some of our equipment will be permanently installed but I wasn't sure if that required separate paperwork. Do you know if WA has any specific requirements for fixture filings that are different from standard UCC-1s?

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

Fixture filings in WA need to include a description of the real estate and typically need to be filed in the county where the property is located. It's basically a UCC-1 with additional real estate info. But check with the specific county recorder's office because they sometimes have their own formatting preferences.

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•

OMG I'm dealing with the exact same thing right now!! Except my debtor is in Oregon but we have collateral in Washington too so I need to figure out which state to file in. This is so confusing and my closing is tomorrow. Why is this stuff so complicated?? The borrower keeps giving me different versions of their legal name and I don't know which one is right. Should I file in both states to be safe or is there a rule about where to file when there's multi-state collateral?

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

Whoa, slow down. For multi-state situations, you typically file where the debtor is located (their chief executive office), not where the collateral is. If your debtor is an Oregon entity, you'd probably file the UCC-1 in Oregon. But this is getting complicated enough that you should really consult with your attorney before tomorrow's closing.

0 coins

Ellie Kim

•

Ok that makes more sense. I was overthinking it. The debtor is definitely an Oregon LLC so I'll focus on Oregon filing requirements. Thanks for talking me off the ledge!

0 coins

Fiona Sand

•

Washington Secretary of State portal is decent but their search function for verifying entity names can be glitchy. Pro tip: if you're not 100% sure about the exact legal name, call their Corporations Division directly at (360) 725-0377. They can verify the current registered name over the phone and it's worth the 5-minute call to avoid a rejection. Also make sure you're filing the UCC-1 in the right division - it goes through Corporations, not their other filing sections.

0 coins

That phone number is super helpful, thanks! I always worry about small typos in entity names causing problems.

0 coins

Great suggestion about calling them directly. I'll definitely do that to double-check the LLC name before submitting anything.

0 coins

Been filing UCC-1s in Washington for about 8 years now and they're generally pretty reasonable to work with. Your equipment financing scenario sounds straightforward - standard UCC-1 should cover you fine. The name change issue is your biggest risk factor but as others mentioned, their business entity database will show you exactly how to format it. For collateral description, I usually go with something like 'all equipment, machinery, fixtures, and other goods now owned or hereafter acquired by debtor' unless the lender wants something more specific. Covers your bases without being overly broad.

0 coins

That collateral description language is really helpful. I was struggling with how broad vs specific to make it. My lender hasn't given me specific requirements so I think your suggested language would work well.

0 coins

Glad that helps! The key is being broad enough to cover future acquisitions but specific enough that it's clear what you're securing. Equipment financing usually fits that standard language pretty well.

0 coins

Finnegan Gunn

•

Just want to second the Certana.ai recommendation from earlier in this thread. I was skeptical at first but tried it last week when I had a complex multi-document UCC situation. Uploaded my borrower's articles of incorporation, their recent amendment, and my draft UCC-1 forms. The system immediately flagged that I had transposed two numbers in the entity name and caught a formatting issue with the address. Would have definitely caused a rejection if I'd submitted it as-is. Now I run everything through their checker before filing - gives me peace of mind and catches stuff I would never notice manually.

0 coins

Ok I'm convinced - going to try this before I submit my Washington filing. Sounds like exactly what I need to avoid stupid mistakes that could delay our closing.

0 coins

Miguel Harvey

•

Same here - this thread convinced me to check it out. Any tool that can prevent filing rejections is worth trying.

0 coins

Ashley Simian

•

The Washington Secretary of State website has all the forms and instructions but honestly their guidance on collateral descriptions is pretty vague. For equipment financing I'd recommend being more specific than just 'all equipment' especially if you're securing a large amount like $450K. Maybe something like 'all manufacturing equipment, machinery, tools, and related fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired, including but not limited to [specific high-value pieces if known].' Gives you broader coverage while highlighting the major collateral pieces.

0 coins

That's a good approach for the higher dollar amount. I do know the specific equipment pieces so I could list the major ones while keeping the general 'all equipment' language too.

0 coins

Ashley Simian

•

Exactly - best of both worlds. Specific enough to clearly identify the main collateral but broad enough to catch anything they acquire later.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

Has anyone had issues with Washington's online filing system timing out? I've had two UCC-1s get lost in their system over the past year - submitted successfully but never got confirmation numbers. Their tech support was helpful but it delayed both closings. Now I always save screenshots of every step and print the confirmation page immediately. Just a heads up since you mentioned your closing is next week.

0 coins

Yikes, that's exactly what I'm worried about with the tight timeline. I'll definitely save screenshots and maybe submit a day or two early just in case there are technical issues.

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

Yeah, better safe than sorry. Their system is usually fine but those two experiences made me more cautious. The confirmation email usually comes within a few hours if everything processes normally.

0 coins

Taylor To

•

One more thing about Washington UCC filings - they charge $12 for the standard UCC-1 which is pretty reasonable compared to other states. You can pay by credit card through their portal. The filing becomes effective immediately upon acceptance, and you should get your filing number and confirmation pretty quickly. Make sure you keep that filing number for any future amendments or continuations you might need to do down the road.

0 coins

Good to know about the fee and immediate effectiveness. I'll make sure to save all the confirmation details for our loan files.

0 coins

Ella Cofer

•

$12 is definitely reasonable. Some states charge way more for UCC filings. Washington keeps it simple.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm new to UCC filings and have been intimidated by the whole process. Reading through everyone's experiences with Washington state filings and the practical tips about entity name verification, collateral descriptions, and even the technical issues to watch out for has given me a much better understanding of what to expect. The Certana.ai tool mentioned by several people sounds like it could be a game-changer for someone like me who's still learning the ropes. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that makes this community so valuable!

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today