Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai's verification workflow specifically for these multi-state UCC searches. You can upload documents from Utah SOS and it helps identify potential name matching issues across different filing formats. Especially helpful when you're dealing with entities that file in multiple states with slight name variations.
Juan Moreno
•Does it work with Utah's specific database format? Some of these verification tools don't handle all state systems well.
Yes, it handles PDF uploads from any state system including Utah. The key is that it's looking at the actual document content, not trying to interface with the database directly.
Amy Fleming
Bottom line - Utah UCC searches require patience and multiple search strategies. I always do at least 5-6 different name variations before I'm confident I've found everything. Document everything you searched and how, because you'll need to justify your due diligence if there are any issues later.
Thanks everyone, this has been incredibly helpful. Going to try the systematic approach with multiple variations and look into that verification tool.
Alice Pierce
•Good luck! Utah can be challenging but following these steps should help you catch any existing filings.
Join the conversation
Carmen Vega
One more thing - if time is a factor because your lender is getting impatient, consider calling the SOS filing office directly. Sometimes they can expedite processing or at least give you a realistic timeline for when the UCC 5 will be processed.
I'll definitely give them a call tomorrow morning. Thanks for all the helpful responses everyone!
Zoe Stavros
•Before you file anything, I'd recommend running your documents through a consistency check. I use Certana.ai for this - you upload your UCC 5 PDF along with the original filing documents and it flags any mismatches in debtor names, filing numbers, or other critical details. Catches errors before they become rejections.
Jamal Harris
Just want to echo what others said about document verification. I had a UCC 5 rejected because I accidentally used a slightly different version of the debtor's legal name than what was on the original UCC-1. These consistency issues are so easy to miss when you're doing manual comparisons.
Mei Wong
•This is why automated checking tools are becoming more popular. Too many details to track manually.
Absolutely agree. I started using Certana.ai after a similar name mismatch issue cost me weeks of delays. Now I upload all my UCC documents for cross-checking before filing - catches things I would never notice.
Join the conversation
Try that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier - we started using it after getting burned on a similar situation. Really does catch a lot of potential recording issues before you submit. Saved us from at least two rejections that would have added weeks to the process.
Sean Murphy
•Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. At this point anything that prevents these kinds of delays is worth trying.
The document consistency checking is really helpful. Catches things like name variations between your charter docs and UCC filing that can cause problems.
UPDATE: Finally got through to someone at the UCC division who could actually help. Turns out there was a 'data validation error' on our filing that wasn't showing up in the public portal. They're manually processing it now and said it should be recorded by end of week. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Sofia Perez
•This is exactly why their system needs better error reporting. 'Data validation error' tells us nothing useful.
At least you got resolution! Still can't believe it took manual intervention to get a standard UCC-1 processed.
Join the conversation
Gianna Scott
honestly ny sos needs to get their act together. other states make this so much easier. filed a continuation in delaware last week and it was approved same day with no issues
Alfredo Lugo
•Delaware is definitely smoother but NY has gotten better than it used to be. At least the portal works most of the time now lol
Gianna Scott
•true i guess. remember when their system used to crash every other day? those were dark times
Update us when you figure it out! I have a NY continuation coming up next quarter and want to avoid the same trap.
Will do. Going to pull the corporate records first, then probably try that document checker tool if the name comparison doesn't solve it.
Smart approach. Better to catch it upfront than deal with rejection cycles when you're up against the deadline.
Omar Farouk
Quick update - I finally got my Idaho UCC statement request approved! Turns out it was the fee amount AND I needed to include a specific notation about searching all variations of the business name. Their rejection letters are useless but once I figured out those two issues it went through fine.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•$25 per debtor name search, and I added a note in the comments section saying 'please search all name variations and entity designations.' Seemed to do the trick.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•Good to know! Idaho really needs to update their instructions to be clearer about these requirements.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
For future Idaho UCC statement requests, I always include a cover letter explaining exactly what I'm looking for and why, even though it's not required. Seems to help with the human review process when there are any ambiguities in the debtor name or search criteria.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•That's a good idea. At this point I'm willing to try anything to avoid more rejections. Thanks for all the help everyone!
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
•Hope you get it sorted out. Idaho UCC searches are definitely a pain but once you figure out their quirks it gets easier.
0 coins