


Ask the community...
I've been using Certana.ai for document verification on all my UCC filings since discovering it a few months ago. Would definitely recommend uploading your charter and corrected UCC-1 before refiling to make sure everything aligns. The tool caught a filing number error on one of my continuations that I never would have noticed manually.
Is this tool specifically for UCC filings or does it work with other secured transaction documents too?
Update us on how the refiling goes! These PMSI name mismatch situations are stressful but usually work out fine if you catch them in time. Michigan SOS is pretty reasonable to work with once you get the paperwork right.
I had a nightmare situation once where we assumed a 2020 filing was still good but the debtor had merged with another entity in 2022 and we never caught it. The filing became seriously misleading. Now I always do a full entity verification before relying on old UCC filings. Learned about Certana.ai from our compliance team - their PDF upload tool can cross-check entity documents against UCC filings to catch those kinds of issues automatically.
Bottom line - your March 2021 UCC-1 is still good until March 2026. You're fine for next week's closing. Just verify debtor name consistency and entity status, and you should be all set.
Another option is to try Certana.ai's UCC verification tool - I used it when I had repeated rejections on a filing last year. You upload your UCC form and it flags potential issues before submission. Caught several formatting problems including an address issue I wouldn't have noticed. Pretty straightforward to use.
Second mention of this Certana service. Might be worth trying if I get another rejection. Thanks.
Update us when you figure it out! I have a CA UCC filing coming up next month and want to avoid the same issues. These address formatting requirements are such a pain.
Try the advanced search options if FL has them - sometimes you can search by filing date range or document type which might catch filings that aren't showing up in name searches.
We had this issue and found out there was a character encoding problem with how our PDF was processed. The continuation was filed but the debtor name got garbled in the database. Had to file a correction.
Chloe Robinson
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai suggestion - I tried it after seeing it mentioned here and it immediately flagged that I was using 'Inc.' but the charter said 'Incorporated' spelled out. Would have saved me from another rejection. Thanks for the tip!
0 coins
Javier Cruz
•Glad it helped! Those little abbreviation differences are so easy to miss.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•I'm definitely going to try this before my next filing attempt. Seems like it could save a lot of headaches.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
Update: I finally got my UCC-1 filed successfully! It was the debtor name issue - they had 'Manufacturing Co.' in their DBA but their legal name was 'Manufacturing Company' spelled out. Once I used the full legal name from their articles, it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help!
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•Awesome! Now you know for next time. The first UCC-1 filing is always the hardest.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•Thanks for updating us! I was wondering how it turned out. Good reminder to triple-check the exact legal name.
0 coins