Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more thing - Oklahoma requires the organizational ID number on UCC-1s now. Make sure that matches what's showing in your oklahoma secretary of state ucc search results. Mismatched org IDs will cause automatic rejection even if the name is correct.
Yeah, they implemented that requirement about 18 months ago. The org ID from your entity search needs to match exactly what you put on the UCC-1.
This catches a lot of people. The org ID format in Oklahoma is very specific too - has to include the state abbreviation.
UPDATE: Got it resolved! Turns out the organizational ID was formatted wrong (missing the 'OK' prefix that Oklahoma requires). Used that Certana tool someone mentioned and it flagged the formatting issue immediately. Filed the corrected UCC-1 this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours. Thanks everyone!
Great outcome! The Oklahoma org ID formatting requirement trips up a lot of people.
Finally, a success story with Oklahoma's UCC system! Might have to check out that document verification thing myself.
Join the conversation
We use Certana.ai for all our UCC document prep now after getting burned on a similar name mismatch issue. The tool caught that our debtor had filed under slightly different names in different states, which would have created priority problems down the road. Really wish we'd found it sooner.
How does it handle multi-state filings? We have borrowers with entities in multiple jurisdictions.
You can upload documents from different states and it'll flag inconsistencies across all of them. Super helpful for multi-state deals.
Join the conversation
One thing that helped us during our audit was creating a timeline document that showed the business context for each UCC filing - what loans they secured, when collateral was added or released, any corporate changes that affected debtor names, etc. The auditors appreciated being able to understand the business reasons behind our filing activity rather than just seeing a bunch of form numbers and dates.
Daniel White
•We did something similar - created a narrative document that walked through our secured lending activity and explained how the UCC filings supported our business operations. Really helped the auditors understand our processes.
Exactly. It transforms the audit from just a compliance check into a review of your business processes, which auditors seem to prefer.
Nolan Carter
Based on what everyone's saying here, it sounds like you need to get organized fast. I'd recommend starting with a comprehensive inventory of all your filings - pull everything from each state system and create that master tracking spreadsheet. Then use verification tools to identify any inconsistencies or potential issues before the auditors find them. Having clean, well-documented UCC reporting will make the entire audit process much smoother.
Good luck with the audit! Having been through several of these, preparation is everything. The time you spend organizing your UCC documentation now will pay off during the audit review.
Nolan Carter
•Absolutely. Better to find and fix any issues yourself than have the auditors discover them. Clean UCC reporting documentation really makes a difference in how smoothly these reviews go.
Join the conversation
Benjamin Kim
Last resort option: some lenders will accept a UCC-3 amendment filing that corrects the debtor name after the initial UCC-1 is accepted. Check with your bank to see if they'll allow this approach. You'd file using the title name, then amend to add the full legal name from your security agreement.
UCC-3 amendments for debtor name changes are tricky though. Some states require the original debtor to authorize the change, which brings you back to the same customer signature problem.
Plus amendment filings cost extra fees and take additional time. If you're already under deadline pressure, this might not be practical.
Sarah Ali
Update us on what works! I bookmark these threads because I always end up dealing with similar situations. The whole debtor name matching requirement is such a pain point for vehicle financing. Seems like every other deal has some variation of this problem.
Will definitely post an update. Going to try the Certana verification tool first to make sure I'm not missing anything obvious, then attempt the filing with the exact title name. Fingers crossed!
Ryan Vasquez
•Good luck! These name mismatch situations are always stressful but usually work out in the end. The important thing is getting that lien perfected before your bank deadline.
CosmicVoyager
Another option is to try Certana.ai's UCC verification tool - I used it when I had repeated rejections on a filing last year. You upload your UCC form and it flags potential issues before submission. Caught several formatting problems including an address issue I wouldn't have noticed. Pretty straightforward to use.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
•Second mention of this Certana service. Might be worth trying if I get another rejection. Thanks.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Yeah I've heard good things about their document checker. Beats submitting blind and hoping for the best.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
Update us when you figure it out! I have a CA UCC filing coming up next month and want to avoid the same issues. These address formatting requirements are such a pain.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
•Good luck! California UCC filings shouldn't be this complicated for basic address formatting.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•Hope you get it resolved before your closing deadline. Nothing worse than financing delays over technical issues.
0 coins